|
Post by Administrator on Nov 23, 2015 22:21:17 GMT
I had an American friend I know stay over a couple years or so back... and he did not know what "De-Icer" was! he had never even heard of it! I usually use the Kettle now, as wind screens are pretty tough there days.. I just pour the warm water over it.. But today I was like... Hmmm.... The rods in the kettle take like only a minute or less to warm the water up... Dont ask me about CARS as they probably all have the latest thing.. But at least the VANS do not seem to have anything, that would be SIMPLE! Just push a button to warm some rods or pipes in the windscreen wiper, or at least just heat a tiny ammount of the water for 30 seconds and DA - DA! Now has ANYONE in the UK TOYOTA city thought of THAT yet?! a Scratch card is waiting down at the Co-op for you. I dont those are the ones that spark the diesel either... I dont think Wesley Snipes had these fitted to his sword in the movie "Blade"
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Dec 16, 2015 20:44:46 GMT
I decided to send a few scratch cards out as Christmas presents to my fave causes... But its difficult to decide who is putting money to the best more productive (not proffit) use. Daily Mail Online story The Great British rake-off... what really happens to the billions YOU donate to charity: Fat cat pay, appalling waste and hidden agendas More than 195,289 charities in UK raising close to £80billion a year Many have become 'hungry monsters' using money to feed own ambitions David Craig's new book exposes the truth about Britain’s charity industry Recent inquiry found there are too many charities to keep track of activities The figures are astonishing. There are more than 195,289 registered charities in the UK that raise and spend close to £80 billion a year. Together, they employ more than a million staff – more than our car, aerospace and chemical sectors – and make 13 billion ‘asks’ for money every year, the equivalent of 200 for each of us in the UK. But many charities have become hungry monsters, needing ever more of our money to feed their own ambitions. And while registered charities claim that almost 90p in every pound donated is spent on ‘charitable activities’, many spend at least half their income on management, strategy development, campaigning and fundraising – not what most of us would consider ‘good causes’. My book, The Great Charity Scandal, is not an attack on charity, but an attack on charities that put their own interests first. LINK> www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2835947/The-Great-British-rake-really-happens-billions-donate-charity-Fat-cat-pay-appalling-waste-hidden-agendas.html
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jan 17, 2016 16:02:43 GMT
Everyone seems to agree that they do not like the sound of their own voice in recordings. I would like to think more about ideas for trying microphones made from bone materials and softer things than Hard plastics & metals. It might result in a sound that is more natural. Do you know why they place the wire in the centra of the Diaghphram? In an ear its free to vibrate evenly. How about the unique shape of the human ear? Is it too much "controversy" concerning too powerfull brain waves being included in the signal from a diaghphram that isnt "dampened" at the centre? or am I talking a load of old tosh? Those "guards" that they have in front of the Mic at broadcasting stations... the shape & design of the guards.. does this signify anything? I do not know... I just think that there are other designs that could result in your voice being heard just the way you hear it sound, without there being any other issues or problems. I think that metal & plastic are quite hard, and some softer materials and better design would be better for recording your voice as you hear it sound. Any thoughts on this? I dont think this is about "what is best" I think its all about how you want it to sound, not in quality, but style and character.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Mar 12, 2017 21:38:03 GMT
Hmmmmmmmm...
I was just on facebook and in one of the adverts inbetween... They now have a "Bowl light"
Electric neon light lights up the toilet bowl so you dont miss the mark...
Hmmmm :/
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on May 23, 2017 18:11:00 GMT
I havent Posted in this thread for a while.. but i decided today that i might do a petition to Branson at Virgin.... Because i saw this really nice awesome piece of land that said it had been sold.. and im wondering what for? i hope not to build on? Because it is a beautifull little spot.. and the motorway junction at Sandiacre i think needs to keep this land just as it is for natural beauty.. There is a decent visible sign board up... I thought.. why cant Virgin buy the land? its not that big.. they could put a virgin advert up on the sign board and they wouldnt be paying advertisers then... I thought Branson should be promoting his buisness, as liking the nice views of England.... so i came up with this idea.. "Virgin" LAND.. "Eye land?" nice too look at when you drive past & sponsored by virgin... Buy their products and they will preserve little pieces of Beautifull England from Horrible developers & the Highways Agency & Local councils. He could make money from it... do a coffee table book of all of his little beauty spots.. got to beat the Natural Trust? Gets lots of visibility from people at traffic lights but not too distracting as a TV media board. HELP! Doesnt quite look as cool with no trees leaves on in winter though.. lol You cant really see from these pics but theres a great charismatic track and field with trees... I saw it today.. i think the signs been up a while.. its called Sandy acre.. so is it a joke or what? Dont let the Highways road geometry team het their degree wastage jobsworth hold on it. Its like.. Beautiful land... to enjoy & look at.. dont let someone Go & Fuck it. There are only 40 or so main junctions on the M1 between London and Leeds.. every one is a important place.. we dont want it to go all developed buildings at those places
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Oct 8, 2017 19:36:37 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Oct 17, 2017 21:07:46 GMT
THE MEDICINE THEY HAVE PUT MY DAD ON IS CALLED Exenatide. They purport to claim it improves cognative function in Animals, but tests have not been confirmed on humans. And my own observations have found that it is severely detrimental to memory, attention and cognative function in humans. I find it extremely sinister how these chemical medicines are being created & administered to people with type II diabetes. I think that its all lies and that these medicines, like Metformin are extremely harmfull to humans. And people should be taken off them ASAP before any more damage is done to the human race. Thankfully they have admitted that a proper diet is the true best way to treat type II diabetes. Exenatide reduces TNF-α expression and improves hippocampal neuron numbers and memory in streptozotocin treated rats www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014299915302557Exenatide enhances cognitive performance and upregulates neurotrophic factor gene expression levels in diabetic mice. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26935863I think these studies have not been evaluated or conducted properly.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jun 6, 2018 17:27:08 GMT
I was watching a YouTube video a while back.. Could have been a Dr.Berg video, might have been somebody else..
But they were saying that in scientific tests on animals.. Ones that were fed less food lived longer.
And as your metabolism slows down when you diet.. Your cell turnover rate must be slower..
So I'm wondering if.. In light of the Cymatics book I have with the "cell division" algorithms of sound shapes.. That I previously talked about..
If the reason animals that eat less live longer.. Could be due to a reduced ageing rate? And also less chance of overactive cells that divide and become cancerous??
Just a thought.
If so then the current fast food market cannot be helping the cancer charities as really less food and less money is the answer?
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Oct 14, 2018 1:15:00 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jul 16, 2019 20:04:25 GMT
A guy was saying that everyone sending scooters from America has to mark them as normal or motorised now on the packing form. I wonder if they are trying to get people into using them?? Why i say that is because Marks & Spencers (not my shopping) have these tiny little shopping trolleys and baskets. You cannot fit much groceries in them! They are like little miniature scooters or something.. If people are going to get fit, loose weight and buy less groceries.. They might use motorised scooters instead of a car! No grocery space needed! How many scooters would you be able to buy for the cost of one trolley anyway!? Scooters lined up outside the supermarket to get home on instead of shopping trolleys!?
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jul 18, 2019 15:51:00 GMT
Now they want to stop young drivers driving at night time... So if you go to a friends house you are stuck there and cant get home? How stupid. We need a "Ban" on these stupid ideas. Why don't they just Admit they want to get rid of all humans & replace us with ROBOTS? Its just ridiculous. Why have MPS? what was wrong with the 1930 Road traffic act? why have MPs? cant we just get rid of the government & have 5 year Parliament like the world CUP once every 5 years and just leave the law alone.. We don't need to pay these people to do these jobs. If the law stayed the same & humans evolved.. then no laws would be broken there would be Zero crime.. and it would be the law that needed changing because people were in fact restricted by it, in evolution. Its just pointless. Instead of wacky laws.. we need to think about it properly. Now we have crazy wanna be Prime Ministers waving Kippers around... letting their inhibitions go.. They will be dancing the streets naked soon. If we had "mini Buses" like VW campers everywhere, we would not even need cars so much & people could get them if they wanted take it or leave it. There should be more rally & race tracks if people want to race around. Stupid laws that make no sense.. load space v goods space. Has Arnold got "Goods" or "personal effects" in his briefcase?
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jul 18, 2019 16:30:49 GMT
Do you think the Head Legal advisors around the UK will get their passports accepted, when they have been ignoring published DVLC driving licence statements? Would you trust them with your lunch money?
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jan 4, 2020 18:25:54 GMT
Wow...
Following the topic of The Prince William and David Attenborough prize for environmental world challenge..
"Sea Squares" could be an interesting option instead of a floating bridge or wall..
Actual enclosures that are movable..
You set them up.. and drain the seawater out of them...
Thus creating electricity from water motion.. great force.
Its total opposite of salmon cages..
The objectives can be multiple..
1. Filter plastic from the sea. 2. Generate electricity 3. Exploration of large sections of seabed for archaeological and environmental purposes
The Sea squares need to be water tight and large... either quarter, half or 1 mile square..
Depending on what can be manufactured..
They could have tourist attraction value for additional funding...
There could be great multiple use potential..
I still think the floating sea bridge from UK to Ireland is a good idea and use up plastic as it floats and doesn't break down easily..
The scaremongering about ocean plastic is propaganda from existing power companies and wind farms.
You can actually filter the ocean. Not contaminate it. Quite the opposite.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jan 4, 2020 18:30:45 GMT
The each wall could be designed like a web matrix of joints waving with the ocean currents.... So instead of breaking it would only move and ripple generating huge electricity all the time... much better than wind farms.. as it would have much more multiple uses..
The best solutions are multiple solution not single solution
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jan 19, 2020 21:55:59 GMT
Wow...
So... I was talking about the idea to have giant "Sea Cubes" to make electricity with.. out in the ocean.. parting off the sea so we can also do archeological work as well..
Anyway..
I was watching Dr.Who just now... You know the Tardis is bigger on the inside?
Well, what about the fact a lot of Americans have a swimming pool?
How about a house that is bigger on the outside and smaller on the inside?
Basically you don't need an ocean of water to get the huge force to generate pressure for electricity!
Forget solar panels on the roof, forget a wind turbine...
What about a house dropped into a cube of water?! So... the house is actually inside the water cube...
And the pressure is so great against the walls that they all move and it creates electricity!! It also should insulate the house very well as well so less of the electricity for heating! I mean, you only need a small amount for appliances.. not that much really...
It would always be working.. it wouldn't rely on water running in any direction or circuit...
In fact... just now, when I got to typing this... I've just also realised that in Dr.No they have that wall with fish swimming.. but its supposed to be under crab quay, under the sea... very thick glass..
I think you could actually have part of the house underground and the other part above ground..
The plan would be houses further apart like in the countryside... not closer together..
Or else those that used this technology would need decent size gardens anyway..
The house essentially would be free to run. You would automatically have space to grow your own vegetables then as well.
I haven't read this idea anywhere else yet.. not to say if anyone has had the same idea or already done it...
I think its viable.. There must be an advantage to the extra insulation in the uk, because then in winter it would be like an entire radiator around the whole house..
This also has got to be better than those wind things everywhere..
And so far solar panels are not that good.. Unless the entire attic is a reflective light catcher reflecting light around and generating heat as well....
I think the insulation itself would help reduce need for a lot of the power also..
I'm pretty certain the weight of the house itself and gravity would keep movement so electricity was always generated.. and pressure against all the walls..
Obviously you don't want to be sea sick.. But if there was an upper storey... that would be even more force..
There are loads of things you could do..
Haven't they already done this in Venice? Where it's all flooded?
|
|