Can you believe this story they picked out to promote.. Exactly when they need it?
www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/driver-who-inches-mowing-down-13967542So has or has not this person been prosecuted for a Red light offence as well? Or is the Dangerous driving charge supposed to replace it? Not 2 charges?
Why is there a traffic light offence in the first place?? So you don't have an accident.. Or hit anyone?! That's the point..
So why haven't they charged for a red light offence? Unless they can only use their own cameras? But what if 5 witnesses gave statements for one occasion??
Seems ridiculous.
I think they prosecuted this to make a political point.. They can do what they want.
When really we have a set of complete retards in government who have no fundamental understanding of law or life. Or principles of which previous people created laws.
When you drive through a traffic light camera (red light) it detects both speed and the red light offence so you can be prosecuted for 2 offences.. Speeding and contravention of the Traffic regulation order.
But there are other offences. Causing or permitting somebody to contravene a traffic regulation order/speed limit.
So.. If a police force prosecuted the Epsom man for dangerous driving, but not contravention of the red light.. When the video shows he went through a red light.. The court would be guilty of giving permit to contravene the red light, if they didn't charge him for it.
You can't just replace a offence with dangerous driving. (the original offence is dangerous anyway) by god.. Driving down the street in London at 20mph is dangerous with the bikes everywhere..
Some of those cyclists should have equivalent of 50 jail sentences for how they ride through red lights all day.
The Dangerous driving charge is not to be confused with specific offences. Which are all dangerous anyway.
The offence Dangerous driving specifically covers parts of the vehicle hanging off.. Or loads not secured.. Like HGV.. I once saw a HGV with its side bar hanging off into the road.. And sparks flying off it.. It was like a knights Lance but angled into the road.. That would be dangerous driving. God knows how he hadn't noticed it.
The traffic light camera offence especially when you truly can't stop in time and nobody is at the crossing..
I believe its a rigged device using OGD detection and the council set it up to get people on purpose..
It's nothing like the above story.
London is ridiculous and different anyway.. Everywhere is that dangerous traffic lights or not.
But entering the M621 towards Manchester from Leeds City.. They have an evil traffic light setting timed up.. Which I believe is good example of what they are doing at the fixed red light cameras..
I mean of all the police red light cameras.. How many photos have had pedestrians getting hit or nearly hit if they are the worst instances??
Would appear they are pretty useless and just for fines and fearmongering.
My first ever offence was the camera the council placed a sign blocking view of the camera.. Bottom o'th Moor Oldham..
Since I started the job they been tricking me out..
What annoyed me most is the police art side of their sick black comedy..
Like breadbury with airport plane path..
Speed camera on a bend but not the other way. And the signs are illegal..
It's about the chief officers power to do it.. Over big buisness man money...
Literally the name jokes are sick and demented where they choose their sick man traps.
Especially the new Lancaster bypass 40mph super slow down...
Patrick Mcloughlins duchy Road..
River looney
Looney bin..
Says it all really...
Cameron Oxford, Pat twat miners cap..
Sick fucking twisted bent runnymead joke of a Bolsover castle joke.
When will we get serious people running the country who are not overweight adverts for corporate food giants?
Like Barroness Creamer and dumplings stew? Oh... Because half the porky pig people country won't vote for them then.. And get their NHS medicine treatments..
Because we are all working 5 days a week to make their pizzas and shit.
Cameron.
Retard.
Corbyn.
Conbin.