|
Post by Administrator on Dec 30, 2020 23:07:00 GMT
I know I've already recorded this but it needs to be in this thread as well
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Dec 30, 2020 23:07:53 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Dec 30, 2020 23:47:39 GMT
Ive found the relevance of this, quite significant especially in study of the origins of the "right to object" in building and planning as well as in grievances as well.. because also petition for marriage and divorce is connected Now, in law itself especially when seeking employment of a Lawyer.. The Lawyer should be "unbiased" neutral. So its actually not ridiculous to actually ask a lawyer, Crown prosecutor or even a probation officer . If in carrying out their duties... If there is "any personal reason why your representation, complaint or other request for work" cannot be 100% honestly and truthfully undertaken.. may they let that reason be know now" Because really it may be that even a paid, employed lawyer might not be best representing your interests to their full or honest capacity.. Basically it's good to check that they are 100% behind you. grammarist.com/phrase/speak-now-or-forever-hold-your-peace/#:~:text=Speak%20now%20or%20forever%20hold%20your%20peace%20is%20a%20phrase,now%20used%20in%20everyday%20language.&text=This%20phrase%20is%20derived%20from,communities%20was%20at%20best%2C%20spotty.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Dec 31, 2020 14:18:58 GMT
Didn't realise but my youtube discussions will be automatically transcribed So its possible to get a download of the lectures/statements 🤔
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jan 1, 2021 0:37:26 GMT
Also..
Another important and correct way of understanding the Right to Petition..
As written into the 1688 Bill of Rights..
Is very much like a certain form of "witness protection"
Because obviously the petitioner bringing the particular evidence or grievances against the government or to government would require such protection..
We know witnesses require special protection in very important big criminal cases. And a very serious important action and evidence brought by way of petitioning the government is no different.
So it must be intellectualised and understood as the very first and original form of witness protection made in law, as a right.
This is correct.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jan 1, 2021 16:44:41 GMT
Also, any Minister, Any Judge, any Police officer or Lord.. anyone who is suspected of or found to be causing an offence or lying or involved in crime..
Automatically forfeits their authority to punishment against the witnesses/plaintiff/accuser/petitioner for that evidence to be free to be brought/delivered
Evil Ministers/Judges cannot use their authority against the petition.
That's the one rule.
And, if an illegal prosecution is brought.. for an offence that is against a petitioner..
For example the dangerous driving charge against myself when I was investigating Illegal road signage on the A42 as part of a wider ongoing investigation..
If the facts and circumstances of that investigation and the reason and purpose of it, are ignored in the prosecution case...
That is example of judges omission of serious critical information.
The prosecution omitting or ignoring serious critical information.
As we say... the pursuit of the most serious offence in a set of facts and circumstances is always the priority. And exactly whom it is that is to blame.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jan 2, 2021 0:46:54 GMT
"Specials" are not ordinary coppers.
They are part time "volunteers" unpaid. Police.
Also I want to note that the lawyers that volunteer for charities like "pro bono" is also voluntary work unpaid.
Therefore a investigation petition that is done for the public free of charge "unpaid" is clearly voluntary work.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jan 19, 2021 16:11:51 GMT
Dam YouTube... Even banned Trump while he is still president.. Absolutely illegal. Their Maverick young lawyers are wack. And seriously have "issues"
They even banned TalkRadio briefly!
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Feb 11, 2021 18:28:48 GMT
Pure Logic determines we CAN petition about identi individuals. the current government policy is illegal and in breach of the right to Petition itself.
are "immigrants" identifiable people?
are "the elderly"
they can and must be petitioned about.
therefore, "Protesters" and in fact..
and group, and people and therefore persons.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Feb 22, 2021 14:31:56 GMT
USE OF MOTOR VEHICLES ON ROADS IN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND RESPECT OF RIGHTS. EVIDENCE FROM THE KING GEORGE 1930s ROAD TRAFFIC ACT. russian image hostOK, I've got to do a video discussion on this!! I totally understand this, but haven't been feeling like doing the video yet... I've got the notes and understanding correct.. Thinking I feel more like writing it all than talking about it. :/ One think that comes to mind... I'm starting to think this might have a lot more to do with The Prince Phillips meddling in the passing of legislation.. Because King George's government clearly have a great respect and admiration for Rights and special acts of law.. even in connection with the Road Traffic acts. It's not something that's "legislated upon" though in this or even modern Road Traffic regulations acts.. Its about the "interpretation" and the references and acknowledgements that are sited in the act. Fundamental principles and understanding of existing law and how it interacts with not just this act, but other acts and special acts.. Its how its written in respect of those other fundamental principles... Which is "ignored" and failed to be "sited" in the modern acts. This 1930s act, serves to confirm all my previous interpretation and theories and study findings of how these rights apply and interact with the road traffic acts. Therefore the Crown prosecution service and courts need to study and acknowledge these act's as evidence that in fact.. They have no power to make an order or hear a case, when a special act of law or right is being invoked. And such rights as the Right to petition. Clearly DO apply to road traffic acts. When protection of parties is being used through special acts of law and powers, given to us by order and enactments of Parliament.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Feb 22, 2021 14:44:23 GMT
I will cover the evidence contained within the 1930s Road Traffic act... in detail. Please bear with me
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Feb 22, 2021 14:49:51 GMT
Actually... what we find..
Since The Prince Philip came onto the scene is the gradually theft of our rights!! With Actually most recent atrocities by Tony Blair and David Cameron and now Borris Johnson.
By petition committee manipulation, misinformation and printing of illegal policy.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Feb 26, 2021 21:49:22 GMT
There is now confirmation of compatibility between the Road Traffic acts and Bill of Rights "Right to petition" claim..
By merit of it being a special act of law /order by Parliament. Of protection from liability and risks involved in the use of motor vehicles on roads.. in circumstances and facts pertaining to the pursuit of meeting the objective of the petitioning.
Authority given to the person who has the legal right to be protected from risks and liability arising out of the pursuit of the cause.
Also we find that this Authority is conferred on any person.
Separate parts of brief
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Feb 28, 2021 6:14:38 GMT
Got my head around this now!
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Feb 28, 2021 6:42:02 GMT
|
|