Post by Administrator on Apr 21, 2019 16:59:35 GMT
You have got to be kidding me,
This Jeremy Johnson QC character,
He draughted the Lord Hanningfield representation for Parliamentary exemption from prosecution (parliamentary privileges)
www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/sunday-mail-spy-probe-investigated-8481884.amp
southsideonlinepublishing.com/en/jeremy-johnson-qc
He is deeply involved in police.
I don't think he can be considered independent from police.
A Judge in Leicester validated my claim to the Bill of Rights. In March.
Then in April this month a different Judge claimed no parliamentary privilege at all for anyone exists.
So that is a completely untrue statement as Judge Alistair Mccreath in Crown Court validated it..
So that's I have had to complain.
They are definitely (Parliament) validating the Bill of Rights and Human Rights act 1998 section 6 is in the right area of law...
Looks to me like they only have interest in article 9 of the Bill of Rights but ignore the Right of the Subjects - The right to petition.
I have read the article 9 to actually be the possible "origin" of the illegal prosecutions which the Right of the Subjects (article 5) is protecting the people against in their petitioning...
Which under the Human rights act 1998 section 6.. Is the laying or introducing of proposals, legislation or remedial orders before either House of Parliament (or the monarch).
The Human rights act itself being legislation in force as is the Bill of Rights..
It does not say you have to be an MP or Lord to make such an order or introduce it..
So it would be logical and right in line with the Right to Petition..
For regular people as much as Lords or ministers..
And the entire point of the Bill is the change from absolute Rule by Royalty to a democracy in its early forms where the voters vote for MPs to represent their votes and will in Parliament.
This Jeremy Johnson QC character,
He draughted the Lord Hanningfield representation for Parliamentary exemption from prosecution (parliamentary privileges)
www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/sunday-mail-spy-probe-investigated-8481884.amp
southsideonlinepublishing.com/en/jeremy-johnson-qc
He is deeply involved in police.
I don't think he can be considered independent from police.
A Judge in Leicester validated my claim to the Bill of Rights. In March.
Then in April this month a different Judge claimed no parliamentary privilege at all for anyone exists.
So that is a completely untrue statement as Judge Alistair Mccreath in Crown Court validated it..
So that's I have had to complain.
They are definitely (Parliament) validating the Bill of Rights and Human Rights act 1998 section 6 is in the right area of law...
Looks to me like they only have interest in article 9 of the Bill of Rights but ignore the Right of the Subjects - The right to petition.
I have read the article 9 to actually be the possible "origin" of the illegal prosecutions which the Right of the Subjects (article 5) is protecting the people against in their petitioning...
Which under the Human rights act 1998 section 6.. Is the laying or introducing of proposals, legislation or remedial orders before either House of Parliament (or the monarch).
The Human rights act itself being legislation in force as is the Bill of Rights..
It does not say you have to be an MP or Lord to make such an order or introduce it..
So it would be logical and right in line with the Right to Petition..
For regular people as much as Lords or ministers..
And the entire point of the Bill is the change from absolute Rule by Royalty to a democracy in its early forms where the voters vote for MPs to represent their votes and will in Parliament.