|
Post by Administrator on Nov 19, 2021 23:27:46 GMT
Bentcop . Biz channel Mr ___________ Dear YouTube Again. Further correspondence and evidence to YouTube Chief Executive and Head of legal. Continuing from my previous representations by this form and the counter claim form on my channel. Your Community strike against me/ my political evidence petition channel. On points of claim "Harrassment / Cyber Bullying. Please see the attached* evidence (unmodified) to you now in relation to this case_ and proceedings with you now concerning my counter claim appeal and rights. This image conservative party material, published in multiple newspapers. images.app.goo.gl/FrPvXcMAK4CC1CbE6And use the google image search keywords "pocket tory milliband" that will result in a number of other similar example images. "Media" images and film are all covered by the exact same law and legislation rules, copywrite and claims. No member of the public or community can initiate proceedings against the tory party or newspaper nor can Ed Milliband himself. You can say he is being mocked, harrassed in the images, media even cyber bullying. But it is material of political party and purpose. That is why it can be published and used. Without challenge due to parliament connection and engagement. Election, referendum petition. There are classed of material and media that fall under class E and Class F these are anything used in connection with elections, voting, petitions. Class F also provides for use of a right or enactment additionally. And the right we insert and can insert is the 1688 Bill of Rights, right to petition and 1st Amendment. Petition redress of greivances. Its exempt. Both film and photos. Audio as well. I have the legislation that provides for classification of E and F materials. Please download it. Google drive link i provide to law on class of materials. E and F and use of. Law governing.. use of enactment This is for posters, flyers banners, even painting. Painting only is enforced against under certain class. And class E and F painting can be done. All these laws are just further model of the existing frameworks. The same models and framework applies do to... Political material, film, media being facilitated in any act... All acts provide for insertion of right. Where claimed. The criminal procedure rules itself to consider or even initiate preliminary proceedings required all parties ( in this dispute, YouTube) to recognise and apply rights. Be them medical or political if claimed. Political right, legislation, the act.. right to petition is there for elections, referendum (that a petition can trigger, pursue with enough signatures) petitions.. complaints to government and legal proceedings. Any stage. And are protected from intervention by other claimants, litigants. "All prosecutions and commitments are illegal" "Congress shall make no law to abridge (intervention) in the right to petition for redress of greivances with government. A case. "The needs of that case" The same as any criminal or civil case. Its proceedings are provided for use of any material as evidence. Petition is not private proceedings. Disclosure. The manner of proceedings of petition to government is that evidence is on display. For public review. Not to be altered not to be claimed against, strikes from the community. It is not there for casual entertainment or proffit. Its there as evidence. Example. Which cannot be given if modified. Unless the petitioner wants to modify it to demonstrate something. Again... These rights apply to my channel. As i have been saying all along without fail. On record. The worst part is that particular video i have been given and have permission by all in the video to use it. And there is no harrassment of cyber bullying. I have linked you the full video on Fergal McEntees channel. And Zizzi Wolfs facebook. So it is impossible anyway. As their footage is the same video event and clips. Literally the church leaders statments and interviews with Jonathan and Fergal. Release the strike and claim please without further delay. And begin action to create new checks and registration for political channel settings application. That by legal right are not subject to community strikes or copywrite strikes. Thank you Mr__________
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Nov 20, 2021 5:06:40 GMT
Youtube Chief Executive Complaints Legal Head.
Bentcop . biz channel
Ok....
Another thing.....
This is what gets me... If i want to link a clip from a film to use as an example.. i first search to see if that is already up. Usually someone else already has it up. So i dont have any interest in uploading it or need to.
So... I only need to upload a short brief clip of a film or movie, if its not available.
Why do i upload it?? I upload it to use as an example. To ILLUSTRATE SOMETHING.
Now, its going to be absolutely zero use if i edit or modify it so its not giving the example anymore. Pointless.
Copywrite, not copying for sake of stealing or claiming its my own work. Or making my own design or creation from it . Such as these Dr.Who spoof films for example that have been "modified"
My channel is not that type of purpose. Im not just uploading say "a movie" for people to watch the movie. Its a short clip, to illustrate a point.
These guys who create their own "modified content" changing video so its different. Its totally different channel.
If you are hosting evidence.... And its from someone elses media... You DONT edit or change it. Or how will it contain the details or clear information or accounts of events?? How can people view, link, share, evaluate the evidence?? Its totally different context and purpose. Totally different usage. And rights law on usage. In connection with a case, petition, proceedings. Not "entertainment".
As stated in my previous representations.
But what gets me is this..... YouTube KNOWS people like to use movie clips to illustrate a point or give a response, even political one... WHY??
BECAUSE YOUR COUNTERPARTS AT FACEBOOK ARE ACTIVELY ENCOURAGING IT.
BY GBOARD ON PHONES AND LAPTOPS HAVING STUPID BUILT IN ANIMATED GIFFS OF FILMS. AND MOVIES. THAT PEOPLE PUT IN FORUM REPLIES AND GROUPS. PERSONALLY I CANT STAND THOSE. THEY ARE TACK!!! BUT LOTS OF BLOKEY MALE GROUPS LOVE USING THEM. MACHO GROUPS AND KIDS GROUPS.
IN FACT WHEN I GOT MY NEW PHONE. I COULD NOT GET RID OF THE STUPID GBOARD GIFF SUGGESTIONS. I HAD TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO GET RID OF IT.
Now.... Facebook and Gboard are ACTIVELY, PSYCHOLOGICALLY GROOMING PEOPLE AND PRIMING PEOPLE TO GET THEM INTO USING GIFF ANIMATIONS FROM FILMS. IN SUGGESTIONS.
FACEBOOK. ZUCKERBERG. so where are the copywrite claims on those huh? None.
You and gboard and the mobile phone companies PROVIDE THEM!!!
You are encouraging movie clip use in the brain. And that is causing people to want to upload movie clips and excerpts yo YouTube to use as examples or make a point
YOU and FACEBOOK.. partners in crime.
So that.. when people get hooked on it.. You get a nice little constant supply of copywrite claims to keep you happy and busy punishing people, making money for your 3rd party's and promoting their films... While you get to throw your authoritarian weight around and flex your online muscles
Just complete and total set up... All orchestrated behaviours. You probably have a psychology and marketing team that set it up.
So its actually "ENCOURAGED' to get people to use movie clips to respond to something. And you are bagging people for doing it.
If i had the money i would raise a case for conspiracy to provide legal cases and claims for YouTubes 3rd parties.
Try Jacob Wohl on that case.
Really diabolical.....
Fact is that my channel us not buisness, entertainment or personal. It is political and evidence. And you cant make me alter evidence when it must be presented unmodified. Its totally different channel and purpose to that Dr.Who content i put. Because thats what you are saying you expect people to do to clips.
That doesnt apply to evidence.
And as for short movie clips... Similarly to Gboard giffs.. if a person changes it.. it wont be any use to make the point with anymore. And you know that. Its why people get into gboard giffs.
Really we someone with intelligence at YouTube.
Because this is real top level law and issues.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Nov 20, 2021 20:54:31 GMT
Onto another Matter Now.. Zuckerberg again..... Complete fruit loop.
He wants to have people become "unsatisfied" with real people, relationships & World. Literally people will abandon us.
And Drift into that World.. Leaving Jeff Bezos & Richard Branson & Elon Musk To Take over this real World Completely. And go "unchallenged" with their real life play missions... Where they will be a ruling Class. & Actually be free from "costs" of legal challenges (We could not afford) to stop them.
Absolute Pure Evil Demon of Humanity. And Everything we can do & use to stop him is already being removed. Already being de funded, legal aid, right to object to building & our REAL world being destroyed around us.... As more and more of our real friends become addicted. To his "drug" Literally the Mind & like a drug when imagination in in effect.... It will get addictions... People will not want to hang out with real people. Its a very sad & Lonely Idea & the Fact that Nobody really has the power or vote to stop him....
He has encourages a following of power.. on YouTube Such as Mr. Beast... Hundreds of Millions... And can control how many children follow them. And Subscribe.. While Other Real Channels that oppose have algorithm's put on to work against them.. For Example Russel Brand.
Its Doom for Mankind.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Nov 22, 2021 19:18:15 GMT
Complaint to META About Facebooks plans
__________
Complaint
Dear Meta "Chief Executives, President, and who it may concern"
After watching Mark Zuckerberg's presentation on the vision for "Meta" (I saw this featured in a recent video from Russell Brands YouTube channel)
I really am not a fan of the idea at all. And i intend to record a detailed feedback video of why i dont think it is a good idea.
Mainly though, even Facebook now, i believe is failing peoples Fundamental rights and liberties that society and democracy is founded on.
Its true that you have this "ideal" of community standards. But this is your own policy that you impose globally and it is now overriding the law and rights of nations.
You might have good interests at heart, and good intentions, but to have that global influence i believe requires much more care and responsibility.
And i dont think Facebook has got it right yet... And already you intent to expand more further influence globally through "meta".
I also am concerned about your political connections to government, in this. For example ex deputy prime minister Nick Clegg, involved in and working for Facebook "meta". Do the Liberal Democrats party now have stakes in meta??
Your vision of Facebook community standards, administration, control, reporting, blocking banning... Seems an obsession also. Not encouraging love and understanding but walls, segregation, individualisation, intolerance and evading concern or care.
Facebook has pursued community administration tactics and control. Literally networks of new social "bosses" outside our work bosses.
Yet, now you seem to be going the other way with "meta" claiming you encourage total freedom, creativity.
That is very much a contradiction. And what effects can this have on the human mind?
Also, in relation to Facebook, it is supposed to be subject to all Rights law and liberty of democracy and each country.
Yet.. no Group admins or moderators ever OWN their groups. Facebook owns Facebook. People merely form groups which bring people together with the same interests. There people dont even have the same attitudes and you are not encouraging understanding, with block and report tools. You encourage ignorance and separation.
Politically and strategically that has a huge advantage for political party franchise, because then people will be less tolerant of eachother and come together less in fact... To unite against political franchise and enterprise and actually be more devoted to the "system" itself. Facebook, meta.. than real people. Always following celebrities and corporations more than real life friends.
Thats the dark side of where meta will take us. Distracting the main bulk of people from what Mark Zuckerberg, Richard Branson, Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos are then getting upto in the real world.. unchallenged. By unity and power of voters.
Another point on Facebook currently..
There are SERIOUS censorship issues still evident.
Your vision was to create a fair safe community. Under rights and law, free from abuse.
But i have very strong evidence from being in groups, that power and controls of admin and moderators in groups is going to peoples heads. And Admins and moderators are abusing their powers. And there is really very little you are doing about it. In fact there is nothing really there for us to be able to report it and i dont think you are capable of tracking it and really understanding it. I think you are encouraging authoritarianism.
I agree that people should not abuse people. But we have a situation now, where people are not swearing, not abusing anyone, not breaking a law and not even actually breaking any listed group rules...
Yet admin are now just "deleting posts and comments" simply because they "dont like it" or "dont agree" or just "dont want" people to be able to say what they think or opinion.. literally... They dont want them to be able to have a free speech.
No wonder people might find meta "appealing" complete freedom" when you have actually created and actively encouraged quite the opposite of freedom , on a global scale.
You own Facebook. But it is a platform open to the public. You say it is "a community" community guidelines" therefore treated as anywhere in reality, in the community, under the rights, freedoms, freedom of speech of countries. Governments.
You are not enforcing those rights and laws.
Instead you have created groups, where admins and moderators, untrained, and not read in law or rights, are now just expressing purely their own absolute likes and dislikes, and pure personal opinion over every single thing people post and say.
Deleting and removing all or any free speech, when there is no rule broken, no stated group rules at all. Or law broken.
Also, some groups have 5 or more admins or moderators and they have very different opinions on standards and they dont even know what eachother is doing. And we cant keep track of who is doing what to posts and people. It is chaotic moderation.
In fact... The largest amount of Cyber bullying, harrassment now is coming from admin and moderators against the members. Individuals. When no swearing was used, no arguments, no group rule listed that was broken.
Literally the very personal whim and likes of admin, mods are being exercised as if it is their own front room or house. And it is supposed to be "community" standards. Not "private house" standards.
In fact i have always been able to speak freely in someone's house, more than i have ever been able to speak on facebook groups. Without issues.
Facebook encourages intolerance and misunderstanding AND removes fair right and ability to talk about it even.
Many issues on facebook we are even obstructed from talking about with an admin to resolve it.
I believe this is strategic to encourage actually less community and more lines of division, that will benefit governments and enterprise. The breaking up and division of people and their power to unite. Its a clever strategy. Otherwise very large movements of people will form and even could oppose the Facebook or other big enterprises and parties themselves. And i think that benefits people such as Nick Clegg, Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, who have very wide influencer media now popping up that is pro their cause. Putting in childrens space cartoon themes primed in. And these money oligarchs can afford to insert psychological influencer content now effecting people everywhere they look, listen, without escape. Unless we pay up.
The fact i want to concentrate on, though... Is this culture you have created, and are responsible for globally.. What other options are there for us??!
When Instagram, Meta, Facebook, Youtube, Google literally now are the only major global platforms that people use??
Yet you override fundamental rights to speak your mind. Even when not swearing or offending. Just "words or opinion, or even speaking"
"Permission to speak sir"
That is regimented, authoritarian rank system. Rank is military.
You can never encourage love and freedom when you have rank. Because votes are not equal. In democracy voting is equal. Under law and freedom to open your mouth without needing permission.
And what you have encouraged amd facilitated now, in so called "online communities" is an environment that overrides the law and legal right of nations.
You do not have the right to speak without permission. Even in the "community". You need permission to speak from an admin or moderator. Before you can reliably put a statement or sentence to writing, without it being immediately in jeopardy of the pure whim, will, fancy or opinion of an admin or moderator.... EVEN IF NO RULE WAS BROKEN AND NO LAW.
so literally there was no basis in law or rule by which the admin or moderator used to remove a comment.
This is not community at all. It is not the ideals or concept of community. It is the ideal and concept of authoritarianism and of regimented control. Intolerance.
It is not community.
And now... Content with getting people used to blocking amd banning, and more and more intolerance... Your solution is "Meta" the virtual world where you offer perfection... So that nothing you dont like at all or want can be your world..
Meanwhile.. in the real world.. this is actually the true reality of what the Conservative Tory party ARE DOING. Through supreme financial power they have taken from us, by getting us addicted to their products, foods, and Jeff Bezos had be benefitted from, and Youtube and Facebook through advertising. They are responsible for pollution to the planet. And Boris Johnson, the Tory government ARE taking rights, freedoms, right to object to buildings ruining our villages and towns around us... So they CAN implement and live their dreams in reality!! And The super Rich, Jeff Bezos, Richard Branson and Rich friends can live their reality unchallenged. While we have to settle for Meta world of virtual reality.
What a scam and distraction. Absolutely despicable. And all the unity, true community that could unite and come together... Actually using the Facebook, YouTube, Instagram platforms... People have been trained and primed, led NOT to talk things through, NOT to be understanding and tolerate debate, not to listen.
Because YOU DONT WANT THEM UNITED REALLY AT ALL.
Meta will distract and segregate people. And have them focused on and obsessed with the characters you implement. The celebrities and stars you place in constellations around them. Your advocated, your sales people....
For example Blathnaid Treacy, already a national obsession with these stars... Coersing nations to give money over to these "Charities" that really is just "The Government" that decides where the money will go. And no real chance of anyone winning the money jackpots because it is a system designed to defeat real luck.
If its not enough that people already pay tax to the government, and give money to these "enterprises, Amazon" "YouTube"... Then, the rest of any remaining money is soaked up by the lotteries.. so that every penny is accounted for. Nothing remains. No financial power of individuals that could be used to oppose or challenge what is being done to us, as this unfolds.
And as your platforms (only main major platforms) are, as a state.. NOT in fact encouraging unity AT ALL or political rights or power... In fact, segregation, intolerance, misunderstanding, ignorance, blocking, banning...
You do NOT actually have a real true intention of "community" at all. It is community that is leading to "Anti community" banishment into the virtual world.
If Facebook, meta wants to prove that it has any value or interest at all in "community" and equality....
It would remove admin controls and moderator controls from facebook.
Nobody owns a group anyway. Facebook owns everything. All admins do is form groups of interest. So there is no ownership.
Everyone has ability to block anyone. So WHY do we need any other control than that??? If anyone in a group doesnt want to interact with anyone else, they can block them.
There no need for them to be blocked from the rest of a group. When nobody else has a problem with them.
I believe that you dont want large groups of shared interests to be free to talk openly and fairly. And you now have admins and moderators at an all time low intolerance level.. to an extent that it is authoritarian training. Literally like the Spectre camp in From Russia with Love.
You have NOT been checking the motivations and private interests of your group admins and moderators..
So personal likes and dislikes have been free to go beyond group rules and law of right... So that actually they are bossing and censoring to levels never before known to mankind...
And the like / dislike buttons have encouraged this.
In fact i see this problem in the courts, with Judges and Magistrates. Where they get used to authority and begin over time to abuse the power.
Then... People will want to escape this. And your solution is actually not far from a prison cell itself. The virtual world.
I wouldn't be so opposed to this virtual world, if it was not YOUR fault in why we need it, because of your devizing and failures with Facebook in the first place.
And no, not financial failings. Far from it. You have successfully captured eveyones imagination. Literally on Facebook, against their rights...
And now you will unleash that captured imagination into the virtual world. Where YOU are the gods. You are the programmers of the fabric of reality there.
While here, you intend to divide and conquer further.
No wonder people will need to escape to meta.
While in the real world, that actually IS under the power of GOD, you plan to complete domination, world domination. With ALL possible conception of opposition to your plans removed. Financial opposition removed for ordinary people, (unless they subscribe to enterprise, take, take take and proffit) they certainly will not be using that money against a system that gave them that financial power. They join into your influencer network, to sell more and more (thus at detrimental effect to the planet)
You do not want any possibility to remain that could conceivably vote against what you are doing to us.
Because your constallstions of advocates and celebrities are now in strategic positions... News. Television, Lottery, commercial radio and the small. Number of political parties.. Labour Conservative , Liberal Democrats are now affiliated with meta, with Amazon and with the main enterprises that are planning this.
Unfortunately Mark Zuckerberg.. you have not used any capacity to solve any problems on society at all. On the planet.
You are contributing to and have created the problems and believe that tech and tech geeks are the solution to the problems in the world. Yet you are the cause.
It is your divide and conquer strategy with governments that is reducing us to celebrity obsession and regime rule where you will be the gods.
And i believe the spiritual leaders.. Pope Francis, the Archbishop of Canterbury need to be very concerned about your plans for the human mind and humanity.
You have no spiritual qualifications or training, yet to plan to influence the minds of the planet.
Under what authority?? The sovereign power of money that you have taken?? Are you now the sovereign power of the world???
We dont seem to be able to see the true stars that guide us. Because if all the light pollution you have created by your cities... And now further you want to hide the light of the world from us further and shine only your light on us. Through "Rayban" glasses and meta.
It is bordering past evil.
Unleashed mind is chaos. And chaotic imagination soon becomes a reality.
In reality the laws of physics prevent chaos. Our bodies cannot survive without the laws of physics. Temperature... In space we will freeze.
The mind needs stability. Imagination unrestrained leads to chaos. Self harm, self mutilation as fun.
I believe that your desire to unleash the mind is chaotic and that it will only lead to more chaos. Therfore i am also writing to the pope Francis over this matter. Because as far as i am concerned you are not competent or responsible enough to have the power of money that you have. And greed and sin is behind it no matter what good intentions you claim to have.
This is my complaint and statement to meta and all concerned.
Regards.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Dec 6, 2021 12:45:26 GMT
A Person degrades their own character when they fall below the standards required to read and understand the english language.
The plaintiff called me out on purpose. He started the incident. He is responsible for the incident, the instigator of the incident.
You completely fail to read a situation, its cause and dynamics.
As i said.. its RETARDED ... As published in the dictionary.
The plaintiffs behaviour was retarded. Then.. you evaluate the posts and add further retardation to the situation. By failing to identify the manner and condescending tone and attitude that the plaintiff replied with to my original comment. I have no recent records of posting bans
The plaintiff i believe engages in that conduct regularly. I was within my rights i state the facts.
The fact is he was retarded in his conduct. I will use the word until it is removed from the Oxford English dictionary.. or you compile a list of words that are not allowed on Facebook and remove them from use in the platform permanently.
Your guidelines are so vague they do not stand up in court. There essentially is NO GUIDELINE. Because you are so vague that your guidelines cannot be identified. And your staff do as they please.
There is no world standard. It doesnt exist. You are attempting to create a world standard yourselves. Yet from which countries law?? From which court?? Everyone has a right to a fair trial. You give NO opportunity for statement or response before you administer Punishments.
You are lowering the world standard amd creating your own governance. Yet your guidelines are so absolutely vague that they are impossible to define Clearly. They have been written so you are free to interpret it as you wish.
Which is no clear exact interpretation. What words?? You list none.
What technology?? You use no technology at all. You have no words disabled. Or we wouldnt be able to type it.
And if you attempted to remove words from the dictionary you would be removing free speech....
Mark Zuckerberg is criminal. He is an Authoritarian who takes away world rights and is attempting to impose a cyber government that has NO due legal process NONE. NO statement. NO right to representation before punishment. None.
Absolute low standards of administration and poor staff training and education.
Breaking rights across the world. All the time taking away due legal process. Legally required process. Of statements and representation.
The platform is corrupted. Amd when people are in political groups, its ILLEGAL to stop us posting in petition and campaign groups. As you have no legal right to intervention.
Please remove the posting ban immediately. I have zero history of bans. And my conduct is good.
I am allowed to use the word "retarded" it is in the Oxford English dictionary available to purchase for any person or child under 16 years old and all words are there not only to learn but use. The word can and does mean "lacking" in understanding. And of there is no other word fitting i can use it. Within my legal rights. In fact i gave example here:
SEE MORONIC. POLITICAL USE, IN GOVERNMENT OF POLITICAL PETITION GROUP TO GOVERNMENT IS EXEMPT. >>. where even its used in live broadcast to the nation I broke no law. If i have broken a law then press charges and state the offence. You are forcing a policy on me against my right to free speech. The policy can not find me guilty without a fair trial in a court of law. I am innocent. Unless i admit the offence. I do not admit the offence as i have broken no law. You are now punishing me when i am giving statement hereby i do not agree with the decision. Or accusation. I have the right to a fair trial in a court of law before i can be punished.
Your policy serves to take away my rights as a UK citizen.
Restore my posting status immediately. I CAN and WILL use the WORD RETARDED. From page 1228 of the concise Oxford English dictionary. "Less advanced in mental or social development" The poster WAS stating he could not understand my post. It was perfectly clear. Therefore he is less advanced in mental development.
The word is there to use. The dictionary is also not age certified. Any age can purchase and use it. The word is published for use in english language.
Restore my posting status immediately. Now. Today. Not tomorrow,
You are unlawfully obstructing my profile when i am engaged in petitioning on several UK petitions sites, that i have a right to post on now. Immediately under the right to petition. 1688 bill of rights.
Your policy is illegal and obstructing me from signing petitions and adding information to petitions that have critical time.
If any person does not wish to interections with me, they are free to block me. You are further obstructing my political activities freely.
Magna carta "to none we will deny, to none delay right of justice"
You are not only denying me a fair trial before punnishment. You are denying my political rights. Delaying them.
You are not justices or judges. You have zero authority to take action on my account without asking for a statement.
The comment i put is not a statement. It is evidence.
The other person also started being funny in the first place. Yet you fail to identify that. Because you are also retarded. And its the correct appropriate word.
You have no legal right to tell me what words a can and can not use. Unless you remove them from the platform completely. Otherwise they have been made "permissible" by your own programming.
All words that can be typed and posted are therefore permissible. You gave permission to type and post them in the programming of the platform.
If you dont restore my status immediately i will take legal action against Facebook for abuse of authority and illegal policy that serves to create a framework that permits words.. then you abuse people with authoritarian actions, against lawful language of the oxford dictionary.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Dec 6, 2021 14:04:14 GMT
Can you explain, in English please. Not automated replies.. HOW... If you have already made a "decision" on my restrictions... You ask if i "disagree" with it, every time i try "like" something .. You will be basing this new evaluation on what? The exact same evidence?? Can you tell me exactly where i can submit a LEGAL STATEMENT with evidence and explainations by that "disagree" form... Otherwise you literally will have no new evidence or information what so ever. So how can you re evaluate?? Also dont you know that when people "disagree" they are not admitting fault, and they cannot be punished. Until proven guilty. Once someone "disagrees" you need to initiate court action. Because they cannot be punished. You are not a court or judiciary. You can gather evidence, make statements like the police. But you are not a constable, nor justices. Or sherrif. You are citizens and you have a few lawyers.. you can collect evidence. You can only arrest if you are going to pursue legal action. If you are not pursuant of legal action through the courts, you can only hold and use evidence and statements. Only constables, Sherrif or the council can give fines also. LITERALLY you dont have a jurisdiction to make an order. Your policy cant include any right to be a jury or judge, without a fair trial in a court of law. The Facebook policy is a perversion of the course of justice. You have hijacked global legal rights from independent nations. And have created a cyber government where you are judge amd jury with no actual jurisdiction. You force. Unlawfully a cyber jurisdiction only because its unchallenged and you have the controller. And are based in another country. You omit any ability for the defendant to give a statement (seperate from evidence) Comments under scrutiny are not a statement. They are evidence . And you should not be applying restrictions while the defendant still disagrees with you. Same as if you appeal a disqualification at court you are not disqualified until the trial. Its lifted. The entire dream and vision of Facebook is a total Perversion of the course of justice and a new all time LOW. In standards of service and rights. Literally if Facebook WAS the Government and this ended up the world standard.. We would have no right to speak, give statement, no fair trial, and guilty until proved innocent.. and in fact there would be no appeal as your system doesnt give any options at all. You do not even give the plaintiff and defendant opportunity to resolve the matter themselves.. In the civil procedure rules... All efforts of the parties must be made of possible to resolve the issue out of court.. You give NO effort at all. You believe that a forced strike and then restrictions is "resolving things making all efforts to" You make no effort to hear any statement of explainations. Your form gives NO options at all. By the Civil Procedure rules.. literally you give ZERO facilitation to "openly resolve the matter" or allow the parties to. Its all forced. With only your own staff or machine automated with NO communication before action. It goes against everything that the legal system is founded upon. It is total Authoritarianism.. absolute
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Dec 7, 2021 2:56:43 GMT
FACEBOOK CHIEF EXECUTIVE FACEBOOK LEGAL POLICY & COMMU&NITY STANDARDS ACTIONS
RIGHT.
Are You saying that.. 1. It is IMPOSSIBLE to IN TRUTH & FACT complaint to FACEBOOK & get RESOLUTION for misuse of your Legal process & Policy??
Also the OVERSIGHT BOARD is Pointless. Its Not Guaranteeing our case/appel will be looked at even. So its not an appeal.
It a "potential appeal". Where it leads one to believe one CAN appeal. So Appeal is not guaranteed.
Your POLICY is completely currently Fascist.
THERE IS NO WAY TO GIVE ANY STATEMENT AT ALL TO FACEBOOK, WHEN A PLAINTIFF RAISES A COMPLAINT AGAINST US. NONE.
You Look at evidence & Execute decisions with.. NO POSSIBLE LEGAL REPRESENTATION FROM THE DEFENDANT AT THAT STAGE.
Its a Perversion of the Course of Justice & Denying Rights under 1.1C of the Criminal procedure rules, the Right to a Statement.. As Well as Your Policy Ignoring other Critical Political Rights.
Literally your policy is created so that we have NO RIGHTS. Not even to give a single statement before you take action. The Evidence is not a statement. The "Comments" on groups where an issue is raised is NOT the defendants Statement. It is Evidence on the (Case). The Fundamental baseline requirement of any legal action is to OBTAIN A STATEMENT FROM THE DEFENDANT. Not use their (Comment) as their statement. Their offending Comment is "Evidence". Its not a statement about the incident.
You are Using Forced Authoritarian Regime to Literally STEAL Due, Legally Required Process. Its a perversion of the Course of Justice.
And You are trying to impose this Globally on the World. In all Countries & as a Business Entity, It is illegal. It Breaks all Due process requirements.
The people who have written your Policy, Your Lawyers are Wrong.
And The Same Goes for facebook. Your Evaluation Methods also are Failing. Poor Evaluation Standards.
At NO POINT do you facilitate to make a statement on your "appeal decision" process either. None. So why would your decision change, on appeal?? How can it when we can only re-sumbit?? there is NO STATEMENT. possible at that stage.
Also Your "Oversight Board" It appears to be an avenue of Appeal. But it is NOT. Its literally that "It MIGHT" get selected for review. So How can it be a Legitimate "appeal" ?? Its not an Appeal. An Appeal is a existing process where appeal is possible. Not "Might be possible"
Literally your entire mission, Policy and Principles are to obtain Global Control & pervert the Course of Justice. And attempt to force a standard & Social Dominance & Governance Globally that Robs people of Proper legal process. The Fundamental Right of Legal Process, and Free speech, even obstructing what is regarded as "a Statement" and Representation so that you can punish & take actions against a defendant where that have had ALL Due Process REQUIRED IN LAW in Civil & Criminal Matters, Stripped away. It is a Criminal Framework.
And Its Strategic, I believe in collaboration with the Government. As you have Ex Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg Working for you at Facebook. a Lib Dem party Member. The Policy is Unlawfull.
As is YouTubes Policy. Denies & ignored All Political Rights. & Denies due Process of Civil & Criminal Proceedings required in law & perverts the Process, So that UPON COMPLAINT the Defendant is deprived of all Statements, that are REQUIRED MORE THAN THE EVIDENCE. from the Platform/posts. Defendant Statement is PRIMARY REQUIREMENT OVER THE ACTUAL EVIDENCE.
A Comment that has been "claimed" against is not the statement. of The Defendant.
There is a clear distinction.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Feb 13, 2022 22:34:18 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Feb 19, 2022 5:49:24 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Mar 3, 2022 13:05:45 GMT
There are near worse things going on currently with facebook and its effects on people and the entire planet, socially and even in buisness now. If you arent realising this .then its even more sinister. The effects on rights and customer service that whims from facebook blocks and bans is having. I just also saw a video with Mark Zuckerberg talking about Meta and its direction.. talking avatars and interactive avatars and make up enhancement changing how you look online yet they demand ID for you to place adverts and to even be on there yet these new avatars are "false" ID in a way. Its counter intuitive. Also Facebook is now full of Hackers and scammers more so in Facebook help groups. The fact that people would need help shows the platform gas serious issues and defects and the social order its creating is not working. People cannot get in contact with facebook or a solution from facebook itself so they go to these groups, with no other alternative and they are getting scammed and hacked. And facebook is either incapable of dealing with it. Or turning the blind eye I think they have cultivated this sinister situation on purpose. The platform is wanting to press ahead with plans and development when it has many many problems and deep rooted issues under the surface.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Mar 8, 2022 21:59:47 GMT
Am being hacked and messed around with on facebook..
Someone posing as other group admins.. Hacking groups and removing me from groups..
Also blocking signatures on petitions and my tagging.
The police will not help.
The hackers are just editing, changing messenger messages, posing as other party and just absolute intervention and domination of all social interactions.
Just helpless. Facebook offer zero assistance at all and the report hacking tools have been removed theres no dedicated hacking report tool now on options. Unless you submit general bug report.
Hackers can access the complaints and just delete them. So you are left totally without assistance.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Mar 10, 2022 17:18:39 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Mar 18, 2022 3:53:50 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Mar 20, 2022 2:34:12 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Mar 28, 2022 4:46:49 GMT
AMAZING!!!!!!!!!! YES PUTIN!!! As Russia bans Facebook and Instagram, what alternatives will Russian social media users turn to? www.euronews.com/next/2022/03/25/as-russia-bans-facebook-and-instagram-what-alternatives-will-russian-social-media-users-tuAMAZING!!! THIS HAPPENED IN REAL LIFE!!! PUTIN HAS BLOCKED MARK ZUCKERBORGS!!! YES!!!! Zuckerberg Enjoyed to Illegally Block President Donald Trump from his Platform Facebook & other platforms.. So now we see Zuckerborg face his OWN MEDICINE.. He BELIEVES IN THE SCIENTOLOGIST WAY OF LIFE. IF YOU DONT LIKE IT JUST BLOCK IT. So WELL DONE PUTIN. FACEBOOK HAS BEEN ENCOURAGING ADMINISTRATORS & MODERATORS ALL OVER THE WORLD TO DESTROY & CORRUPT GOOD WILL AND KIND HEARTS & UNDERSTANDING & TOLERANCE. A WAVE OF WORLDWIDE NEGLACT HAS BEEN PSYCHOLOGICALLY BREEDING. I HAVE NOTICED THIS ALL AROUND. FACEBOOK REFUSE TO COMMUNICATE WITH PEOPLE & ENGAGE WITH USERS. NICK CLEGG REFUSES TO REPLY OR RESPOND. FACEBOOK HAS SERIOUS HACKING & SCAMMER ISSUES IN ITS GROUPS PARTICULARLY THE FACEBOOK HELP GROUPS FULL OF SCAMMERS & HACKERS. SO WELL DONE PUTIN!!!!!! I USE FACEBOOK, BUT I AM GLAD YOU BLOCKED IT. I HOPE ZUCKERBERG FEELS LIKE TRUMP DID NOW. TASTE OF OWN MEDICINE!!! 😱😱😱😱😱😱 Zuckerberg is taking over the world and your childrens minds THANK GOD PUTIN HAS BLOCKED TRUMPED AND FACEBOOK BY BLOCKING ZUCKERBERG FROM HALF THE PLANET! 😮
|
|