Post by Administrator on Jan 15, 2015 20:55:11 GMT
Here is a simple chart i put together for you.
If anyone can get hold of their speeding offence video clips from the ticket offices that would be great, because we need to compare videos to see more of this (FL) focal length behavior.
I need clips of where the laser does not go under the vehicle at all,
Clips where it does aim between road and number plate
And clips where it aims at the windscreen or even crazy aim clips where the police van is rocking all over the place during the speed reading.
If you can upload your videos to youtube and name them BENTCOP.BIZ MY SPEEDING VIDEO with tags for tele-traffic uk, bentcop.biz, speed cameras and speeding fines then we can access them and have a look in detail.
Here's a rant I just did regarding the whole video footage obtaining issue, I just read it back and deleted a lot of it... hahaha, (i am not a harvard graduate) but i am just trying to get my point across and the truth of the matter... I know there are some decent people in the law sector but I have experienced a few times now and really there are 2 types.. Those who haven't a clue and those who are "@%[[l'###"< smarm criminals << swear word
I have read the law and they dont have to give you "all the evidence" in a case. But that is where there are multiple different pieces of evidence. The video is ONE piece of evidence complete and as soon as they "take a photo from it" it is NOT ONE COMPLETE PIECE OF EVIDENCE.
Thus they are confusing you in order to not give you the video. This is how the CPS and lawyers work. They are not honest people. If they were the road signs would all be correct and the laser guns banned.
A defence lawyer is really someone who is saying "if you give me £1000 i will have a word & see what I can do" or else see what someone else can do for less money while I pocket the rest.
Example Mr Freeman of Manchester and his butter bunny "Mr. Sweet" who are both criminal fraudsters. They will take a nice £4,000 from you for "Mr. Freeman's" services yet when you turn up there will be a local barrister contracted to defend you on a pile of notes that you know more about then them and who does not even introduce themself, speak to you or even say hello! unless you are Alan Carr, then Freeman will turn up for the PR stunt.
Freeman is NOT MARTIN LEWIS. Martin Lewis WILL HELP PEOPLE FOR FREE. Freeman WILL FLEECE YOU FOR £4,000 with help from "Sweet" and some random £350 barrister. = fraud. You think you are getting Freeman but instead you get fleeced and guess what??? what IS that SPECIAL REASON NOT TO CONVICT YOU??? the only reason that is special to the court is that HMCS dont have to fork out your expences or anything at all. No penalty points woooo!!! but massive pocket penalty indeed.
Question, has Freeman ever made any council but a roadsign correct? or would that be bad for his buisness flow of "customers"?? two words Freeman - Jail.
Anyway..
Heres what I have to say about the supply of a photograph and the video footage in my rant anyways...
Obtaining video footage
Before someome being prosecuted can even decide to plead guilty or not guilty, defend a prosecution or admit a offence and pay a fine they MUST be able to see the evidence. And this should NOT be a reduced or edited or modified piece of evidence as it has then been tampered with and changed from its original form.
The "identification" purposes excuse of a photograph is nonsense.
The driver has been identified as they have been named by the vehicle owner. And if the owner does not name them then the police & CPS would go ahead anyways.
As soon as an NIP is accepted and the driver has been named the UNEDITED EVIDENCE IN ITS FULL FORM MUST BE AVAILABLE TO THE DRIVER. AND I FURTHER STATE THAT EVEN BEFORE THE DRIVER IS IDENTIFIED THE FULL VIDEO CLIP MUST BE GIVEN OVER AS THERE COULD BE TWO DRIVERS OR MORE WHO SWAP PLACES AS A PHOTOGRAPH IS NOT ENOUGH.
The police DO NOT WANT YOU TO SEE THE FULL VIDEO BECAUSE YOU CAN FIND OUT THE INFORMATION THEY DO NOT WANT YOU TO KNOW LIKE MALICIOUS TECHNIQUES AND STRANGE BEHAVIOUR OF THE FOCAL LENGTH THAT DISCLOSES AIM VARIATIONS.
IF A PHOTO HAS BEEN SUPPLIED THE VIDEO IS THE SAME PIECE OF EVIDENCE.
A PHOTOGRAPH SNAPSHOT TAKEN FROM A VIDEO CLIP SHOULD BE AVAILABLE TO THE OWNER AND KEEPER OF THE VEHICLE BEFORE THE DRIVER IS EVEN IDENTIFIED IF IT IS TRULY ONLY FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES.
AS SOON AS THE DRIVER IS NAMED AND THE DRIVER ADMITS THEY WERE DRIVING THE VEHICLE AT THE TIME THEN THE VIDEO IS INSTANTLY AVAILAVLE BECAUSE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO KNOW IF YOU WERE SPEEDING OR NOT AND DECIDE HOW TO PLEAD OR EVEN IF TO ACCEPT THE CONDITIONAL OFFER IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN THE EVIDENCE (UNEDITED, UNMODIFIED)
AND CLAIMING YOU ONLY CAN BE GIVEN IT IF YOU GO TO COURT IS A LOAD OF RUBBISH AND A LIE. EVEN THEN THEY WILL TRY SUPPLY THE VIDEO AT THE LAST MINUTE AND OUTSIDE THE TIME THAT THEY HAVE BY LAW TO HAND IT OVER.
YOU ARE ALLOWED TO DEFEND YOURSELF YOU DO NOT NEED A LAWYER OR COURT WHEN DECIDING IF TO ACCEPT A CONDITIONAL OFFER, BUT IF YOU ARE ACCEPTING THE OFFENCE PENALTY THEN YOU MUST BE GIVEN THE VIDEO BEFORE ANY SUCH OFFER CAN BE ACCEPTED OR YOU ARE BEING A VICTIM OF AN ABUSE OF PROCESS.
TO DENY THIS IS A LIE AND A BREECH OF POLICE AND CPS EMPLOYMENT POLICY AND LYING WILL RESULT IN EX EMPLOYMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE AS IT IS FRAUD.
IF A PHOTOGRAPH HAS BEEN SUPPLIED AFTER THE IDENTITY IS CONFIRMED OR EVEN BEFORE THEN THE VIDEO IS THE SAME PIECE OF EVIDENCE.
AND I GO FURTHER TO STATE THAT A PHOTOGRAPH ITSELF IS NOT ACCEPTABLE FOR IDENTIFICATION. THE VIDEO HAS BEEN CHANGED AND ALTERED. A PHOTOGRAPH IS NOT THE DETECTION OF MOVEMENT OR SPEED AND A PHOTOGRAPH CAN ONLY BE USED AS A NON LEGAL FORM OF GENERAL INFORMATION TO THE OWNER OR KEEPER OF THE VEHICLE. AS SOON AS THE DRIVER HAD BEEN IDENTIFIED THEN THE PHOTOGRAPH HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE SPEED OF THE VEHICLE IN REGARDS TO EVIDENCE AS IT IS NOT A COMPLETE PIECE OF EVIDENCE IT IS MANIPULATED AND CHANGED EVIDENCE AND CAN NOT BE USED IN COURT TO PROSECUTE FOR THE SPEED, ONLY TO ESTABLISH THE DRIVER.
NOTH WALES POLICE, WEST YORKSHIRE POLICE, AND ALL OTHER FORCES WILL TRY NOT TO HAND OVER THE VIDEO. IT IS IN THEIR CULTURE OF ABUSIVE LEGAL PROCESS OF DECEPTION AND LIES AND THE ONLY REASON WHY THESE LASER GUNS HAVE NOT ALREADY BEEN BANNED AND THE ONLY REASON WHY THE CPS AND POLICE HAVE BEEN ALLOWED TO OPERATE ABOVE AND BEYOND THE LAW ITSELF.
THEY ARE ALL IN BREECH OF EMPLOYMENT POLICY AND GUILTY OF FRAUD BY ABUSE OF POSITION.
THE CPS ARE A FORKED TONGUE ORGANISATION AND THE PERSON WHO IS SUPPOSED TO CHECK THE VIDEO FOOTAGE IS A LIAR, INCOMPETENT, PART OF A CULTURE AND SYSTEM WHERE HE IS EXPECTED NOT TO BE HONEST OR HE WOULD BE NO USE TO THE PROSECUTION WHO ARE ALL IN BREECH OF THE OVERRIDING OBJECTIVES.
IF YOU EMPLOY A LAWYER TO HELP YOU IT WILL BE VERY EXPENSIVE. IT IS SET UP SO THIS WAY SO THEY CAN NOT BE CHALLENGED. AND YOUR DEFENCE LAWYER HAS AN ADJENDA OF MONEY NOT SEEING TRUE JUSTICE IN ANY WAY USEFULL TO SOCIETY OTHER THAN THEMSELF AND IF YOU ARE LUCKY YOU MIGHT GET OFF WITH "SPECIAL REASONS" WHICH IS A THING THEY CONJURED UP SO THAT YOU DO NOT GET PENALTY POINTS AND THEY DONT HAVE TO PAY YOU OUT AND YOU STILL HAVE TO PAY YOUR LEGAL EXPENSES> IT IS DESIGNED TO OBSTRUCT YOUR DEFENSE AND SUCCESS. THE ENTIRE FRAMEWORK - COURT FIXED TO FAR AWAY PLACE AND NOT LOCAL, EXPENSIVE DRIVING EXPERTS WHO REALLY ARE RUBBISH AND COURT OPTIONS DESIGNED TO BE AGAINST YOU.
WHO IS THERE TO CHALLENGE THEM?? THE POLICE? CPS? A DEFENSE LAWYER? THE COURT? THEY RUN THE SYSTEM. THEY ARE THE SYSTEM AND THEY TRULY BELIEVE AND ACT BEYOND ALL DOUBT ILLEGALLY BEYOND THE LAW AND OUTSIDE OF THEIR POWERS BECAUSE THERE IS NO ONE WHO WANTS TO HELP YOU UNLESS MONEY IS INVOLVED! AND IF YOU WANT FREE LEGAL HELP?? WHO EVEN DRIVES WHO IS ENTITLED TO FEE LEGAL HELP?? BARELY ANYONE! IT IS RIGGED FOR YOU TO LOOSE FROM THE VERY STREET SIGNS AND ROAD TO THE COURT ROOM AND EVERYWHERE IN BETWEEN.
Before someome being prosecuted can even decide to plead guilty or not guilty, defend a prosecution or admit a offence and pay a fine they MUST be able to see the evidence. And this should NOT be a reduced or edited or modified piece of evidence as it has then been tampered with and changed from its original form.
The "identification" purposes excuse of a photograph is nonsense.
The driver has been identified as they have been named by the vehicle owner. And if the owner does not name them then the police & CPS would go ahead anyways.
As soon as an NIP is accepted and the driver has been named the UNEDITED EVIDENCE IN ITS FULL FORM MUST BE AVAILABLE TO THE DRIVER. AND I FURTHER STATE THAT EVEN BEFORE THE DRIVER IS IDENTIFIED THE FULL VIDEO CLIP MUST BE GIVEN OVER AS THERE COULD BE TWO DRIVERS OR MORE WHO SWAP PLACES AS A PHOTOGRAPH IS NOT ENOUGH.
The police DO NOT WANT YOU TO SEE THE FULL VIDEO BECAUSE YOU CAN FIND OUT THE INFORMATION THEY DO NOT WANT YOU TO KNOW LIKE MALICIOUS TECHNIQUES AND STRANGE BEHAVIOUR OF THE FOCAL LENGTH THAT DISCLOSES AIM VARIATIONS.
IF A PHOTO HAS BEEN SUPPLIED THE VIDEO IS THE SAME PIECE OF EVIDENCE.
A PHOTOGRAPH SNAPSHOT TAKEN FROM A VIDEO CLIP SHOULD BE AVAILABLE TO THE OWNER AND KEEPER OF THE VEHICLE BEFORE THE DRIVER IS EVEN IDENTIFIED IF IT IS TRULY ONLY FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES.
AS SOON AS THE DRIVER IS NAMED AND THE DRIVER ADMITS THEY WERE DRIVING THE VEHICLE AT THE TIME THEN THE VIDEO IS INSTANTLY AVAILAVLE BECAUSE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO KNOW IF YOU WERE SPEEDING OR NOT AND DECIDE HOW TO PLEAD OR EVEN IF TO ACCEPT THE CONDITIONAL OFFER IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN THE EVIDENCE (UNEDITED, UNMODIFIED)
AND CLAIMING YOU ONLY CAN BE GIVEN IT IF YOU GO TO COURT IS A LOAD OF RUBBISH AND A LIE. EVEN THEN THEY WILL TRY SUPPLY THE VIDEO AT THE LAST MINUTE AND OUTSIDE THE TIME THAT THEY HAVE BY LAW TO HAND IT OVER.
YOU ARE ALLOWED TO DEFEND YOURSELF YOU DO NOT NEED A LAWYER OR COURT WHEN DECIDING IF TO ACCEPT A CONDITIONAL OFFER, BUT IF YOU ARE ACCEPTING THE OFFENCE PENALTY THEN YOU MUST BE GIVEN THE VIDEO BEFORE ANY SUCH OFFER CAN BE ACCEPTED OR YOU ARE BEING A VICTIM OF AN ABUSE OF PROCESS.
TO DENY THIS IS A LIE AND A BREECH OF POLICE AND CPS EMPLOYMENT POLICY AND LYING WILL RESULT IN EX EMPLOYMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE AS IT IS FRAUD.
IF A PHOTOGRAPH HAS BEEN SUPPLIED AFTER THE IDENTITY IS CONFIRMED OR EVEN BEFORE THEN THE VIDEO IS THE SAME PIECE OF EVIDENCE.
AND I GO FURTHER TO STATE THAT A PHOTOGRAPH ITSELF IS NOT ACCEPTABLE FOR IDENTIFICATION. THE VIDEO HAS BEEN CHANGED AND ALTERED. A PHOTOGRAPH IS NOT THE DETECTION OF MOVEMENT OR SPEED AND A PHOTOGRAPH CAN ONLY BE USED AS A NON LEGAL FORM OF GENERAL INFORMATION TO THE OWNER OR KEEPER OF THE VEHICLE. AS SOON AS THE DRIVER HAD BEEN IDENTIFIED THEN THE PHOTOGRAPH HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE SPEED OF THE VEHICLE IN REGARDS TO EVIDENCE AS IT IS NOT A COMPLETE PIECE OF EVIDENCE IT IS MANIPULATED AND CHANGED EVIDENCE AND CAN NOT BE USED IN COURT TO PROSECUTE FOR THE SPEED, ONLY TO ESTABLISH THE DRIVER.
NOTH WALES POLICE, WEST YORKSHIRE POLICE, AND ALL OTHER FORCES WILL TRY NOT TO HAND OVER THE VIDEO. IT IS IN THEIR CULTURE OF ABUSIVE LEGAL PROCESS OF DECEPTION AND LIES AND THE ONLY REASON WHY THESE LASER GUNS HAVE NOT ALREADY BEEN BANNED AND THE ONLY REASON WHY THE CPS AND POLICE HAVE BEEN ALLOWED TO OPERATE ABOVE AND BEYOND THE LAW ITSELF.
THEY ARE ALL IN BREECH OF EMPLOYMENT POLICY AND GUILTY OF FRAUD BY ABUSE OF POSITION.
THE CPS ARE A FORKED TONGUE ORGANISATION AND THE PERSON WHO IS SUPPOSED TO CHECK THE VIDEO FOOTAGE IS A LIAR, INCOMPETENT, PART OF A CULTURE AND SYSTEM WHERE HE IS EXPECTED NOT TO BE HONEST OR HE WOULD BE NO USE TO THE PROSECUTION WHO ARE ALL IN BREECH OF THE OVERRIDING OBJECTIVES.
IF YOU EMPLOY A LAWYER TO HELP YOU IT WILL BE VERY EXPENSIVE. IT IS SET UP SO THIS WAY SO THEY CAN NOT BE CHALLENGED. AND YOUR DEFENCE LAWYER HAS AN ADJENDA OF MONEY NOT SEEING TRUE JUSTICE IN ANY WAY USEFULL TO SOCIETY OTHER THAN THEMSELF AND IF YOU ARE LUCKY YOU MIGHT GET OFF WITH "SPECIAL REASONS" WHICH IS A THING THEY CONJURED UP SO THAT YOU DO NOT GET PENALTY POINTS AND THEY DONT HAVE TO PAY YOU OUT AND YOU STILL HAVE TO PAY YOUR LEGAL EXPENSES> IT IS DESIGNED TO OBSTRUCT YOUR DEFENSE AND SUCCESS. THE ENTIRE FRAMEWORK - COURT FIXED TO FAR AWAY PLACE AND NOT LOCAL, EXPENSIVE DRIVING EXPERTS WHO REALLY ARE RUBBISH AND COURT OPTIONS DESIGNED TO BE AGAINST YOU.
WHO IS THERE TO CHALLENGE THEM?? THE POLICE? CPS? A DEFENSE LAWYER? THE COURT? THEY RUN THE SYSTEM. THEY ARE THE SYSTEM AND THEY TRULY BELIEVE AND ACT BEYOND ALL DOUBT ILLEGALLY BEYOND THE LAW AND OUTSIDE OF THEIR POWERS BECAUSE THERE IS NO ONE WHO WANTS TO HELP YOU UNLESS MONEY IS INVOLVED! AND IF YOU WANT FREE LEGAL HELP?? WHO EVEN DRIVES WHO IS ENTITLED TO FEE LEGAL HELP?? BARELY ANYONE! IT IS RIGGED FOR YOU TO LOOSE FROM THE VERY STREET SIGNS AND ROAD TO THE COURT ROOM AND EVERYWHERE IN BETWEEN.
So yeah, I didn't really want to give one of my email addresses out cause I don't want loads of extra mail but If you could send some video clips in (lets say before march and not after) Then I will put them on here made into sequence ... Which is messing with the video but in a detective kind of way to find out detailed information, not a supplying you with reduced evidence kind of way like the police do!
