|
|
Post by Administrator on Jun 21, 2016 22:54:16 GMT
This scan i did a while ago looks like an LTI beam going across towards a car bonnet, lol.. if you imagine the up/down slight motion of the line as the beam being sent 200meters.. and the wavy green graph as a car bonnet or other vehicle, the point of motion towards the edge of screen is like the focus point of the beam,  a lorry rear would be a flat wall, moving not an sloped bonnet. simples! |
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jun 24, 2016 19:46:12 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jun 27, 2016 7:42:00 GMT
Here are some calculations which show that the difference between 56 and 61 mph is something like 2cm per 10ms laser pulse...
And from my staircase experiment it doesn't have to be an evenly distributed change in distance across the pulse stream.
57mph - 0.1 seconds - 0.0015 miles
0.0025 km
0.1 seconds 100ms (10ms pulses)
2.5 meters divided by 10
0.25 meters (25cm)
61mph - 0.1 seconds - 0.0016 miles
0.0027 km
0.1 seconds 100ms (10ms pulses)
2.7 meters divided by 10
0.27 meters (27cm)
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jun 27, 2016 7:49:43 GMT
How can a device have passed Home Office approval if it cannot even get the same reading from repeated identical motion on the same target?
It will be interesting to see how the 1000 model performs.
Could "too many errors" being displayed in stead of the wrong reading be a shield to scrutiny?
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jun 29, 2016 15:38:25 GMT
West Mercia Police Outside the place i was delivering to In Newport Shropshire.. Questions about the Prolaser III by Kustom Signals. He doesnt know much about speed lasers or doesnt seem to! He doesnt know anything about Shropshire Mobile Camera van unit or the LTI!?  |
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jul 2, 2016 7:54:20 GMT
How To Make A Night Vision Camera Out Of A Regula…:
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jul 13, 2016 20:48:58 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jul 13, 2016 23:04:13 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jul 28, 2016 0:42:49 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jul 28, 2016 17:27:29 GMT
Here is the first infra red night vision filming i have done of the LTI beam, confirming the similar photos i found someone else had done of it on the internet already.
Here is just a brief few comments about it..
I hope to get a better demonstration video done.
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jul 29, 2016 9:32:43 GMT
I've just noticed this morning that there is a strange circular crack on the number plate of the van. I didn't do it. No idea how, because it would need a very strange impact to crack it in a circular shape without being so hard to break the registration plate more. (Same people who are responsible for placing dead Badger, fox & rabbit?)  It cannot have been from crashing into anything, as the front of the bumper id further forward than the reg plate!  Strange timing as well, after just doing the filming of the LTI beam with a night vision camera. And finding that it is not as wide as they say. It's looking like it will not be 3ft wide at all over the 100 - 300 meter general working distances. So it could have an impact on many historic court cases where evidence has been given that the beam is very wide, rather than smaller and requires a more precision aim for longer time on the target. I am going to check the claimed 0.4 second time for reading taking as well.  |
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jul 29, 2016 14:39:40 GMT
I believe that Laser Tech Inc will have made prototype models of the LTI Ultralyte WITH a VISIBLE laser, in the "testing & Development" phase of the Devices. And That they will be *Fully Aware* of all and every Quirk of the device and error ranges possible with its use. Obviously undisclosed as yet.  The interesting thing is that Tele-traffic Uk Provide a "Cosine Effect" Chart with the Ultralyte manual... But there is no "Beam Size Chart" for the beam at different distances. Or the exact Sight scope alteration guide for different shooting distances. Or a "Reading Time" variation chart for "time to obtain a reading". The Ranfer & Concept systems do NOT disclose the TRIGGER point on-screen either. |
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jul 29, 2016 16:03:58 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jul 29, 2016 16:21:57 GMT
The thing is that if the laser were unaligned that badly, then technically the device wouldnt even be able to get a reading.. Let alone quite a precision aimed one at 400 meters.
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jul 30, 2016 5:27:24 GMT
|
|
a lorry rear would be a flat wall, moving not an sloped bonnet. simples!
I hope someone has not switched it or fitted anything into it! grr!
JBNfLosRi2!~~_1.JPG)
0cPBP5vUGUqRQ~~60_1.JPG)
It cannot have been from crashing into anything, as the front of the bumper id further forward than the reg plate! 
