THE OSSETT BYPASS - PURPOSE BUILT ENTRAPMENT ROAD

The sign by the Sculpture park, just off junction 38 M1, no previous known mobile radar checks, so most likely a sign for the "ENTIRE" West Yorkshire fixed camera network? and no Europort sin off this junction either. Could it be a reverse psychoofy for "no mobile units" near this junction yet there ARE at junction 40?!

J38 welcome to west yorkshire police radar checks but no fixed cameras around that area hardly




Yorkshire sculpture park. Yellow & Black sign, not uniform with the rest of the signs. a calling card?




J39 M1 Denby Dale (not Horbury junction) 1 lone sign going away from Wakefield into Kirklees opposite direction to Europort. no sign paired with it into Wakefield.



This is the sign at J40 M1 same roundabout as the Ossett bypass sign but going into Wakefield. Quite high up/



And then there is the actual europort little sign itself that i have already featured in the video.. here is the map. (there might be a couple more on the Doncaster or Pontefract roads, but not 100% certain) - really spooky thing just happened now this second, one of my light bulbs just "popped out" of the light fitting on the wall! when it was screwed in?! but did not shatter! i think it is still in 1 piece on the floor!? really spooky like poltergeist movie! actually a bit scary! lol. hmmmm. wierd. can it be done by messing with the house electrics?!

so... regarding the Wakefield Europort sign again....

Here is what the wikipedia website has to say...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wakefield_Europort



In truth the site is in fact 7.5 miles from Wakefield as the crow fly's and 3.5 mile from Castleford. So i take the quited Wikipedia information to be incorrect.




So, its claimed to be opened in 1996 and i would be interested to know if that Europort sign was placed on the Ossett bypass then. Because if it was, then I am wrong. But if I am correct with my hunch and it was placed in 2000 it would be in line with the speed limit change from National speed limit to 50mph, if in fact the Traffic regulation order is authentic! i wonder if there are any newspaper storys from around then? or an opening day photo? either way, some event did take place in 2000 a Lafarge Redland Aggregates. Not Lagarge from Star Trek next generation of motorway cameras, though. and since then it is said the operation only runs at half capacity.

development was officially sanctioned by the Secretary of State John Gummer due to its strategic importance.


Here are some photos of Distnes to Castle Ford & Wakefield. Where the only Europort signs that i have seen so far are, and the actual distance to the Europoer from Ossett bypass. and direction of travel from the signs. I will do a Wakefield borders map as well...

The signs have absolutely no consistent relationship to entering wakefield or going to the Europort at all! This is early Government retard strategy, which we are now having imposed on us by the new motorway speed cameras right next to Carr gate police College, possibly more attention diverted away from Cameron & the Secretary of state for transport.

Another issue with the Notice of Intended Prosecution from West Yorkshire Police for the Ossett bypass, is that Halsted would not have been aiming straight at the vehicle/van. So he should have added on the cosine effect speed (if his measured speed was even correct anyway) and the prosecution speed was the speed quoted and from the video photograph, it was not corrected to the actual vehicle speed. So the N.I.P. had the incorrect speed on it because they had not bothered to work out the angle of approach for the exact distance from Halsteds position.

And even if it was in excess of 50mph, it was not "correct". It was not the actual speed (claimed by the device) with calculations made to it for "Correction". Thus the N.I.P. did not contain the correct speed anyway. No matter if the device itself made the correct speed reading.

manual-ultralyte-100


www.bentcop.biz/manual-ultralyte-100(1).pdf

283m 15-20 degrees



224m 10 degrees



165m 5 degrees



112m 5 degrees



57m 15-20 degrees




Its a bit like the recent Parking Ticket I was given in Newark. Where the Parking Warden put the Wrong vehicle REG into his Machine. To be Valid the ticket must have THE registration mark OF THE VEHICLE. And as it was not correct, but that of a different vehicle it was NOT a valid ticket (even though the regulations were also in fact not what was claimed by the warden anyway) but that it beside the point.

The N.I.P. MUST contain the actual recorded speed CORRECT to the angle of approach. And as the speed was not corrected for the angle at the distance of the reading, it is NOT the vehicles true speed thus the N.I.P. is not valid.

Add that to the illegal road signs and the entire prosecution is completely void from every possible way.

The Points must be removed & fine refunded.

Can you tell us THE speed of THE vehicle?

Yes or no.



You must be able to answer the question correctly. What was the speed of the vehicle? What is the speed of the vehicle, sir?

*** JUST TELEPHONED THE VW VAN CENTRE ***

They do NOT do speedometer calibration. It is NOT part of the MOT. They do not touch it. Or test or modify it. It is factory set to the design and cannot be changed. It is NOT under or over calibrated. It is designed to be as exact as possible. If you have the correct tyres and wheels fitted.



What is the sum of the fine to pay, sir? Please key in the fine amount into your keypad in pounds and pence, then press the hash key.



Hmmmmm.
Ok, so I knew you can get digital scanners that can unlock a car, but this mobile phone app gets all the vehicles errors, bulbs, doors, status and wheel speeds as you drive past?!

So why are the police toying with laser guns?

VCDS Mobile Test Drive: