From the Crown prosecution service website
Under "Abuse of process"
www.cps.gov.uk/legal/a_to_c/abuse_of_process/#b10Some relevant parts to my current situation:
I will elaborate on each point of concern soon.. But the implications are obvious.
The bottom line to all this is that no matter what argument or reasoning the CPS assimilate, including thec fact my petition is in opposition to their work and concerns collaborated court and police work involvement which cannot possibly result in a fair trial if magistrates have convicted multiple drivers at the traffic lights historically knowing the signage may have been illegal previously..
Bottom line is this. It states that primary legislation has priority ultimately. That is the CPS own rules.
Thus. It IS illegal to be prosecuted. For work done that i include in my petition work which can be whatever i choose. And can be the testing and evaluation and survey of the enforcement set up. For a petition on the appropriate subject and cause.
There is no contest. It is illegal to be prosecuted for doing that work. Primary legislation states it on the CPS website and takes priority absolutely after all reasoning and deduction process. The legislation remains.
They can not prosecute me.
That is final. As stated.
All the other concerns of unfairness and magistrates historic involvement just make it even more riddiculus. It is major abuse of process.
I am now looking at Writing up a Warrant to the court for the arrest of the chief of police, magistrates and prosecution.
Even with only accusation (and i have factual evidence) the proceedings would have to be stayed. And with the actual legislation in effect and the mere existance of the hearing as illegal status.. The subject of the petition in relation to the offence..
The proceedings must be stayed permanently.
It is in fact criminal activity towards me.
I can even get a solicitor to draw up a warrant request if mine is not accepted.
And how could a court within the shared jurisdiction ever consider a warrant for the arrest of a police chief who they have all convicted drivers for at the multiple unlawfull locations within the jurisdiction? They can not fairly without prejudice consider warrants for themselves and eachother.
It is a matter for a Higher court or the Old Bailey or something.
It is absolutely abuse of process.
The fact that the Right to petition states primary legislation, and the petition subject is actually accusing the magistrates, prosecution & police of crime... instantly gives the rare and biased situation of potential (& actual) unfair case evaluation and complete unquestionable concerns to the proceedings.
My evaluation of the unlawfull traffic lights & other multiple sites across the county (and country) that these magistrates and their colleagues have all worked on and convicted drivers with a not large history of convictions behind them.. and the implications that would have on the magistrates, gives absolute biased on the side of the court against the defence. and by the prosecution and police decision making, and obvioua intent to want to continue the enforcement site.
Which is why a am petitioning in the first place, because current Crown Prosecution and police & Court complaints have not been effective and in fact totaly denied.
Thus is why i have had to call on protection in law to do the work. Its ultimate purpose.
The Court can NOT hold proceedings on the matter. I am going to make request for a warrant for the arrest of the magistrates & chief of police. either written by myself under oath, as stated or get a solicitor to issue one to the Court.
Now if that court cannot fairly decide upon issuing a warrant to its own staff or other court staff in the county, then how can it possibly even entertain the idea of any legal proceedings what so ever regarding the case. ??
The Court must stay proceedings permanently. They are illegal. & criminal.