LAWYou SHOULD not be innocent or guilty by means of finance. You either did something or did not do something. And the Law can not be interpreted by means of "BUYING" the truth of lawIt is for the state to find out what actually happened in an event or crime.
(business law exempted)
I know there is free legal help for the people why can not afford Lawyers, and very wealthy people can supposedly afford expensive legal people. It seems it is the Middle class who are left out.
It should not matter in any way at all what your financial situation is. The law is the law, and the truth is the truth.
You can not BUY TRUTH.
To Stop financially motivated LEGAL SECTOR BUSINESS, any prosecutions by "THE PEOPLE" against any person should be fully defended by "THE PEOPLE" thus ALL DEFENSE AND PROSECUTION SHOULD BE FULLY SUPPORTED BY THE STATE PAID FOR BY THE TAX PAYER.
YOU EITHER ARE GUILTY OR INNOCENT AND MONEY SHOULD NOT BE THE DECIDER IN THE TRUTH.
EVERY CITIZEN SHOULD BE PROVIDED WITH THE BEST POSSIBLE DEFENSE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM WHEN CHALLENGED BY THE POLICE AND CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE.
THE ARMS ON THE COURT DISPLAYS A LION AND A UNICORN AND A SHIELD.
Also you can NOT HAVE ONE COURT DECIDE ONE THING AND ANOTHER COURT DECIDE ANOTHER IN AN EXACT SAME MATTER - FOR EXAMPLE ROAD SIGNAGE.
ONE COURT IN STAFFORDSHIRE CAN NOT RULE A SIGN LOWER THAN 1.5 METERS IS ADEQUATE and then ANOTHER COURT IN A DIFFERENT CASE IN GLASGOW or LIVERPOOL RULE THAT A SIMILAR SIGN LOWER THAN 1.5 METERS IS INADEQUATE.
IT IS NOT COMMON SENSE OR TRUTH OR CONSISTENT WITH ANY FORM OF TRUE RATIONAL RIGHT THINKING.
THE COURTS DO NOT MAKE UP THE LAW, NEITHER DO THE POLICE. THE LAW IS THE LAW. AND DIFFERENT PERSONS SEEM TO HAVE VARIOUS AGENDAS WHEN INTERPRETING IT, THUS THERE NEEDS TO BE A SINGLE CENTRAL BODY WHO ENFORCES TRUTH. The CPS NO LONGER IS TRUST WORTH TO FOLLOW ITS OVERRIDING OBJECTIVES BECAUSE IT IS CORRUPT.
Also free legal help may be biased. The CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE SHOULD BE a LAW SERVICE TO THE PEOPLE. NOT A BIASED SERVICE OUT TO GET PEOPLE.
THERE IS NO REAL NEED FOR A COURT.
YOU CAN BE INTERVIEWED AND FACTS CAN BE ESTABLISHED OVER TIME BY HONEST INTELLIGENT PEOPLE. YOU CAN NOT BE GUILTY OR NOT GUILTY BY MEANS TO AFFORD IT. THAT HAS NO SENSE, RATIONALITY OR PRINCIPLE WHAT SO EVER AND IS MEDIEVAL IN THINKING.
ALSO people who can not have a true understanding and comprehension of law and facts by common sense and honesty should not be permitted to work in this sector of law. With financial motivation removed and persons removed who like to use victims of law as their "punishment gimps" then true REAL HONEST JUSTICE can be achieved and sustained and that is a freedom and entitlement of "THE PEOPLE"
Also in LAW and POLICING a certain amount of resources should be put into FINDING OUT WHY CRIMES OCCURRED AND FINDING REAL SOLUTIONS TO CRIME AS PART OF THE INVESTIGATIONS. SOLUTIONS should be FULLY ASSOCIATED WITH PUNISHMENTS, so that any work done to punish criminals also provides insight into how similar crimes can be prevented from the REASON and CIRCUMSTANCES why they occurred.
For example - THIEF STEALS £100 WORTH OF GROCERY'S BECAUSE HAS NO MONEY.
SENTENCE MIGHT BE 100 HOURS OF COMMUNITY WORK UNPAID.
RIGHT SENTENCE SHOULD BE - THIEF IS FOUND WELL PAID JOB AND SENTENCED TO TURN UP FOR THE JOB FOR 5 YEARS UNDER MONITORING. AFTER EVALUATION INVESTIGATE IF THIEF HAS STOLEN AGAIN.
IF THIEF HAS NOT STOLEN AGAIN WITHIN 5 YEARS SENTENCE WAS A SUCCESS. REPEAT WITH SIMILAR CRIMES AND EVALUATE NATIONAL STATISTICS AFTER a 10 YEAR PERIOD.
Example 2
MP OF DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT HAS SET UP TOLL ROADS TO DEFRAUD PUBLIC AND FINANCE THEIR OWN PERSONAL DREAM ROAD PROJECTS AT THE EXPENSE OF THE PUBLIC.
SENTENCE MIGHT BE - BAN MP FROM WORKING IN GOVERNMENT EVER AGAIN.
RIGHT SENTENCE SHOULD BE - DEPORT MP FROM UNITED KINGDOM FOR 10 YEARS GOOD RIDDANCE.
_________________________________
In regards to road signage it in truth is the job of the council and police to make certain road signage is correct. The CPS are also supposed to check that the council and police have carried out checks and it is only that failing why magistrates have even been making decisions on road signage, which is not even within their power to decide on.
(unless it is thought to have been changed or stolen... and if the police had been doing its required checks before every session, it could not be possible in truth to come into question in a prosecution case.
When there is a question of a section .87 concern then the police investigate. Section .85 is NO DIFFERENT. It is NOT CORRECT FOR THE POLICE TO REFER THE CASE TO COURT. This is EVASION of responsibility for road signage checks & investigation of facts concerning the prosecution.
Also after 6 months the prosecution was terminated if it had not been completed. But because the police read forums & got wise to people stalling and time wasting with driving defence and letter writing the police process units started "AUTOMATIC" court referals as a strategy to tackle this 6 month time frame people had started using. The police use every possible method to break past any obstructions in their prosecution "set ups" and THAT INCLUDES THEIR DECEPTIVE ENTRAPMENT SITES AND THEM BEING MADE TO BE PUT RIGHT.
THE FAST TRACK SYSTEM TO PROCESS DRIVING CONVICTIONS BY THE LABOUR GOVERNMENT IS BENT AND ILLEGAL. TONY BLAIR & GORDON BROWN'S GOVERNMENT SET UP THIS SYSTEM BECAUSE THEY WANTED TO PROCESS A HIGH NUMBER OF OFFENCES WITH AN AUTOMATED SYSTEM. I TELL YOU NOW THAT SYSTEM IS CORRUPTED AND A PERVERSION OF THE COURSE OF JUSTICE. THE POLICE HAVE CERTAIN RESPONSIBILITIES FOR ROAD SIGNS WHICH THEY ARE CHOOSING TO IGNORE FOR THEIR OWN REASONS OF HIGHER CONVICTION STATISTICS AND REWARDS. THEY HAVE BENT THE FRAMEWORK AND MORE SO OPERATED ILLEGALLY. ENTRAPMENT IN COLLABORATION WITH THE COUNCIL AND FRAUD IN COLLABORATION WITH THE CPS.
FOR ONE NAME I KNOW MARTIN GOLDMAN OF THE CPS LEEDS WEST YORKSHIRE HAS BEEN SENT A DISK OF EVIDENCE PRESENTED TO THE CPS BY *ANY PERSON* (me) FOR PROSECUTIONS AND DIRECTION OF THE POLICE TO INVESTIGATE A NATIONAL LIAISON CASE OF CORRUPTION & FRAUD BY THE POLICE, CPS, HIGHWAYS AGENCY, COUNCILS AND GOVERNMENT. MARTIN GOLDMAN IS A CRIMINAL FRAUDSTER BY ABUSE OF POSITION AND HAS PERVERTED THE COURSE OF JUSTICE BY DIRECTING HIS STAFF TO BREAK THE CPS CODES & OVERRIDING OBJECTIVES HE IS IN BREECH OF TRUTH & HONESTY EMPLOYMENT AND NEEDS TO BE BROUGHT TO JUSTICE. AS THE ONLY INVESTIGATING ROLE IS BY THE POLICE AND PROSECUTING ROLE IS BY THE CPS ITSELF MARTIN GOLDMAN IS OPERATING OUTSIDE THE LAW AS IT PROTECTED BY HIS STAFF AND COLLEAGUES. THUS I ASK FOR PRIVATE AND INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION INTO THE CPS, POLICE AND COUNCIL BY ANYONE WHO CAN OFFER THEIR SERVICES FOR FREE TO THE PUBLIC.
In addition to this the "development" of signage & road layout investigations undertaken by high cost "specialist" road traffic defence lawyers, I know it is the product of corrupt LAW practice and a perversion of the course of justice. To supply buisness to the Law sector in times where other areas of crime are drying up. The problems of intentional placement of incorrect signs Starting from core council road department lies all the way through to magistrates and Crown court by means of corrupt police forces, because if they had been honest and truthfull these matters would not even get to the courts. It is a system designed and intended to slither around the law like a snake only by incorrect conduct and behaviour of the staff involved.
I have written to The Lord Faulkes on this and other matters (as well as Her Majesty the Queen) but I was not worthy of a reply from such an high honest authority (who is unpaid apparently) yet I do not see his Lawyer peers going unpaid or working for an honest days fee (such as Mr Freeman of Manchester who is a criminal fraudster)
The DVLA have been informed of court fraud as well, and refuse to remove penalty points applied beyond the power of law. They claim only the convicting court has the power to remove them. How can this be when the court itself is acting fraudulently? How can they authorize anything?
The Ministry of justice and CPS complaints system lies and also is dysfunctional. The CPS will not even complete the bars standards complaints form and refuse to respond to legal letters, as do the police. They think they only have to reply to a lawyer, because they think you can not do anything about it yourself if they ignore letters. The system is self protected and only paying money to a lawyer can seemingly break this ring even if you write & speak the law.
I mean to write out a detailed description of why the entire road traffic prosecution franchise in LAW is corrupt & illegal and completely set against the driver from the start, but I have not had the time to get around to it yet. This is just a brief. Including many more points of where and why everything is laid out against you.
Just to mention some other things for your information while I am at it...
One of my girlfriends had a best friend we will call "Miss Piece" and I remember her telling us that she has a degree in Law and specialised in family law "but she could not bring herself to do the things they wanted her to do" so she did not stay in her Law career for long and instead worked in the telecommunications sector.
I should also tell you of a man I knew as "Roy" (I dont know if that was his real name or not) "ROY" used to sit by himself at the bar of the "Parish pump" pub we used to drink in in Huddersfield. I did not talk to Roy much. He used to sit by himself & talk to one or 2 people are the bar, sat on his stool. He once said to me. "Do you know, I had to DESTROY AND BREAK DOWN someone in court today" - "Do you know how that makes me feel?" I dont know how it made Roy or anyone else feel, but he was say at that bar drinking most evenings after work.
Another instance I should note is the Young "Couth" male CPS barrister at Huddersfield magistrates court, when I had tottet up 9 penalty points through work and I was facing loosing my driving licence. I was asked by the magistrate if I had anything to say and I said " I was just driving along the road normal" The magistrate claimed this showed no remourse.
The couth youth barrister then "TOOK GREAT DELIGHT AND PLEASURE" in informing the magistrates that I had previously been banned for 6 months from driving. And the magistrates then took great pleasure in BANNING ME FROM DRIVING - not for 12 montrhs BUT FOR 2 YEARS! EVEN THOUGH I REQUIRED MY DRIVING LICENCE FOR WORKING.
Now as It turns out the road WAS IN FACT A 40MPH road, changed by the council to 30MPH but "ALLOWED TO 36MPH" by a threshold. (the cameras on that road have been set at 40mph and changed randomly to between 33 & 35mph.
So the natural design of the road IS 40MPH.
So I can not see how I displayed "No remourse" when I was not racing or rushing.
If I ever have seen any display of no remourse IT IS NOTHING LESS THAN THE COMPLETE DENIAL AND LIES THAT I HAVE SEEN FROM THE POLICE AND CPS THEMSELVES when the tables are turned towards them.
I did state I was sorry in my mitigation letter.
I truly believe that many CPS and Magistrates (I have seen good Lawyers & Magistrates) But many of them seem to be people who gain some kind of pleasure & satisfaction in torture and pain inflicted upon the accused, similar to these rich people who pay prostitutes to whip them and give bondage, but they seem the type who enjoy giving the pain out.
I believe that ALL CPS & Magistrates should be screened before employment to make certain no pleasure is gained from the emotional suffering of others, so that the role does not become some some outlet for their hidden fetishes.
We see this with Court security. No offence to lesbians, But we do find A high number of Court security persons are female lesbions and IN TRUTH I ABSOLUTELY BELIEVE that they enjoy the job because they get to touch and handle women of the same sex, on entry to the court building. There are many in the Police also. I note that when I was taken under false arrest the female police officer - TOOK GREAT DELIGHT AND EXCITEMENT IN PUTTING THE HAND CUFFS ON ME EVEN THOUGH IT STATES THAT HAND CUFFS SHOULD NOT BE USED IF NOT GOOD REASON TO REQUIRE THEM.
On that occasion SGT TYSON had come to arrest me with 2 VEHICLES AND 4 OFFICERS!!! When for the alledged flyering offence it is a fine from the council not police arrest. (you can not be prosecuted for putting up petitions anyway) And I had reported the Camera service officer myself to Professional standards, yet they turned the apparent "FRAY" charges around against me and now have changed it further to common assault when I have never even make physical contact with that person.
All this is going off the original point now and so far what I have seen is that the Police are incompetent and somewhat retarded anyways, besides the CPS being "sinister and evil" and most magistrates being "useless" and a waste of tex payers money.
If the end leads to "JURY" decisions why not have an anonymous random SMS TEXT system for fast jury duty where details are texted to random citizens and then erased after a decision is texted back? No personal details have to be given and it would be fair & random. I believe this is a CHEAP inexpensive solution to court decisions in the future if TRUTH & HONESTY cannot be re-established in the legal system, free from cash incentives.
I am truly dissapointed with the current legal system and I DO NOT RECOGNIZE THE AUTHORITY NOR COMPETENCE OF THE CURRENT AUTHORITIES WHO CLAIM TO ENFORCE THE LAWS OF THE UNITED KINGDOM. AND I CHALLENGE THAT THEY OPERATE ABOVE AND BEYOND THE LAW AND THE TRUTH AND ARE CRIMINAL, THUS THEIR AUTHORITY IS VOID.
Also this is a message to the House of Lords. (I know you will get it) As I have already written to them twice.
Law
The second major role of the House of Lords is in law.
A group of Lords are known as law Lords. They sit as the supreme court of appeal – the highest court of law in the country. Theoretically, anyone who believes they have been the victim of a miscarriage of justice can take their appeal to the Law lords although because the seriousness of cases only a handful of cases which pass through the UK’s courts each year end up with the Law Lords.
LORDS, YOU CAN NOT BE CONVICTED OF A SPEEDING OFFENCE IF THE ROAD SIGNAGE IS NOT ERECTED & MAINTAINED, WHICH MEANS YOU CAN NOT BE IN A POSITION WHERE YOU HAVE BEEN CONVICTED BECAUSE IT IS BEYOND THE POWER OF THE COURT TO CONVICT.
IT IS THE JOB OF THE COUNCIL AND POLICE AND CPS TO CHECK THE REQUIRED ROAD SIGNAGE HAS BEEN CHECKED BEFORE AND ENFORCEMENT SESSION. THUS IT IS NOT EVEN A ROLE OF A DEFENCE LAWYER TO CHECK THE ROAD SIGNS, AND ANY MISTAKE BY ANY OF THE POLICE, CPS OR COURTS OR COUNCIL SHOULD BE DEALT WITH THROUGH THE COMPLAINTS SYSTEM. SO IT IS BY TRUTH NEAR IMPOSSIBLE FOR ROAD SIGNAGE NOT TO BE CORRECT & PRESENT.
THUS WHY IT IS POSSIBLE FOR OVER 750 PEOPLE TO BE PROSECUTED ON A ROAD WITH OVER ONE WHOLE MILE OF MISSING ROAD SIGNAGE??? AND HOW CAN IT NOT BE IMPORTANT A CASE FOR THE HOUSE OF LORDS UNDIVIDED ATTENTION AND IMPORTANCE WHERE OVER 750 PEOPLE HAVE BEEN CAUSED INJUSTICE, AND FURTHER THE VICTIMS OF LEGAL ABUSE AND A PERVERSION OF THE COURSE OF JUSTICE?
IF CORRECT PROCEDURES ARE FOLLOWED IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANY ROAD SIGNAGE TO BE INCORRECT OR NOT PRESENT. EVEN MORE IMPOSSIBLE AT A LOCATION WHERE THERE ARE NO LESS THAN 4 POLICE OBSERVATION PLATFORMS.
THE PROBLEM IS NOT WITH THE LAW THE PROBLEM IS WITH YOU. YOU AND THE PERSONS YOU EMPLOY IN RESPONSIBLE POSITIONS.
YOU ARE NOT FIT TO BE IN ANY POSITION OF RESPONSIBILITY AND ARE NOTHING LESS THAN INCOMPETENT AND LESS THAN A COMPETENT AUTHORITY TO GOVERN. YOU ARE IN BREECH OF EMPLOYMENT POLICY OF TRUTH AND HONESTY WHICH YOU REGARD WITH IGNORANCE.
YOU ARE HEREBY REMOVED FROM POSITION AND AS FAR AS I AM CONCERNED ALL ILLEGAL MAGISTRATES DECISIONS ARE VOID AND HAVE NO TRUE LEGAL EFFECT.