Post by Administrator on Oct 6, 2016 10:24:20 GMT
Ok.
So, there are only a few comments - one or two being left on the YouTube videos.
There have been a mixed reaction of comments. Like for example...
"Why didn't you film the road signs?"
That was a video speaking to some camara van operators between Bury and Rochdale I think.
Well... The reason I did not film the road signs on that occasion was that I had a schedule to keep to for work and I had already turned back to ask the camera officers questions. I just didn't have time to focus on the signs on that occasion. Also its a street lit road a think. So there will not have been any signs. And I am certain I did take some photos of nearby signs. They are in the thread where that video is I think. The person May have viewed the video from YouTube and not in context to this forum. Just as a random YouTube video.
Another comment from a different person was..
"Be nice if you could get to the point"
Well... No offence but I deleted that comment. The point is to sign the petitions.
Then there is Crosschannel fairy, who did point me to the TSRGD 2016 dry circular confirming that 2 terminal signs and repeater signs were required by law prior to 2016. But only by the fact he was arguing that they aren't required any more. But that still leaves previous cases open for refunds. And other than that he was basically completely discounting the Traffic Signs manual chapter 3. Which has unlawful signs configurations in it. Examples. I believe he was just trying to "de-rail" and sabotage the topics. Like a guy called lollygaggle does. Who is pro speed camera.
If you go to the pepipoo fightback forums. I think there are a lot of police and solicitors on there who are giving information and steering discussions to prevent any challenges to the cameras. Like a sort of undercover unit in social groups. Who are in fact working for their own interest. Which are disguised as the general public.
So those are my reasons so far for keeping the forums locked. Also the police behave like that anyway by having unknown addresses and limited telephone contact.. because they don't want you challenging them in person or as a group. Collaborating cases. On roads together. They use obstruction so they can continue to operate unchallenged. Thus I needed to protect the forums so I could provide the information to you without it being obstructed.
I think there is enough evidence on the website to show the cameras have and are being used with unlawful road signs. And the police and council have been misleading drivers. And that's enough reason that the cameras should go. And we should not be driving too fast anyway. But we should have better signs and safety features that don't trick or mislead people.
I don't see how anyone can not agree with that.
Anyway....
I would like to see some signatures on the petitions. That's why I have done all the work and website.
So... If we get 1,000 signatures in total across any of the main webpage petitions at www.bentcop.biz . I will open the forums up for membership and discussions. And I will not delete any posts or block any person. And as it is a political forum you will be able to say what you want. I will make a new forum for discussing anything in. Also sections for each topic.
I think its a fair deal.
So upto you.
So, there are only a few comments - one or two being left on the YouTube videos.
There have been a mixed reaction of comments. Like for example...
"Why didn't you film the road signs?"
That was a video speaking to some camara van operators between Bury and Rochdale I think.
Well... The reason I did not film the road signs on that occasion was that I had a schedule to keep to for work and I had already turned back to ask the camera officers questions. I just didn't have time to focus on the signs on that occasion. Also its a street lit road a think. So there will not have been any signs. And I am certain I did take some photos of nearby signs. They are in the thread where that video is I think. The person May have viewed the video from YouTube and not in context to this forum. Just as a random YouTube video.
Another comment from a different person was..
"Be nice if you could get to the point"
Well... No offence but I deleted that comment. The point is to sign the petitions.
Then there is Crosschannel fairy, who did point me to the TSRGD 2016 dry circular confirming that 2 terminal signs and repeater signs were required by law prior to 2016. But only by the fact he was arguing that they aren't required any more. But that still leaves previous cases open for refunds. And other than that he was basically completely discounting the Traffic Signs manual chapter 3. Which has unlawful signs configurations in it. Examples. I believe he was just trying to "de-rail" and sabotage the topics. Like a guy called lollygaggle does. Who is pro speed camera.
If you go to the pepipoo fightback forums. I think there are a lot of police and solicitors on there who are giving information and steering discussions to prevent any challenges to the cameras. Like a sort of undercover unit in social groups. Who are in fact working for their own interest. Which are disguised as the general public.
So those are my reasons so far for keeping the forums locked. Also the police behave like that anyway by having unknown addresses and limited telephone contact.. because they don't want you challenging them in person or as a group. Collaborating cases. On roads together. They use obstruction so they can continue to operate unchallenged. Thus I needed to protect the forums so I could provide the information to you without it being obstructed.
I think there is enough evidence on the website to show the cameras have and are being used with unlawful road signs. And the police and council have been misleading drivers. And that's enough reason that the cameras should go. And we should not be driving too fast anyway. But we should have better signs and safety features that don't trick or mislead people.
I don't see how anyone can not agree with that.
Anyway....
I would like to see some signatures on the petitions. That's why I have done all the work and website.
So... If we get 1,000 signatures in total across any of the main webpage petitions at www.bentcop.biz . I will open the forums up for membership and discussions. And I will not delete any posts or block any person. And as it is a political forum you will be able to say what you want. I will make a new forum for discussing anything in. Also sections for each topic.
I think its a fair deal.
So upto you.