Post by Administrator on Jan 22, 2021 20:02:30 GMT
Dear Chris & John,
Ive Submitted one of many New Pieces of insight to one of the local groups. In this instance it is the Neatherton Community Group, also facing immediate issues affecting their lives & homes & village.
Please do TRY to understand the examples & points. Even if you do not agree with them.
I intend to bring ENLIGHTENMENT to what the Councils Part actually is. Which is not the be all & end all of the matter. Merely "lifting a restriction so an applicant & builder can build without civil court action. Not actually a prerequisite to action from "Civilians" in direct opposition & objection - through Law & right which is certainly not limited to a council meeting.
NO BUILDING NEED TO OF HAS TO TAKE PLACE BECAUSE OF SUCH A SESSION. It's merely one of many things. & in fact as we are discovering.. Being abused by all taking part. All the way from Street level.
Guys I am certain you have posted similar before but ive got around to reading the Procedure rules!! No wonder people were complaining about them getting up walking out of the room!! according to this they aren't allowed to!! But only the Chair can enforce it / and although there rules are supposed to limit time so the proceedings do not go on "too long" and it's to keep "order" and maturity.. I can easily see how these rules are used to "manipulate" the proceedings & stop things being presented/heard. What I found exactly as I predicted is the "report" of the Surveyor for the council carries a lot of weight & is relied upon heavily.. So with a Biased Officer who has favourite builders & actually ties with Contractors (for example in Shropshire Kier Traffic IS the Council Highways office) It's absolutely open for manipulation & I can see how the council agenda is easily facilitated at the loss of those opposed. It Does give Right for Petitions and also there can be site visits which I said were important for Castle hill & other similar Ancient Sites to compare with. The main thing is this though.... I think people "lose sight" of exactly what "this is" This does not ensure a build. all it does is remove the (prohibition on building) The person doesn't have to build. So i think people think there is nothing that can be done. The Right to object through this process is not the only action possible. All this IS is a service provided. There are RIGHTS we can act through from Personal opposition IN LAW that are completely separate from simply the council "lifting" a blanket restriction. It's not the be all and end all. I am going to go through these points.. But mainly.. the "DECISION" Itself.. The "VOTING". I think some people are a bit unclear what that actually IS. And is MEANT TO ME. It's absolutely NOT "Councillors" own personal views and decisions of if THEY think the application should be allowed or not. Because to see it like that is a great error. They are THERE TO "PROCESS AND VALIDATE AN APPLICATION AND THE OBJECTIONS. (Note that there is also facilitation to hear "supporting material for the project" those in favour, seperate from the applicant. OBJECTION is FIRST because they are in fact wanting to ENFORCE THE STANDING LAW & KEEP PROHIBITION IN PLACE. & have every right to. (even outside of that meeting & proceedings but they are being given a chance to make representation. I think the example of a CARD GAME (GAME OF CARDS) is a better EXAMPLE to use. Where we all have cards .. and certain cards HAVE A VALUE (A RIGHT) and they are played on the table. Certain cards guarantee a victory to whichever side. Now if you are going to guarantee victory.. Then you are going to win every time. Unless you stop the cards from getting placed on the table or being drawn, or getting "seen". And The Problem we are hearing is that. That the council are manipulating the proceedings so that the objections don't win, not because they don't have the winning cards, but due to them not being seen, put down and other manipulation.. Now REALLY A card is a CARD. You can't say a 7 is a 8. because it's a 7. So you can't say a certain reason for objection is Not valid. If it's a valid reason, you can't say that reason is NOT valid. But if it's not played, then it hasn't been used. Now the decision doesn't always go to a vote. If the matter is unanimous. It only goes to a vote if there is conflict of opinion. But who decides if it's unanimous or not?? The Chair. So the Chair has a LOT of control & say in fact the chair can let the committee get away will off sorts of breaches of these rules and nobody can do anything according to these rules. The Thing you are all missing is this..... IT'S ONLY A VOTE TO LIFT THE LAW/RESTRICTION ON A BUILD. IT DOES NOTHING ELSE. IT DOESN'T ENSURE THE BUILD WILL HAPPEN. IT IS ONLY TO LIFT A RESTRICTION SO THAT THE COUNCIL WILL THEN NOT TAKE LEGAL ACTION AGAINST THE APPLICANT IF THEY DO BUILD. (Many things don't need permission) Like Disability ramps. Now although you CAN OBJECT.. It's only a formal offer for you to make representation. To the council via the service they Provide. (YOU ARE BRINGING YOUR OBJECTION) YOU VOTE TO KEEP THE BUILDING RESTRICTION IN PLACE. YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO SAY NO TO IT. But your RIGHT CAN BE MADE ON SITE TO THE APPLICANT BEFORE THEY EVEN APPLY. YOU DON'T WANT THE BUILD TO AFFECT YOU. AND A GOOD HONEST NEIGHBOUR WILL RESPECT THAT RIGHT! Now If he builds without permission the COUNCIL WILL TAKE LEGAL ACTION. YOU CAN YOURSELF ACT USING THE LAW.! or the Police can cause criminal damage if its affects a street or public place! Not their own Property. This is where your RIGHT can COME TO EFFECT TO THE APPLICANT WITHOUT EVEN IT GOING TO COUNCIL. And this is where the LAW and RIGHTS come in. The Thing is this though.. The Council are really there as a service. To LOOK AT, PROCESS AND VERIFY THE DETAILS AND MATERIAL OF ALL CONCERNED IN A PROPER ENVIRONMENT. It's actually Not a "meeting" OF WHAT THE COUNCIL THINK!!!!!!! ITS NOT "WE THINK THIS OR THAT". You need to see it more as a CARD GAME.. where the cards are placed and NEED CHECKING. THE MEETING IS TO CHECK AND VALIDATE THE CARDS. EVERYONE CONFIRMS WHAT THEY ARE AND WHO HAS "WON". Imagine if 2 referees at Football disagree. They go watch the screen now on replay to see it played back. If it's not seen properly... then one might not SEE the Foul or what happened. Now with MORE COUNCILLORS (than 2 referees) there is LESS CHANCE OF THAT HAPPENING. Everything is going to get seen, verified and recorded. But it's certainly NOT what "THEY THINK" because unlike football.. We have all SUBMITTED OUR CARDS" The Cards are set. (unless you didn't see the planning notice and therefore never submitted an objection) because of lack of notice. Not if there is a disagreement of the "READING OF THE CARDS" it then goes to a vote. BUT THE VOTE AGAIN IS NOT MEANT TO BE VOTING ON WHAT THOSE COUNCILORS WANT!!!!!!!!!!! OR LIKE!! OF THINK!! THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO BE VOTING ON THE CARDS BEING VERIFIED WHAT THE READING IS "ACKNOWLEDGE & APPLY THE OBJECTION) (seems like there are severe limits on number of objections & time to present them too) Anyway... It's actually the case that certain Objections ARE VALID and Will be able to stop a lot of planning. But unfortunately the VALUE of those "cards" , those "objections reasons" also have SET WORTH. EFFECT. the Council though has been saying those are NOT VALUABLE OBJECTIONS.. "This objection is not a 9" It's only worth a "2 of clubs" when in fact a next door neighbour's objection is VERY POWERFUL. can STOP AN ENTIRE BUILD.!! I notice they also like to go for smaller builds of less houses because then it's not considered a Major build" these are easy to get through. And If they put less notices out.. Few will know they had a chance to object in time. (Also this Report written of recommendation by the officer) I find very sinister. When the council has party political objectives & allegiances. So that actually can affect opinions.. BUT it's not meant to. It's actually NOT to do with the objections. Because you can have a recommendation leaning for or against regardless of objections. But the objections are the main thing & that's why they are first. Ive made this video. Please don't think I am Having a go at anyone here!!! It is aimed at & addressed to the Council. John Ritchie & Chris Read. At Kirklees But I have covered some RIGHTS & EXAMPLES in it. Please do listen & don't hold anything against me personally.. It's just the material & info I would like you to focus on, not me! Please Please just focus on the info It's just to get you to think about Context & fundamental points. Hopefully you can see how the Street level/notices is important in connection with the decisions part, but more importantly WHAT actually is happening is not the be all & end all of It! And people forget that it's only the lifting of a restriction, nothing more. It's actually not the only avenue of your rights. your Objection force. It's only a formal service.. You have a RIGHT on site. Which is the reason the entire procedure was created supposedly to offer a formal meeting. For all parties. I know it's Funny, but watch the Start of "Dr.No" the 007 film at the card table when he says "I have no objections" to raising the limit. Lol !
Post by Administrator on Jan 22, 2021 20:06:41 GMT
Heres a piece I've sent to Green Party Councillors Sue & Andrew
Its a piece of writing that explains the fundamental principle of logic around one of the exuses that the Decision making commitment used in the Castle Hill decision..
Now yes I know its decision making..
But its just to highlight logic in general at use all the way through every part of the process.
And there are plenty more examples.
This being only one.
"Why the statement that:
There might be many people who support the Castle Hill project"
Is ultimately not relevant. And why it is less that a feeble excuse. Its actually a bluff and blag of a statement to use.
I will be making some videos to cover the other issues. __________
Andrew Cooper, Sue Lee-Richards,
There are some 'Logic that the council seem to completely be oblivious to.
And its critical.
"There may have been lots of people who were in favor of the application/project at Castle Hill"
Let's get this clear fundamentally.
1. In voting, there is a candidate. Ballot and voting.
You don't win any election based on those who do not vote. They loose their cast of say by not voting.
Now in a planning application, it is the "applicant " who applies. 1 party. Where the adjudicator the council are supposed to be neutral or it cannot be a fair decision.
The law is set to "you cannot build" nobody in recent history can build without permission. The default settings are you can't build. Its protects everyone's interests automatically by default.
Therefore the opinion of everyone including the LAW is AGAINST builds.
Therefore that is everyone's default.
Do you understand this?
Now when an applicant desires to, wishes to start a project.. they are applying to have that default "lifted" in regards to their application.
If nobody wants to elect to keep the Default in place, for whatever *valid reasons they have.... then the council will look at the application and CAN lift the restriction unless there is a reason not to.
Now... as the default law is "restriction in place" it speaks for the nation.
Therefore the votes and matter is between the applicant and those who elect to keep the restriction in place (those who will be enforcing the restriction to remain) being the effected parties.
It is between the applicant and the objectors. Nobody else.
Therefore you do not bring in anyone else into the matter.
And especially of nobody has in fact written in favor of the application AT THAT SITE.
Those the do not vote/support are not counted in a vote.
And as I said. The default of law is (NO) you don't/can't build. Therefore no point or reason can be used by Kirklees Council in relation to Castle Hill, that is based on what other people may or may not think.
And Andrew Cooper and Sue Lee-Richards and Claire Walters have a duty and obligation in their respective positions to make this clear as a matter of intellectual fact and reason of logic and truth that seems to escape the council staff and ministers and it needs to be clearly put to the Call in report to Blaizeley.
1688 Bill of Rights - The right to Petition - It is the Right of the Subjects to petition the Queen & all Commitments & Prosecutions for doing so are illegal.
Post by Administrator on Jan 22, 2021 20:08:15 GMT
Dear Chris & Ritchie,
You will likely be aware of my Petition about Tinker Lane where I am putting 3,000 Petition Flyers out and a Newspaper advert to get the 3,000 Signatures on my Chang.org Petition To Kirklees Council tiny.cc/tinkerlane because I believe that the Council Site inspectors & Site Enforcement is NOT doing the job Properly. I think it amounts to a breach of planning that is due to collaboration by Council & Applicant & Contractor to defeat any opposition and ultimately secure builds. In line with the Councils political Government agenda.
Many Many people share the same opinion and have been publishing evidence online in many local groups, from the Green Party Groups, Netherton Community Group, Extinction Rebellion & More. Everyone is giving the same evidence. Now that Evidence is recorded on your complaints systems.
The Green Party v Labour dispute about the Castle Hill decision.. The Details of the accusations of Wrong doing.. Are evident Again & again by many, many other people in relation to their own disputes & decisions made over their objections as well. In multiple Plots & building applications that have been objected to.
We all believe the decision making process is being fiddled & have Testimony & evidence that its not one but many times again & again. In fact this is "culture" of conduct that is defective.
My evidence also of ON SITE problems... is logical. If the council IS fiddling the decision making.. they it doesn't really matter WHO objects or How many. Which is why I believe you dont bother with Proper notices & number of Notices or their enforcement & its never investigated or taken seriously. & that WE CAN ALL PETITION AND AGREE WE THINK IT IS A BREACH OF PLANNING (WE THINK THAT) And we think WE CAN PROVE THAT AGAINST YOUR PLANNING INSPECTORS & ENFORCERS.
We think the Evidence IS "THE COMPLAINTS OF PLANNING NOTICES" on record. The complaints ARE THE TESTIMONY. (Not your own opinion or findings)
We are in direct opposition of your opinion. & findings MY OUR MANY MANY MANY petition of WHAT WE DEEM.
Now, unfortunately It's a reality. Planning Corruption. The Green party have Made Official awareness of "A SERIOUS PROBLEM"
Over in liverpool the Labour party have more serious problems AN ARREST OF THE MAYOR.
Not Fantasy. Very Real. "Planning corruption & Witness Intimidation". This is CRIME. Crime in the Council.
Its very real. Not just accusations we have had Police ACTION.
Fortunately my 7 year investigation into Illegal Road Signage (Collaboration of Highways England, Local Council, Contractors Kier Traffic, Balfour Beatie)
I FOUND ILLEGAL ROAD SIGNAGE. I ACTED AND MADE THE AUTHORITIES CORRECT IT. So I was found to have been correct in my findings. It was at Enforcement Sites.
Multiple Sites with the SAME REPEATED PROBLEMS.
Now, North Yorkshire Thirsk Highways Office & interviewed in person.
He did STATE.. "yes I was correct road signage had been placed at these sites ON PURPOSE, INTENDED TO BE WRONG. AND YES HE BELIEVED I WAS RIGHT THAT IT HAD BEEN PLANNED. Including West Yorkshire Police Enforced Road the Ossett bypass.
I never have had any arrests or Legal action, no fines refunded as of yet.
Only the Signage put back as it should have been. Shropshire Council claimed it was not put wrong on purpose it was "a honest mistake" I believe their council contract manager to be a liar. And Covering for Kier Traffic.
In Bedforshire A1 Sandy. Road Signage & speed limit on the A1 was 50mph where the police enforced 50mph. And Fined Many Drivers.
That section on the Traffic Regulation order was National Speed Limit. It had Never "officially been set as a 50mpg road". I checked Properly.
When Approached by me, Highways England Bedford made up excuses & their Highways Manager Lied to me and Attempted a poor "Bluff" about the Road Set up. That was absolutely a lie & false statement.
Now all these roads had the same types of errors & I believe it was planned & co -ordinated. The Police were active & obtained fines where the signage was illegal. And Misleading. "Illegal".
Its planning corruption.
Now, There are intimate connections between HIGHWAYS & BUILDING we know this because for example at Flint Street in Huddersfield , these departments share the same buildings.
Now.. As for Central Government..... and the Council...
There are RIGHTS people have, in order to Petition about these things & complain. Through your Processes.
Many of your websites & advice pages are Only Guidance & not quoting LAW. There are many Lies and wrong statements on your Council website and advice pages & the Governments.
Particularly concerning what people can complain about, how they can complain, and the Rights they have.,
I have evidence on each issue that shows the Government & council are WRONG about claims they make about what we can and cant complain about & petition about.
& I can explain each thing in great detail. Explaining the Law, Logic and Fact & truth behind it.
The Democratic Society, the Building & planning Department & the Party political members. I believe are giving misinformation about many things in order to Beat the objections, complaints & opposition that the Public bring against the councils agenda and actions.
The Reason is clear.
You want to win & you want the public (opposition) to loose and be put at a disadvantage.
& all together this is corruption & CRIME. As with the Joe Anderson Arrest and I am looking to get arrests in Kirklees and NATIONALLY.
I have all evidence of the road traffic side on my websites www.bentcop.biz / bentcop.boards.net and my youtube channel.
And I am finding the evidence for the building & planning side of things is all published on the facebook groups & community groups, by those opposed to the council.
ALL THIS EVIDENCE IS ONE CASE OF CORRUPTION. NOT SEPERATE.
Now my current task is to educate the public on LOGIC. REASON, INTELLECT.
I will teach them.. how the Council are Blagging the process & procedures in order to disarm the public of real effective objection & complaint.
How lies and misinformation about RIGHTS are published on the council websites and Government ones.
How Excuses made by the council at all levels from the On-site street level, all the way up to the decision making meetings... are actually complete failure in logic & reason. And it is cheating people out of their victory's in opposition,
All the specific facts & details I have and can give to the smallest detail, law, right & all evidence.
This extends to the Police & Crown Prosecution Service also to have been doing the same in their own proceedings for the same reasons.
I am not a fantasist. But if you Watch the New Years Eve Dr.Who episode, you know that Jodie Whittaker is a Huddersfield woman. Its no coincidence that Chris Chibnall has written the story based around government corruption. And at the exact right timing. Yes its a fantasy Science Fiction. But Chibnall & the BBC are highlighting to the Public in their way that we have a serious corruption issue in the council. So I would be qualified to read those themes and the content as an "Example" to the public of current issues we face....
You know that 150,000 Police & CPS crime files have just vanished from the Police computer systems. It was in the Newspaper a few days ago. That is SERIOUS.
The timing is no co-incidence.
I myself have been unlawfully arrested & prosecuted for my investigation work looking into the police corruption. Even though Extinction Rebellion now are free to do many things I was doing.. which has shown that I myself was treated with Bias & malpractice by the police.
Now this will not be easy.
WE ARE IN DIRECT OPPOSITION WITH THE COUNCIL.
WE WANT ARRESTS OF PEOPLE WITHIN THE COUNCIL. HIGHWAYS, BUILDING, PLANNING.
And the situation is that the council does NOT WANT THAT.
We are looking at proving that HUNDREDS OF BUILDING PROJECTS HAVE BEEN PROCEEDED WITH ILLEGALLY. FROM ON SITE ALL THE WAY UP TO THE DECISION.
ROADS & HIGHWAYS PLANNED AND PRE-MEDITATED TO FINE PEOPLE AND ON SITE SIGNAGE PUT WRONG ON PURPOSE WITH INTENT TO MISLEAD.
ALL AROUND ENGLAND.
Not Just Kirklees.
The Connections are the Political Parties involved. The connections are are Kier Traffic, Balfour Beatie and other COUNCIL CONTRACTED HIGHWAYS & BUILDERS.
The Reason are BUISNESS. PROFFIT. POLITICAL PARTY AGENDA TO SUCCESS.
And the LOSS, is by those opposed.. the Persons Fined. The persons who are suffering from building developments they oppose against NOW. ALL OVER THE UK.
The Fundamental Power and truth of the Objection itself being "down Played" by the council, lawyers & ministers. to what the true effect & extent of those executive powers to petition ARE.
And I will prove all this.
Its also no coincidence the Pandemic dropped on us. At this time. only a fool would claim there are no other reasons it appeared.. With Extinction Rebellion Going Berserk about the environment as well... all at the same time.
Now if you cannot understand this... you are playing dumb I believe as on the facebook groups EVERYONE AGREES AND UNDERSTANDS.
But they dont understand there IS SOMETHING they CAN do about it.
And I am going to Teach them what they can do.
That the current procedures you are offering. The Current solutions have been warped & manipulated to make it HARD to Win against the Council. and that many truths & rights are being down played & covered up in order to defeat the opposition.
I will bring the TRUTH. and the LAW the REAL logic to the people so that they understand they have been cheated, and are being put through processes of objection & complaint that have been tailored to fail them.
I intend to STOP these building Projects. ALL OF THEM. Where people have opposed. And show them that the "decision is not final"
There are MANY ways to STOP these builds. And when the truth about the Highways & fines & illegal road signage becomes Clear to the Public.... It will not just be the Extinction Rebellion who are protesting.. Its will get FULL PUBLIC SUPPORT.
I have taken the Liberty to make a few videos & I will be doing more videos.
Its time to tie the knot between the Planning Corruption & the illegal Highways Signs & enforcement. And Its time people will know their true rights.
If you cannot understand this now.. Then there are serious problems.
All there is to know is that.. We are opposed to what you have been doing & we believe that you have been doing many things wrong and that there has been 1. a reason behind it and 2. intent.
To Win. & secure the council party agenda. You have not been unbiased.
And I am going to prove it.
It will be legal action.
Legal action to STOP the BUILDING
LEGAL ACTION to Get Fines refunded Legal Action to get Justice And Legal action to Prove that the Public have been cheated out of the full capacity of RIGHTS
And that false & untrue statements & information has been published by the Council & by HM Government.
That is where we are with this.
And right now, People are waking up. We are backed by some serious forces, serious forces for Good..
And I think you need to realize this and face the immediate reality...
Because we are witnessing AN PRESIDENT OF AMERICA BEING IMPEACHED TWICE NOW
A Mayor Arrested....
We will have action for the Illegal Road Signage and the Building & planning as well.
This is what this is about.
And yes... You could call it a "Conflict"
But the Truth & Fact will prevail when It is fully revealed., & Fully understood by the People.
So I would , if I were you inform EVERY SINGLE COUNCILOR EVERY SINGLE COUNCIL STAFF IN EVERY DEPARTMENT.
THE PUBLIC ARE PUTTING TOGETHER EVIDENCE AGAINST THE COUNCIL ON MULTIPLE FACEBOOK PAGES. YOU HAVE OUR EVIDENCE ITS YOUR OWN RECORDS,
YOUR RECORDS ARE THE EVIDENCE.
Now there are 2 things here....
1. How YOU interpret that information / records
2. How WE interpret that information / records.
And WE ARE THE ONES INVESTIGATING IT NOW UNDER THE RIGHT TO PETITION. WE ARE POLICING THE LAW.
WE ARE BRINGING THE CASE.
So Please be prepared.
1688 Bill of Rights - The right to Petition - It is the Right of the Subjects to petition the Queen & all Commitments & Prosecutions for doing so are illegal.
Administrator: All photos back up, so hopefully the threads are all back as they were now. If you have been visiting within the last 2 months then sorry if it hasn't made sense without the images
Apr 3, 2020 4:02:06 GMT
Administrator: I've only just discovered David Icke. Following him being banned from Facebook and YouTube lots of people have interviewed and featured him. Because his material is now extremely relevant youtu.be/4KhtaurSUcw
May 5, 2020 21:40:56 GMT
Administrator: Petition committee currently stalling on publishing 2 seriously historically critical & nationally important petitions preserving the rights affirmation ministers don't want to reject or publish them. TORY & LABOUR franchises hate it ibb.co/mFp9QJL
May 5, 2020 21:59:38 GMT