Post by Administrator on Sept 14, 2016 21:37:38 GMT
*images don't seem to be loading for display here... They are still hosted and can be viewed directly by entering the individual links Into browser bar. Thanks I will try find out why they aren't loading/displaying
Right click - save. Various campaign artwork. Make of it what you will. I have changed the general theme quite a lot. Obviously there are conflicts of interest between road safety, corruption, authority complex and this has been tackled with comedy and parody at times. You can use/reproduce the artwork to get signatures on the bentcop.biz petitions. The artwork is exempted from ASA regulations for this purpose and protected from all prosecutions. Please dont litter. Free to use.
Post by Administrator on Sept 18, 2016 8:37:47 GMT
Ok, so this new legislation (unless it was already in the 2002 TSRGD or additional manuals) allows any person who is unauthorized, to BE authorized to place any sign for the purpose of warning drivers of an obstruction in the road.
And any missing, unlawfull, illegal or sign in bad condition is catergorized by the Department of Transport as an obstruction in the road. That is what they class it as.
As you have become an Authorized person under those circumstances, you can use any method of placing or attatching a sign, as any Authorized person for whatever purpose or duration you deem the sign needing to be in place for. Thus metal brackets, rope, sandbags, plastic tags, stickers, or any method that any authorized council authority or Highways agency employs in use for notice or sign attatchment can be used. (obviously i would say) other than the fact it is a prescribed sign. The intent to place such sign is not criminal. There are similar laws where all you need is "good reason" or lawfull reason. The Bill of rights would be lawful reason (lae based reason) for example to be exempted from criminal damage by placing a notice. Because in law there is a law-related option for giving reason of exemption from the offence if you can state a law that is relevant. Obviously placing a petition notice carry an associated lawful related exemption which is the right to petition.
So, for example, the petition materials are already covered by exclusive cognisance for work for Parliament, also covered by the Bill or rights, rights of the subject, right to petition. AND now in addition to this - because the petition is concerning dangerous, unlawfull and illegal road signage, and warning drivers of it - the petition notices and stickers, signs are now also covered by the TSRGD 2016 - You are authorized to place any sign warning drivers of an obstruction in the road - or obstructions in the road.
With these three legislations together - The New TSRGD, the Bill of rights 1688 and Exclusive cognisance, there can be no challenge at all from the Police, local council or Government over the placement of any petition sign or notice, by the road to warn drivers of unlawfull, illegal or missing road signage. Especially if it is for a petition to parliament concerning the matter as well.
I will be interested, now to put this to West Yorkshire and Greater Manchester police, over the Illegal Arrest against me by Sgt. Phil Tyson of Manninghan Police station, Bradford - Lilycroft Road. For Criminal Damages, when I was obviously not a criminal, and clearly using my civil rights to petition the public over concerns about unlawull, illegal and missing road signage in connection to police speed camera enforcement.
I do not know if the TSRGD legislation limits the authorisation to place a sign/notice to that specific road. by Name or road, or by area covered under its TRO Traffic regulation order. But if the sign concerns matters of National concern over the entire country.. then it should not be challenged on any road.
You could give example.... It is necessary to Place a sign for the destination of LONDON. on a Road in West Yorkshire? when London is hundreds of miles away? Thus why not place a warning sign in West Yorkshire of unlawfull and illegal obstructions in the road in London?
Ultimately the Prosecution/Police led prosecution are the ones to debate any concerns with over the matter. Possibly the answer might be to petition the police themselves - If by law the police would allow that even without obstruction to your political rights?
I will just check up on exactly what the requirements of such a sign need to be. Specification wise. And then i could design a special warning sign for the petition that can be lawfully placed.
Though, i believe that this legislation existing to "Give authorisation to warn drivers of unlawful road signs, combined with the Bill of rights" - is enough to give more than good reason, in fact lawful reason why you can place petition notices and be authorized to do so, especially for a petition about unlawfull road signs - as this 2016 legislation demonstrates in law that there is a right of citizens to place signs & notices to warn drivers about unlawfull and incorrect road signage. And that you are not "Criminal" for wanting to do so.
There is no intent of crime behind it. no intent of criminal damage. There is exemption from regulations and the giving of Authorisation. Which added to the Bill of Rights, right to petition is plenty evidence in law that putting petition stickers on speed cameras to warn drivers about unlawful road signage has no criminal intent behind it or motivation at all.
And any person prosecuted for such acts, has been done so wrongly. That would include challenging any person over the removal of the petition notices and stopping on any road or highway, or even motorway to place such a sign or notice.
Because if you can place a sign or notice on a motorway, then obviously you must be authorized to stop on such a motorway to place a warning sign, or else it would be impossible to place it.
Post by Administrator on Sept 18, 2016 10:31:04 GMT
Ta-Da! the Bentcop.biz brand warning sign, which can be placed by any person, lawfully to warn drivers of unlawful, incomplete, illegal or incorrect road signs or markings, or anything else classed as an obstruction in the road! less than 15% of the surface of this sign is covered by the construction component of the manufacturers brand! I will see how much it is going to cost to get these made! There could be a triple sided version as well! the manufacturers brand can be incorporated into the stand construction!
It can state on the reverse side that the sign will be removed on the date the unlawfull road signage it is warning drivers of has been corrected!
The sign will conform to all regulations! I could sell them on ebay! It will need a sand though. But it only says it needs a stand to comply with the regulations. There is in fact nothing to say that you cannot use another type of attachment method, such as metal brackets or stickers. Because it is only assumed that you would not have those available, and require a temporary stand to be sufficient to support the sign on the road. As i have repeatedly stated, the council place and remove stickers. Sticker use is not a criminal offence, if done with "Good reason" or authority. The TSRGD gives you authority to place the sign. The local council use "Sign stickers" as well. Once you have authority to place a sign, temporary or permanent, the removal of the sign is absorbed by the local authority. It is not a crminal offence or fine against an individual person. Also, you can remove any sign or notice yourself, after being informed by the council in writing. Note that West Yorkshire police and the 5 borough councils of West Yorkshire did not inform me in writing to remove any of my petition notices before they were removed by police officer Alan White. The Bill of Rights gives you authority to oppose any local authority without authorization over any political matter, through petitioning. And there is no criminal intent to place petition notices or stickers to inform the public or drivers about either 1. a petition and how/where to sign it. 2. an obstruction in the road/unlawful road signage.
webpage by... BOB BOILEN March 27, 2011 - 10:44 AM ET can you believe it?!
There are 6 video tracks on that webpage!
If you are not yet certain what this has to do with anything... check out my thread on the LTI ultralyte speed gun and trying to find the infra red beam it shines onto cars! (videos in more recent posts in that thread)
The UK Tele-traffic uk manufacturer of the LTI 1000 Mr Garratte looks like David Gillmore of pink floyd, and the album cover of Dark side of the Moon features a laser beam being broken by a triangle. a Pink triangle sign is not red. and not authorised for use. it is unlawfull. thus any LTI police laser beam device used on a road with pink instead of red borders around any signs, is not submissible prosecution evidence. co-incidences?
The disturbing thing is that there is a specific law for not complying with a school crossing sign (red triangle with school children shown) and a lot of those signs are dangerous, unlawfull, pink instead or red, no ID markings, old, worn or made to look "vintage" when they are supposed to be warning of children & schools. The Pink Floyd song "Another brick in the wall" features school children singing. Slightly different spelling to signing! co-incidences? or a Government New Deal joke on setting up Tele-traffic uk?
Dark Side of the Moon is one of the biggest grossing music albums of all time. Not unlike the Speed camera network's visual album of prosecution photographs and videos.
Post by Administrator on Sept 18, 2016 11:49:20 GMT
In fact, the sign would be likely only to warn one direction... i dont think there is anything that requires the reverse side of it? It could have the Bentcop.biz petition brand on the rear, for non-proffit campaign sponsorship/funding. I will have to check... but look at these examples.. i dont see anywhere that specifies a removal date on them...
Some are 3d!
1688 Bill of Rights - The right to Petition - It is the Right of the Subjects to petition the Queen & all Commitments & Prosecutions for doing so are illegal.
When I was younger, My Friend introduced me to the books... I did not realise that most of them had been released already... We were getting into & Buying the "New release" style cover ones. I was semi-aware of the older cover versions.. but I onloy thought there were about a dozen or so of the storys written...
So when these new cover releases were getting published, I thought the Storys were brand new as well! which it turens out at the time - a Lot were not..
I do not think I would have liked & got into the Books if that Re-release of them had not happened. Because the front covers of the books just do not inspire my imagination on the design & layout of the earlier versions..
In fact.. since that time there seems to have been LOTS of later re-releases & some of the covers are silly! like the City of Thieves book with actual photographs on it photo-shopped!
Ive just got Forest of doom and I am really dissapointed that its the first release! because the seller cheekily advertised the book as the later release version, photo on this ebay listing!
For me, at that Age, I did enjoy reading the books, but rather than actually following the story coherently.. (I did manage to) it was more about the "Idea" of each book... the Maps, the Illustrations, Characters, Cover and places.. the "world" the mental contruct and unique style that was conjured up in my mind from each of the books, and how they contrasted with each other the other books..
Some were.. like for example "Appointment with F.E.A.R... a unique "idea" like a combination of a Future film like "Blade Runner" mixed with "a James Bond villain" or a Spiderman Villain.
Here is the Poster for Appointment with fear... I think that the Yellow comic style writing font, used on that specific edition release around the time i was reading them realy worked. And though I love the artwork, I think that the yellow font just makes it "Work".
The added bonus here is that.... The Character looks like Sgt. Phil Tyson!! and the beams are just like LTI ultralyte beams in & out chambers! from his spectacles AND the Circuit is JUST LIKE THE LTI ULTRLYTE DEVICE! and its a villain with it, in the Frank Garratte tele-traffic uk style, David Gillmore dark side of the moon! do you think the artist knew about the LTI?! at the time?
see how all the different versions have a different overall vibe.
its a bit like me doing these adverts in the Newspaper... the Daily Mail didnt do my advert as i wanted it! i really think that if Dean Abraham had done it as i designed it, i would have got a lot more visits to my website and signatures!
I think the banner would have been a lot better by itself.
here some of the Fighting Fantasy books where i prefer one cover version over the others. i think the artwork alone on some seems incomplete without the title designs and layout i am used to seeing.. at the time i owned some of these books.
Cavern of the Snow Witch. At the time i thought the story was brand new hot off the press! i didnt have the internet and wasnt a book geek going to publisher events. i just bought the books. They were adding new ones that we were buying and sharing reading them, as we caught up to the realeases as they came out!
I remember that we did a "Talk" at School and I did mine on the Fighting Fantasy books! a few of my friends brought their collections in and we put them together into the full collection on the table, just to admire it! haha.
Post by Administrator on Sept 25, 2016 18:15:03 GMT
The Warlock of Firetop Mountain. There is actually a stone wall behind the illusionist. I never have seen the image in this detail before! I wrote a song about staring at walls.. and you can create lots of ideas from "nowhere" just being inside.
the "magic globe" does look like an LTI beam moon spot. and infact, the LTI on a flat wall gives a more consistent reading than on the front of a car... where you get the slip effect from the "illusion" of a faster or slower speed!
a Dragon. "Drag" the beam along the car bonnet? and very LTI like-strange antenna from the "WARlocks" head. Police "Locked" in constant WAR with the driver.. by the "Warlocks of the Ministrys of Justice" and Transport departments.
a Powell Peralta "Chris Senn" on sale in "Madrid" Spain! real or not real?!
Here look... the Chris Senn Cop board.. i dont think i have seen a higher priced skateboard. I bought my friend a Boba Fett star wars limited edition skateboard, for a birthday present a while back. Because it was in a huge blister pack! like a star wars figure used to be in. because he collects classic star wars figures & boba fet is his fave character.... i though that was expensive, but the price on the Chris Senn.. Also i realised that Boba Fett, sound like "A Bob of Phet" as in the slang for amphetmines?!
G. is for gun. J. is for jail and D. is for donut.
Also Santa Cruz is a bit like Santa cruizing around on his Sled delivering presents for kids?!
Do you think there is a contest on for the highest priced skateboard ever?!
Post by Administrator on Sept 27, 2016 13:46:17 GMT
Ive got quite a few decent ideas for some more bentcop.biz designs.
its just that my other hard drive was forced to crash, by suspected hack. and i havent installed any image editor yet. ive been using paint and just the free online image editor, which is really basic...
So i have been hindered from doing any more artwork properly for quite a while...
1688 Bill of Rights - The right to Petition - It is the Right of the Subjects to petition the Queen & all Commitments & Prosecutions for doing so are illegal.
Administrator: There are some problems with my hosting site. Images will not be able to be displayed within threads until & resolve the issue. I am working on fixing it. Sorry about this
Feb 22, 2020 15:39:42 GMT