Hmmmm
Bad News....
N.I.P. has been issued for the 02 July somewhere in Huddersfield
On 18th of June i uploaded after filming speeding quad bikes doing wheelies at and near the Greenhead Roundabout, Huddersfield
youtu.be/CvqTgRrSN0w the file was damaged, but i managed to repair it. I sent that report & video in to the Central Police Ticket office & West Yorkshire Police.
Up to then, and also recently, i have been testing out mobile police enforcement vehicles accuracy, by actualy TRYING to get a ticket through to compare the speed accuracy with the speedometer, if i have had the opportunity, which is difficult. but i have also been surveying road signs in between driving around (a job the police and council should have been doing themselves)
bentcop.boards.net/thread/154/official-stated-testing-approved-devicesHeres evidence of me testing mobile speed camera vans (& a few fixed cameras but only a couple fixed ones as i havent wanted to concentrate on those fully yet.
In fact im about to give up testing on Dual Carriageways because the van i drive is limited to 80MPH and so far i havent been able to get a ticket issued to correlate the speed accuracy (I think they have been purposely not sending the tickets out when they knew i was fliming at the time) because for example, i drove past a speed camera van on bolton well over the speed threshold and no ticket was sent.
Anyway, i have still been surveying and doing various fiming discussions & petition worrk between. but i dont even LIKE or WANT to speed anyway.. its only really been when i have been following other vehicles who are speeding to get evidence, or else to test a camera out..
Anyway...
Friday Evening my boss said that they have got a ticket through, for 36mph in Huddersfield, somewhere near Paddock or Marsh area, Sunday 02 July but i cant think of any fixed cameras around there, unless it was a police car and i dont remember seeing any at all...
I havent got all the information yet, but apparently it was around 6:00 to 6:30pm and look.. at that time, i WAS DOING PETITION WORK!
I WAS FOLLOWING & FILMING A SPEEDING QUAD BIKE WHICH I SUSPECTED TO BE THE SAME OR KNOW TO HANG AROUND WITH THE SAME ONES I HAD ALREADY REPORTED AND SENT IN TO WEST YORSHIRE POLICE!! Which they obviously did not prosecute me when i had to speed to follow them to obtain the evidence!
6:30pm Sunday 02 July 2017 A18EDS being used for Political petition work and purposes of Speed enforcement From before 1:00 until after 6:30pm
original file with time recording stamp in file properties 6:30pm
www.bentcop.biz/MOV_0026_quad_prolaser.mp4And a bit earlier on on the 02 July, i was still working earlier over at the Ossett bypass filming a talk about the Concreate Blocks and the fact i think they had been designed on purpose to block the road signs view, as when you compare them to the Cirencester bypass footbridge and Haslingden 2nd footbridges.. they dont need those blocks that high or in that section of a footbridge! so i think it was designed to obstruct the signs for legal purposes with intent!
www.bentcop.biz/MOV_0010_footbridge_block.mp4(originally uploaded 03 July 2017)
So, here is my evidence i was actively out working for the petition evidence and collecting research and filming videos AS WELL AS SOME SPEED ENFORCEMENT OF MY OWN (POLICE WORK) at and around 6:30 and i had been using the vehicle for that purpose to travel to do the work and was also surveying road signs as well all day (a job the police and council should be doing when they are driving around) thus i am protected by the Right to petition for my work, which is btter protection for me to do my work, without being prosecuted.. as the police only work under this legislation..
Which only allows a vehicle being used for any police purpose (not just enforcement) to not have to observe (obey, look at, notice, acknowledge, comply with) if it would be (likely) may? HINDER THE PROGRESS OF THE VEHICLE for the purpose of which it is being used.
Which reallly is a riddle and a half, but simply, if they have no valid reason to speed, or a certain time limit or urgency to get somewhere quickly they are not supposed to exceed the speed limit..
(but note that as i AM doing my own police work, i also can use this legislation even if i am not a police constable, as long as my work is genuinely for police purposes, which it IS, as my entire website is. also i have been sending the work in to them..
Anyway.. THIS is the legislation that i am working under in addition..
Which the police dont like it at all.. because in fact it protects the citizen, while doing THEIR WORK from none other than the POLICE THEMSELVES, the CPS and the COURTS...
and ALL prosecutions for any reason what so ever are ILLEGAL against me. Period. Tough.
The police really dont like that.
Also in relation to the road traffic act..
The Road traffic act most certainly indicated that the legislation, when worth noting does not necessarily only apply to a police constable
The act, when worth mentioning (or reminding you, states Constables OR ANY OTHER AUTHORIZED PERSON (persons who might have other legislation in effect, (such as bill of rights, right to petition,) or any other permission.
Note that i dont need direct permission from the local council or police, because i am opposing them! and am protected FROM THEM.
They cannot punnish me in law while i am working doing this work, and i dont have special "Riddler requiements" like the legislation they work by.. such as .. only if it would hinder the use of the vehicle, or not having to observe a speed limit)
The legislation i work by is absolute that ALL prosecutions against me are illegal, there is no need only for there to be a hinderance.
Also in regards to the act.. it says that in relation to the presentation of official documents..... such as if you have a Medical seatbelt exemption form or certificate.... "Things like that"
If you present such a document, form, certificate or any paperwork (such as the bill of rights, and a petition itself (or link to your online electronic petition) it SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE SUCH, AND TRUE AND CORRECT UNLESS PROVED OTHERWISE
So basically, if you say you are doing a petition, and produce any document, paper, certificate... ERR HOW ABOUT THE ACTUAL FULL WEBSITE WITH OVER 10 DRAUGHTED UP AND ACTIVE ACTUAL PETITIONS AND FULL WEBSITE OF EVIDENCE !!
It shall be deemed to be what it is purported to be, unless proved otherwise.
But.. as its illegal to be prosecuted and taken to a court of law.... i suggest it would be difficult for the police to prove i am not doing a petition work, when they are bound by their truth & honesty policy... when its obvious that i AM.
basically... they arent allowed to attempt to say im not doing what i am doing, if i produce evidence that i am doing it...
And as the right to petition is more extensive than the legislation the police themselves are working by...
Then its pretty much impossible to challenge it..
Especially considering that on the 02 July Sunday.. Between 1:00 and 6:30 i was most deffinately driving aroud working for the petition and was protected. in fact i was also fliming speeding quad bikes again, as the same roundabout as the one i already had been at previous weeks ago and reported the wheely quad bikes!
So i will have so send this in to Professional Standards to get them to Withdraw this Prosecution N.I.P. that has been issued from 02 July.