|
Post by Administrator on Feb 3, 2017 13:54:28 GMT
MR POLICE CHIEF. IF THERE IS ANYTHING YOU NEED TO DISCLOSE TO THE PRIME MINISTER MRS.MAY, REGARDING THE LTI SPEED GUNS ACCURACY, CAN YOU PLEASE DO SO NOW. YOU ARE UNDER EMPLOYMENT TRUTH & HONESTY POLICY. YOU DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT & ANYTHING YOU DO SAY COULD EFFECT YOUR IN COURT. I HAVE REASON TO BELIEVE THAT FAILING TO DISCLOSE IMPORTANT INFORMATION IS SHOWING NO REMOURSE FOR AYTHING WHICH COULD LATER BE PROVED THAT YOU ACTED TO CONCEAL OR LIE ABOUT INFORMATION WHICH WOULD PROVE YOU YOURSELF ACTED FRAUDULENTLY OR WITH INTENT TO MAKE A GAIN FOR YOURSELF OR ENTITY & CAUSE A LOSS FOR ANOTHER PERSON. (SUCH AS A DRIVING LICENCE) MR. GARRETT & MR. TYSON WOULD YOU LIKE TO OPEN UP YOUR TEST RANGE TO THE PUBLIC? LTI 1000. CARDS ON THE TABLE.YOU KNOW THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE CONCLUSION. THE INEVITABLE TRUTH. "yes Mrs.May, we perfectly assure you this equipment meets your, rigorous home officeapproval standards of safety and correctness. and we have no interest in proffit for our buisness , or that would be a waste of the peoples money, time and psychological legal health. We didnt create this system to frighten them. as that would be intent to cause distress. As mr Tyson likes to swap charges around, for creativity.. like flyering to criminal damage.. for sport & fun. "CPS must win at any cost to the Mp's expenses scandal." or is it tax payers expenses scandal?
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Feb 19, 2017 14:50:40 GMT
Somebody just posted this on a facebook drivers page... Looks like they have no intention of stopping the mobile camera vans. They are spending more money on night vision for them.... And this camera officer really seems to think that camera vans improve safety.. Not limiting the top speed of modern safer cars.. I would like to see what his responce is to being questioned about the road signage. www.mirror.co.uk/lifestyle/motoring/watch-out-motorists-new-high-9687380Theres a video there.. Not certain i will be able to post it directly here. The actual story is from 25 January 2017. I had heard about the new night time technology... I think they do the videos to get them to push psychological resistance and openly support their team i dont think he looks too enthusiastic. For them no need to come up with this device.. there must have been issues about proving the aim at night time.. And that means that the aim can be challenged in daytime... but they dont even want to show you the video footage to look at it!! so these devices are in fact... just a "Statement" because really they are just trying to plug up every possible hole they can out of being challenged.. Yet they just will not put the road signs correct! lol. And the speed limits consistent! and stop the cars being able to do over 70/80mph would have helped from the start... When will these retards ever just realise that the entire idea is stupid from the start?
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Feb 20, 2017 19:53:48 GMT
I like reflecting on the dialogue in this new video
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Mar 24, 2017 18:37:11 GMT
Ok...
So in this video a police officer gives evidence that the old radar guns could not single out a vehicle from traffic.
Does that mean they are going to refund the old radar speeding tickets?
Also he gives evidence that the beam is 3 inches. Yet Steve Callaghan stated to me in person its 3 feet to a meter.
Can you believe this? Officer states he picks and chooses what the prosecutable speed limit will be on any given day! 😮 not the published official CPS website threshold speed!
They are allowed to give expert opinion when it comes to "speed" in court because they are police officers!! Obviously they have no idea about giving evidence in LAW! This was only 3 years ago!
How about a professional driver?! They have more experience than a police officer over speed and driving.
Can you believe this!! I QUOTE..
WHEN HE IS SATISFIED HE HAS GOT THE SPEED HE WANTS. Out of the device! 😮
Also gives "expert" evidence the beam must be square on the vehicle! So deffinately cannot be from any angle to either side according to this guy.
So this is the peo laser II. I have the pro laser III the newer one.
He is describing the function where you can hold the trigger down and see the speed displayed live and variable on screen... Which is what im eager to investigate.
Officer uses the words in a statement in this video...
" building up very, very, very slowly.
I believe his word use and subconscious language reveal evidence to us... That when using the device you can "build the speed up" by using the very carefull slow movements. With dexterity thus obtaining the "speed he wants to get out of it"
As in his previous statement.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Mar 26, 2017 17:38:28 GMT
This is the device that was used at Ossett bypass by Halstead. I thought he was positioned at the Police parking pad, but i have been to the site and now from the Video evidence i can establish that he was parked in the Lay-by. But its impossible to determine his exact parking position, front or back and exact co-ordinates. So, im dissapointed that its not where i thought it was from, but i still strongly believe that the road was not and is not enforceable. Also, im only given the video from a certain point and im interested to see if im going faster even, further back up the road! A cute little prolaserIII with a box around it! and video camera! www.truvelouk.com/products/laserwitness-lite-mobile-laser-camera/I have now been on site again and found the correct positions and road section. It appears that the Police device is giving a completely wrong distance. I made a few video discussions, but i thought it was the location just a bit further along, but i believe essentialy everything i discussed im correct on, and now ive got the right location, it does still look like the device distance is incorrect reading... so i will have to measure it. Telegraph and argus publish the West Yorkshire locations but i dont think they go back as far as 2013 Look heres FNZ that Halstead was driving. Top front hatch open. Kustom signals Laser witness lite in top hatch. www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/news/15063271.Mobile_speed_cameras_locations_for_Bradford_and_West_Yorkshire_this_week/
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Mar 26, 2017 17:52:38 GMT
Ok so... The Laserwitness lite is made by Kustom signals. So its ProlaserIII technology and the website says that.. And i do have a prolazer III. The exact same model thats still in service with West Mercia police force. So the speed measurement, and distance measurement is the same. The LaserwitnessIII being their "video unit" version... Which records video. kustomsignals.com/products/product/laserwitness
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Mar 26, 2017 22:22:30 GMT
Here we have a poor lady got prosecuted for just going above the limit. 31mph is mentioned in the thread on peppipilocks forum. But the photo shows 36mph. In fact this is only 6 days after the Ossett bypass date! By the laser witness device. Luckily she posted the photo which i just downloaded. The target is not even on the vehicle its underneath. Well WELL under. forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?act=attach&type=post&id=26939The unknown peppipoo plonkers are giving her the worst advice ever... complete and total "ROY" CPS, idiot lawyers and bafoons who are set up and placed there to destroy challenges and de-rail people. Its the "Road safety support" Steve Callaghan" community of the internet. She is under 36mph and cannot even be prosecuted. By official published CPS threshold.. This is the type of photo most people will get and i dont think she got the video. Not many people do. And from photos like these at this example location... Checking the device even gave a correcr distance like im doing from my video footage is near impossible. Unless you have a very very good visual guide on the road and you know where the police van was parked.. or have a very good evidence of where it was NOT parked. forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=87989Be Warned.. Pepippo forums is NOT there to help you. How can a photo be sent as evidence when the beam is not even in contact with the vehicle!! And how is it even GIVING a speed reading?! On my video as it goes to edge of vehicle those three lines error message displays! Im keen to see the video of this one. How can a photo be sent as evidence when the beam is not even in contact with the vehicle!! And how is it even GIVING a speed reading?! On my video as it goes to edge of vehicle those three lines error message didplays! Im keen to see the video of this one.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Mar 26, 2017 22:31:54 GMT
Heres an example of a calibration certificate Hampshire police. Which is really a loada crap. www.hampshire.police.uk/internet/asset/9a99f39f-80e3-4fcf-9e85-eba0ce9f59eN/HC-001198-15%20Calibration%20certificate.pdfHeres a Dorset one.. www.dorset.police.uk/media/1417/laser-witness-lite-calibration-cert.pdfIf you know what you are talking about. As the electronic and lens parts are not calibrated. And if it was the aim that was to be calibrated scope lens to laser it would have to be every time he moved the van or was targeting a different distance field. The certificate is just a loada Steve Callaghan tosh like rubbish.. Like the beam is 3ft wide... Then another expert witness on another official police video says its 3 inch... Ive shot between pedestrians holding hands so its more like 3 inch and ive filmed it with night vision as you know. Heres an honest John site page.. Saying they delete all videos after 3 years yet North Wales police go safe officer said they keep theirs forever. www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/mobile_speed_detection_vehiclesIf it officially comes to light these devices have been misused and are in fact trash... Id like to see the CPS take on the destruction of critical evidence. Obviously they see it as boom or bust from tne start... Serious enough to warn and ban people but not serious enough to keep the evidence?
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Mar 27, 2017 19:49:44 GMT
I rang Kustom Signals HQ to verify the tolerance on the Prolaser III & 4. and its the same for both devices. Also you dont "Really" calibrate a device... the laser might be a little wonky but they are all made unique.. it sort of always aims straight. enough for it to work. Its a bit like a toy electric keyboard it "Just works as made" you dont really tune it as such. When calibration is talked about its usually the "SCOPE" alignment thats being talked about. as the laser itself would rarely need alignment and that doesnt really effect the devices ability to get the speed right or the distance... only if you aimed 100% it would reduce the aim accuracy only. Not if the device is working or not to get the right calculations.. ive been through all this though. Maximum email response from further request. From device manufacturer. (all you are going to get outside a court room)
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Mar 27, 2017 20:24:00 GMT
The White arrow is 514ft from the OTHER Police position! the dedicated pad with POLICE written on it! But he was deffinately NOT parked at that one! LOL He was where one of those 2 Red lines are! Also he should have accounted for cosine effect on the legal document N.I.P. if he had have been on the police platform aiming straight at oncoming traffic instead, he wouldnt have had to make the cosine effect adjustments which are given in the Tele-traffic UK documentatin for the devices. Also this is exactly where there should be a sign to "Tell you where the exit goes to" the destination.. but theres no sign to tell anyone where its going to! OK SO SOMETIMES I HAVE TO GET it WRONG before i get it right.. I dont mind learning..
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Mar 29, 2017 21:10:27 GMT
Ok....the van was on the same side of the road... So after being WRONG about the police van being in the opposite layby...(stupid me) telrphoto camera lens view of road Im still glad i looked into it further even though complained to PM and CPS... I still believe im correct on a lot still. Also... The gun gives an error during the reading...and we dont even see the start of the reading as they cut it out.. So heres todays update and where i am with this now... I got to try out the prolaser3 in speed mode as well today... As we near yet another April fools day... Will the police continue the resistance even longer? Video edit of today to follow shortly
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Mar 30, 2017 15:19:56 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Mar 30, 2017 15:25:21 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Mar 30, 2017 23:55:21 GMT
Warning todays video contains strong lanuage
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Mar 31, 2017 11:18:19 GMT
|
|