Post by Administrator on Feb 17, 2016 10:14:06 GMT
A selection of the more obvious Television programs and content that has resulted from this petition and website campaign so far.
I have also had newspaper advertising and newspaper cover storys with indirect references to the issues.
Also dont' forget my best time Lord score on the Google Dr. Who game... the impossible?! can you beat it?! not showing off or anything.. just for purposes of informing you that very strange things are afoot, with the extremely serious matter of corrupt police chiefs.
Will you vote UKIP? to have them all removed? Is Nigel Farrage growing on you? is it all a ploy?
Well, i claim nothing then.. except being arrested and prosecuted illegaly. Bollocks to the lot of everyone posing with school kids and road signs then not even putting them in place and not sending out videos when required. Lying in court roomss, not accepting facts in letters & complaints..
hmmmm.. it claims to have been shown on the 13th Feb 2011 on the website. Bear in mind i have found various questionable times & dates on both the BBC iplayer site AND the SKY television site as well.. that i have also documented on this website., for example with "Yonderland" and "Black sails"
This one i am 100% certain used ideas from a BBC comedy writing competition I entered and sent in all the visual ideas and concept and script for a show, based on dancing scenes as well. It was before "cuban heel" film came out as well. The competition entry are supposed to be confidential.. ok, i got my idea from inspiration from Starsky and Hutch, the A-team, blues brothers and other programmes, but it was my own creation and i dont think they would have dont this series at that time in that style and with those characters if it hadnt have been for that competition entry.. well i cannot prove it. or possibly it was the other mysterious method ideas get leaked.. through the unknown spy network?
Which how characters in current relevent programmes can end up looking like people you know..and leaving you wondering... hmmm, is someone taking the pee pee?
Post by Administrator on Feb 17, 2016 12:54:24 GMT
This one is in series 7, so i cannot really claim it for bentcop.biz. But The name "George" is supposedly taken from Dixon of Dock Green, which is where I got the Bent Cops idea from anyway - its a line in one of the episodes i must have seen as a child..and the scene stuck with me... "Theres NOTHING WORSE than a bent copper" literally nothing worse, as its the police who are supposed to protect the public from villains, not be their lap dogs for scooby snack medals. Probaably why the police are extra keen not to ADMIT being bent copsin the first place. Their rewards should not come from the government or Royal inspectorate, only from the public opinion.
Post by Administrator on Feb 18, 2016 21:39:55 GMT
I updated to windows 10 on the computer I'm borrowing... And its kinda funny.. because they have this search box in the bottom left and it says....
"Im Cortana, ask me anything."
And its sounding like "Im Court Anna" ask me anything!"
And its funny because the court will not tell you anything. Haha. And you cannot get them to do anything!
When the search box can literally answer you anything online or find it out easily...
Also my 2nd girlfriend was called Anna and she is a bit of a compulsive liar... Lol
So... The phrase... I'm Cortana ask me anything. Is quite amusing while mocking of the court staff refusing to accept anything you say to them even though it is law and fact verified repeatedly!
And when I was at Chorley Magistrates court, the receptionist was convinced they would watch my video and look at my Evidence, yet they tennis balled me to Burnley for no reason! And never watched anything, only had the speed camera Geordie guy side track me in the interview room.
Anyway I wad trying to find the Name of the Blonde prosecution girl to complain about who ignored my section .85 road sign evidence, but when I returned to the court to ask, the other blonde girl wouldnt give me the details even for the bar standards form! She even claimed the prosecution didn't work for the CPS! That she worked for the police! She basically refused to co operate at all.
The only reason the police win at anything is by complete obstruction to truth and fact. By ignoring and force. Bigotry and arrogance.
I don't think its got anything to do with "legal advice" either the giving of or reciving of what so ever. Information is readily available these,days with ease of access. The advice excuse is,a red herring.
In most cases you have the information and don't need advice.
The issue is the court being unwilling and unable (refusing) to FOLLOW legal orders, legal fact and legislation, when given notice...
They simply refuse to accept it from the general public. It's got nothing to do with knowledge of law at all.
It is completely to do with cooperation and uncooperation. Refusal to obey law and policy.
The court does not recognize or accept when the law states they "can not do something" or they do not have the authority. They do not like it.
Also the courts don't stop talking about the "Threshold" and its clear the use of the term had been adopted from the driving threshold speed allowance.
But used to bolster the existence of what they have (illegally) created and to validate it, by using the term threshold for sentencing... In that it is supporting and allowingcthem to "cross the line" in their punishments given.. to sentences frequently "way above" the appropriate sentences, in excesses of the right correct sentences...
So in that they are allowing drivers to exceed the speed limit without prosecution...
Magistrates are being allowed (or allowing themselves) to exceed the sentencing threshold regularly when convicting criminals.
By the adopting of the term, its spreading of usage in courts and its effects on attitudes and common law.
Also the true, real existing disputes and complaints to the court and CPS is not functioning and the reason again is staff conduct and behavior of intent for the complaints procedures NOT to operate correctly.
Post by Administrator on Feb 29, 2016 17:06:26 GMT
This guy in the photo looks exactly like the speed camera verifier who I had to speak to at Chorley Magistrates! the Geordie guy who I gave a bollocking to, who is payed £2,000 to block challenges against speed camera footage.. if you can ever get hold of it that is!
BBC1 Comedy Playhouse - Series 17: 1. Hospital People
Mockumentary following the lives of non-medical hospital staff. A new manager, Susan Mitchell, takes over the beleaguered Brimlington hospital.
I claim that it is more than a co-incidence that the CPS department that feature in this first epidode of the prosecutors is Cheshire/Liverpool.. one one that I am currently disputing the "1 second" traffic light prosecution time with.. where Dorset police do not prosecute. And if this is true then it is against the Human rights act that UK citizens are not being treated equally in law and not fairly across the UK for the same thing.
The Prosecutors: Real Crime and Punishment - 1. The Charge
Series documenting the work of the Crown Prosecution Service. The prosecutors must decide how to charge a driver after a child is killed in a collision.
The Charge The Prosecutors: Real Crime and Punishment Episode 1 of 3
The Crown Prosecution Service is often under scrutiny for its decision-making. Now for the first time the CPS has allowed cameras in. Filmed over 18 months with prosecutors in Merseyside, Cheshire and the South East, including the director of public prosecutions, Alison Saunders, this groundbreaking series goes behind the scenes to reveal how our criminal justice system really works and what it takes to secure a conviction. Each episode focuses on a different part of the process, following prosecutions and those involved in the case from start to finish.
In the first episode the prosecutors must decide how to charge a driver after a child is killed in a collision, with no evidence that he was drunk or speeding or on his phone. Nicky, the mother of the child killed, cannot understand why the driver is not admitting his guilt since his car was on her side of the road. Her reaction as the prosecution develops is unexpected and humbling.
In every serious criminal case, the CPS must decide who to charge and what to charge them with. These crucial decisions lie at the heart of our criminal justice system. A charge must not be unfair to the defendant, but must reflect the gravity of the offence for the victim. If at the end of the process someone is convicted of an offence, the judge sentences within guidelines set according to the charge made by the CPS.
After a series of attacks on banks where an organised criminal gang has been blowing up cash machines to steal money, the prosecutors face the challenge of selecting the right charge for a new type of crime. A more conventional bank robbery might be charged as 'burglary commercial premises', but that only carries a ten-year maximum term of imprisonment and the prosecutors feel it does not reflect how the gang is endangering the public.
At a scrutiny panel with the director of public prosecutions, community members challenge a CPS charging decision in a hate crime where a man had posted abusive messages on an extremist website. He was arrested under Section 19 of the Public Order Act, but the CPS charged him with a lesser offence of displaying threatening, abusive or insulting writing, provoking criticism from the panel.