|
Post by Administrator on Apr 22, 2016 22:19:24 GMT
I also measured my mums car for distance from the ground and its about 8 inches. The van is 12 inches and my dads car is 12 inches as well. so 4 inch ... apparently that effects the reaction time for the under road loop grid to react. But i am now questioning this grid. Is it just a distraction from the fact that you dont need a grid you would be best with a LINE. it would still work! BUT i dont actually think they WANT you to be able to measure it anyway. And after all, as different vehicles have different heights and metal parts configured underneath... the vehicles will get registed to the exact line at different times anyway grid or no grid! duh! but still react to it... & IMHO the box will not make detection any more or less... all that does is add a larger area to the area you are trying to measure FROM! and try to make a huge BLOCK out of it! and apparently it cannot get motorcycles anyway even as a grid!? And As the entire device is useless without legislation and law, which itself is not clear on any specific time OR distance for the Amber light phase.... (err except that red doesnt exist if you were close when it went to amber) the entire set-up, to me just seems silly. Like a smeg head idea from the start. and an attempt at a "right to be picky" licence by the lot.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Apr 23, 2016 6:59:17 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Apr 23, 2016 7:12:53 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Apr 23, 2016 7:28:12 GMT
The little black box might be a camera!? i thought it was a censor!? www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2730096/How-green-lights-way-work-Hackers-reveal-simple-control-traffic-lights-major-cities-using-just-laptop.htmlHow to get green lights all the way to work: Hackers reveal how simple it is to control traffic lights in major cities using just a laptop (Hmmm the little CCTV car the other day was watching the traffic lights with a CCTV camera linked to a laptop in bury! could he have been controlling the traffic lights as well?! Claims of a 'systemic lack of security' in traffic light system Michigan researchers hacked into system used by 40 states Were able to control signals for 100 lights using a standard laptop Unsecured wireless networks and default passwords were used Researchers have uncovered a series of major security holes in traffic light systems that allowed them to to control 100 signals in Michigan. Researchers say there were major flaws in the system, which is used in 40 states across America.. They worked with a local road agency to investigate the problems - and say they found a 'systemic lack of security' that allowed them to control lights. scroll down for video University of Michigan researchers hacked into nearly 100 wirelessly networked traffic lights - and were able to control every light on the system from a single laptop. With permission from a local road agency, the University of Michigan researchers hacked into nearly 100 wirelessly networked traffic lights. The team say the flaws they uncovered - which included the use of unsecured wireless networks and default passwords were used - are likely to be founds across the country. See the full article LINK> www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2730096/How-green-lights-way-work-Hackers-reveal-simple-control-traffic-lights-major-cities-using-just-laptop.html
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Apr 23, 2016 11:19:20 GMT
Trying to find out more about the censor on the top
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Apr 23, 2016 20:54:10 GMT
Here i found out that the black box on top of the traffic lights are called AGD's above ground detectors and work either Microwave vehicle detectors or infra red vehicle detectors! And work by radio link? Twamgle Post subject: Re: What are the black boxes on top of trafflic lights? PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2014 12:09 www.sabre-roads.org.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=32556
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Apr 23, 2016 21:25:20 GMT
Just as I suspected.. it is easily possible for the equipment to be configured to go to a RED light as you approach, thus time it so that you could set the traffic light camera off using strategic timing against the driver. Only 2,304 views I will need to find the exact brand & model fitted to Macclesfield traffic lights, but it DOES have one of these type devices fitted to it. Thus it IS possible at Macclesfield traffic lights, rather than being not possible. Also just a co-incidence this is called a 316 stop-line model. and it is related to the red stop light. The little red snow shovel i had stolen im certain was called a 457 shovel, but i cannot find it at all in a search! It has just vanished. Like Mystery traffic light settings that vanish with no trace? These videos here seem to contain hints at straight/curvy roads in the literature symbolism. Do you think the older models were not supposed to be used at sites like the Macclesfield traffic lights section with bent road profile? The technology would be less advanced then?
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Apr 24, 2016 16:50:36 GMT
Hmmmmm, two to 60 meter range. What is the range on the Macclesfield device model fitted to the traffic lights?! Do the older models do upto 40 meters?
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Apr 24, 2016 18:17:01 GMT
I want to go back to the Dorset 1 second allowance time again....
And the Highway code minimum 23meter stopping distance (longer for larger vehicles)
Here are some more calculations...
Anyone at 30mph under 40 meters away will not trigger the camera when it goes amber if they don't stop. Anyone going under 30mph will not make it through the lights unless they have the extra 1 second allowance
Minimum stopping distance Highway code 23.3m 1.8 seconds 29mph
38.8 meters max 3 seconds 29mph .....................
27mph 3sec 36.2meters
27mph 2sec 24.1meters
27mph 1sec 12Meters
At 20mph, with the extra second added, you will only be 4 meters or so short of error with a 4 second time.
This also is a very similar time table to the actual highway code 23 minimum distance at 30mph and adding more distance for larger vehicles with more stopping time needed. (according to the taught highway code)
there arent any times under 1 second into red that are against the actual highway code 23meter time because it only takes about 1.5 seconds to go 23 meters. But 1.5 is the traffic light time for setting off from red to green. So its a time you are used to. The 3 second amber time is double that. And you experience it moving, not stood still.
What this means is that if you are 1.5 seconds away from the traffic lights when amber shows, you will be through the traffic lights 1.5 seconds later.
But if you are 3 seconds away from the traffic lights when amber shows, then 1.5 seconds later you will be then another 1.5 seconds,away.
Now this is supposed to be our official national safe taught emergency stop time and distance. So if you ARE 1.5 seconds away from the traffic lights when amber shows, you will NOT be likely to perform the emergency stop.
Also you will not trigger the camera anyway.
And if you are over 40 meters away from the traffic lights at any speed, I doubt you will attempt to get through anyway. Or be caught out for time.
Thus this "between" range for time and distance is the phase in question.
Where Dorset police give the extra second, that removes any question of this un-between range where thinking time or slow vehicles might be caught off guard.
But this range is seemingly where other police and councils are getting the most offences from.
So the question is.... What are the stopping times and distances for vehicles other than cars?
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Apr 24, 2016 21:21:03 GMT
Just looking at solicitors....
Really difficult choice for me, because the duty solicitors Amal did not defend me at all from the police station representation. And an Asian guy at community service said he would not use an Asian pakistan solicitors! Because they don't want to see him win! ! He doesn't trust them?! He used a white english solicitors! But Carr and co who the Huddersfield clerk set me up with didn't stop the case either and correctly defend me...
So really tricky, because Simon Morton even sent the Money back as well! When I tried to get him to help..
So its not looking good, even though they put up statements like this one....
Example Of Dorset area solicitors website statement...
I actually am not looking for a defense solicitors anymore. I just need to sue the police and CPS for human rights with the unfair code of practice of decisions across the country of published prosecution thresholds
But the other incorrect signs and markings at Macclesfield are plenty extra for defense anyway.
But I will have to do the illegal prosecution probably seperate unless I go with the fact I was surveying the traffic lights for the petition at the time. Which is the truth.
I am even considering triggering the camera again but filming it from various angles at once, and the speedometer. But they might just change the camera settings or turn it off. Or edit it, or not even send it out. I could do it in different vehicles to show the vehicle height effects the timing of the camera.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Apr 25, 2016 16:12:54 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Apr 26, 2016 17:28:09 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Apr 27, 2016 22:44:22 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Apr 28, 2016 7:00:09 GMT
Ok so reflecting again on the teardown video on YouTube of the traffiphot iii
If it is illegal to permit someone to contravene a traffic regulations order...
Then installing a camera that has dummy settings and lock out times must be in consideration for being illegal!?
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Apr 28, 2016 7:05:40 GMT
Ok so reflecting again on the teardown video on YouTube of the traffiphot iii
If it is illegal to permit someone to contravene a traffic regulations order...
Then installing a camera that has dummy settings and lock out times must be in consideration for being illegal!?
You are enforcing a traffic regulations order actively and you are permitting or facilitating a device that can be set to discriminate between who and when enforcement takes place!? It has to be against CPS code of practice as well.
Also, if the road bends the distance to the stop line will be different to each inductive loop from the camera.
What is the legislation in other countries for these matters?
we could even explore the fact that the legislation over Emergency vehicles being given permit to exceed the speed limit is illegal?
There is no law that says it is illegal to make a law giving permission to do the majority of other things is illegally. But is legislation "permit" and permission? Legal authority? Same thing?
|
|