Post by Administrator on Jan 3, 2017 2:14:20 GMT
I haven't opened the parcel yet.
But I think that it is probably the Electronic Speed sign that I donated to the Police and Council originally before they sent the case to Calderdale magistrates court.
The Speed sign cannot be used on the bypass because its 2 lanes. Yet Blackpool council use one on a dual lane road..
If it is the electronic speed sign.. I wonder if I can get the money back from it or sell it ?
As I'm pretty skint at the moment. :/
Ive just got the invoice out and it was £1,652.93 on the 17/01/2014 to SWARCO traffic ltd.
And you might think its very expensive, but if we compare this device to the Tele-traffic UK model of the LTI laser - the "1000" model.. its a joke really.. because the LTI devices are like dinky toy casio keyboards with a couple of glass lens, which cant cost more than a couple of Pint glasses. And really i dont think that the 1000 model is that different from the "Compact" model which has a stronger laser than the LR 100. And the "Configuration" is just a matter of twiddling a few things around inside.. And as for different software and hardware.. Phht.
hmmm...
So I dont see how he is asking £5,000 for one. In fact the original LR100 ultralyte really in theory.. even though they arent selling as many as "Toys-R-US" shouldnt be any more than a casio keyboard, or a £100 printer. There really is nothing to it, the circuitboard is just like a kids robot toy... look at all those new ones they have like in the Argos Christmas Advert!!
And as for the Concept and Ranger systems being £15,000... you are paying Frank Gattett and Mike Ricketts apparently for their "Expertise" and "Ongoing service" not really for the equipment.. when ive found people making infra red night vision cameras and equipment from similar video devices and components for only "a few hundred pounds".
And as for "Computer systems".. well... any buisness pays a computer guru £1,000 to sit there and install windows for half a day, when its a matter of pressing "Next" on the screen...
So really... Tele-traffic is "Sponsored" by "The public" which the police use our money to make Garrett into a dream millionaire in his perfect dream job of "Getting you" not just getting you, but tricking you, trapping you and taking YOUR dream job away from YOU, for the rewards of a Chiefs Medal and Honour.
Only that they could have just put up electronic speed signs for a fraction of the cost of Tele-traffic running costs..
And set the roads to consistent speed limits with the correct lawfull road signs.. and the accident rate would be more of less the same.
Only that.. if the Government has banned cars that go over 70mph and made them illegal 10 years ago... there would have been HALF the accidents. Less than Half the Prosecutions, trouble, Work & Hassle,
And the remaining number of accidents would be a lot less SERIOUS to be Blaming the Driver all the time and put some responsibility onto the pedestrian & cyclist as well... then if you take LONDON out of the figures.. you are left with a LOT LESS problem than what they are making it out to BE..
AND.. instead of a massive hole in the deficit.. it would just be Frank Garrett and Tele-traffic UK, going out with a lollypop stick to the remaining few trouble areas that are probably designed rubbish in the first place...
So we might as well have just Paid Garrett to go to Spain and bought him a retirement villa and saved all the hassle and money.
Or we could have split Garreets fortune with all the other Bobbys on the Beat and they might have been bothered to check the road signs properly as they would have been paid more and given more of a dam about it all?
But I think that it is probably the Electronic Speed sign that I donated to the Police and Council originally before they sent the case to Calderdale magistrates court.
The Speed sign cannot be used on the bypass because its 2 lanes. Yet Blackpool council use one on a dual lane road..
If it is the electronic speed sign.. I wonder if I can get the money back from it or sell it ?
As I'm pretty skint at the moment. :/
Ive just got the invoice out and it was £1,652.93 on the 17/01/2014 to SWARCO traffic ltd.
And you might think its very expensive, but if we compare this device to the Tele-traffic UK model of the LTI laser - the "1000" model.. its a joke really.. because the LTI devices are like dinky toy casio keyboards with a couple of glass lens, which cant cost more than a couple of Pint glasses. And really i dont think that the 1000 model is that different from the "Compact" model which has a stronger laser than the LR 100. And the "Configuration" is just a matter of twiddling a few things around inside.. And as for different software and hardware.. Phht.
hmmm...
So I dont see how he is asking £5,000 for one. In fact the original LR100 ultralyte really in theory.. even though they arent selling as many as "Toys-R-US" shouldnt be any more than a casio keyboard, or a £100 printer. There really is nothing to it, the circuitboard is just like a kids robot toy... look at all those new ones they have like in the Argos Christmas Advert!!
And as for the Concept and Ranger systems being £15,000... you are paying Frank Gattett and Mike Ricketts apparently for their "Expertise" and "Ongoing service" not really for the equipment.. when ive found people making infra red night vision cameras and equipment from similar video devices and components for only "a few hundred pounds".
And as for "Computer systems".. well... any buisness pays a computer guru £1,000 to sit there and install windows for half a day, when its a matter of pressing "Next" on the screen...
So really... Tele-traffic is "Sponsored" by "The public" which the police use our money to make Garrett into a dream millionaire in his perfect dream job of "Getting you" not just getting you, but tricking you, trapping you and taking YOUR dream job away from YOU, for the rewards of a Chiefs Medal and Honour.
Only that they could have just put up electronic speed signs for a fraction of the cost of Tele-traffic running costs..
And set the roads to consistent speed limits with the correct lawfull road signs.. and the accident rate would be more of less the same.
Only that.. if the Government has banned cars that go over 70mph and made them illegal 10 years ago... there would have been HALF the accidents. Less than Half the Prosecutions, trouble, Work & Hassle,
And the remaining number of accidents would be a lot less SERIOUS to be Blaming the Driver all the time and put some responsibility onto the pedestrian & cyclist as well... then if you take LONDON out of the figures.. you are left with a LOT LESS problem than what they are making it out to BE..
AND.. instead of a massive hole in the deficit.. it would just be Frank Garrett and Tele-traffic UK, going out with a lollypop stick to the remaining few trouble areas that are probably designed rubbish in the first place...
So we might as well have just Paid Garrett to go to Spain and bought him a retirement villa and saved all the hassle and money.
Or we could have split Garreets fortune with all the other Bobbys on the Beat and they might have been bothered to check the road signs properly as they would have been paid more and given more of a dam about it all?