|
Post by Administrator on Aug 22, 2021 20:56:28 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Aug 24, 2021 20:26:57 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 19, 2021 2:36:26 GMT
This has Judge Nicholas Watson written all over it!!
Amazing evidence of judges who break the law and have serious issues
Watson is a serial abuser who perverts the course of justice and abuses victims..
By breaking procedure rules. The crown prosecution service also have abusers within the organisation,
I think i will send this into the CPS and office of JCOI as its just like my own investigations!!
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 19, 2021 15:01:42 GMT
Well... there is a new Series just gone up on YouTube.
Predator DC investigating Judges and CIA and Senators
This is my opinion on it
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 26, 2021 23:49:47 GMT
In July 2008, Attorney General Baroness Scotland of Asthal named Starmer as the new Head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and Director of Public Prosecutions; he took over from Ken Macdonald on 1 November 2008. Macdonald, himself a former defence lawyer, publicly welcomed the appointment.
π
James Gordon Brown HonFRSE is a British politician who served as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom and Leader of the Labour Party from 2007 to 2010. He served as Chancellor of the Exchequer in the Blair government from 1997 to 2007. Wikipedia
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 28, 2021 4:46:54 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 30, 2021 17:19:42 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Oct 3, 2021 15:18:42 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Oct 3, 2021 19:38:08 GMT
Pope Francis and Primate of England the Archbishop of Canterbury endorse the climate as a legitimate cause.. in the recent "Joint statement on the protection of creation" Archbishop outranks the Prime Minister. Also as The Prince Charles also has taken part in Civil Disobedience and also outranks the Prime Minister, i dont think that Priti Patel and Borris get it at all or understand the realm and fundamental structure of Britain and the Commonwealth.
They are like Children in a toy shop playing with legislation and rights that they do not understand. I. Order to attempt to get their own way and control of the machine...
Just as Borris unlawfully Prorogued parliament.
Will someone arrest the pair of them.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Nov 21, 2021 20:30:48 GMT
There are some serious issues now arising with the integrity of Justices... In the Extinction Rebellion cases at least. And this is exactly the reason that rights exist. The Right to Petition. And why courts of civil and criminal law are not permitted to hear politically connected petition cases and matters of their actions, facts or circumstances. free image hostingExtinction Rebellion are reluctant to try this rights claim but have had plenty chance to try other things... With all the cases though. I had this looked at by Emma Fudge DJ Fudge right at the start before XR cases started really... And she thought there was enough in its validity to arrange a seperate hearing under rights. Not as defence or plea. But Nicholas Watson DJ Watson tricked me out of time and even presenting it properly. It was never presented or heard .. Jonathan, with new revelations of corrupt judges, cant you see why this is the law, and right?? With business connections and interests in the campaign and environment from opposition.. side.. cant you see why the judiciary are not allowed to get involved in any matters of political pursuit. And why law was irrelevant in Ian Bray case... Law didnt matter. Was pure opinion of public. Jury (the offence side too) as law didn't matter or have to be acknowledged.. That is why the right protects from legislation. See how the legislation was overridden?? By public opinion. Which is where the signatures and public support come in. Its a national matter. All facts circumstances.. Its clear in the history that parliament deal with it. Not the courts. I don't think its a long shot. Its about getting them to understand it. I think deep down you know you have the RIGHT to do what you do. Or you wouldn't be there doing it. And if you believe you are doing the right thing you can never be guilty of a crime, when in your mind it was the right thing to do. Hence the term RIGHT.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Dec 2, 2021 6:06:28 GMT
As the Ian Bray case proves... Law has no effect on a Jury's opinion. The people are the deciders. Law itself can be overriden. And the principle here is that the public signing petitions... Are validating the actions and cause of the petitioning. This supports the Right itself that all prosecutions and orders are unlawful. The Petitioner cannot be attacked by the sword of justice. To do so is unlawful. Therefore no defence in law is needed. Because there can be no case for prosecution. Any strike of attack by prosecution is unlawfull. Illegal. Courts of the Kings bench (Queens Bench). The Crown courts with Jury and magistrates courts... The Jurisdiction is the Parliament where the Monarch resides (Both Houses in tandem) or if there is no parliament, the Privy Council, Monarch directly. The Right to Petition the Subjects does not require the elected Ministers. The "Electors" of Ministers and Councillors are likewise signing petition on a matter with the same powers as they elect Electors with.. Only on one single matter and course of actions that are being petitioned. Not the full spectrum of Council or Government. It could very well be in opposition to Ministers or any Franchise, or Councillors.. or Royal Officers or the Monarch. The Right cannot be changed by any law or enactment committed. The Ministers have no legal right to attempt to change the right AS IT IS and WAS. No law. Shall be made to change from then to now, by any Minister or Government. Be warned to attempt to make orders to abridge the right in any way AS IT STANDS is ILLEGAL. I draw attention to Boris Johnson and Priti Patel therefore and the Lords.. That the proposed Policing Bill is illegal.. and poses unlawful enactment. The Parliament can NOT enact completely as it desires. It is restricted and forbidden.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Dec 3, 2021 3:59:49 GMT
Some writing of origin of the term constable (Keeper of the Stables)
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Dec 3, 2021 4:05:27 GMT
Just some notes for my reference,
From a Facebook conversation...
Outlining the "compatibility" in law.. Of the right to petition and proceedings in which Ian Bray was aquitted.. and those proceedings being evidence of "compatibility"
Further evidence is the basic of legal requirement of assistance from all parties and the fact you can claim charitable work. For orders being discharged. And that who can validate what is charitable is the public, Jury.. and that registered charity can be comparable to public supported petition
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Dec 3, 2021 4:06:16 GMT
There is actually a video as well.. I made but i prefer to record it again..
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jan 7, 2022 1:19:50 GMT
|
|