W O R K for the STATE the right to Petition Subjects May 2, 2020 19:12:18 GMT
Post by Administrator on May 2, 2020 19:12:18 GMT
I've Submitted complaints XR Lawyers.. the Lawyers who supposedly represent extinction rebellion.
I don't believe that they are truly on the side of Extinction Rebellion or the Citizens rights.
I am pretty much of the opinion that they are just "playing the game" and going along with "how the courts" want them to "play" it,
When its not even a matter for the courts to decide anything. Its not a matter that can be put before them when under political engagement.
Also, the Petitions committee currently not responding to new petitions again. Not even Rejecting them.. because they don't even want to give a rejection reason... Or anyone to really find out about the full capacity & issue of these rights. They just want to brush it under the table & hope it goes away. Ignore it.
Which is even further delay & denial of rights.
The Solicitors who work in this area of law signed up for free legal aid are extremely difficult to find and are full of excuses and don't even grasp the concept..
The Best method is making the probation service present it, as they do with other rights, such as Sick notes.. all through the same parts of the Human Rights act & procedure rules. Just a different right.
The Main issue is the time limit also.
You cant have a time limit to "appeal" when none of those courts have jurisdiction.
When you "already" have claimed the right & it hasn't been recognised because of defects in proceedings & failures of a court. You are not appealing a decision. When the court cannot make any decision or hear the case.
The Petitioning to parliament WAS ALREADY Proceedings in a Higher Jurisdiction. Therefore appeal is a ridiculous concept in a Crown Court AND in the Royal Courts of Justice because they are all below parliament.
The fact that Senior District Judge Emma Arbuthnot was not even getting the Lord Jenner Braunstone's right correct.. at Westminster Magistrates.. When Later Jeremy Johnson even though Successful to party correct the affair of Lords STILL did not get it right.. shows that there has been a severe misunderstanding and fatal errors in many past proceedings concerning Lords & MPs.
When we "petition" Parliament.. WE BRING the matter.. into political proceedings. WE SUPPLY the material.
There is no Appeal to a higher authority or time limit... when you are already ENTERING that Higher authority.
Therefore, there is no Appeal time or deadline for courts or crown courts or civil courts, when literally the facts & circumstances are ALREADY engaged in.
How can there be an appeal required??
Higher, Higher, Higher...
You are ALREADY PETITIONING PARLIAMENT.. The Facts, circumstances & Evidence of that matter... are part of those proceedings. Already at the highest level.
There is no deadline to miss for any lower courts. It THEIR FAULT and DEFECT for getting involved. the Police & CPS defect for pressing on with charges in breech of rights. Failure to recognise them and the Courts error for going along with it. ALL Politically motivated non the less. Undoubtedly.
When you CLAIM a Right. Its BEEN CLAIMED.. There and then.
And any failure to recognise it is not the fault or problem of the claimant. It is the other parties.
They cannot "Steal" rights from people. Ignore them.. Fail to reply or respond until a purported deadline is over & then hope its gone away.
That is theft of a right. a perversion of the course of justice, misconduct in office.
Therefore as long as the Claimant LAYS CLAIM to the Right. It HAS BEEN CLAIMED.
A right is not an appeal with a deadline.
A doctors Sick note is a RIGHT. A claim.
Its not a case, it is not a defence it is not an appeal. it is a RIGHT that has effect of its own legal overriding enactment & premise.
They cannot try to argue that "sick notes don't exist" or there is no general principle for them... When they do exist & its a major fundamental Right..
They cant ignore sick notes and then claim nobody claimed them in time. the deadline is passed.. When It was stubborn ignorance & in fact political opposition from the Police , CPS, Courts refusing to recognise that right. In fact trying to get a prosecution "through" the courts anyway ..
You cannot "oppose" or challenge a right like that in the Criminal Courts.
When Provisions of Criminal & Civil Procedure rules give explicit direction that all Parties have a legal obligation to recognize & help to put to effect those rights.. Such as where we see Probation helping to get sick notes claimed & orders changed by their effect.
That is how it SHOULD be with the Right to Petition.
Not the Police always trying to oppose it, the CPS stubbornly ignoring claims & the Court Being Coy to also play the fool & pretend those rights aren't valid or some other excuse which amounts to perverting the course of Justice.
This is WHY the Criminal Courts, the County Courts ARE NOT ALLOWED TO HEAR CASES THAT ARE CONCERNING PETITIONs, GREIVANCES, DISPUTES to Parliament.. and the facts & circumstances that come with those proceedings & evidence, promotion of the cause