So, my mum says that her emails keep getting deleted, but she hasnt deleted them. Theres one do do with a Terrance Gray left.. all the others have gone. It keeps happening & she doesnt think its a setting. I hope someone isnt hacking her device to get to me... Like I think might be happening with the dead animals getting left places ??
Also the London Evening Standard say they deffinately sent me a copy of the Newspaper my Advert was in 22nd August 2016... in the post.. But its never arrived.. So has that gone missing in the Post. just like my Petition signatures could have gone missing and be being deleted?!
I cannot see why all those adverts would not get a lot more signatures.
Here is the digital layout verson they sent.. I hope it did get printed! you cannot miss it really!
London is really bad for speed cameras.. If someone else did this petition & would be like.. WOAH! woW! and sign it straight away!
Also... if you read the very genuine and I thing well put together letter of complaint to the CPS I posted earlier on this page... regarding the "fair trial impossible" (I also addded a oath of truth and that the statements are factual and i signed it) concerning the Affidavits as well...
Well.. I sent one to CPS HQ as well. as the Police & Courts.. Ive got an Email at about 8:00 this morning that Im not going to read.. from the Crown Prosecution service Cheshire... with the TITLE "Victimization"...
So it appear that in Reply to a genuine "complaint" to the CPS through their "COMPLAINTS & DISPUTES" faciluty.. they are now replying with "Complaints against your complaints"
Or more like.. they dont like the fact you have genuinely pointed out things they have done wrong and try to turn it around that you are in the wrong!
Anyway.. I have got these Photos of Nicola Sturgeon Billboard adverts for party politics.. with Mockery and "Victimization" of other Mp;s in them... not that different from a lot of newspaper cover photos photoshop jokes...
Its not "Victimization" as soon as you have "exemption". When you are "Authorized" to Punnish criminals, you have authority and authorization to victimize them, scare them, harm them, cause emotional and psychological harm to them. The offender becomes the victim. the victim of the LAW.
You have a parking ticket or you dont have one. other than the paper, its just a car and a person.
You are upset by a politician knocking down your favourite building, or by a vandal vandalizing it. Its still a building being destroyed. only one person is allowed to do it, another isnt.
Politics is based on arguments and debates, disagreements, and people complaining thus Parliamentery work is protected.. or else politicians wouldnt be able to say or do anything.. because there is always somebody opposed to what they do, are doing or have done..or are going to do. Thus there is ALWAYs SOMEBODY who is being "Victimized" by Mp's and politicians. Everything they do will have negative effects on somebody.. be is chaging taxes, choosing where to spend money, where not to spend money. Thats why they have to be tough. But as you can see.. they still have a joke at eachother with public mockery.
The thing is that when they do things that the majority of people do not vote for, or agree with... or try to lie and cover up what they are truly doing.. it is often difficult to bring them to account. Although a well placed campaign or petition could get Shadow ministers resigning if the correct approach or political attack is performed.
Unfortunately we dont always know who is working with MP's.. shadow people could potentially cause accidents on purpose to get into newspapers and cause the right kind of public response at the right time that the politicians need for public support or "cooling" to what they are doing.
Or you can get "Distractions" like expensive firewarok displays, free food & beer, fairs, partys and all manner of diversion to get the publics main attention away from the mps real primary activity. They will usually play this down. You might get a newspaper like "The great speed gun scandal" even paying tribute to the very thing in a flood of over-publicity. They might arrange for a solicitor like Nick Freeman "Mr.Loophole" to come on the BBC radio advertising availability of the solicitors and throw a few hints about road signs being wrong.. just enough bait that peole will know to "go to THEM" if they get caught by the police for offences. When the solicitors are making sometimes THOUSANDS at a time. While the distraction of someone like "The money saving expert" is promoted alongside it at the same time - giving the public the impression that the "system" the BBC are working to help them. working for them. and to trust the "System".. look to the banks... do not pay attention to local councils who might be putting road signs out all wrong!
Anyway... I am going to ask the CPS headquaters if they will or can in law prosecute these billboard adverts for victimization of the persons used in mockery in them featured?
Or if they are exempted. And If the Political parties were to feature people or staff from the Police force, Magistrates Courts and prosecution staff in them, as demonstrated...
Then would they be able to prosecute then? or still not possible?
The Police use physical force to make people comply with them and obey the LAW. by Force. as is named "The FORCE".
Politicians use "Political power" to exert force to get people to "Obey" the law, and or get people to do things or get a message across. And like the police FORCE.. Political "FORCE" through either humor, gesture, example, demonstration or even accident, shock, horror... is protected work.
In a way every Horror Film is intent to "Cause distress" if you want to get technical with the LAW. But they have "Certificates" which gives legal effect.
Just like a Petition being drawn up Gives Legal effect to the Protective Bill. You do not even have to register it on the Parliament website. If you draw it up, that is creation of the document.
Parking permits.. certificates, membership cards...
The CPS do not like the fact that the "General public" can petition and have rights & protections. But they do not Challenge the MP's or Lords.. or.. else... they did try with Lord Hanningfield.. but that could have been staged anyway as Propaganda of the MP;s sending the message that we can not bring them to account for the Illegal road signs situation.
The Thing is that is it a lot harder to get the Police to accept the protection afforded to a citizen than the acknowledgment the CPS must give the MP's and Lords in Law.
Anyway I have had political materials on my website concerning Prosecutors Martin Goldman & Sam Goozee the Huddersfield Clerk since the start of my petition which I have been regulary informing the Crown Prosecution service Headquarters, Police and other regional departments of for over a year.. so for the Cheshire CPS to just Pull the "Victimization" card now is completely not in line with all previous cases that my website has been involved in with zero complaints about it from the Police or CPS at all. Only my first stickers that got stolen by officer Alan White.
Also.... I remember in relation to the Calderdale Magistrates Court, When I was simply "contesting" the illegal road signs with Sanda Kerr, the Court secretary via Email.. she pulled the excuse that it was " very vexatious" - but that is just regular complaint and disputes! genuine as well! the courts & prosecution just seem to "CALL" getting annoyed when they do not want to correspond or communicate anymore. and you might be completely correct in your complaint or dispute!
Who else can you go to when the Ombudsman Dame Julie Moore even resigned?!
As it turns out the Ossett bypass is unlawfully signed and the Council even have changed some of the signs since, but no refunds. The Courts really just refuse to co-operate even with completely correct Law and road sign evidence. Most likely not wanting to admit past errors.
Also.. it was Sanda Kerr who claimed to me that "The court does not accept emailed documents"
Which was a big fat lie! because Lord Hanningfields Last minute documents & Letter was emailed halfway through a hearing! so courts CAN accept email documents!
So if that statement from her was untrue regarding courts not accepting emails.. then the "Vexatious" comment also is likely to be as exaggerated as well. Thus it lends to the Crown Prosecutions "Victimization" titles email.. which I am not going to read, but I will report to CPS Headquaters, because The "Complaints & Disputes" facility is not supposed to respond with "A complaint about your complaints"
And if you read back up this thread.. my Letters to the CPS are all legitimate and correct and rightfull.
I just dont think the CPS want a complaints facility. Has anyone even had any results from using it?!