Post by Administrator on May 10, 2017 22:42:52 GMT
This is now the thread to add evidence of the accuracy or inaccuracy of Home office approved LTI and Kustom Signals speed measurement devices. How they are being used and how the law is being applied. If it is being applied fairly and equally to drivers.
I have the right to state my intent not to offend but to obtain test evidence from the police for a report and complaint to the Parliamentary and Health service Ombudsman. I require the element of surprise so that tests are natural and device settings are not changed. Or prosecution procedures.
I do not have to reveal my purpose to police until a measurement has been taken and a prosecution notice issued. After which i will notify prosecuting authorities of the Petition protections and ombudsman complaint gathering evidence.
I may drive any vehicle i require to for purposes of preventing police from changing tactic or procedure which could effect their process. Like the Heisenburg uncertainty principle and schrodingers cat theorem.
Where they could act differently because of attempting to hide or cover up actions of behaviours towards me by knowing i am collecting evidence on them.
Its is illegal to be prosecuted for doing this petition work. And if police are surveillancing me and acting to obstruct or effect my testing and research and investigation then as a citizen with the right to gather evidence on and report criminal fraud .. Any actions by the police to counter my work will be considered as perverting the course of justice and conspiracy to defraud the public.
I shall now begin to present the evidence i have been obtaining
1. To establish if the law is being and has been applied equally and fairly within and or between police forces. In relation to N.I.P. issue and lazer accuracy... In addition to road signage issues already covered in previous threads.
2. If the equipment is in fact accuract and if it has been being used correctly and professionally.
Thank you.
I have the right to state my intent not to offend but to obtain test evidence from the police for a report and complaint to the Parliamentary and Health service Ombudsman. I require the element of surprise so that tests are natural and device settings are not changed. Or prosecution procedures.
I do not have to reveal my purpose to police until a measurement has been taken and a prosecution notice issued. After which i will notify prosecuting authorities of the Petition protections and ombudsman complaint gathering evidence.
I may drive any vehicle i require to for purposes of preventing police from changing tactic or procedure which could effect their process. Like the Heisenburg uncertainty principle and schrodingers cat theorem.
Where they could act differently because of attempting to hide or cover up actions of behaviours towards me by knowing i am collecting evidence on them.
Its is illegal to be prosecuted for doing this petition work. And if police are surveillancing me and acting to obstruct or effect my testing and research and investigation then as a citizen with the right to gather evidence on and report criminal fraud .. Any actions by the police to counter my work will be considered as perverting the course of justice and conspiracy to defraud the public.
I shall now begin to present the evidence i have been obtaining
1. To establish if the law is being and has been applied equally and fairly within and or between police forces. In relation to N.I.P. issue and lazer accuracy... In addition to road signage issues already covered in previous threads.
2. If the equipment is in fact accuract and if it has been being used correctly and professionally.
Thank you.