|
Post by Administrator on Sept 3, 2016 17:11:23 GMT
Ive written another letter to theresa May, requestion action towards Simon Byre as i believe that it is Parliaments duty to protect its petitioners from prosecution because parliament provides the petitioning service. And if its out of court jurisdiction then parliament should look after the petitioners if a court will not accept the Bill of rights or exclusive cognisance./
Also the CPS & Cheshire police refusing to accept legal letters being layed with drivers details to the police within the required time as providing evidence/laying the police with evidence. Literally just another fine & points scam of the terrible "Fast track" N.I.P. system.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 3, 2016 19:53:01 GMT
I went to post some letters today, twice... and the first place I parked I got a parking ticket and after I had done It hadnt expired so I put it in the machine slot for someone else to use.
2nd time.. i parked by a machine Ive used recently, but it was not even turned on! so I could not buy a ticket! Very strange. They have since i complained about the 50p coin return rip-off scam.. put £1 as minimum payment.. so if you are there for more than five minutes but a lot less than an hour it is a complete rip-off.
Theresa May claiming it is the police culture that needs to change when it is the Ministers that refuse to comply when required. And the police copy their behavior
(Again) The Police will never change unless the Ministers change.
Westminster Magistrates Court letter... (i have now sent out Warrants, Affidavit's that i have written up myself from templates for arrests connected with the illegal prosecution against me.
I actually believe that anyone can hack into the Police nowadays and send out false N.IP.s to people and force them to go to courts & the police are oblivious to it.. They steam ahead like a raging Bull in a china shop tearing down & destroying all people in their path, mums, gans, women, men, boys.. they dont care really.. Its Tony Blair & Gordon Brown who have stolen the polices investigation obligation away with the "Fast track" N.I.P. Its not justice, its total abuse of the legal system.
What is all thise "time limit" rubbish about? How is anyone going to have time to investigate & learn about the roads.. its all solicitors money. Guilt or innocence is not by time or money its by truth & fact.
Why all this fast track law.. buisness that you cannot say "No" to?
Why not law where everyone gets automatic best lawyer possible paid fore by themselves to find out exactly what happened?
The Ministry of justice is arcane and abusive. It is in fact a Torture chamber dressed up to look like a couple nice old Ladys & the Mayor & Mr. Sweetman on a panel. When they are the ones at fault for the road signs being substandard & dangerous.
The Clerk. Beg for Mercy.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 3, 2016 21:36:40 GMT
It seems to me that the courts really are just after the money and tagging you or sending you to work for free at weekends.
I would pay up and do 40 hours community service just to spare me the torture...
The police licence to apply for and the court to issue warrants IS the punnishment for being suspected of a crime. You need to understand that. (obviously unless its prison, but my brother has been and a friend of mine Had to go as well) to be honest just having my bro around dangerous anyway..but I rather just have him kept away from me rather than prison..lol
I do not associate with criminals..these are just people in the wrong place at the wrong time or adversely influenced by other people I would say... Not bad people.
But I've seen Real Manchester street lads come out of court with terror on their faces.
being made to appear before The court definitely is part of the Punnishment. The arrests, house searches, being treated as a captive and submissive...
To most people its worth £1,000 to be spared the distress and just pay the fine and do some community work to spare the Defecit the minus trillions of services costs..
But again.. this is about people. A police "presence" an "authority" a "force" and "powers".
And supposedly detectives who can solve crime and work out how to prevent it ever happening again.. who are making really good progress and therefore less need for police and police like fortress type buildings and police escorts and security gates and CCTV cameras and control of what people do and when they do it. ?
I think its like the Red guard vs Musketeers..
Are the police just there to collect monies ultimately or to keep the piece?
Why not just everyone pay extra tax and have kind parking directors instead of giving tickets? It just doesn't make sense. Why all this punnishment? "Getting" people? Why not "helping" people? Why does Simon Byrne need to be Ruthless?? Needs "not to care".
Here isca couple who are having relationship problems... And immaturity...
The Genius of Simon Byrnes Captain capable steams in with his Ruthless army to save the day.... And an hour talking to house wives about crime over a cup of tea..couldn't get rid of him... Didn't want to leave... Short of constables so have to limit down to PCSOs on the streets?
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 5, 2016 22:35:35 GMT
A couple of my BENTCOP.BIZ stickers can be found on google maps.. I think Google has removed most of them... What they do, it have the police remove them... kinda acknowledge them on the radio - non directly... Get a "Mr. Sweetman" type character talking on the radio non -directly saying... "yes there is a risk".. basically.. saying yes, yes, we know about the speed cameras, but "There is a risk" that.. You are all going to vote them out by ballot instanly. and "We do not want you to do that". "we are not going to let you do that" because we decide what we are doing in this country (Theresa & Co) not the tax payer. So we are blocking all votes and doing exactly what Theresa & Co want. Got it. Not Back to work slaves. We have Your Country to do what we want with, and your minus £££ that we are partying with to Americi. For Theresas Importent Tea Partys.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 6, 2016 21:55:18 GMT
(The House of Lords have confirmed that to use exclusive cognisance and the right to petition - both bill of rights based law, you simply make a "Representation" to the police, crown prosecution service and/pr Court! no special form to fill in!) Ok...so.. A Representation is a "communication" a giving of details or information. When the police request to know who is the driver of the vehicle.. They want correspondence with you. You are required to correspond. Communicate. Not to ignore them. And to not lie or say you were not the driver of the vehicle. So any communication you make to the police corresponding with them and giving a honest representation that you were driving the vehicle at the location at the indicated time and place in question..is an accurate and honest "representation". More so than just a simple bare minimum form. I wrote to the CPS Leeds repeatedly complaining to Martin Goldman Chief Crown prosecutor that the Ossett bypass road signs were not lawful. But it was not until i made a LEGO model "representation" of the Owl lane ossett bypass roundabout, and delivered it to CPS Leeds, posting it to them under the security gate...that initiated the action actually being taken to correct some of the illegal signs. In that instance the representation worked. Rawdon council in Leeds gave a representation to West Yorkshire police that the traffic regulation order of the road was not in place. But it took West Yorkshire police 3 years to automaticaly refund all drivers fined on the road. And remove the penalty points..which had expired by then anyway! No appeals were required. See the wharfedale newspaper story on my website. Thus when doing a political petition to the public, it needs to be represented... Communicated... You need to tell people about it! Posters, flyers, stickers... A website! Rosettes, a public speech, newspaper adverts. Your cause is being represented. Lots of people put up stickers, posters..in public.. The Circus, commercial buisnesses.. Skateboarding stickers on signs..the council litter stickers and notices..they are representing something. None of these get much attention from the council or police. They ignore them. As soon as i put up my petition cause campaign stickers. The campaign "representation" the police and council were all over it! Taking them down. It was not the stickers that caused them to be removed. It was the "representation" a campaign that asked for public support against police corruption and speed cameras and unlawfull road signage! The petition was "well represented" and it contained the appropriate legislation for protecting it because it is a campaign subject where it is the authorities that are being challenged. Which is your political right as a citizen. To be able to do work without the law interfering. Because the government and councils are usually who you are opposing or petitioning and you are challenging them so do not need their permission or authority. Thus with petitions and this petition www.bentcop.biz the petitions themselves and the website ARE the representations. Www.bentcop.biz IS the representation. It includes all required details, facts, work and evidence. And as the Bill of rights - right of the citizens - Right to petition bill states it is ILLEGAL to be prosecuted... Thus in any situation where your petition work is being challenged..or prosecuted.. It is the PROSECUTOR to whom any "representation" must be presented to. Thus.. Pre prosecution representation should be submitted to 1. The police and/or 2. The prosecution. But can also be presented to a Court if it was (illegally) proceeded to court by a prosecutor who was conducting an illegal prosecution in a court. So... On my new information sent to me via email by the House of Lords on the 06 September confirming to me that to use the Bill of Rights based Exclusive Cognisance and the Right to Petition..one is only required to communicate a accurate "Representation" of the petition that is claimingvto be protected and petitioning to the House of commons HM Government. Thus... I present my petition! www.bentcop.bizPlease feel free to explore the website and sign petitions. All required information is found on the website. I believe this petition cause, website and work done for its purpose and cause to be the truth to the best of my knowledge. Also, as the Chief Of Police is the Director of the Authority responsible for Investigating & starting "Prosecutions" and as he ultimately has Police powers to "Remove" or "Delete" any conviction for any reason at all, including errors or any other reason (He/she might claim they dont have that power but they do) Then the Chief of Police is responsible for any "Representation" being made Regarding an Illegal prosecution against a petition to Her Majestys Government". And that would be on Equal grounds to the Chief Crown Prosecutor or any police officer or prosecutor working for either of those collaborative authorities, who must inform the Chief of the "representation" being made to them regarding the petition & its legal status. But that could include a Judge or Magistrate if it were to become a situation that involved one or has come to involve one. Thus the Magistrate would be obliged to Inform the Chief Of police and Chief Crown Prosecutor of the "Representation" if they were not already aware of it. And that the Prosecution was "illegal". And any proceedings or legal commitments resulting from such prosecutions were Void and Null. As I have been informed by the House of Lords by email... I now can state that my Representation to the Prosecution and police & Court has been made. & The Bill of Rights must be Upholded. I can do investigative work of Police Enforcement sites including use of their cameras for my petition work & investigations and I can place petition notices on the cameras without requiring permission from the Police Authority. My Representation to the Court IS my Website. www.bentcop.biz And The offences cannot be sentanced or convicted against. Any conviction is void and null. And I can put a "representation" to the Court at any time or stage, even after the case has ended. No Appeal process is required as no Court authority of jurisdiction exists in the Commonwealth concerning any petitioner to HM Government for work done for their stated campaign petition Work.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 7, 2016 19:57:37 GMT
So this really annoying guy called Cross Channel Fairy keeps commenting on my youtube videos for bentcop.biz. he is now going on about 2.14 TSRGD 2016 Which is saying they now dont have to have 2 terminal signs as a symbolic goals set to change speed limits. And they dont need repeater signs. Which i find extreme danger to the idea. They contradict, while confirming reason for safety requirements, while escaping liability?! Basically it confirms in printed writing that previously they DID require 2 terminal signs. So the Ossett bypass drivers are officialy required refunds and penalty point removal. Its doesnt mention the sizes though..so the size tables should still apply. I dont know what the government are playing at but i do not like it. You cannot see the motorway legend signs from certain angles...they are removing repeater signs and adding more speed cameras. Pat gets a Dutchy from Cameron and the lot of them are claiming they cannot be prosecuted...even though they are charged with supposedly provision of consistent speed limits. The fact that they STATE clear safety reasons for sign size and repeater requirements in the traffic signs manuals..then now claim they are "relaxing" the regulations is a complete contradiction to road safety. It is obviously prosecution related reasons over enforcement. For the changes. Because it cannot be to improve road safety at all. We need to get these MPs and Lords under control...as they are running riot and ruining the countrys sign system. They cost money to employ when there was nothing wrong with the previous system if it had been cleaned and maintained. Lord Adonis and Patrick McLoughlin and David Cameron are the hole in your pocket that could be sewn up but instead they buy new tailored gold thread trousers..to attend a public lavatory convention
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 7, 2016 20:06:15 GMT
The problem with the road signs is that the rules WERE relaxed.
There was a lot of leaway for sign distances so that they could be placed free of obstructions...yet examples like Macclesfield traffic lights they put them behind the traffic signal box. Stupid.
You need to understand one thing. Forget the signs manuals for 1 minute.
This is the problem...we are dealing with a set of pricks who think they are trying to be very clever. When they are in fact dangerous and deceptive man monkeys.
They are part pretending to "help you" while at the same time screwing you over and giving themselves pointless man projectsc to do to keep the entertained from the pub.
That is it. If i have to try to convince you i will. The BBC havent got a thing on the truth of the matter.
Anyway..
What does it matter now as "they" have won and ive been twatted again so i might as well give up.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 7, 2016 20:33:53 GMT
Also, lets not forget that over the years since at least 2000 the road signs have been gradualy allowed to have become unlawfull across the entire country.
The extent of wrong signs is so bad that it would be a complete nightmare to put right..so what they have done is brought out a new manual and instead of replacing all the illegal signs they are now going to just "get rid" of a load of them.
And supposedly relax the rules..
More of your hard earned cash down the toilet. After they took you all to the cleaners beforehand.
And they are going to get away with it scott free..and easy. Thank you good day sir.
I do not think that fraud is covered by exclusive cognisance. Because any breech of truth and honesty conduct policy cannot be classed as parliamentary work. So no jury needs to decide on it. It has been decided already in the governments ownemployment rules. Anything which can result in a sacking via the conduct and behavior policy must be able to be decided upon and if it can be decided to sack someone with that, it must be a breech of parliamentary rules and thus has already been pre catergorized to be viable as openly covered by the protections possibility... Unless you are including all "depertment of transport staff, except the Lord, Barroness and Mp.
But then, you could have an Mp, or Lord giving an order and all who follow it being prosecutable for fraud, but the Mp being immune. But if they caused the fraud... the others would be less responsible and it would be a lesser offence of aiding & abetting. So is the Mp's work in the department of transport thus in a different sphere of work from then they are in parliament? it would suggest 2 tears of activity. Because Department of transport employees are not working in parliament.
The action is FROM parliament >>> TO the department of transport.
Where with a petition (that has its own seperate law) the direction is petition >>> TO Parliament.
Work FOR parliament and work FROM parliament. 2 distinctions. The petitions commitee is inside parliament. But Number 10 Downing street and the Depertment of transport, Horse ferry road are not inside parliament. Neither is the Ministry of justice. Or the Tower of London.
The petitions committee have rules and guidelines for petitioners for example. But in law there are no rules for petitions. But..you do not need to use the house of commons petitions site to petition parliament. You can use any of a number of different sites or just write up your own petition under your own terms.
The beauty of the Bills of rights right to petition is that the public are not under employment policy. While MPs voted in by our grace ARE under employment policy. Supposedly. They forget they are public servants and think they are the masters. Like Theresa May. The ultimate Jaffa the genie illusion from the Aladin story. You dont need to be an MP to make a change. Just look at all the work the 38 degrees petitions site does for example.
A lot of these people go for these positions for the socio-pathic authorative attractions of the position. Rather than possession of true ability to create a better country Or solve problems.
So...
Are HM Government going to be listing the Traffic Signs manuals in the "Fictional" section of the library now...seeing as the official unlawful sign configurations are no longer valid? What is valid? What isnt valid? Was Patrick Mcloughlin and Lord Adonis just rushing and scrambling to avoid a unlawful road sign crisis at the last rush?
Where is my money going you ask? Defecit definite publishing and partners fantasy books and Lord Co LTD?
The driving defence lawyers sports Almanac valid for prosecutions between 2000 and 2015.5?
It is actualy starting to make the New Statesman Rick Male comedy look like normal behavior. Should the BBC do a comedy called "Pat the Dutchy?"
From Mine to Doors? Kramm more in? The Add_on guide to loosing it? Fine safety solutions?
Top speed Toffs? The Barristers Bentley? Authorized vehicles of exemption. Pay your way to a faster future?
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 8, 2016 10:07:13 GMT
TSRGD 2016 - no repeater signs and only one terminal? Seriously? The problem with only having one terminal sign is that if you do a safe U-turn just by it or past it.. And the sign is on your left... Then you will not see the speed limit for the other direction. If it was fastened to the reverse side of it. And roads can have different speed limits for each direction. So its not a very good idea. As they are even getting rid of repeater sign requirements! I really dont know what game they are playing! Also currently these exact sections of roads where a speed limit changes are the precise sites where mobile speed cameras are catching a high volume of drivers for being a few MPH over a speed limit... Just changing speed a little too slowly. Here is a perfect example of a guy i was talking to on Wednesday 07 september. The Day of my court sentencing hearing at Crewe magistrates court.. I sent additional files by email for court presentation.. But did not attend because it was a bit of a public transport journey to get there and back.. And i was upset so went for a walk in the woods and countryside... And sitting in little nice places..but really distressed. It reminded me of the Steve Jackson And Ian Livingstone book The Forest of Doom. Heres a guy i was talking to by chance.. He actually owns fields and has had a run in with a barrister who owns land next to his and tried apparently to steal some of his land! The barrister is a Gun and ballistics expert for the police! The guy i was talking to has also written to police chiefs as well to complain about road signs for parking! In South Yorkshire! He also recently had to do the speed awareness course for a location where the speed limit changes! So one terminal sign would increase the number of these incidents! Not improve the safety! The barrister apparently had this guy arrested 3 times for trespassing! But eventualy the guy won ownership claim to the land over the barrister.. Who makes rent money from land he owns. Unamed/anonymous guy has had problems with a Barrister and also complained to South Yorkshire police chief as well as had speeding ticket between two terminal signs and a parking ticket where the signs were changed after being given tickets. Here some Newspaper storys about "Lamping" i never knew that term for it!?
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 8, 2016 14:12:14 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 8, 2016 14:56:09 GMT
TSRGD 2016 So, clause #12 of page 413 in the New TSRGD 2016 states a rule that makes it lawful for any person to place any sign in the road, warning drivers about a obstruction in the road. And as my stickers placed were for the petition website warning drivers of unlawfull, and illegal dangerous road signage which IS classed as an OBSTRUCTION in the road. Thus I Did have additional Lawful right to place the www.bentcop.biz petition notices besides the Bill of Rights and exemption from control of advertising under the clean neighbourhoods act. So I should not have been prosecuted by West Yorkshire Police or Greater Manchester Police for criminal damages placing my notices, and they had no lawfull authority to remove the stickers in a manner that would leave me with any removal costs from unauthorized placement of the signs/notices to drivers.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 9, 2016 9:36:52 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 9, 2016 18:15:40 GMT
Unfinished: The Making of Massive Attack The story of the creation of Massive Attack's debut album, Blue Lines, which was released 25 years ago, to critical acclaim and commercial success. How the city of Bristol found a musical identity it could claim as its own - told by the people who were there. www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b07thrcg/unfinished-the-making-of-massive-attackthis is worth mentioning as well...just been shown it by YouTube Newton Faulkner teardrops live (Massive Attack co…:
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 9, 2016 20:38:56 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 10, 2016 8:11:07 GMT
Ok..... Can you believe this!? Just found this out now. But i knew the police had their own 'legal services' department attached to professional standards and chief offices and police laboratory. This is seperate from the crown prosecution service. The police lead their OWN prosecutions from their own lawyers and legal support network. Also using discreet private detrctives and investigators. - some ex police and private detectives that the public might use or assume unconnected to the police themselves. Anyway.... This is a list of prosecutions that the police can conduct themselves in courts and not have to work with the CPS. Only published on the Home Office website 2011. But valid from 1999? www.gov.uk/government/publications/police-led-prosecution-list-of-offencesThey are mainly all motoring offences! And a few drug testing ones! Since 1999 around the time of the Ossett bypass! 50mph limit change! Drug and drive zahs or what?! I bet they have some great samples for people to try. Listen out for unsuspecting characters in your local night clubs... :/ Anyway... They have a few offences for helmets as well!? Motorcycles and the seatbelt ones... I think the girl at Chorley was supposed to be a police prosecutor.. Not in fact CPS! Possibly why no defences work hardly if you do not attend?! If the police control all the driving prosecutions and drug testing..no wonder that they have no fears fpr unlawful road signage or possibly using drugs themselves!? So it might be that the CPS might not be quite as bad as i thought...although they should have investigated my complaints correctly and the documents. But it depends how much bullshit the police have been feeding them with. We dont know .. But it does mean that any evidence sent to the Police central ticket offices is layed to police. And you dont need to send it to the CPS. Also the magistrates ringing the police chief for permissions for driving courses..and them all being in the road safety partnership Magistrates, Police, council is most certainly a situation where fair trial is impossible! And why give a conditional offer time limit when you can do a course by a magistrate later? It really is gangster land. The CPS publish the speed percentile thresholds on their website. For error allowances...yet i have heard at least 2 people say to me that they done speeding for only 34mph or so... So could the police be doing people for below the CPS published threshold independently? Also it seems the Alan White offence i was charged with 'distressing white' is a police led charge. But not the criminal damage charge. .. Most people send the N.I.P. back to the police and dont copy it. So never have evidence or record?! Could there be a cheque scam as well? A deal with Her Majestys inspectorate of police? It makes a lot more sense that the police are behaving like Gangsters.. They have a status quo stand off partnership with the Highways agency.. If they do highways staff for speeding they will get the police for drug running.. There always seems hints to this laying around in little scout messages :/ Anyway... The Government books seem purposely written in a way where there IS doubt left to the road sign legality. When it could have been presented in a way easily leaving no doubt or uncertainty what so ever. Which they claim they want drivers to have no doubts to the speed limit! Yet they are failing to provide consistent ones. The sport of crime management and defecit control between players. Vocational job satisfaction. It would be interesting to see a panorama undercover investigation into the real police, court and Mp job satisfaction. What are these people getting out of it all? Is it the costume? The crowds? The authority? The game play? The holidays? The money? If we all gave Pete Dragon all our wages every week and stored them in big B&Q warehouses..what would he do with the money? Build a hadron collider? Pete vs parliament Full vs empty. Hero to zero? What would you like to do today? Remember the I dream of Jeanie programe? How about i dream of police fortresses? I dream of corporate art? Tokyo city! Errr Peace and quiet? Bob the builder? Can we fix it? Yes we can. Jim'll fix it for you to win the golden ticket! Wonka bars are on me! Woo! Hmmm.... :/ Pure genius. Suggs.. Baggy trousers? Oh what fun we had! Did it really turn out bad?
|
|