GOOD & HONEST (NO WIN NO FEE) LAWYER WANTED

A legal loophole which meant scores of motorist had their speeding penalties revoked has been closed, according to the body responsible for roadside cameras.

An administrative blunder meant the speed limit on the A65 at Rawdon could not legally be enforced.

And it meant the West Yorkshire Casualty Reduction Partnership had to track down all the 130 motorists who had been caught by the speed cameras on the affected stretch -from the Conservative club in Rawdon to the Horsforth roundabout.

Last week the partnership stressed that letters had been sent out to all those affected, and they are keen to drive home the point that other motorists do not need to contact them.

The problem came to light when it was discovered that a small section of the A65 had no traffic regulation order attached to it -which in turn meant the 40 mph speed limit was not enforceable.

The anomaly arose because of an oversight which meant that the 40 limit which was imposed in 1993 was not legally enforceable.

Officials from Leeds City Council say they had picked up on the error almost three years ago and had passed that information on to the Casualty Reduction Partnership.

A spokesman for the council said: "After checking our records in March 2005, we discovered there was not a speed limit order for 40mph in place for this stretch of road and informed the Partner-ship.

"We have now approved the making of a 40mph order for this stretch of road and that will be commencing in the very near future, and with full consultation."

But last week the Casualty Reduction Partnership insisted it had not been informed of the oversight until late last year.

Spokesman Philip Gwynne stressed that action had been taken as soon as the partnership was made aware of the problem.

"Just before Christmas it came to light that this speed limit order had never been completed.

"So technically speaking the speed limit could not be legally enforced.

"As soon as we discovered this we shut the cameras down."

Mr Gwynne, who described the oversight as an anomaly' stressed that the Partnership had stopped enforcing the limit as soon as it was made aware of the position.

He said they had written to the 130 affected drivers and had offered to return the fines and remove the penalty points in about 90 of those cases.

A small number of the 130 cases were not proceeded with at the time, and in about 30 cases the Rawdon speeding offences were part of a number of offence, and would not on their own have been responsible for the penalties which drivers received.

But he argued that even though fines were being returned and penalty points were being removed from licences, those drivers had still broken the speed limit.

"They broke the law," he said. "They admitted they broke the speed limit. Neither they nor we knew at the time that this order was not in place, so as far as they are concerned or we are concerned they have broken the law.

"Technically we were not able to enforce it -but that doesn't mean they were not speeding. They were speeding."

He stressed that all those who qualified for a refund had been informed, and anyone who hadn't heard so far did not need to contact the partnership.

He also stressed that the loophole no longer existed and the speed limit was being enforced again.

It had been thought the affected section of road ran through Yeadon, but the council spokes-man confirmed it was a Rawdon stretch which was affected.

Chief Superintendent Simon Atkins - Robert Halsted/L.D. MacFarlane/Sgt. Phil Tyson
A638 Ossett bypass SP30
15:13 10/10/2013
SK1400199811 calderdale magistrates/bradford crown/leeds crown
REF: 0133050041308320 Ossett bypass
full original single video evidence clip. not reduced or duplicated into edited material photo frame.
&
C00678098 Phil Tyson, illegal arrest and prosecution

Dear Simon Atkins

After repeated letters and notices, legal requests and contact you have failed to provide me with the video evidence clip of the alledged offence SP30 Ossett bypass.
how is it possible to have taken a case to court without providing me with the defence evidence for examination? not only before the calderdale hearing, but also before the Bradford crown court appeal which i had to withdraw because of failure to provide the video. I then requested the video again as i required that case as evidence in the Phil Tyson case where your Sgt. arrested me illegally against the Humaan rights act and bill of rights... when i have political protection and exemptions for use of the materials.

instead of writing to me as required in flyering regulations, to request removal of my political stickers, or else face a fixed flyering fine (which i am exempted from anyway) your Sgt came to arrest me, after i caught his officer stealing my printed political materials. To deprive me of signatures and public support and awareness of my campaign.

Also your Sgt. has lied on interview tape and in statement.

And in addition to this, the CPS and magistrates courts have acted illegally as well against my political rights, yet your officers refuse to prosecute them, as you are colleagues who seal a ring of protection- serving to obstruct and prevent any justice being administered against your own officers and staff, when they are obviously placing & maintaining illegal road signage where speed measuring devices cannot be used because the terms of its use are in breech.

Can you please explain why and how you are prosecuting speeding offences with no evidence, because you do not seem to need any, use any, or ever produce any that is seen by anyone.

If you do not send the video to me, it is obvious that there is something wrong with it.

i have other videos from lancashire police sent to me. It should be sent before the court date automatically.

you are obstructing and perverting the course of justice and your Sgt. has arrested me illegaly and used legal abuse against my political rights and freedoms which is to be able to place political petitions in public, without the need to obtain authorization. But as i did get written permission anyway from bradford south council that was additional authorization - ignored by the CPS, Police and Courts. The same council stickers do not cause criminal damage. it is an authority issue and the issue is the police themselves acting beyond the law. Refusal to accept that no citizen needs to ask any authority for permission to place political notices is constitutional law which no other citizen can oppose, including those in employment within the police force, Crown prosecution service and Ministry of justice.

if you do not send me the video from the Ossett bypass, then i claim you are liars, cheats and criminals who use the public funds to protect their own personal interests.

i claim that no viable video exists of the Ossett bypass SP30 and no speeding evidence exists for the case. unless you can provide it to me... i claim the photograph, beside a red royal mail van is nothing but a still image and proves nothing what so ever other than the presence of a vehicle which looks like the one i drive, on the road. And as the signage did not conform with Traffic sign manual prescription.. the file obtained from the speed measuring device could not even be used to prosecute.

your entire speed camera franchise is corrupt, crooked and criminal. i have done a survey of road signage and a significant proportion of the signs at enforcement sites do NOT comply with the road signs manual. therefore the terms of use of the devices is void at many places where police presence is regular.

will you send me the video disc. i am growing tired of your blockade and brute ignorance stragegy of "we will do as we please" and throw the jungle book of law away into the gutter attittude. Wheen it is clear that Police officer follow "man rules" and no other authority.

i have sat in court and heard lies and cherade before my own eyes and ears. You bank and bet on lies, deception and falsehoods, backed up by CPS and magistrates corruption "all in" on the act. Pre meditated agreements and arrangements.

i have run out of insults, because your operations are below insults and not even fit for further complaint. And it is common behaviour for Australian drivers to spit at speed camera officers as normal social respectability.

There is no legitimate police authority that exists. You are simply men in uniforms, who have taken control through lying and abuse, with equipment payed for by the public..

If the voters vote in UKIP all the police chiefs will be going..

The only reason you refuse to supply every person with their speeding video is to conceal and hide the truth and facts in the evidence.

you have plenty to hide or you would simply upload every video to the west yorkshire police website with a view code issued with the N.I.P.

if you can show CCTV foootage of robbers and thefts on the news, online then there is absolutely no reason not to disclose speeding videos.

the very design of Lawcroft house on Lilycroft lane speaks volumes of what the building is about. its very presence is to blockade, obstruct and prevent anyone from doing anything. you do not gather evidence if it is not going to be fairly scrutinized. you must give part of the evidence.. You can not ignore the requests, except by breech of employment policy.

in these driving cases where there is ONE single evidence exhibit.. a video.. YOU GIVE IT over. you do not reduce it to a single photo frame. and create a new evidence exhibit from it. the original video is the only one piece of evidence of speed. the photo is not valid evidence of anything other than a reduced duplication for vehicle owner identification assistance only. It is not prosecution material for the speed. And contains no measurable evidence of movement.

you do not.... "make another piece of evidence" from it - to create two pieces ...just because you dont want to give the video. Because that is in fact fraud. Forgery and manipulation of evidence. Changing evidence and alteration of evidence. Which is an criminal offence itself.

a photo clip.. 1 frame, reduced from the original evidence is NOT the evidence at all. it is nothing.. It is a fabrication, a creation. Something new.

Send me the video.

and as you have corrected the majority of incorrect and illegal signs on the Ossett bypass, you can now remove the endorsements and refund my court fines and collectica fee...(and do the same for other drivers prosecuted incorrectly on the road) as well as direct the Chief of police to remove and delete the illegal convictions and sentances against me by Phil Tyson and the corrupted CPS and magistrates.

Also you can find out why the Crown court files say there were two pedestrian offences in my sentancing, with 2 x 3 points, yet the DVLA so far dont know anything about it... as according to them as yet they dont exist... which begs the question how any of the case exists at all... because the entire charges are unquestionably and completely illegal under constitutional law by political exemptions of which prosecuting me was in fact a criminal offence itself. Officer Alan White stole my political materials to deprive me of signatures on my petitions and to prevent and block public awareness of my cause and campaign. This was a civil power that i had lawful authority to exercise and the magistrates are a set of egits and charlatans. aloof because they are full of spite and contempt because they have been using legal abuse against drivers for years, and the police have been protecting them, as part of shared interests together. Nothing has ever beeen more true of fact than this. And you are living a lie if you deny it is not the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth of the matter.

Yours sincerely
Mr ________