|
|
Post by Administrator on Feb 28, 2021 19:30:44 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Mar 1, 2021 2:49:25 GMT
Phillip you are the weakest link. Goodbye
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Mar 2, 2021 22:26:54 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Mar 15, 2021 15:40:54 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Mar 27, 2021 3:00:17 GMT
 Wirral Councils Mace. visit-to-wallasey-town-hall- |
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Apr 1, 2021 11:31:36 GMT
Another lecture discussion on Political cases vs Criminal cases that the Justices continually fail to recognise
This time following a case in connection with some HS2 protesters
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Apr 2, 2021 14:04:52 GMT
Parliament currently doing this stupid biased survey regarding the new Protesters Bill proposal www.smartsurvey.co.uk/s/0LIDQC/Notice how they limit the field of cgaracters to only 100 words so as usual our freedom of speech is obstructed. Which is literally THE problem with petitions they offer on their site anyway and generally. |
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Apr 24, 2021 12:18:58 GMT
So....
Extinction Rebellion activists acquitted in the Crown court yesterday..
By a Jury.. for smashing Bank windows.
Landmark moment for Extinction Rebellion..
But its actually more frustrating than anything because most people still just don't understand the underlying principle in effect..
They are just coasting through this on Dutch courage.. even though they are winning, its still not being done right.
________________
Some points from the other thread I added
_______________
This is another thing....
The Jury likely had already heard and knew about the Extinction Rebellion window smashing actions.
In law criminal cases are supposed to be kept out of the media until the case is over.
People aren't supposed to know about it.
But because the Jury DID know about it outside of the context of proceedings..
They therefore had political opinions and knowledge..
Which goes to show that political matters cannot be heard in a criminal court..
As demonstrated by the outcome.
The newspapers have gradually over time totally perverted the rules of informing on live or ongoing court cases because the government uses them as a tool anyway for propaganda..
They break all the rules themselves.
Anyway...
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Apr 24, 2021 12:19:37 GMT
Here im trying to explain it to these people here.. lol. Explaining this to the average extinction Rebellion people is futile. Its as futile as trying to explain to the Judges DJ Watson or CPS This new Case.. the Not Guilty Verdict.. It is amazing.. But really its a Miracle.. Im not saying the Decision was wrong or Not.. But its the FUNDAMENTAL DYNAMICS that these people do not get.. You just cannot explain it to them.. They dont have the cognative capacity to understand even when they win a case...  |
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Apr 24, 2021 15:49:13 GMT
Justices of Assize were definitely of the Kings Bench www.familysearch.org/wiki/en/Assize_Court_Records#:~:text=The%20word%20assize%20refers%20to,of%20%22oyer%20and%20terminer%22%2C Mobile. Justices of the peace dealt with more smaller local cases by Quarter Sessions Still.. if you are bringing evidence against the Justices.. you can take the grievance/case directly to the King / Parliament It's a fundamental principle particularly as we played a much deeper role in policing that if there are issues with the Authorities we are protected from punishment by those authorities while we are in pursuit of the matter. Simple |
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Apr 25, 2021 12:19:19 GMT
JUDGE GREGORY PERRINS & THE EXTINCTION REBELLION CASE CLASSIC EXAMPLE OF WHY PROSECUTION NOT ALLOWED
Simon BramWell, Ian Bray, Jane Augsburger, Senan Clifford, David Lambert, James "Sid" Saunders V Crown - Trial - at Southwark Crown court Friday 23rd April 2021 Judge Gregory Perrins
Perrins found it a rather "peculiar case" after claiming there was no legal basis for defence.
I explain why Section 6 of the Human Rights act 1998, The Right to petition parlisment without being prosecuted and the fundamental dynamics of the Crown Court Framework is defective when a case is brought in connection with Political Matters brought to the parliament.
This case is classic example of why such cases ultimately will fail. Because of the Public having an engagement in the matters, facts & circumstanves, which renders it not a standard criminal case..
Politically charged & why these rights & laws exist, that the Police, CPS & Judge failed to identify.
Therefore serious lessons need to be learned.
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Apr 27, 2021 0:36:33 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on May 4, 2021 18:42:44 GMT
CHARITABLE CAUSES / VOLUNTRY WORK
CLASSIFICATION:
Just for Future reference....
Helping Old People
Any Type of People with Illness or in need, disadvantaged people...
Animals...
All these Resisted charities are recognised by the public for doing something that helps the greater good. Of the public.
Litter picking is regarded (by the public) as a “good” cause. This is why charities & volunteer’s do it. There are Charity such as “Keep Britain Tidy”
Now this is still recognised as a “good cause” but has the additional facet that its also “illegal” (an offence) to drop litter & you can be fined.
So Picking litter is in line with legislation & law upholding & un-doing bad that was against the law.
This is the bridge between 2 factors that identify good work.
1. Regarded as a greater good by the general public. If helping animals or elderly people was not considered “god” work by the larger public then it would not be recognised as a good cause.
2. Upholding or in line with law enforcement, rules or un-doing something that was in contravention of law or rules (I.e. litter picking / keep Britain tidy)
This is where Voluntary Police work & Pro Bono work comes in. Because it is “in line with upholding lawfulness & rules”
So anything you are doing which is acting to enforce rules & regulations & make certain any law or rule was broken & seek to put it right/against the offender or rule breaker.. This is in the interest of the public that the rule or regulation served to protect the interests of the public.
So a petition about rules being broken is a good cause. Due to the law & regulation have being breached.
And someone doing something wrong.
Litter picking falls into this.
Even with Registered Charities, there are some causes that the General Public might nor be that concerned about. Not also people support what charities do, in fact some could have opposition. Although in general most have some widely recognised element of Good work.
Thank you
Richard
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on May 23, 2021 15:42:22 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jun 12, 2021 22:00:05 GMT
Lots of serious issues now with Southwark Crown Court and Judge Gregory Perrins.
Particularly between The Ian Bray case and also two different Angela Ditchfield cases and the Crown Prosecution service.
There is also the Lord Hanningfield case to figure into it as well.
The CPS are going to the High Court and going the wrong way. Getting people convicted instead of Aquitted
|
|
