|
Post by Administrator on Aug 15, 2019 10:57:18 GMT
The main thing which is allowing professional negligence to be rife & go un-controlled and grow.. Particularly in Magistrates Courts is the LACK of a (Recorded) sessions requirement.
If Magistrates Courts hearings & trials were all RECORDED..
Then not only would magistrates be held to greater account for their actions, words, conduct & professional negligence... also Legal advisors as well for failure to act and apply the law and intervene.
Also.. the presentations and case work given before a court is often a complete shadow and underachievement of what is "proposes to be" and what is (costed) out beforehand by the Solicitors...
They profess to extensive research, costs and services.. which when the truth is disclosed amount to severely LESS than what has been paid for and expected.
thousands of pounds of fees for expensive £1500 defences.. end up being less than half an hour of discussion in a room, which seem to be completely lacking from the barrister/solicitor on the day of the court date.. and instead a 5 minute chat is scribbled down on paper notes which could have been something a duty solicitor could have done for free.
It is in a lot of cases an absolute shambles.
I believe that gathering evidence of this, could uncover a need for radical changes to the Justice system.
Court Staff, legal advisors & District Judges, also act & behave more like "The Adams Family" or "a retirement home" rather than a professional legal unit.
The Restriction on what can be said, heard and voiced.. is an absolute BARRIER to "The Truth, the whole truth & nothing but the truth" Rather than any real facilitation of finding out "anything" at all.
Literally the Modern Magistrates Prosecution case presentation is not much more than the standard of some middle school teachers in a History or English class. Or even a First School.
More intelligence and detail is used in a college art class.
People are being given fines, having to pay THOUSANDS in court fees and fines and even very serious sentences and driving disqualifications which are serious matters.. And much more details and information could be given earlier than the way it is currently set up.. And with the type of people currently working in these organisations.
It is a huge short coming & failing of Government..
And to find over 5 Major Road Traffic sites unlawfully signed of the speed limits.. only highlights the tip of the iceberg of more serious problems in courts, in the prosecution & with the police themselves.
Its like the Magistrates Court is a (Catch all) net and only the crown court is the professional court.. But even then.. there are questions as to why fees are so high when the standard of work is so poor.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Aug 15, 2019 11:18:23 GMT
In fact I have Just been speaking to a Damien Simmons from Freeman & Co solicitors.. Manchester.
From what He said, Its clear that they are aware of the Highways Authorities changing around road signage. He seems to make up a bit of an excuse that (They don't really always know what they are doing) and even when they correct the signs they still are not always right..
Highways England are supposed to be a Professional Unit.. A Government department.
If they don't really know what they are doing.. why are we employing them.
Its not only professional negligence.. it actually questions them being a "competent authority" in the first place. To even have licence to operate.
Also Freeman & co are Suggestive to road signage errors still after it has been corrected.. Now I know that is the case with Haslingden & other roads because there are still some errors there... But I think its evidence of fact that the Highways authority are (Continually) making mistakes & leaving them (on purpose)
Possibly leaving these issues for these defence lawyers to use (as well as misguiding the traffic as well)
Also the Solicitor talked about sending a specialist surveyor out. to do a full evaluation. I have already done the evaluation.
Also where was the evaluation from Freeman & co when I used them for the Bolton Wanderers traffic light case? where was the defence professional witness figured into the £4,000 defence pot?
Road Safety Support is now non profit (supposedly) yet they still have given a lot of false evidence & unprofessional conduct in courts in the past..
I have myself witnesses nothing other than unprofessional court presentations & incompetence , falsehoods & lies.. in all my encounters with courts.
The only (Professional) act and charade is (sounding & talking) professional before the money is given over.
True that I have been given no sentence or lower sentences in the past. But never found not guilty.. And I have myself submitted much greater written defence material & details than I have ever seen presented by any professional I have encountered.
I do not believe the courts want to "give" people credit & validation of their abilities & defences.
I think a LOT of people submit very strong & high quality material & work to courts themselves.. & to the CPS & I think the CPS are both Jealous and unfair & unprofessional.
They just don't want to give you it. It complete childishness.
I have witnesses the Childishness in person at Lords Walk, Preston CPS office. And other offices say.. "There is nothing they can do" or other excuses.. & fail to provide any proper discussions or meetings.
Nobody has a clue what happened at an event and the witnesses are extremely unreliable and in a case where a false statement is given its injustice.
I really don't know how they have managed to pull it off for so long on such a BLAG..
They talk about Blagging skills.. talking your way into a club or restaurant..
These Court people have Blagging down a not only an art but a career & vocation. The District Judges are the Teachers of Blagging & the Prosecutors are the Pupils of it.
And after the Conduct of DJ Watson.. At Leicester & Loughborough.. It has to be worst professional negligence I have ever witnesses in a place which is supposed to be very serious & important.
|
|