Post by Administrator on May 18, 2019 22:26:58 GMT
Ok, so.....
This >
www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/WillandMarSess2/1/2/introduction
Just to be certain its valid....
The 1688 Bill of Rights cannot be changed independently in different countries, as it is in effect across the commonwealth, right?
Reprint as at 26 March 2015 by New Zealand Government
www.legislation.govt.nz/act/imperial/1688/0002/latest/DLM10993.html
Still includes the "Right to Petition" article.
I believe that this also:
Dispensing power
By assuming and exercising a power of dispensing with and suspending of laws, and
the execution of laws, without consent of Parliament:
Means that if you are petitioning and prosecutions against you are being stopped - you must be officially recognised as petitioning by parliament (resisted) or acknowledged. Now a days parliament has accepted petitioning from a number of independent websites, such as 38 degrees & change.org which are published petitioning sites.
Though I guess as it says "all commitments" are illegal.. it would counter claim the requirement for consent from parliament; if that were the meaning?
I note that in this version here, illegal prosecutions is noted as "wrong prosecutions"
www.legislation.govt.nz/act/imperial/1688/0002/latest/096be8ed81139321.pdf
Wrong prosecutions
By prosecutions in the Court of Kingās Bench for matters and causes cognisable only
in Parliament, and by divers other arbitrary and illegal courses:
Anyway.. we have established that, The Right to petition is still in the Bill of Rights, which is still actively valid law.
Right to petition
That it is the right of the subjects to petition the King, and all commitments and
prosecutions for such petitioning are illegal:
So.. what about this King business?
It sounds so romantic and medieval. In this day and age...
Does this help?
Does this now feel a bit like we can make a connection with modern day legislation & acts of law that feel more acceptable & trust worthy?
ok, ok....
Still not convinced?
Lets try something a little bit more recent for you....
Emergency Response Drivers (Protections) Bill
publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/2017-2019/0145/0145.pdf
a Parliament publication in the form of a Bill. published 19th December 2019
For the purposes of this Act, an emergency response driver is a driver who is using a vehicle for fire and rescue authority, ambulance or police purposes, in the exercise of their functions for the purposes described in section 87 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 (exemption of fire brigade, ambulance and police vehicles from speed limits).
There you go, a very modern bill, with articles 1 to 5. I had not seen a modern one before. Only just found this one..
So... I believe that this particular Bill is Subordinate legislation.
The Bill of Rights being Primary legislation. Taking precedence over other acts of law, such as this example here.
This Act may be cited as the Emergency Response Drivers (Protections) Act 2018.
This >
www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/WillandMarSess2/1/2/introduction
Just to be certain its valid....
The 1688 Bill of Rights cannot be changed independently in different countries, as it is in effect across the commonwealth, right?
Reprint as at 26 March 2015 by New Zealand Government
www.legislation.govt.nz/act/imperial/1688/0002/latest/DLM10993.html
Still includes the "Right to Petition" article.
I believe that this also:
Dispensing power
By assuming and exercising a power of dispensing with and suspending of laws, and
the execution of laws, without consent of Parliament:
Means that if you are petitioning and prosecutions against you are being stopped - you must be officially recognised as petitioning by parliament (resisted) or acknowledged. Now a days parliament has accepted petitioning from a number of independent websites, such as 38 degrees & change.org which are published petitioning sites.
Though I guess as it says "all commitments" are illegal.. it would counter claim the requirement for consent from parliament; if that were the meaning?
I note that in this version here, illegal prosecutions is noted as "wrong prosecutions"
www.legislation.govt.nz/act/imperial/1688/0002/latest/096be8ed81139321.pdf
Wrong prosecutions
By prosecutions in the Court of Kingās Bench for matters and causes cognisable only
in Parliament, and by divers other arbitrary and illegal courses:
Anyway.. we have established that, The Right to petition is still in the Bill of Rights, which is still actively valid law.
Right to petition
That it is the right of the subjects to petition the King, and all commitments and
prosecutions for such petitioning are illegal:
So.. what about this King business?
It sounds so romantic and medieval. In this day and age...
Does this help?
Does this now feel a bit like we can make a connection with modern day legislation & acts of law that feel more acceptable & trust worthy?
ok, ok....
Still not convinced?
Lets try something a little bit more recent for you....
Emergency Response Drivers (Protections) Bill
publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/2017-2019/0145/0145.pdf
a Parliament publication in the form of a Bill. published 19th December 2019
For the purposes of this Act, an emergency response driver is a driver who is using a vehicle for fire and rescue authority, ambulance or police purposes, in the exercise of their functions for the purposes described in section 87 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 (exemption of fire brigade, ambulance and police vehicles from speed limits).
There you go, a very modern bill, with articles 1 to 5. I had not seen a modern one before. Only just found this one..
So... I believe that this particular Bill is Subordinate legislation.
The Bill of Rights being Primary legislation. Taking precedence over other acts of law, such as this example here.
This Act may be cited as the Emergency Response Drivers (Protections) Act 2018.