Post by Administrator on Dec 4, 2019 11:53:06 GMT
Anne sacoolas
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7750299/Family-Harry-Dunn-criticise-Donald-Trump-visit-UK-Anne-Sacoolas-USA.html
Banishment was a punishment.
It's no trivial affair. It's so serious to remove someone from a country that it's been abolished. There are rights in place so that nobody can be banished from their own country so its considered a serious action to have taken especially by the Celtic tribes.
1.You are considering charging a woman for an offence when a right has been obviously verified and applied by the government issuing the immunity. Therefore they are responsible for any justice themselves in relation to the protected individuals actions that are facts and circumstances in connection with the political undertaking.
The same is supposed to be right, here. With the bill of rights protections. A Petitioning undertaking is carried out under the 1688 bill of rights right to Petition. ALL prosecutions for doing so are illegal.
The courts, all courts Queens bench, judges, magistrates cannot decide matters only cognizable, debatable, decidable in parliament. Which is the authority the undertaking is taken to. Parliament. The full particulars are under that undertaking.
Not the courts. As it is illegal to take matters to the Queens courts.
Parliament can decide matters concerning acts under a right. The Petitioning undertaking.
The U S Government, White House decide matters all acts covered by the Diplomatic immunity.
And removing someone from a country IS a punishment . Was a severe punishment. Because home residents are protected from being removed from their country as a punishment.
So you are overlooking the significance of removal from a country..
Which is to be recognized as so severe that its actually banned as a punishment for home residents.
So the U.S. Government taking her out of the country is not lightly.
Also some people in the uk with Criminal records cannot even go on holiday to America.
You can read the small print and clauses all day..
The Crown Prosecution Service lack the general principles and sight of why why why these things exist and the history and purpose
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7750299/Family-Harry-Dunn-criticise-Donald-Trump-visit-UK-Anne-Sacoolas-USA.html
Banishment was a punishment.
It's no trivial affair. It's so serious to remove someone from a country that it's been abolished. There are rights in place so that nobody can be banished from their own country so its considered a serious action to have taken especially by the Celtic tribes.
1.You are considering charging a woman for an offence when a right has been obviously verified and applied by the government issuing the immunity. Therefore they are responsible for any justice themselves in relation to the protected individuals actions that are facts and circumstances in connection with the political undertaking.
The same is supposed to be right, here. With the bill of rights protections. A Petitioning undertaking is carried out under the 1688 bill of rights right to Petition. ALL prosecutions for doing so are illegal.
The courts, all courts Queens bench, judges, magistrates cannot decide matters only cognizable, debatable, decidable in parliament. Which is the authority the undertaking is taken to. Parliament. The full particulars are under that undertaking.
Not the courts. As it is illegal to take matters to the Queens courts.
Parliament can decide matters concerning acts under a right. The Petitioning undertaking.
The U S Government, White House decide matters all acts covered by the Diplomatic immunity.
And removing someone from a country IS a punishment . Was a severe punishment. Because home residents are protected from being removed from their country as a punishment.
So you are overlooking the significance of removal from a country..
Which is to be recognized as so severe that its actually banned as a punishment for home residents.
So the U.S. Government taking her out of the country is not lightly.
Also some people in the uk with Criminal records cannot even go on holiday to America.
You can read the small print and clauses all day..
The Crown Prosecution Service lack the general principles and sight of why why why these things exist and the history and purpose