Post by Administrator on Jan 12, 2024 5:51:10 GMT
1918 is when the suffrajets successfully got law passed to give women the right to vote. Although they already has the right to petition.
Their right was made law in the Representation of the people act 1918
Here is a photo of the suffrajets using a vehicle designated for use in a petition to the prime minister.
The Representation of the people acts provide for legislation around the use of vehicles by candidates who are declared to be petitioning for election. The vehicles are to display a notice.
Section 33. Use of a motor vehicle for conveying electors to a poll.
It provides for the operation of a fair election.
Prosecutions against election fraud by officials or candidate, in these acts were to be through the High Court and not at common law. And only fines. Until later, prison was added.
In the 1688 bill of rights, besides the right to petition, we have law for Elections...
That they (elections) should be free.
Also
Violating Elections.
By Violating the Freedome of Election of Members to serve in Parlyament.
This says violating the FREEDOM. It doesnt say violating the election or corrupt practices.
But to obtain the election or any referendum, we petition the government FOR it
Also the PURPOSE OF parliament is not just for making and changing of law .... Its actually FOR settling of disputes with government
Frequent Parliaments.
And that for Redress of all Grievances and for the amending strengthening and preserving of the Lawes Parliament ought to be held frequently.
And for that..... We need cases, causes, disputes to lay, bring, petition.
Also... I want to mention that....
In the Representation of the people act it prohibits police for illegal canvassing. Intervention and tampering with petition for elections.
I note that in both cases at Huddersfield Magistrates Court and Manchester Salford Magistrates court C00****** and 1500****** the charges of criminal damage and placing unauthorised sign by highway... These were petition materials Class F. With full details on them printed. By Town and Country act 2007 statutory instruments with automatic deemed and express consent by that act. Through the standing orders 145a (3) HOC committee to share the petitions. In any form and by any means. For function. I could even have if i wanted to, paint them (class C) combined with class F. By use of enactment 1688 bill.
So the police were violating my petition in the same way as provided for here..... Which is why in town and country planning there is no right for council or police to obliterate the materiel, with class F adverts.
Example:
I wish to also note that here:
In the Representation of the People Act. The candidate can send 1 free communication by post. To each elector. Using the postal service.
Remember that Royal Mail was PUBLIC OWNED. Ours. Which is relevant.
I think there might be a case for this being done for petitions to the House of Commons. But that i would need to argue.
But for shure newspapers have names like "The Evening Post" and the "Yorkshire Post".
There are notices REQUIRED to by put in the newspaper. Like road closures, works or notices to make them "official" and i think petitions falls within this.
Because in class F. It says required, and to serve a function of Government. And using standing orders powers. (To show the evidence to the public) this is the reverse of a press ban. But a press being compelled.
Standing orders 145a (3) does compell the evidence, like a court. Or tribunal.
So ...... This appears in the UNITED STATES AMERICA 1st Amendment. "Freedom of press"
We have right of access. And i say also free of charge. For public notices.
I researched that most if not all newspapers before 1980s gave 1 free advert. To non-proffit. Or lost property... Now only very small local papers only offer it openly.
But i think the legal right is there.
Still.
Also it makes it "official"
In fact... If you read the acts, like ive sited.... That is what makes the candidate in election petition officially declared. When published. Or at least the petition.
Now most are published on House of Commons own website. Or 38 degrees or change.org...
I think some could be published in the London Gazette.
So there is legal argument for 1 free advert in the newspaper as well as sending 1 free letter by post for petitions to the House of Commons, as well as Elections petitions.
This would be needed to be negotiated with the press and post office... But i am currently doing this.
And for zero rated TAX as well for purchase of materials.
So.... To start with the cases at Manchester and Huddersfield. I dont know the Judges names. But i think those charges are illegal and proceedings. And the police committed an offence against me.
Illegal canvassing.
Also.... The reason i mainly write all this is to show that petition is legitimate casework, engagement.
And even clearly provides for use of vehicle. At least in election petitions. And in policing.
So one can use and have a vehicle in use for purposes of House of Commons petitions. And if there is any enactment in use for it.
Or provisions, its the 1688 Bill.
So.....As for POWER to give directions.
In casework.
By the Constitutional Reform act 2005
Criminal procedure rules is one act whereby we give directions
Civil procedure rules is an example of another act.
But also just the 1688 Bill Right to Petition. We are writing directions. By petition to HOC. And it does have provisions. And we are giving directions to that Committee. That operates like a court with limited powers by standing orders 145a (3) that gives the power for the evidence, sharing, publishing and summons.
So.... If there are any legal matters that need attention (like with tribunal) the matters are referred to a court. High Court or Supreme.
If we were in a situation where we are being prosecuted and we think its not lawful then shurely we would object. Complain, give directions to discontinue if we believe we have a right.
It seems that with matters to the House of Commons, this in fact is indeed from the Judges side, Judiciary therefore "Representations to the House of Commons committee" that need to be made therefore. Using Constitutional reform act. Section 5.
And i have right to give those directions through my enactment.
And either to the Lady Chief Justice directly, through the Judicial conduct investigations office, or in fact through DJ Fudge or DJ Watson to the Lady Chief Justice.
Who i can give directions to confirm my casework and petition with the Committee that is acting like a court. By 145a (3) and request directions to have the prosecution discontinued, or that my driving licence disqualification be discharged.
And if the Lady Chief Justice does not wish to comply with directions.
It says that she has to write to be and give a reason why.
This is where i am with it.
Thus far.
Thank You.
Their right was made law in the Representation of the people act 1918
Here is a photo of the suffrajets using a vehicle designated for use in a petition to the prime minister.
The Representation of the people acts provide for legislation around the use of vehicles by candidates who are declared to be petitioning for election. The vehicles are to display a notice.
Section 33. Use of a motor vehicle for conveying electors to a poll.
It provides for the operation of a fair election.
Prosecutions against election fraud by officials or candidate, in these acts were to be through the High Court and not at common law. And only fines. Until later, prison was added.
In the 1688 bill of rights, besides the right to petition, we have law for Elections...
That they (elections) should be free.
Also
Violating Elections.
By Violating the Freedome of Election of Members to serve in Parlyament.
This says violating the FREEDOM. It doesnt say violating the election or corrupt practices.
But to obtain the election or any referendum, we petition the government FOR it
Also the PURPOSE OF parliament is not just for making and changing of law .... Its actually FOR settling of disputes with government
Frequent Parliaments.
And that for Redress of all Grievances and for the amending strengthening and preserving of the Lawes Parliament ought to be held frequently.
And for that..... We need cases, causes, disputes to lay, bring, petition.
Also... I want to mention that....
In the Representation of the people act it prohibits police for illegal canvassing. Intervention and tampering with petition for elections.
I note that in both cases at Huddersfield Magistrates Court and Manchester Salford Magistrates court C00****** and 1500****** the charges of criminal damage and placing unauthorised sign by highway... These were petition materials Class F. With full details on them printed. By Town and Country act 2007 statutory instruments with automatic deemed and express consent by that act. Through the standing orders 145a (3) HOC committee to share the petitions. In any form and by any means. For function. I could even have if i wanted to, paint them (class C) combined with class F. By use of enactment 1688 bill.
So the police were violating my petition in the same way as provided for here..... Which is why in town and country planning there is no right for council or police to obliterate the materiel, with class F adverts.
Example:
I wish to also note that here:
In the Representation of the People Act. The candidate can send 1 free communication by post. To each elector. Using the postal service.
Remember that Royal Mail was PUBLIC OWNED. Ours. Which is relevant.
I think there might be a case for this being done for petitions to the House of Commons. But that i would need to argue.
But for shure newspapers have names like "The Evening Post" and the "Yorkshire Post".
There are notices REQUIRED to by put in the newspaper. Like road closures, works or notices to make them "official" and i think petitions falls within this.
Because in class F. It says required, and to serve a function of Government. And using standing orders powers. (To show the evidence to the public) this is the reverse of a press ban. But a press being compelled.
Standing orders 145a (3) does compell the evidence, like a court. Or tribunal.
So ...... This appears in the UNITED STATES AMERICA 1st Amendment. "Freedom of press"
We have right of access. And i say also free of charge. For public notices.
I researched that most if not all newspapers before 1980s gave 1 free advert. To non-proffit. Or lost property... Now only very small local papers only offer it openly.
But i think the legal right is there.
Still.
Also it makes it "official"
In fact... If you read the acts, like ive sited.... That is what makes the candidate in election petition officially declared. When published. Or at least the petition.
Now most are published on House of Commons own website. Or 38 degrees or change.org...
I think some could be published in the London Gazette.
So there is legal argument for 1 free advert in the newspaper as well as sending 1 free letter by post for petitions to the House of Commons, as well as Elections petitions.
This would be needed to be negotiated with the press and post office... But i am currently doing this.
And for zero rated TAX as well for purchase of materials.
So.... To start with the cases at Manchester and Huddersfield. I dont know the Judges names. But i think those charges are illegal and proceedings. And the police committed an offence against me.
Illegal canvassing.
Also.... The reason i mainly write all this is to show that petition is legitimate casework, engagement.
And even clearly provides for use of vehicle. At least in election petitions. And in policing.
So one can use and have a vehicle in use for purposes of House of Commons petitions. And if there is any enactment in use for it.
Or provisions, its the 1688 Bill.
So.....As for POWER to give directions.
In casework.
By the Constitutional Reform act 2005
Criminal procedure rules is one act whereby we give directions
Civil procedure rules is an example of another act.
But also just the 1688 Bill Right to Petition. We are writing directions. By petition to HOC. And it does have provisions. And we are giving directions to that Committee. That operates like a court with limited powers by standing orders 145a (3) that gives the power for the evidence, sharing, publishing and summons.
So.... If there are any legal matters that need attention (like with tribunal) the matters are referred to a court. High Court or Supreme.
If we were in a situation where we are being prosecuted and we think its not lawful then shurely we would object. Complain, give directions to discontinue if we believe we have a right.
It seems that with matters to the House of Commons, this in fact is indeed from the Judges side, Judiciary therefore "Representations to the House of Commons committee" that need to be made therefore. Using Constitutional reform act. Section 5.
And i have right to give those directions through my enactment.
And either to the Lady Chief Justice directly, through the Judicial conduct investigations office, or in fact through DJ Fudge or DJ Watson to the Lady Chief Justice.
Who i can give directions to confirm my casework and petition with the Committee that is acting like a court. By 145a (3) and request directions to have the prosecution discontinued, or that my driving licence disqualification be discharged.
And if the Lady Chief Justice does not wish to comply with directions.
It says that she has to write to be and give a reason why.
This is where i am with it.
Thus far.
Thank You.