Post by Administrator on May 17, 2021 21:38:09 GMT
Ive entered a claim to the CPS on behalf of myself and angela ditchfield.
The CPS are clearly not allowed legally to Challenge a RIGHT to protects someone from the "prosecutors" themselves, because it is not following the overriding objective of that right. Why would they?? The RIGHT is there to protect citizens from a prosecutor.
Who else would challenge such a right? other than police & prosecution, or a judge?? who does the right protect against?? Prosecutors & police & Judges. (& Ministers) They can NOT challene it and the criminal procedure rules forbids it! They must FURTHER the overriding objective, not "un further it" reduce it.
Its clearly a perversion of the course of justice.
Never the less, Now that Ian Bray of Holmfirth has been Aquitted of Criminal damage by the Jury & Order from the Judge in the Southwark Crown Court April 2021 This case has extended the acts and actions that are acceptable under like rights claims. www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-56853979
Therfore, You are under obligation under 1.1C of the Criminal Procedure rules to further the objective which is your burden not the defendants. As a Party its your legal duty...
So can you go and get my Huddersfield & Manchester cases opened up and overturned as well as Angelas ASAP. we really cannot accept any further delays.
In Magna carter it says to none shall we deny, no none we shall deyal, Right or Justice. My updated statement youtu.be/y-A2zcGpop4
I believe this attitude demonstrated by Jonathan Seed the Wiltshire PCC candidate is perfect example of your own current attitude in the CPS, your own conduct & behaviour as well as that of the Police authorities & even Ministers.. Which is why we have the right to be protected from then when in opposition. You even did not want to uphold the Rights of the Lord Hanningfield either at Southwark Crown court. Again same attitude.
I want my cases re-opened and overturned ASAP as well as Angelas Case. Because as of April, we are eligible and its your legal obligation.
Also.. the fact that you even went to the High Court & had a case re-opened.. when it was a RIGHT... She had used.. You dont have the RIGHT to "un further" the Overriding objective. You challenge criminal cases that were a defence.
Angelas case should not have been & never has been "a defence". Its Right. She was Aquitted, which furthered the objective.
You had no legal RIGHT to attempt to question or act against a right.
FURTHERING an Objective is a legal obligation and you can NOT CHALLENGE A RIGHT, ESPECIALLY ONE CREATED TO PROTECT FROM PROSECUTORS. ITS NOT POSSIBLE IN LAW.. WHEN THE RIGHT SERVES TO INTERVENTION FROM PROSECUTORS.
You are going the wrong way. down a one way street.
I dont know how many more tricks you intent to pull before you get this.
Now if you continue, Its Treason against the people and Perversion of the course of Justice.
Administrator: EXTINCTION REBELLION ON LIES AND CORRUPTION IN THE PRESS youtu.be/p1xeZ6gYp1k special relationships between the local tabloids and Council/Police control what the public see and hear in the press.
Jun 12, 2021 6:24:18 GMT
Administrator: With extremely high levels of complaints against local authorities and police, the percentage of the public who elect these authorities is very low. Outlining that we are being governed and controlled by a minority percentage of people, who run the news
Jun 12, 2021 6:28:26 GMT