|
Post by Administrator on Jan 22, 2015 21:42:14 GMT
This is a website that is really worrying. An entire website someone has put up that informs people that the Police professional standards department does not function correctly and is not only incompetent but criminal. It is REALLY SINISTER. All I can say with my dealings with the police and what I have heard on the News on T.V. is that they have a serious flaw and aversion to self discipline and PROSECUTION when crime is occurring WITHIN THE POLICE FORCE. They have evolved to think they are ABOVE AND BEYOND THE LAW. And the truth & honesty policy to them is a joke. Either they have learned too much from criminals, or become criminal through their contact and experience. Also because the very serious nature of the job is the bread & butter of these people they will AVOID THE END RESULT OF WHAT THEY DO TO OTHERS WHEN IT IS THEM IN QUESTION. The IPCC is a similar shambles & the police have no fear & no master as their colleagues are the CPS and circle of associates is the Courts they answer to none. Here is the website. LINK> www.upsd.co.uk/I strongly believe the ONLY way for the police to function with any real integrity is to have a "police of the police" This department would be directly answerable to the public and operate from a central station with a few officers to police each county and police the police as the police police the public. I would have them called "the lead beaters" and they would be in non-uniform and not have police powers over the public only over the police. Thus a Police officer would never know when a leadbeater was going to happen by or when they were being investigated. Literally the police would be in constant fear of "The lead beaters" and would not dare lie, cheat, steal or be corrupt. I believe the IPCC to be a waste of public funding & I would get rid of professional standards. The money saved from dumping the IPCC and every constabularies Professional standards department would be more than enough to fund a central Lead beaters station. That is my proposal.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jan 22, 2015 21:46:19 GMT
Dont forget also the Crown prosecution service complaints which never is upholded to any proper ends.
The CPS even believe that they dont have to give the name of barristers over for complaints forms like the Bar standards! They truly think they can not be banned from the Bar or else try to avoid it which is breech of employment itself.
The SRA Solicitors regulation authority also are "Aloof" and use terrible tacky toff like wit to evade questions & answers when looking to complain about CPS barristers, police lawyers who are all under employment of the tax payer.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Apr 8, 2015 18:43:48 GMT
I have written to Her Majesty the Queen twice now regarding the use of widespread and dangerous road signage linked to police entrapment sites.
Also Number 10 Downing street & the Prime Minister.
There is also Her Majesty's inspectorate of police who are "supposed" to be representing the "Public interest" in investigating & watching over the police. Note that it states public interest and not Royal interest or Government interest.
I wrote to the inspectorate and they fobbed me off. I am going to write to them again because it is them, not the IPCC or Professional standards who have the role of if required should check through all the police laser footage if malicious techniques are reported to be widespread and signage checks have not been carried out.
As it is "Her Majestys inspectorate of police, though... and these Chief of police are getting medals from The Queen for high prosecution counts.. then I am really concerned that there could be a case of treason within her majestys inspectorate where illegal activity, fraud, perverting the course of justice and legal abuse are being ignored by the Inspectorate of police.
trea·son ˈtrēzən/ noun noun: treason; noun: high treason; plural noun: high treasons
the crime of betraying one's country, especially by attempting to kill the sovereign or overthrow the government.
I have reason to belive that if the inspectorate of police are not carrying out their job properly and overlooking corruption, fraud and legal abuse from within the police force, then that is TREASON against the people.
They are supposed to be protecting the people.
To ask your government to abide by the laws it puts in place and make certain the rules are followed is nothing less than the duty of honest citizens.
To petition your government to abide by its own rules, regulations, laws and policy is not a crime but Justice and truth.
The Police commissioners are NOT functioning correctly.
The Police professional standards barrakades itself into Police HQ buildings and ignores or puts aside all complaints even if legitimate.
Police Chiefs will not reply directly over any matter that implicates them.
Neither will the council who lie blatantly.
The inspectorate of police is clearly not doing their job.
The government is making enough money from the National Lottery now and does not need speed cameras.
The question remains who is responsible for the illegal dangerous road signage at mobile Entrapment sites, the fact also that sign checks have not been done and also that video footage has not been correctly inspected?
There is both Government and Royal influence over the police, not just Home office regulation.
This is a ring of crime that is so far protecting itself by using our own public resources to operate & protect itself, when It is guilty of legal abuse against UK citizens, perverting the course of justice and entrapment. I further add that the inspectorate of police that is supposed to protect the publics interest could be guilty of TREASON AGAINST THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED KINGDOM.
I am going to write further letters.
I have petitioned within the law to get to the truth and the police have used legal abuse to attempt to obstruct me. It is our right as citizens that the government IS EMPLOYED UNDER TRUTH & HONESTY.
It is quite apparent to me now that those policys are regarded as a joke to all employed in public service.
I can not MAKE the police do what they are supposed to. We need new laws where if the Police are not doing what is required of them then there is some action that can be ordered available to the public, some special law department that will MAKE the police DO.
(This is supposed to be the inspectorate of police funny as it is)
|
|