Post by Administrator on Jun 27, 2015 21:37:55 GMT
SO, There is one huge deal here, that what exactly was said & presented in a Magistrates court hearing is not put on record. No artists impression, and nothing to prove any evidence was even seen by the Magistrates or even produced by the prosecution or COURT CLERK. IN TERMS OF REQUESTING A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS... THERE ISNT ONE. ONLY FILES & DOCUMENTS IN AN OFFICE DRAWER, DID THEY EVER LEAVE & IN THE COURT STAFF ROOM IN SOCIAL DISCUSSION OF THE IMPENDING CASE WHAT DIABOLICAL SCHEMES ARE PUT INTO ACTION BY "personal conduct and behaviour" regarding how the case is presented & what is said?
( COURT CLERKS HAVE A HABIT OF NEVER FAILING TO "REMEMBER" TO INFORM THE MAGISTRATES OF VITAL LITTLE PIECES OF INFORMATION CRITICAL FOR MAXIMUM CONVICTION POINTS.) Yet seem to have a very failing memory when IMPORTANT LEGAL DOCUMENTS AND FACTS NEED TO BE WAVED UNDER THE NOSE OF THE MAGISTRATES. OR IS THAT THE LEGAL ADVISOR???
This might be important, but NEWSPAPER REPORTERS may have had many or some attendances to driving conviction prosecution hearings, so they might be a good source to approach for historic records of what exactly when on at court hearings... ESPECIALLY IF THEY WERE VERY FAR AWAY AND IT WOULD HAVE BEEN A VERY LONG WAY TO DRIVE TO ATTEND THE HEARING, OR IF YOU SENT THE DEFENSE OR MITIGATION BY EMAIL, IN THE POST OR TO THE CENTRAL TICKET OFFICE INSTEAD OF THE COURT. OR TO BOTH, OR IF YOU DID SEND IT TO THE COURT BUT IT SEEMED TO MAKE NO DIFFERENCE TO THE OUTCOME OF THE HEARING???
This is just a quick post as I am short of time here.....
But I will endeavor to make a FULL detailed post of my "STRATAGEM DE COURTSY AND CO"
Which is an art of DECEPTION DESIGNED TO BE A CONFUSION IN LEGAL PROCESS WHERE YOU DO NOT KNOW EXACTLY WHAT YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO DO AND WITH WHOM BEFORE THE WHOLE THING IS OVER AFTER MUCH PARRY FROM THE CENTRAL PROCESS TICKET OFFICES & BUREAUS.
(Much like parking ticket contests with councils whom pass you off to some agent down south)
Well... I never claim I might not be wrong but Have a look into it yourselves and a think.. While we get ready to delve into the world of "CLARK KENT" or was that the prosecution? WHO IS THE LEGAL ADVISOR IN THIS COURT!!??
DOES THIS COURT KNOW THE MEANING OF THE WORD COMPLAINT? AND DO THEY BELIEVE IN THE LORD GOD JESUS CHRIST WHEN HE MIGHT SAY: THE COURT HAS NO POWERS TO CONVICT, OR THIS PROSECUTION IS ILLEGAL! OR I WISH TO REPORT THE COURT STAFF FOR FRAUD!
It may fall on dead ears.
More soon We have barely scratched the surface! Make certain the evidence arrives to you on time to have adequate time to inspect & evaluate it! If it arrives at all!
Did the CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE EVEN GET THE EVIDENCE IN TIME FOR A PROPER EVALUATION??
WHAT ABOUT AUTOMATED CONITIONAL OFFER CONVICTIONS? WHO EXACTLY ARE POLICE LEGAL SERVICES? CAN YOU FILL IN THE GAPS BETWEEN ALL THESE PERSONS & DEPARTMENTS?
WHOM INVESTIGATES POLICE SECTION .87 OFFENCES OR IS THAT SECTION .89?? WHERE IS THE SECTION FORM TO COMPLETE? DOES IT CORRELATE WITH THE POLICE COMPUTER OF VEHICLES ON CALL? going off topic here!
WHY IS THERE NO SECTION .85 FORM THAT CAN BE FILLED IN? CAN YOU WRITE UP YOUR OWN?
( COURT CLERKS HAVE A HABIT OF NEVER FAILING TO "REMEMBER" TO INFORM THE MAGISTRATES OF VITAL LITTLE PIECES OF INFORMATION CRITICAL FOR MAXIMUM CONVICTION POINTS.) Yet seem to have a very failing memory when IMPORTANT LEGAL DOCUMENTS AND FACTS NEED TO BE WAVED UNDER THE NOSE OF THE MAGISTRATES. OR IS THAT THE LEGAL ADVISOR???
This might be important, but NEWSPAPER REPORTERS may have had many or some attendances to driving conviction prosecution hearings, so they might be a good source to approach for historic records of what exactly when on at court hearings... ESPECIALLY IF THEY WERE VERY FAR AWAY AND IT WOULD HAVE BEEN A VERY LONG WAY TO DRIVE TO ATTEND THE HEARING, OR IF YOU SENT THE DEFENSE OR MITIGATION BY EMAIL, IN THE POST OR TO THE CENTRAL TICKET OFFICE INSTEAD OF THE COURT. OR TO BOTH, OR IF YOU DID SEND IT TO THE COURT BUT IT SEEMED TO MAKE NO DIFFERENCE TO THE OUTCOME OF THE HEARING???
This is just a quick post as I am short of time here.....
But I will endeavor to make a FULL detailed post of my "STRATAGEM DE COURTSY AND CO"
Which is an art of DECEPTION DESIGNED TO BE A CONFUSION IN LEGAL PROCESS WHERE YOU DO NOT KNOW EXACTLY WHAT YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO DO AND WITH WHOM BEFORE THE WHOLE THING IS OVER AFTER MUCH PARRY FROM THE CENTRAL PROCESS TICKET OFFICES & BUREAUS.
(Much like parking ticket contests with councils whom pass you off to some agent down south)
Well... I never claim I might not be wrong but Have a look into it yourselves and a think.. While we get ready to delve into the world of "CLARK KENT" or was that the prosecution? WHO IS THE LEGAL ADVISOR IN THIS COURT!!??
DOES THIS COURT KNOW THE MEANING OF THE WORD COMPLAINT? AND DO THEY BELIEVE IN THE LORD GOD JESUS CHRIST WHEN HE MIGHT SAY: THE COURT HAS NO POWERS TO CONVICT, OR THIS PROSECUTION IS ILLEGAL! OR I WISH TO REPORT THE COURT STAFF FOR FRAUD!
It may fall on dead ears.
More soon We have barely scratched the surface! Make certain the evidence arrives to you on time to have adequate time to inspect & evaluate it! If it arrives at all!
Did the CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE EVEN GET THE EVIDENCE IN TIME FOR A PROPER EVALUATION??
WHAT ABOUT AUTOMATED CONITIONAL OFFER CONVICTIONS? WHO EXACTLY ARE POLICE LEGAL SERVICES? CAN YOU FILL IN THE GAPS BETWEEN ALL THESE PERSONS & DEPARTMENTS?
WHOM INVESTIGATES POLICE SECTION .87 OFFENCES OR IS THAT SECTION .89?? WHERE IS THE SECTION FORM TO COMPLETE? DOES IT CORRELATE WITH THE POLICE COMPUTER OF VEHICLES ON CALL? going off topic here!
WHY IS THERE NO SECTION .85 FORM THAT CAN BE FILLED IN? CAN YOU WRITE UP YOUR OWN?