This is interesting.....
Somebody on one of the facebook groups shared a petition.. "Abolish the House of Lords"
I havent signed it but i was curious.. it didnt say who draughted the petition (my petitions display my name in huge writing on the sign page)
Anyway here....
petition.parliament.uk/petitions/183134/signatures/new thats active still taking signatures.. but that page doesnt say who draughted it up... petition number 183134
That was the old sign up URL.... (think it still works now its been fully activated)
This is the same petition when you sign up via its full published url....
petition.parliament.uk/petitions/183134Same petition number... and 10,933 signatures as of now. deadline 14 August 2017
If you google it... this shows up
www.google.co.uk/search?site=&source=hp&q=Sign+petition+Abolish+the+House+of+Lords&oq=Sign+petition+Abolish+the+House+of+Lords&gs_l=hp.13..0i22i30k1.2339.2339.0.2837.2.2.0.0.0.0.215.320.0j1j1.2.0....0...1c..64.hp..0.1.103.0.KtwdN2sRytkAnd these 3 pages listed in results... some of them are "Similar petitions that were rejected because there is already this previous petition.. above.
3rd march 2017
petition.parliament.uk/petitions/18859226 february 2017
petition.parliament.uk/petitions/187721Yet they all have different evidence attached which once rejected cannot be used or added or combined together.. and its difficult for anyone else "Who simply shares somebody elses petition link" to contact the draughter of the petition to give more evidence.. when the petition cannot be edited... so valuable evidence on the subject is lost or blocked.. why not IF IDENTIFIED similar petitions, just put them in a same "folder" and if ONE gets 100,000 the evidence for the others & signatures can be combined & added up. thats the "RIGHT" thing to do. Not obstruct somebodys unique petitions and evidence..
Parliament it so unprofessional with "1 sentance responses" that "are not helpfull" at all.. its SO UN UNIVERSITY.. so KINDERGARTEN and I truly believe thats how the country is run.
Now.. I submitted A petition, that was featured on the HOME PAGE of
www.bentcop.biz..
To get rid of the "House Of Comons" or.. not exactly "get rid" of it.. but to "Form a Government" (The Queen asks the Prime Minister to Form new governments all the time) To Form a new government where "THE PEOPLE" vote on all matters & Make decisions.. NOT MPs and we just have secretarial and administrative staff Speaking & working in the Commons Carrying out the "will of the People".
Its perfectly clear what being asked.
Its no more drastic or radical than "Abolishing the House of Lords" because you are keeping Parliament, just giving the VOTERS the DECISION MAKING POWER.. while MPS just really VOICE IT and do the Paper work ..
Which I think it RIGHT & PROPER.. in this "Day & Age"..
Also the Millenium Dome should have been a National "Debate and protect centre" Not "out in the steeets" with Boundaries pushed back..
If the People were given a place to Voice their campaigns.. and give evidence properly and with Dignity & CHALLENGE MPs mouth to Mouth fairly (unlike courts where you cant talk freely) then there wouldnt need to be prorects and sleeping on the streets & roads blocked off.
But the MPs cannot even "Stand up to" public Challeges & Evidence on EQUAL GROUND.. with a dedicated TV Channel.. where petitions and evidence could be presented & MPS would have had to answer to the Public face to face....
THAT would have been a better idea IMHO...
But anyway....
Back to the Petitions..
So ONE of these "Abolish the Lords" petitions is now running...
I Didnt sign it.. because I dont have a problem WITH the Lords.. Just that we should get "Some decent ones in" and NO EX POLICE CHIEFS.
Honest People who have been rewarded for truth & honesty not making MONEY or PUNNISHING PEOPLE.. and have nothing to do with the Systems and scandals and enforcement cameras and police and road signs & fake accidents & spy TVs..
So There was NO REASON to reject my petition.. calling to form a NEW government...
And What I was asking COULD and CAN be perfectly understood.. Clearly. I dont need to present the Full detail of the plan, as the general idea is obvious enough....
And they LIMIT what you can write on a petition anyway how many words and they dont seem to Like people linking to strong evidence even though they provide facility to Do it and state you can so...
Anyway....
Sick of the bloody petitions committee and Sean Harris rejection after rejection waste of time and money after waste of time and money.. in fact people should charge parliament for costs and time of work lost after obstructed & rejected petitions for " no real reason" other than being Fickle.