EXPERIMENTS with INFRA RED light on the vehicle. Cop stylie

Ok, so this is what Laser Technology Inc say on their website....

www.lasertech.com/Speed-Enforcement-Measurement.aspx



And I will demonstrate that it is not the case.

So.

1000 ft is 308.4 meters
And 3ft is 90cm

So, if you can get individual speeds from targets smaller than 90cm going in opposite directions at distances of 300 meters, then the Laser Technology statement cannot be true.

The laser pen experiments I have done have a wide laser spread. The chamber size does grow larger the further your target distance is. But that laser is spread more like the the infra red illumination you actually get on a night vision camera or webcam or security camera to actually light up the whole visual field.

This would not be practical for a distance and speed measuring device.

With the actual LTI laser in the chamber. And with a night vision camera, the strongest light from the LTI can be seen. And that light source size does not grow larger as you target greater distances. It gets smaller. So if there is an outer perimeter that gets larger with distance, it certainly is getting weaker, while a definite stronger area gets smaller. But that area must be the light source that the readings are being obtained from.

LTI Compact laser could be the same strength as the tele-traffic LTI 1000. Thus is likely to perform very similar & can produce slip effect

The questionable thing with the Laser Technology Inc statement on their website of the 308 meter claimed 3ft wide beam diameter, is this...

That distance just happens to be the distance where the SCOPE SIGHT red aiming dot, by depth of field distance covers the entire target vehicle of a regular size car completely.

So, you just position that red dot "over" the vehicle. There is no way other than guessing to visually confirm exactly where on that vehicle it is centered. Unless the device is linked to a concept or ranger unit, with a centered target that is perfectly aligned for aiming and use at 300meters. And no other distance.

You can then zoom in to identify the target.

But as I have found so far with the LTI concept UX which has a stronger beam, which is likely to be the same laser as the Teletraffic 1000 laser...

The beams strong surface area does not appear to grow bigger as you pan it further distances.

It appears to get smaller, when you examine it with the night vision camera.

This Is very different behavior of the actual LTI laser operating in the device chamber. Ad compared to a 1mw laser pen. Which does grow larger at further distance. But much larger than 3feet at 300meters.

So... On that initial evidence, I believe at this stage of my research and investagative study of the device, that the operational beam reflects on the vehicle smaller than 3ft diameter at 300meters. And it can obtain a reading from any reasonable surface it is pointed at. Which could be anywhere on the vehicle. I don't believe the registration plate matters with USA and Australia cars as they use matt licence plates.

The common distance for uk use of the device is between 100 to 250 meters and at that distance specific vehicle parts will be targeted if aimed at, and the registration plate Will not attract the measurement signal away from the target of other areas of the vehicle.

That is where I am with this so far.


Any evidence given in court to claim otherwise in previous cases. I believe to be incorrect information.

Some more experiments outside on a UK registration plate from 40 meters, the LTI stronger type laser appears to get smaller not bigger as you get further away. More experiments to follow...

Prolaser 4 demo.





This guy just "Blocks" them with a jammer. errr... what is the point to that? I mean guns are stupid in the first place.