Post by Administrator on Jul 31, 2019 1:34:56 GMT
Dear all parties.
In my case last week 22nd of July,
I proved through Shropshire council that road signage was not lawful at A49 Church Stretton Sandford avenue.
The council corrected the signs.
Supposedly West Mercia police prosecuted me then the case was passed to the Crown Prosecution Service after i requested the video.
Now, in my live Preston Magistrates case..
I note that, the ticket issued by Lancashire police (Tony King) being prosecuted by Lancashire police...
It turns out "Hannah Renshaw" is showing up as a "council prosecutor" in google...
Can you please clarify that the Preston seat belt charge is being prosecuted by a "council prosecutor"
And if this is the case, after being issued a penalty notice by Tony King..
It seems to me a insanely ridiculous position...
The council admit signs are illegal at church stretton. The road is enforced by Dennis Walker. West Mercia police.
The police claim not to be the council or act on behalf of the council.
Helmshore... Lancashire..
Tony King in a police van issues me a seat belt ticket enforced by the police, issued by the police..
Hannah Renshaw now is prosecuting me..
Yet she is a "council prosecutor"
I am guessing the same council responsible for the Haslingden bypass and illegal road signs i had corrected and put right..
And the same Lancashire council who employs Brenda Garside who has in fact Helped me get the Haslingden bypass signs corrected and has been corresponding with me..
Thus there is not only the fact that same council is prosecuting me for the seat belt offence...
We do NOT have a seperate council and police at all here in prosecution..
There is no separate organisation at all.
And the council prosecution is under lawful obligation to disclose those road signs being illegal to every driver issued with a speeding ticket there.
I reported those signs beige illegal to chorley magistrates court and Burnley magistrates court back at the time of the original case.. Before i had them put right.
There is some serious corruption going on here...
I have just been convicted by Telford magistrates court when it cannot be possible as i entered the other live and recent cases as compulsory witnesses..
Wich i was still waiting for the details of from the prosecution.. Cps Birmingham as required disclosure under disclosure rules.
The cps and police are acting as if the council are separate...
Yet here we have Hannah Renshaw waving a council flag in court.. On behalf of Tony King and Lancashire police..
So how can the council (Brenda Garside) who has confirmed the signage with me... Not be in fact Hannah Renshaw (the council) themselves and Prosecution.. And in fact Tony King who was enforcing the road...
When the council have proved the signs were not lawfully in place and had joint responsibility with Highways England???
Are you having a joke at my expense???
I now am asking why the council prosecution is in a court trying to convict me when the same council has admitted the Haslingden bypass was illegally signed...
And it was that which i was questioning Tony King about in relation to the seat belt charge..
When there is not even a seat belt offence existing in the 1988 act. As it was never changed.
I literally also am having rights ignored and i don't need to "defend" myself when its the prosecution responsibility to recognise and uphold those rights.
It is a legal requirement for my rights to be acknowledged and recognised.
Now someone is failing to recognise those rights and failing to uphold them. When i have made them clear in law and fact multiple times that anyone can understand and the law is to be eligible to the normal person.
Why are you obsessed with pursuing defendants are dishonest or lying???
It is the truth. Why are you stealing people's truth and fact from them???
At loss and suffering and financially and emotionally and psychological loss???
Why are you doing it?
You are stealing the truth from people
And replacing it with your own intention and reality which is NOT fact or truth.
It's absolutely wrong what you are doing.
In my case last week 22nd of July,
I proved through Shropshire council that road signage was not lawful at A49 Church Stretton Sandford avenue.
The council corrected the signs.
Supposedly West Mercia police prosecuted me then the case was passed to the Crown Prosecution Service after i requested the video.
Now, in my live Preston Magistrates case..
I note that, the ticket issued by Lancashire police (Tony King) being prosecuted by Lancashire police...
It turns out "Hannah Renshaw" is showing up as a "council prosecutor" in google...
Can you please clarify that the Preston seat belt charge is being prosecuted by a "council prosecutor"
And if this is the case, after being issued a penalty notice by Tony King..
It seems to me a insanely ridiculous position...
The council admit signs are illegal at church stretton. The road is enforced by Dennis Walker. West Mercia police.
The police claim not to be the council or act on behalf of the council.
Helmshore... Lancashire..
Tony King in a police van issues me a seat belt ticket enforced by the police, issued by the police..
Hannah Renshaw now is prosecuting me..
Yet she is a "council prosecutor"
I am guessing the same council responsible for the Haslingden bypass and illegal road signs i had corrected and put right..
And the same Lancashire council who employs Brenda Garside who has in fact Helped me get the Haslingden bypass signs corrected and has been corresponding with me..
Thus there is not only the fact that same council is prosecuting me for the seat belt offence...
We do NOT have a seperate council and police at all here in prosecution..
There is no separate organisation at all.
And the council prosecution is under lawful obligation to disclose those road signs being illegal to every driver issued with a speeding ticket there.
I reported those signs beige illegal to chorley magistrates court and Burnley magistrates court back at the time of the original case.. Before i had them put right.
There is some serious corruption going on here...
I have just been convicted by Telford magistrates court when it cannot be possible as i entered the other live and recent cases as compulsory witnesses..
Wich i was still waiting for the details of from the prosecution.. Cps Birmingham as required disclosure under disclosure rules.
The cps and police are acting as if the council are separate...
Yet here we have Hannah Renshaw waving a council flag in court.. On behalf of Tony King and Lancashire police..
So how can the council (Brenda Garside) who has confirmed the signage with me... Not be in fact Hannah Renshaw (the council) themselves and Prosecution.. And in fact Tony King who was enforcing the road...
When the council have proved the signs were not lawfully in place and had joint responsibility with Highways England???
Are you having a joke at my expense???
I now am asking why the council prosecution is in a court trying to convict me when the same council has admitted the Haslingden bypass was illegally signed...
And it was that which i was questioning Tony King about in relation to the seat belt charge..
When there is not even a seat belt offence existing in the 1988 act. As it was never changed.
I literally also am having rights ignored and i don't need to "defend" myself when its the prosecution responsibility to recognise and uphold those rights.
It is a legal requirement for my rights to be acknowledged and recognised.
Now someone is failing to recognise those rights and failing to uphold them. When i have made them clear in law and fact multiple times that anyone can understand and the law is to be eligible to the normal person.
Why are you obsessed with pursuing defendants are dishonest or lying???
It is the truth. Why are you stealing people's truth and fact from them???
At loss and suffering and financially and emotionally and psychological loss???
Why are you doing it?
You are stealing the truth from people
And replacing it with your own intention and reality which is NOT fact or truth.
It's absolutely wrong what you are doing.