|
Post by Administrator on Aug 3, 2019 23:02:47 GMT
I have only Just Realised that this Make-up Artist Claire Allison.. (apparently) only I have only just noticed this story now showing up in Google... She is connected with the BBC, Sky Television & Broadcasting... (But so is Chris Grayling MP) According to this story she is in fact very concerned & bothered about the whole illegal road signage issue.. (if this story is true) news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/wiltshire/4737779.stmShe used a Solicitor called Barry Culshaw.. I spoke to him, but I have not been in contact with her yet. Barry was Ok I think he would be a good defence representative.. But He is not willing to do things how I want to get more witness statements & share costs with the other drivers.. So He doesn't want to represent me unfortunately.. but If I had the money I think He could do the case.. But I don't believe in people being at a financial loss even if they WIN.. because they still have been fined.. Unless compensation is claimed.. (through Civil action). That's why litigation is better than a criminal defence. When the council are at fault people should not be at ANY loss at all. Anyway.. I wonder if she heard of my Petition campaign through the Newspapers & media?? Its possible... She Might have connections with the Television people connected to "Murder in SuccessVille" "Wild Bill" "The Comic Relief Videos" "Peaky Blinders" "Scot Squad" & more which all have appeared following my Petition campaign being in the Newspapers 5 or more years ago. If there is a possibility in this, then it could be there is a lot of support for my campaign Do you think the police know about this? or still retarded in lala Land? Because as it is going so far.. The Police & Crown Prosecution service & Magistrates Courts have broken every rule in the Book Do you think they still believe they are above the law or have cottoned onto "something" yet? do you think that Judge DJ Watson believes he is GOD? And thinks the public think he is the saviour? not a complete & total corrupt liar and cheater who abuses public office and perverts the course of justice.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Aug 3, 2019 23:09:41 GMT
There Shure was a Wild Bill to pay in that BBC story, huh? I wonder what the Bill will be from the A1 Elkesley, A1 Beeston, Haslingden Bypass, Ossett bypass & A49 Church Stretton? Just for starters? They have got to have been planned. Do you think the CPS, Court & police can be prosecuted for breech of human rights? or is it not an offence? It could be perverting the course of justice, though... And misuse/abuse of public office..
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Aug 3, 2019 23:31:31 GMT
Oh, yeah.. Not to forget to mention....
The other very very very mysterious thing in connection with the Claire Allison story is that...the EXACT same time her case was going on...
The period of time it covered, is exactly when the Government conjured up the ridiculous 50 meters seat belt exemption distance in 2005... End of 2004/into 2005 When there were 2 laws and they only changed one law.. and it thus contradicted with the history, meaning & intention of the other law... I think it was an unlawful amendment.
The Government literally just "made it up"..
I think it could have been in retaliation & revenge at all the money being claimed back in the Claire Allison refunds...
The Government thinking up a way to "get back" at the public & fines..
As the Seat belt law had been made back into association with the Rail & road acts.. in 2003.. which is where its origins is.. with the Goods vehicles operating rounds .. And Train & bus users don't wear seat belts..
Unless they gradually planned to change it over a few years.. but It could have been some MPs hearing about plans to try change the law & making some "reinforcement measures" like "twin railway lines" so it could not be "de-railed" fully & completely.. Because the 1988 Road Traffic act provision is still as it was in law & meaning..
& people have been previously acquitted on that law prior to 2005
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Aug 4, 2019 11:05:01 GMT
So... Another thing i should mention..
Are "Informers" police informers..
I am with a guy at community service currently and he has his own business..
He has been convicted of Dangerous driving as well.. He has been given a very similar sentence to me, yet his incident is a lot more dangerous.. It involved a car smash up/minor chase type incident relating to a minor feud..
It turns out that this man called "Ben Taylor" came into the family circle and he is a police informer.
He used to be a actual criminal, but now does not get prosecuted by police. He gets paid by the police and is under police payment/employment He works for police getting other criminals.. Bigger fish.. So i have been told..
But the story is that this Ben Taylor crashed into the guy who is at community service.. This Ben Guy threatened to kill his wife or something. Seems like a nice enough guy.. Has a good layman record with his own buisness and to me seems of good character..
Apparently this Ben Taylor did not get prosecuted for causing the car accident.
But it rings bells with me because last time i was at community service there was an ex army guy there special operation guy who knew a police sergeant well and used to do work on police cars.. Modifying them and mechanical work..
But the ex army guy was involved in an accident as well.. But while driving a HGV.. And some sort of fast car came past him and caused and he got in trouble..
He is always watched anyway because of his army training apparently on dangerous person lists..
Anyway...
Regardless of this information.. If you believe it or not..
I have always suspected Chief police officers for being involved in setting up accidents and incidents no matter if real or staged. Its always been a suspicion of mine.. Because there is always a reaction incident in the newspapers when something happens.. Like a political response.. To try sway the public opinion..
And my own theory is that its not co-incidence... That yes there are real accidents.. But some of them are staged or organised somewhat..
Like the Leicestershire detective being hit by a train..
Or big motorway accidents.. I do know that cars now with electronics and automation functions can be jinxed remotely... Like engine shut off or doors opened and locked and indicators controlled and brake lights..
But sometimes they might need an actual driver.. And i think the police like to Rugby tackle people sometimes.. Like
"England Rugby" and the chief believes he is doing it righteously or for legitimate reasons or has some legal rights to do it..
I believe it is in fact corruption and they are setting people up.. Controlling peoples fate in life, money and such..
The course of my own life was drastically changed by getting only minor speed camera offences twice now which has had severe consequences on my plans in life.
The evidence from other people.. That might not have been significant to them.. Such as these incidents.. I think there are connections.. Particularly with police and these informer type people.. You always seem to be able to link them to accidents.. Car accidents or senior police officers...
Just seems a pattern to me that fits what i have suspicious about anyway prior to that..
Chris Grayling MP previously worked in Television. He would have a background in staging and planning scenarios and sets..
The entire incident anyway on the A42 at Junction 11 was highly suspicious on my own delivery route that day.. Being obstructed and the highway england had not but the proper notices and signs up.. I don't think the supposed lorry fire the previous night was a co-incidence.. Gordon Quean and Michael Pagella both being present who both had criminal records already.. Then they gave false statements..
Of course this is all far too radical to ever be proved in a court.. You would need ridiculous evidence of details It can only be proposed by a theory or suspicion
I do believe the police have an operations network. And use it. That is the entire point of "operations". They also have their own protection from disclosure..
Although they are breaking their own rules by failing to disclose facts about the road signage to drivers and things that would undermine the prosecution case.. So they are in breech of criminal procedure rules anyway.. And i think that is strong evidence its the tip of the iceberg.. I think they have become so corrupted that the police are now criminals. And the entire force needs a complete stripping down. I also think there are certain people "in favour" of the state.. Her Majesty's Government and people whom Her Majesty's Government prefer to hinder.. And unfortunately the police are an extension of the whims and desires of Her Majesty's Government for whatever purposes they fancy.. So there is a lot of unfairness..
In fact the law has been made and written to benefit some and hinder others..
The 2005 Goods vehicle seat belt exemption Amendment i do believe was a live response to that Claire Allison mass refunds case.. And also it serves to help the insurance sector by making more whiplash claims as well..
People being fed up with junk food, made to wear uncomfortable seat belts, getting whiplash, unhealthy, stress from speedy cameras and unhappy.. 32mph?! In a 30mph road Church Stretton.. One man telephoned me to report he had been done at..
People loosing jobs careers, life ambitions ruined..
Who makes the money from all this? The middle class are being capped. And the only people who succeed are those who "take"
If you learn from the master..
Take take take... Big profits.. Give to the master take from others.. Fame and fortune.. Tiles, lands, kneel before zod. Careless of peoples health.. Supermarket empires.. McDonald's, Burger Kings and Burger Queens..
Then they bring in a lot of people from other countries and put them in high positions like courts and complaints departments and i don't think they quite have the understanding for those positions.. They might have qualifications but they are withholding peoples rights and its the same with the police.. Not going by the rules properly.
Why have rights if we are being deprived of them? Its like a false claim of equality and justice..
Why claim there is a justice system if it really is just a tool to take power and money from the middle classes and keep them capped.
And the newspapers refuse to publish some things.. George Osborne turns up at the London Evening standard and my notices suddenly start appearing in the wrong section.. Under charities.. As if a coy joke..
Television is controlling people's opinions and views..
We have programs making the police look like heroes in one instance and another set of programs joking about them..
True there should be unbiased freedom.. But sometimes the freedom is the problem particularly with food industry and advertising.. Which is why we have become unhealthy.
|
|