|
Post by Administrator on Dec 30, 2020 23:07:00 GMT
I know I've already recorded this but it needs to be in this thread as well
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Dec 30, 2020 23:07:53 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Dec 30, 2020 23:47:39 GMT
Ive found the relevance of this, quite significant especially in study of the origins of the "right to object" in building and planning as well as in grievances as well.. because also petition for marriage and divorce is connected Now, in law itself especially when seeking employment of a Lawyer.. The Lawyer should be "unbiased" neutral. So its actually not ridiculous to actually ask a lawyer, Crown prosecutor or even a probation officer . If in carrying out their duties... If there is "any personal reason why your representation, complaint or other request for work" cannot be 100% honestly and truthfully undertaken.. may they let that reason be know now" Because really it may be that even a paid, employed lawyer might not be best representing your interests to their full or honest capacity.. Basically it's good to check that they are 100% behind you. grammarist.com/phrase/speak-now-or-forever-hold-your-peace/#:~:text=Speak%20now%20or%20forever%20hold%20your%20peace%20is%20a%20phrase,now%20used%20in%20everyday%20language.&text=This%20phrase%20is%20derived%20from,communities%20was%20at%20best%2C%20spotty.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Dec 31, 2020 14:18:58 GMT
Didn't realise but my youtube discussions will be automatically transcribed  So its possible to get a download of the lectures/statements 🤔
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jan 1, 2021 0:37:26 GMT
Also..
Another important and correct way of understanding the Right to Petition..
As written into the 1688 Bill of Rights..
Is very much like a certain form of "witness protection"
Because obviously the petitioner bringing the particular evidence or grievances against the government or to government would require such protection..
We know witnesses require special protection in very important big criminal cases. And a very serious important action and evidence brought by way of petitioning the government is no different.
So it must be intellectualised and understood as the very first and original form of witness protection made in law, as a right.
This is correct.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jan 1, 2021 16:44:41 GMT
Also, any Minister, Any Judge, any Police officer or Lord.. anyone who is suspected of or found to be causing an offence or lying or involved in crime..
Automatically forfeits their authority to punishment against the witnesses/plaintiff/accuser/petitioner for that evidence to be free to be brought/delivered
Evil Ministers/Judges cannot use their authority against the petition.
That's the one rule.
And, if an illegal prosecution is brought.. for an offence that is against a petitioner..
For example the dangerous driving charge against myself when I was investigating Illegal road signage on the A42 as part of a wider ongoing investigation..
If the facts and circumstances of that investigation and the reason and purpose of it, are ignored in the prosecution case...
That is example of judges omission of serious critical information.
The prosecution omitting or ignoring serious critical information.
As we say... the pursuit of the most serious offence in a set of facts and circumstances is always the priority. And exactly whom it is that is to blame.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jan 2, 2021 0:46:54 GMT
"Specials" are not ordinary coppers.
They are part time "volunteers" unpaid. Police.
Also I want to note that the lawyers that volunteer for charities like "pro bono" is also voluntary work unpaid.
Therefore a investigation petition that is done for the public free of charge "unpaid" is clearly voluntary work.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jan 19, 2021 16:11:51 GMT
Dam YouTube... Even banned Trump while he is still president.. Absolutely illegal. Their Maverick young lawyers are wack. And seriously have "issues"
They even banned TalkRadio briefly!
|
|