|
Post by Administrator on Sept 17, 2016 19:25:21 GMT
It really doesnt stand out in the daily mail at all. And the proportions skewed This is what it should have looked like.. but a little bit smaller... but the overall visual of the advert is completely different.. Its a lot better layout.. I have done example with the Crewe chronicle... Also notice that the BBC prom advert WAS squished inwards in the Crewe & Chester chronicle, like the Daily Mail has done to my advert! and they will have paid more.. but its really quite cheap in the local newspapers... for the price of the Daily Mail you can get nearly a full page in the Chronicle. I have to say that the Daily mail newspaper quality finish is not nearly anywhere as good as the London Evening standard. I wonder if the daily mail will do me a discount for an ad during the week seeing as they messed up this one on the 17th? I might try the People. The seems a quality newspaper with more interesting readers? I think the National ones are too expensive if they are not going to do your advert to the correct proportions as requested. Do you think it was a joke because of the motorway number fonts in the BBC 5 live story?
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 18, 2016 18:55:38 GMT
Well, this is silly now. I cannot go to work. I am stuck at home. It is kinda like a holiday, but I want to go to work. This is not even punnishment for a RED light, this disqualification is because I difnt tick a box on a form & fill my Name and addresse in... because i was trying to get on a speed awareness course. By law you dont have to fill the form, in you just give driver details & statement in letter, which i did - to the police multiple times and prosecution and Court. and it can even be accepted by the court supposedly in writing written before the hearing which they have not acknowledged or accepted.. riddiculus How can you be disqualified from driving for not ticking a box on a form with name & addresse yet you have provided multiple name and address & said you were the driver in many letters describing the events and location?! Its obvious that this is the Police & Crown prosecution service punnishing me for doing the petition and its not about the traffic light offence at all.. Even though the stop line is not legally enforceable, The worst thing is that i really would like to go for Fish & Chips at a decent fish n chop shop, but i cant get there now. As the buses are awkward to get to one. I have been to the one down the road a few times.. its ok, but its got unusual opening times... Am i going to have to pay a solicitor £900 to try to get the appeal or a re-hearing? This is stupid, I provided the details. I think someone is Hacking the entire thing to get me. A DVLA email dissapeared while i was reading it the other day. I did a Daily Mail newspaper advert.. still no website traffic or petition signatures hardly... A friend down south confirms the website comes up in a search on the first page and he doesnt thing there is anything wrong with the website... Maybe i should optimize it for "speed cameras" or something... but i give up now. The Police are beyond Law and society. They just like "getting" people. i dont know why... I have not done anything wrong for the extra 6 points at all. I provided driver details and statement. This is stupid... why do they want to stop people going to work and ruin their lives for 6 months or years because of ticking a box on a form and addresse when you already gave it to them in a letter? It is just stupid, its not justice or crime, it is really mean and biggoted people bullying people when they are trying to just "go to work". Its not even road safety related, a form.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 18, 2016 21:38:56 GMT
The emails between me and Dean Abraham from the Daily mail discussing my advert layout have vanished from my emails account. Martin Watchorn was ill at the time apparently. So i am writing to complain.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 18, 2016 21:42:50 GMT
What do you think to a flimsy £1,150 compensation for the trauma of unlawfull arrest?! I would say more like £10,000. and how about psychological damage and emotional scars lasting months & years from the trauma? I would say more like £100,000 for legal abuses, lies in letters of denial, police corruption, psychological damage to the victim & society for the polices corruptive message sent out to the public that these mistakes are being made & the police are not trustworthy. imagine if it happened two or three times... and the abuse and lies lasted years... £1,100 is a pinch of salt to a court. its humiliation. I would want £5,000 just for being summoned to court without being arrested under warrant. its an insult to have to appear before those bafoons and made to beg in front of them. Alone the insult of having to appear at a court is £5,000 worth of emotional damage. I was "Traumatized" at Bolton court, put through a emotional rollercoaster and "Torture" for extended hours and the insult and psychological harm from being made to sit and listen to a prosecutor and barrister who had no clue or idea about anything was actual torture of psychology. I would want £50,000 for the real serious abuse and lasting effect it had on me. i cannot even open letters hardly now and i will not go to court to defend myself even because of it. It is actual torture. rational torture. These prosecutors are vile, evil and psychologicaly warped and not fit for social contact. They are actually recruited for ruthlessnes and evil. £5,000 is a pip squeak poppet knack to a lawyer. they actually enjoy court. Freeman loophole doesnt even turn up! for £4,000 you get an uninformed amateur barrister! £1,100 for unlawful arrest is the magistrates having an "extra joke" for a circus routine and pantomine encore for cheap entertainment for them.. Apparently the police & Courts do not get prosecuted either. But amazingly there are quite a few guys arrested unlawfully here & there.. unless its more propaganda? Why did the court need convincing an illegal warrant has been issued when the court and prosecution are under legal obligation to disclose evidence? If this is regular court & police activity, how can they be deemed professionals?
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 18, 2016 23:01:40 GMT
The ministry of justice. The final bastion of slavery in the modern civilized world. The Police Chief - final slave trader for sale and barter of humans in the court room. Captured from the wild and sold off in a court room. To the highest qualified bidder. Barter for your freedom. Your entire savings for your freedom... For the truth. Your money or your life. 200th anniversary of the British act of parliament abolishing slave trading, commemorated on a British two pound coin. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_slavery#African_participation_in_the_slave_trade
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 19, 2016 10:23:57 GMT
Ok, so this is getting really disturbing and sinister now..
It is not about road safety at all.
This is a driving ban for 6 months i cannot do my job... 6 point for not ticking a box on a piece of paper when you can give similar statement and evidence in letter.
The police not accepting it The prosecution not accepting it The court not accepting it
It can be sent to all three/any of them. And i even submitted this website as evidence and the Macclesfield thread itself where it states live on the internet that i was there at the time of the alledged offence. Why have i been providing evidence if i was not the driver!!!
Someone is messing with things or deleting emails. Some of the emails i sent to the Daily Mail newspaper Dean Abraham have vanished. And my mum is having emails go missing as well.
Look.. The court can accept a driver statement. It doesnt just have to be the police or prosecution.
Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 1988 c. 53Part I TrialSection 20 20F1Speeding offences etc: admissibility of certain evidence. (3)Where on the summary trial in England and Wales of an information for an offence to which section 112 of the M3Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 applies— (a)it is proved to the satisfaction of the court, on oath or in manner prescribed by rules made under section 144 of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980, that a requirement under section 112(2) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 to give information as to the identity of the driver of a particular vehicle on the particular occasion to which the information relates has been served on the accused by post, and (b)a statement in writing is produced to the court purporting to be signed by the accused that the accused was the driver of that vehicle on that occasion, the court may accept that statement as evidence that the accused was the driver of that vehicle on that occasion.[/b][/u]
This is not fair now. Its not justice or road safety. I have done what it said i had to do. They are just doing it to get me back for the petitioning. Thats why there is political protections :/
I dont think the court is accepting anything from regular citizens unless they appear and beg in front of them. Or pay a big fee (fine) to a solicitor that they are not going to be able to claim back! Only accepting ot of they are admitted to the bar, or if the defendent appears before the bar.
You are allowed to send your statements in to court. They are just not upholding them.
It is ridiculous
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 19, 2016 10:46:51 GMT
When the woman from Pattersons law - Driving law specialists rang me, on the morning of the 07th September trail, i told her i had submitted my evidence. She said that 'it wont work' and i took that very clearly that she meant the court/magistrates would 'not accept it'
And i dont think it has anything to do with the law or the evidence..
Just that 'they will not do it' will not accept it.
This is exactly the same attitude you get with the police chiefs.. They 'dont accept it' even when you are correct. They just 'dont want to do it'.
Not accepting something is 'rejecting it'
And its doesnt seem to matter if you are right or not! They just refuse to comply.
This is the same attitude from all government departments..complaints procedures and similar authorities.
They just dont want to do it. Even when there is legislation saying they have to, or if you are 100% correct.
These people are not co-operating.
And i believe that in most cases the police chief and magistrates do that job because of this authority and power they exhibit over these matters. And not the money they get from the job.
They are ruthless, bullies and mean. And ebjoy it. And we are suffering for it in very harsh punnishments when in a lot of cases we have done nothing wrong. Are innocent.
I have provided a driver statement to all three parties..police, prosecution and court.
I have done nothing to get a 6 month ban for in relation to the traffic light regsrdless of if i am guilty or not..it was 3 points. I have not failed to provode driver details for the 6 point MS90 offence. And it has not even been recorded with 6 points next to it. It shows 0.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 19, 2016 12:11:47 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 19, 2016 18:21:34 GMT
My New Political Satire lecture on the subject. Various petitioned causes. (Contains adult humor and strong-ish language) BBC 5 live Highways department advisor states that drivers are not guilty, based on section .85 they could not have been convicted. www.bentcop.biz/5LiveInvestigates-20130310-VariableSpeedLimits.mp3If lots of people know that the road signs are and were not correct, how is it that people still have the penalty points on their driving licences? You should not need Thousands of pounds or a magic spell to be cast in a court room at a specific time and date, to be allowed to drive again. Just like the DVLA allow you to still drive even though your drving licence might have been revoked (if you are legally entitled to do so) that MUST apply for unlawfull convictions as well where you could not have been convicted in law. Just like a licence being revoked by the DVLA but you are still legally entitled to drive. Thus you should be able to still drive and if required by the police, if you are stopped, produce the evidence of the unlawfull road signage in relation to your convictions for that police force to check up on (if you are in a different police jurisdiction)
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 20, 2016 17:53:14 GMT
So....
Just posted in the purpose of this site thread... An email exchange with a solicitor..
He does not disagree with my legislation protections or petitioning documents..
But he thinks it will be difficult to get the magistrates to admit/accept my immunity from their jurisdiction. And that i would need to find the right man for the job. And it cost a lot to fund the case.
He can help me get back on the road.. But he wants to do it by the crown court and it will be about £2000. I could start driving again straight away in two days. But if we loose after the appeal i would get that time back driving added back on to the disqualification again. He doesnt want to go the magistrates re-hearing route. I would have to go to crown court with the barrister.. Which to me is like further punnishment. (IMHO)
I would value the disgrace of being made to appear before those people at £10,000 minimum. For the trauma and humiliation in life alone. Even for 5 minutes. Add the constant worry and stress while waiting weeks and months thinking of nothing else..not being able to live a calm thought free life...
Especially after my illegal arrest and the warrants and also Bolton magistrates court trauma as well...
I am going to be campaigning to get rid of courts and all this legal abuses. Its medieval.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 20, 2016 22:16:22 GMT
Someone is Dicking with my digital devices and emais as well..
I just had an email saying that i had to make a paypal payment?! Something about a hut. Or the hutts. Like as in return of the jedi- the gangster hutts.. Jabba the hut? God knows.. But i checked paypal and it did not correlate to anything on there at all. It must have been bogus.. Because when i went back to examine it again it had vanished :/
Gone.. Pooof..
I am like... Hmmmmmmmm..
Come to think of it, Someone left a small piece of credit card broke up and folded on the pavement down the road... I saw it just as the yellow and black police helicopter was swooping over low down. And a red fire engine on the road behind. All action today.
Look.. jabbas palace is the court. I've just realized. They talk in a different language (fancy lawyer tongue) and barter in front of the huts.
Luke says "I must be allowed to speak" like court you can't hardly say anything! Lol.
Jabba kinda is a bit like the plump magistrate women! The stuck up ones! Crazy.
And the Jedi mind tricks don't work on the huts. Plus they have the pit trap! Pretty much your submitted evidence dissapearing! Or other tricks in court room! Like Sam goozee or whoever it was pulling the 2 year ban trick on me.. when I had only been disqualified for 6months with a 5 year gap! But I got 2 years instead of 12 months!
Star Wars Return of the Jedi- Luke enters Jabba's…:
It is actually leiga who kills jabba the hut.
Star wars : Jabba the Hutt death (Cz):
Crazy Spielberg films :/
Mabe I should have just gone in to court.. But I've been enough times already to know its best to keep away from those places.
It did seem ok when I went to Manchester but I didn't have the right documents I needed on me. The people were the right people though that time! Dam. I do not like the concept of a court or its procedures. It's not a fair process at all. It's rigged. They call it justice but it is not actually fair. Justice is used as 'get what's coming to you for what you've done or are accused of doing".
The procedure or purportedly getting to Thr truth of the matter is rigged and obstructive. Evasive, and in no way honest. How can evidence not be compulsory to be heard? How can the prosecution object? Its a game of contest. Not a process of establishing any truth. It's a buisness and competition.
It is not "good" it is gangster, racketeering and biggoted lady's revenge at the public for being plump. Plump for pleasure. Picking on people. The Begging bowl. Beg for the plump ladys mercy! Beg! :/
Oh, very important piece of paper here... One that didn't get read out.. because the clerk didn't deem it relevant. Hmmm.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 22, 2016 8:09:53 GMT
Today is the 1st Day of Autumn. I am not allowed to go to work doing my deilivery driving job. Because Cheshire Police, Crown prosecution service and Crewe magistrates court will not let me. It has nothing to do with any road safety or driving. In that instance they claim i did not complete a from, when you can provide a letter instead of a form, to all parties, Police, CPS & even the Court as any of the hearings or Trials. Even send it in. Which I have done. But they refuse to agree I have given them the statement even though as well as many letters, I delivered a really big cardboard letter, double sided to the Court. So they must have it. 6 points for them not accepting my statement to cancell out an MS90. which can only be 6 points, yet on my driving licence it has been given with 0 points. And my total points say 0. I offered to do a advanced driving course with an instructor but they have not even sent me on that. I have requested a re-hearing at the magistrates court, which you can do. The solicitor wants me to go to crown court with a barrister for just under £2,000 in about 3 months. I will be able to drive straight away in a few days from now. But i will have to "Appear" at the Crown Court, which is further punnishment to me. (is nearly as bad as the 6 months ban IMHO) And if the appeal is not a success the 3 months wait upto the Crown case will be added back on to the driving disqualification afterwards. All because the Crewe magistrates Court & police will not "Acknowledge" my statement i delivered to them. They want: 1. me to "Appear" before a court to beg for my driving licence. 2. To pay around £2,000 They do not want to: 1. Accept the statement I delivered to the Court that can be accepted agreeing that It was me driving the vehicle. Much a do about nothing? Pretty much the same situation as Sgt.Tyson arresting me for placing notices, when Bradford South Concil said I can place them and in fact told the street scene to not take them down... Which is exactly why i am doing the petition. The police are NOT upholding anything at all, other than their own fancys. They are following their own Agenda, not the law. (IMHO))
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 22, 2016 13:01:01 GMT
More political debate and discussion. satire. This time concerning purported "Right Honurable" people, who are self career obsessed and care nothing for individual citizens. Like Theresa Mays, celebrity Russel Brand get-togethers & Tea parties with models. Right & Honorable to an Mp = They are right. Now honour them. Not, They are honest and do Good deeds. The belief in what it entails is completely different between a Good citizen / Successfull Citizen understanding. An Mp will NOT uphold the Human rights act to intervene if you require serious urgent help. It is beneath them. It is against the Human Rights act not to act if it is within your power to do so. Mp's should not seek to climb the responsibility ladder if they are not going to act on request. Under civil employment.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 22, 2016 18:23:06 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 22, 2016 18:29:52 GMT
There was some "Pawn" words graffiti around our area on the electric service boxes, and virgin media boxes... It has been painted over & cleaned up?! but by the artist or by the electric board?! There are notices on there as stickers as well.
|
|