W O R K for the STATE the right to Petition Subjects Jan 22, 2020 11:43:39 GMT
Post by Administrator on Jan 22, 2020 11:43:39 GMT
So, Collonel John Moore (Dafts) the Petition from the Liverpool Widdows (Women)
He Refers to THEM as the Petitioners.
So the (Citizens) ARE the Petitioners. Not Moore.
This is likely his hand writing. As He is Member of Parliament.
But This is likely because, as I said.. School & Education was not compulsory & few people could read & write to any high standard.
Unless they were taught in the Church, or Went to University.
So Moore drafts the Petition for them. (He is not the Petitioner)
The Petition is Stamped by "Her Majesty's Paper office".. We know There was a KING on the throne at that time. So it is reference to His Wife The Queen (Consort's) Paper office.
And they have separate committees for different petition subject causes.
So.. Today in Modern times.. All the petitions are sent to "The Petitions Committee" one committee. And As Everyone can read & write as it is compulsory Education... We do not need our Local MP Member of Parliament to draft our Petitions for us, as we can submit our own, in writing on paper or by Internet on the website & they are official (Parliament resisted) which is the stamp.. or publishing on the website, or any other letter of confirmation.
Its worth noting.. that before the 1688 Bill of Rights... These Women could easily have been "prosecuted" for "Spying" on Armies and troops.. by reporting on them..
That would have been a offence, charge..
NOT ACTUALLY PETITIONING. AS YOU WERE ALLOWED TO, AND IT EXISTED AND PEOPLE COULD DO IT.
The Offence, if the King had fancied prosecuting her COULD HAVE... been brought, for spying... Note that its not a charge for "Petitioning" and there is still petitioning going on.
Therefore... "The Right to Petition" and ALL COMMITMENTS & PROSECUTIONS ARE ILLEGAL.. MUST refer to anything in connection with the petitioning, cause, subject & acts of the petitioner...
So its clearly protection against "Offences, Charges" against the petitioner... Obviously Travelling to deliver a petition & gather evidence MUST be included in the Protection.
This Raises more serious questions concerning the Anne Sacoolas case.. who is Wife of the American Spy, Military In Northamptonshire.
Because It brings things like Spying (Diplomatic immunity) under association with a Petition example here, that is in relation Armies, Civil Wars, And "Associated matters" Political Matters.
In fact it is the Government Soldiers that have caused damage & plundered. & The Women are seeking resolution.
This is very similar to the Queens Police Force.. Police Chief Officers.. Who are accused of misuse of Road Traffic Enforcement, Speed Cameras & Use of Misleading & False Road Signs against the public.. in a War against Drivers who are just trying to get to work or get home from work..
And all the money that is being plundered from people in the process & their driving licences taken away from them.
Therefore my petitioning & all actions in connection with gathering evidence for that petitioning are correct & valid to the reason & purposes of Petitioning.
And As We DO have the Right to petition Protection in place...
It is illegal for me to BE prosecuted & any prosecutions or court orders are invalid & void.
Therefore & Require my Driving Licence to be returned & monies taken by the courts refunded & all orders made by the courts in relation to these facts & circumstances withdrawn, discontinued, made void.
Because I have had enough of the Crown Prosecution Service, Courts & Police.