Post by Administrator on Jun 17, 2019 16:06:30 GMT
It says here that the secretary of state (transport or Justice?) or is that Lord Chief justice for the Ministry not a Secretary?
Or Home Office?
Anyway.. "The Government" are supposed to inform the police Chief of the law (guidance)
So clearly if you complaint to the DVLA that driving licences are not being endorsed lawfully & the Chief Officer is giving out invalid or unlawful N.I.P. notices & conditional offers to driving licences.. Then the Chief Executive of the DVLA surely can act to "correct the police".
Also, importantly....
This sets out prescribed procedure for when over 2 years of a long disqualification is eligible.. a person may apply to have a disqualification removed.
But notice that it pertains to the "circumstances of the offence" which is (what happened) evidence circumstantial.. The character of the person also.. And what was the actual offence itself.
This all is regarding the fact there was an offence... or else events related to the offence itself.
It is not about "LAW" errors of the court or police in regards to even if there was a law broken or the police made error in law or the court did...
As that falls under the standard court complaints anyway.. (legal errors) so it doesn't need to be after 2 years time, if the complaint is that there was not a law broken.. no offence. especially if it is some Human Rights act argument concerning a person could not be prosecuted anyway.
The fact they have names it (42) must be a intended hit at section 142 of the magistrates court act 1980 anyway where they can re-open any case & re-hear it. But this implies that the case doesn't even need to be re-opened.. the matter can be "sent in" writing. & dealt with. I am not certain if in a revised version they need to ask permission from the chief constable or not
The Word "Tried" also concerns me... as in.. "The police chief will (give it a try) anyway.
He will "have a go at you". the court will... "give it a go"..
They will set up unlawfull road signage and mislead people particularly in lines and lines of traffic & have a try at you.. have a go at you.. see if they can get some fines & convictions out of you all
Or Home Office?
Anyway.. "The Government" are supposed to inform the police Chief of the law (guidance)
So clearly if you complaint to the DVLA that driving licences are not being endorsed lawfully & the Chief Officer is giving out invalid or unlawful N.I.P. notices & conditional offers to driving licences.. Then the Chief Executive of the DVLA surely can act to "correct the police".
Also, importantly....
This sets out prescribed procedure for when over 2 years of a long disqualification is eligible.. a person may apply to have a disqualification removed.
But notice that it pertains to the "circumstances of the offence" which is (what happened) evidence circumstantial.. The character of the person also.. And what was the actual offence itself.
This all is regarding the fact there was an offence... or else events related to the offence itself.
It is not about "LAW" errors of the court or police in regards to even if there was a law broken or the police made error in law or the court did...
As that falls under the standard court complaints anyway.. (legal errors) so it doesn't need to be after 2 years time, if the complaint is that there was not a law broken.. no offence. especially if it is some Human Rights act argument concerning a person could not be prosecuted anyway.
The fact they have names it (42) must be a intended hit at section 142 of the magistrates court act 1980 anyway where they can re-open any case & re-hear it. But this implies that the case doesn't even need to be re-opened.. the matter can be "sent in" writing. & dealt with. I am not certain if in a revised version they need to ask permission from the chief constable or not
The Word "Tried" also concerns me... as in.. "The police chief will (give it a try) anyway.
He will "have a go at you". the court will... "give it a go"..
They will set up unlawfull road signage and mislead people particularly in lines and lines of traffic & have a try at you.. have a go at you.. see if they can get some fines & convictions out of you all