After another complaint to West Yorkshire police Professional Standards, They rang my Mobile today, but I was at work. They have spoken to my mum though today and and have said THEY ARE GOING TO SEND ME THE INTERVIEW TAPES (And I think the Ossett bypass video) in the post.
So if they arrive ok and are all in order correct... That is a step forward.
Although I do not know if I will get them before the 04 December 2015.
I have complained again to Manchester Magistrates that the case is illegal. I have a reply, I am going to read it.
I have been sent the "FOLDER OF DOCUMENTS" back from The Solicitors in Stockport and It seems that the Money Paid was only for "CASE EVALUATION!!!"
Whaa!?
So I dont think it sounds like anyone is going to be appearing to defend me on the 04th! But I still dispute that I should not have to appear at an illegal hearing!
I have found the Administrative email address for Leeds crown court. They have authority over Magistrates courts. I have an appeal REF number...
And I have now written to request that The matter be investigated (they have already got some of the documents)
This is my Letter to them... (email) I am prett certain that I am correct that under constitutional laws & civil freedoms and human rights that any illegal legal proceedings are void and must be corrected as errors in law.
Dear Leeds Crown Court,
Thank you for your recent email and letters which i have yet to read.
I have had a phone call from the police stating that they now are going to send the requested police interview tapes to me, that i have been requesting for over 6 months. There are required before i can complete any further forms so , i am waiting for the tapes to arrive.
There are several issues that I need you to look into before any further progress can be made with this matter.
This information needs to be read, processed and acknowledged by the court, regarding the LEGALITY of the original Huddersfield Magistrates Court case itself and the entire prosecution from Arrest up until this stage of the appeal process.
bentcop.boards.net/thread/58/good-honest-win-lawyer-wantedThe Issue of dispute is this.
That It is consitutional law, layed out as a passed bill of primary legislation that:
A.The Right to petition. That it is the Right of the Subjects to petition the King and all Commitments and Prosecutions for such Petitioning are Illegall. B. Political media and advertisements are exempted from Advertising Standards Authority Regulations (see A) C. Political materials are exempted from the clean neighbourhoods and environment entire act and flyering/defacement legislation including the use of roads & highways (see A) D. You can not be arrested in a polling station. (see A)
The offences that I was convicted of (and I dispute the process was illegal)
Are use of highways & roads (stopping on)
Talking to a police officer Alan White who they claim I intended to distress, yet I was challenging the theft by him of my political materials
Use of paper, printed political materials that are exempted from the Clean Neighbourhoods act And section 23 thus can not cause defacement or criminal damages, because you can not be fined, prosecuted or punnished in law for their use or distribution.
If a Case ad prosecution is "illegal" that means that there is in fact no case and no charges in LAW. And no Magistrate has power to decide on the matter, or even hear the case. Including a crown court and Judges and a Jury. A legal advisor and magistrate cannot decide on constitutional law. It is law that must be acknowledged and obeyed at every stage of a process by police, local councils, the CPS and Courts.
If these departments ignore this law, it is criminal and illegal. Breech of Human Rights and Civil freedoms.
Because this is an extremely rare case, where I was and am Petitioning the government in matters of police corruption, the police "were politically opposed" to my petitioning & distribution of my political materials, and decided to prosecute me anyway, even though it was illegal to do it. (on account of all charges)
As this is a dispute more than an appeal, a dispute of LAW.
It is my belief that the CROWN COURT must Acknowledge my dispute that the entire prosecution case from the moment of the original arrest was against my human rights and the Human Rights act 1998, and the Bill of Rights 1689 AND against the Clean neighbourhoods act political exemptions from legislation, which are in fact FOUNDED on the UK Bill of rights & political freedoms.
Thus, It is Constitutional LAW that I do not even need to appeal the conviction because no conviction exists as the charges, case and prosecution from its origin is VOID, and has no lawfull power of effect.
Your Judges can not hear or decide on the mattewr because to do so is illegal.
And the Huddersfield Magistrates Court hearings were also illegal as well as the Warrants and bail and arrests & police custody.
Also The corresponding case at Manchester Magistrates court is Also Illegal. As the Charges were duplicated from West Yorkshire to Manchester police as an act of obstruction against my petition campaign to attempt to obstruct it, because I am campaigning against police corruption.
Free distribution of printed matter*
Section 23 Controls on free distribution of printed matter
POLITICAL MATERIALS ARE EXEMPTED FROM THE ENTIRE SECTION. YOU CAN PAINT, POSTER, STICK, USE, PLACE, LEAVE OR SCRAWL INTO ANY SURFACE FOR POLITICAL PURPOSES WITH COMPLETE EXEMPTION FROM THE LEGISLATION.
The exemptions do NOT need to be put before a COURT or Magistrates to decide or a Legal Advisor to confirm, BECAUSE THE LAW SAYS IT IS ILLEGAL TO BE CHARGED. THUS FROM THE VERY ONSET OF ANY POLICE ARREST OR INVESTIGATION AND ANY PROCEEDINGS OF LAW AFTERWARDS THE ENTIRE CASE IS ILLEGAL AND HAS NO POWER OR AUTHORITY IN LAW.
THIS IS NOT COMMON LAW. BUT STATUTORY PROVISIONS OF LAW. YOUR COURT OFFICE STAFF MUST ACKNOWLEDGE AND OBEY, UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 AND UNDER JUSTICE POLICY OF EMPLOYMENT OF TRUTH & HONESTY AT ALL TIMES. YOU ARE EDUCATED TO A DEGREE AND LEVEL THAT IS OF UNDERSTANDING OF THESE BASIC LAWS AND LEGISLATION.
Constitutional Law and legislation
The Bill of Rights.
A draft piece of legislation is called a bill, when this is passed by Parliament it becomes an Act and part of statute law.
the right to petition the monarch should be without fear of retribution; Right to petition. That it is the Right of the Subjects to petition the King and all Commitments and Prosecutions for such Petitioning are Illegall.
An Act of Parliament in the United Kingdom is primary legislation.[1] These Acts are passed by the Parliament of the United Kingdom in London, by the Scottish Parliament in Edinburgh or by the National Assembly of Wales in Cardiff.
and—following British colonialism, the resultant doctrine of reception, and independence—to the thrones of those other Commonwealth realms, by willing deference to the Act as a British statute or as a patriated part of the particular realm's constitution.
Along with the Act of Settlement (1700 or 1701), the Bill of Rights is still in effect. It is one of the main constitutional laws governing the succession to the throne of the United Kingdom
and then, by convention, and as it touches on the succession to the shared throne, only with the consent of all the other realms.
Since the implementation of the Statute of Westminster 1931 in each of the Commonwealth realms (on successive dates from 1931 onwards) the Bill of Rights cannot be altered in any realm except by that realm's own parliament,
A separate but similar document, theClaim of Right Act, applies in Scotland. The Bill of Rights (1688 or 1689) was one of the inspirations for the United States Bill of Rights.
In the United Kingdom, the Bill of Rights is further accompanied by the Magna Carta, thePetition of Right, Habeas Corpus Act 1679 and Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949 as some of the basic documents of the uncodified British constitution.
Human Rights
Human rights or civil liberties form a crucial part of a country's constitution and govern the rights of the individual against the state. Most jurisdictions, like the United States and France, have a codified constitution, with a bill of rights. A recent example is the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union which was intended to be included in the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, that failed to be ratified. Perhaps the most important example is the Universal Declaration of Human Rights under the UN Charter. These are intended to ensure basic political, social and economic standards that a nation state, or intergovernmental body is obliged to provide to its citizens but many do include its governments.
human rights may include freedom from unlawful imprisonment, torture, and execution.
The concept of political freedom is closely connected with the concepts of civil liberties and human rights, which in democratic societies are usually afforded legal protection from the state.
Article 7.
All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.
Article 9.
No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.
Article 11.
(1) Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.
(2) No one shall be held guilty of any penal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a penal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the penal offence was committed.
Article 12.
No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.
Article 21.
(1) Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives.
(2) Everyone has the right of equal access to public service in his country.
(3) The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.
The Magistrates Courts Case At Huddersfield which this appeal is regarding and also case
REF: 04ZV0374
Warrant no. 06A5/AA/319
Listed for 04 December 2015 at 10:00am Manchester & salford Magistrates court..
Are Illegal. And a breech of my Human rights & political freedoms.
As the Crown court has higher authority than the Magistrates court, and as I claim that there was no lawfull right to hold the magistrates hearings or for my arrest, and that any Crown court appeal would also be illegal...
I request that the Crown court Investigate, verify and acknowledge my claim and by process of dispute with the court, have my convictions from Huddersfield magistrates court overturned/deleted/removed as VOID and ILLEGAL. And have the Police and Magistrates Courts Huddersfield & Salford Manchester prosecuted for conducting illegal prosecutions and proceedings as well as the Crown Prosecution service, Martin Goldman and the Chief of West Yorkshire police.
If you look into the Appeal documents for this REF number in your possession already, and give the proper attention and investigation merited for this Exceptionally rare case, you will find that I speak the Truth, the whole truth & nothing but the truth.
And my Law, Legislation and political exemptions from ALL the charges are true and of 100% fact.
And that under employment policy, and under constitutional law, you have no other alternative but to have the convictions and prosecutions against me automatically overturned by the CROWN COURT legal office, without me even needing to have an appeal case heard, because to do so would be against the law.
Please see that the matter gets full attention by the legal office.
Yours Sincerely
Mr ________________
But at least they have confirmed they have got the documents and payment now.
