Post by Administrator on May 18, 2020 13:53:23 GMT
I'm pretty certain that "XR" are going to literally take over the place and potentially be "worse" than the current Government is.
Because we have entered an age of conflict and competition for ideas. The ideas flow through the people, students, artists, campaigns and they all just want to do their ideas... untamed. Without restrictions.. Which is how we got into this mess with the creation and freedom of advertising, product design and cooking..
XR need to seriously evaluate their own imposing values they project onto others and take some of their own medicine.
I think they have stepped across the line further than Bentcop.biz because they are "just going and doing what they would have us vote for" without getting the votes. Unless they deem it as experimental. For gathering information of a possible road system.
Unfortunately the attitude of Gail Bradbrook is sort of more like the IRA, but a hippy version.
Changing bus lanes to bike lanes is fine enough...
But are we going to see increases in fines against drivers? And punishments?
If so... I am interested to see some accountability from cyclists by a requirement to be licensed to ride a bike on the road, with cyclists "registration plates" or numbers so bad cyclists can be reported and fined.
Or disqualified.. unless they want to concur with other road users and pedestrians.
Rather than the police and Crown prosecution service going after drivers..
Road users should sort their Greivences out amongst eachother.. with private actions.
Why should drivers have to be taxed highly to pay for their own punishment proceedings against themselves?
When cyclists riding badly and pedestrians using mobile phones and wearing music headsets get away scott free dangerously not looking what they are doing.
This would put an incentive on pedestrians and cyclists to be more careful.
Hopefully the pots and pan banging around the UK might keep them under control.. but as long as food giants have a significant percentage of XR members overweight.. they certainly control what goes in their mouth more than what comes out of it.
XR women like to get their tits out on parade in public.. they might do well to get their flab out for exhibition with dummies in their mouths. And do zoom fasts
Post by Administrator on May 18, 2020 16:15:35 GMT
The problem with extinction rebellion.. is that..
If the entire public suddenly wanted to get into politics they could easily do anything they wanted that may be completed in opposition to what extinction rebellion are doing..
Let's say extinction rebellion suddenly piss off a load of drivers in Cambridge.. 1,000s of them..
Those drivers might protest about cycles or pedestrians..
Can you imagine the extinction rebellion person waking up.. going to the front door to go out.. and finding their garden gate had a concrete barrier across it? Or someone sat in the pavement blocking the gate? And comes down the pavement..
With a sign saying. "Pavement along this street closed" for experimental "traffic only" for 3 weeks. No pedestrians allowed.
Bradbrook would soon pull out a few swear words from her back pocket...
Like "F%&*:" TW$%% C&^T !!
And start claiming she had right of access.
They might tell her to fuck off and go climb a tree or sleep under a hedge for 3 weeks.
She would be quick to the council to get them moved.
They might all park cars on the pavement touching bumpers right up against the walls and hedges, both sides the road, and down the middle...
They might block off bike paths....
You can see why the point is to have the matter debated in parliament. Not enter Civil war.
If you are gathering evidence FOR parliament, fair enough. To be used as evidence or for a debate.
This is where a complaint/Greivences, investigations differ from protesting for a change in the law, or a new law or something new.
You can't just go and do the thing completely as you have removed the purpose of the law which is.. to protect so that a matter can be looked at and debated in parliament.
There are in modern law.. provisions to allow people to act, under Jurisdiction of parliament.
The Government have experimental traffic system rules they can petition to get implemented.
If you want to gather evidence about bike lanes, you can go on site to places where there are bus and bike lanes to gather evidence (even if dangerous)
I think that if parliament think its OK to run an experimental bike lane protest gathering evidence.. us that evidence being submitted to parliament? Is evidence actually being gathered on site? Or is it actually just a environment protest in the form of a road block?
The point of the Right to Petition protection (Which requires there to be an actual petition submitted or intended. Not random protests... Is there to protect the petitioner the subject from the courts.. in order to deliver the petition material. Collect, submit.
Extinction rebellion are advertising themselves to be an environmental group about climate change.
Now suddenly they are road traffic protesters.
Their 3 major demands are NOT road traffic. They are general environmental and this Citizen assembly.
Yet extinction rebellion have unorganised groups all now doing absolutely ridiculous random art protest installations that I don't think correlate to the 3 demands.
Bentcop.biz is very specifically investigating illegal road signage collecting evidence and information to prove to parliament in official petitioning that there is illegal activity, corruption and law breaking by local councils, police and Crown prosecution service, Highways England and Ministers.. Alistair Darling.
Its evidence against persons employed by Government.
This is pure correlation with the Painted chamber committee purposes.
And correct use of the right to petition. The reason for the right is to protect the Government from evil and corrupt ministers, police chief officers and absolutely without question... evil corrupt judges.
That's the point of protection from the courts.
It's not a rampage of what amounts to declaring yourself an authority that doesn't need a debate in order to go and physically re structure the road system yourself. Had XR even appro5the council in Cambridge to ask for the cycle lane?
Extinction rebellion have 3 clear demands.
Yet multiple orgies of completely different student groups are now doing highly deviated person projects of randomness.
And the only reason the council in Cambridge seems to be backing them is because they aren't bringing Greivences against any council members or employees
And the right to petition was created in order to bring complaint... without court intervention..
It seems that Bentcop.biz is getting punished for correct use of the right to petition where as its extinction rebellion who are perverting the rights and Privileges and seem to be getting away with it.
Only because ministers themselves are not being incriminated. And this is why the government and newspapers have even allowed XR to get this far and this much publicity.
More diversionary tactics from consequences of the government being accused and accountable
1688 Bill of Rights - The right to Petition - It is the Right of the Subjects to petition the Queen & all Commitments & Prosecutions for doing so are illegal.
Administrator: All photos back up, so hopefully the threads are all back as they were now. If you have been visiting within the last 2 months then sorry if it hasn't made sense without the images
Apr 3, 2020 4:02:06 GMT
Administrator: I've only just discovered David Icke. Following him being banned from Facebook and YouTube lots of people have interviewed and featured him. Because his material is now extremely relevant youtu.be/4KhtaurSUcw
May 5, 2020 21:40:56 GMT
Administrator: Petition committee currently stalling on publishing 2 seriously historically critical & nationally important petitions preserving the rights affirmation ministers don't want to reject or publish them. TORY & LABOUR franchises hate it ibb.co/mFp9QJL
May 5, 2020 21:59:38 GMT