|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 4, 2017 18:43:53 GMT
I think Davey Jones believes the whole Bentcop.biz thing is funny??  |
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 5, 2017 6:30:06 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 6, 2017 22:13:26 GMT
M54 Road profile example of same road (& speed limit) as A1 dual carriageway.
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 13, 2017 22:47:43 GMT
Ok, so Kustom Signals are on with my Prolaser III conversion to UK Home Office approved standard (Kustom signals are saying that is "Euro" settings! Anyway.. Its going to cost me about £800  i suppose its a lot cheaper than buying a LTI 1000 from Tele-traffic UK for £5,000  Anyway.. Im going to try claim it back from the Home Office under HM Government expenses, as i need the device for 1. the ombudsman complaint & my police work. and HM Government sponsored petitions. So im hoping the police will take my police work seriously when i inform them and withdraw N.I.Ps 0133050492384720 & 0123140187015720 as i have provided video evidence i was testing their cameras accuracy for my police work and complaints evidence... And the N.I.Ps can be and must be withdrawn, discontinued by the same process of termination as with Ambulance or fire service vehicles as im not required to observe the speed limit, and also its illegal to prosecute me for that work i need to do to obtain the evidence and data for the complaints & my prosecution evidence against the police.   The original quote was $250 and i asked also for a battery pack upgrade from car lighter.. thats fine, and the labour and software update.. but why $450 for an optic fibre thingy? will they be spying on us as well?  I hope that im not wrong about this and i can still get some slip effect out of it.. both on stationary and moving objects & vehicles and get good evidence that the police tests are flawed and the polices claims concerning the devices performance are proved invalid. |
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 15, 2017 23:29:15 GMT
YJ15 HDL at 13:24 15th September 2017 A59 Beamsley, North Yorkshire between Beamsley Lane and storiths lane. The Beamsley ProjectI encounted North Yorkshire police speed camera van on the A59 north Yorkshire today. video I was moving into overtaking position to get around a lorry as we reached a dual carriageway section of road that went up a hill, as i just pulled out and started to increase speed to overtake, i saw the camera van ahead on the opposite side of the road up the hill and looked down at my speedometer slightly shocked and it was 50-52mph i then reduced speed and my overtaking maneuver was thrown off. I went to get questions & answers session with the officer. He said he was there to "Slow people down" I do not think slowing people down is a safe idea at a section when cars have been behind lorry's for a long time, exactly at the moment when the road is constricted for them to speed up and overtake.. and attention needs to be to mirrors and the road not exact speed, its not a good idea to have a speed camera van there to distract or startle drivers when engaging in a maneuver that's initiation and execution requires their full atention. Anyway... i did not manage to record the approach or my speedometer but under questioning the officer was challenged over the speed limit for vans and dual purpose vehicles and the officer after discussion and insight, did concur with my opinion and points on the speed limit on a van including insurance policy points and vehicle specs. Also i talked about me getting my device pro laser III converted to UK home office settings and the officer under recorded statement evidence stated that the software on the UK devices, home office settings, does NOT prevent slip effect, and the officer made statement that "Slip effect" is a natural thing and the devices are meant to do it and the home office approved software upgrade does not get rid of it and the devices still produce it when the police use them.. So have i wasted my money getting my device upgraded to test it? if slip effect cant be removed then why are the home office getting the devices upgraded and costing the tax payer a lot of money? i heard the officer take a few speed readings when i was stood next to him and it sounded very fast & quick and i didn't even hear the lock or track growl sound. So i wonder in fact if the whole point of the device upgrade if slip effect is natural and cannot be removed, in fact is to make the device "just faster & more efficient" in fact, it might be better set up to get "cleaner & better slip effect" See video & my lecture after my encounter with the officer today. I still require my N.I.P. withdrawn by North Yorkshire police and also want a copy of the video evidence to compare with my own video. What is going on with this whole Laser subject & the police.. one minute they say their devices cannot give an error.. then they agree its a natural part of how the device works and agree it cannot be stopped/removed.... So what are we paying Tele-traffic UK and Truvelo UK for? just supposedly "better guns" in general? Beamsley Hill?  for real?       
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Oct 4, 2017 19:45:02 GMT
Another example and discussion lecture to indicate the importance of seeing street lighting, especially if its going to be obstructed or hidden in trees.
The Police love to quote the law concerning the spacing & presence of street lighting for 30mph speed limit. But on the A616 Huddersfield, Woodhead road.. i found that the street lighting was hidden in trees and not very visible, especially on the section of road that looked a lot like it was a 40mph natural percentile.
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Oct 11, 2017 16:34:44 GMT
I got the Home Office Approved Prolaser III, calibrated and ready for testing...
Preliminary tests confirm my suspicions are correct and that it performs as i thought it would, for the reasons I assumed.
I got a +7mph and a -10mph reading from the small set of stairs in Wakefield. And with the evidence from the A19 North Yorkshire... which was 4mph less than the speedometer, i now have evidence the Home office device can give errors of both higher and lower speeds. in fact its more prone to larger errors in speed being incorrect than the American standard device is.
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Oct 11, 2017 23:32:04 GMT
i found a power cable i have that fits! the Power cable for my Roland JP keyboard fits! ! ! So i can now charge the device fully!
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Oct 12, 2017 7:22:04 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Oct 13, 2017 7:22:20 GMT
Home Office Approved & Calibrated Prolaser III Final Slip effect confirmations before tests on cars
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Oct 13, 2017 21:10:38 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Oct 13, 2017 21:17:59 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Oct 13, 2017 21:23:05 GMT
forums.pepipoo.com/lofiversion/index.php/t1934.htmlThe Conditions of use, are outlined fully and completely in to DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTS guide to the Association of Chief Police Officers. But the requirement that the road signage complies with the TSRGD & Road sign manuals is "forgotten" to be quoted or mentioned in the actual Police chiefs own "Version" of the guidance. Thats where i am so far with it. I think. Oh.. just a minute... The Road traffic regulation and Highways acts say you cannot be convicted by a court of law if those signs are not in compliance with their PRESCRIPTIVE requirements. (that doesnt just mean any old adequate to what a SGT thinks is OK, or will do.)
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Oct 13, 2017 21:31:41 GMT
They dont actually have to record the evidence with video..
Its just a measurement noted by the officer. That is used.
So..... If we are wanting to Challenge these People...
We need
1. a complaint to the IPCC (who are biased and stupid)
2. a complaint to the Home office and Prime Minister who will just give a fixed rigged reply, thus it will need to go to the Parliamentary and health service ombudsman) complaints over Home Office & The Police & Department of Transport
3. a Petition, to the Government.. supported by the people. With evidence showing the devices are not accurate and are being misused with illegal signs as well.
(we will need evidence that the police have used the devices wrongly) which is contained in the polices own video evidence archives.
(we will also need to test the devices ourselves to get our own evidence as well, which i am currently doing)
We have certain rights, to get this evidence from the police if it is challenging them, or accusing them of error that we are complaining about.
or....
other option..
Prosecute the police for fraud if we think they have done wrong with intent. But that costs money and its difficult to convince a private prosecutor without the evidence first. Also many dont want to tackle the police or take them on.
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Oct 13, 2017 21:36:43 GMT
|
|
i suppose its a lot cheaper than buying a LTI 1000 from Tele-traffic UK for £5,000 
for real? 
im certain ive seen it on the list before though? And the 1000 LTI model
