MR POLICE CHIEF. IF THERE IS ANYTHING YOU NEED TO DISCLOSE TO THE PRIME MINISTER MRS.MAY, REGARDING THE LTI SPEED GUNS ACCURACY, CAN YOU PLEASE DO SO NOW. YOU ARE UNDER EMPLOYMENT TRUTH & HONESTY POLICY. YOU DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT & ANYTHING YOU DO SAY COULD EFFECT YOUR IN COURT. I HAVE REASON TO BELIEVE THAT FAILING TO DISCLOSE IMPORTANT INFORMATION IS SHOWING NO REMOURSE FOR AYTHING WHICH COULD LATER BE PROVED THAT YOU ACTED TO CONCEAL OR LIE ABOUT INFORMATION WHICH WOULD PROVE YOU YOURSELF ACTED FRAUDULENTLY OR WITH INTENT TO MAKE A GAIN FOR YOURSELF OR ENTITY & CAUSE A LOSS FOR ANOTHER PERSON. (SUCH AS A DRIVING LICENCE)
MR. GARRETT & MR. TYSON WOULD YOU LIKE TO OPEN UP YOUR TEST RANGE TO THE PUBLIC? LTI 1000. CARDS ON THE TABLE. YOU KNOW THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE CONCLUSION. THE INEVITABLE TRUTH.
"yes Mrs.May, we perfectly assure you this equipment meets your, rigorous home officeapproval standards of safety and correctness. and we have no interest in proffit for our buisness , or that would be a waste of the peoples money, time and psychological legal health. We didnt create this system to frighten them. as that would be intent to cause distress. As mr Tyson likes to swap charges around, for creativity.. like flyering to criminal damage.. for sport & fun.
"CPS must win at any cost to the Mp's expenses scandal." or is it tax payers expenses scandal?
1688 Bill of Rights - The right to Petition - It is the Right of the Subjects to petition the Queen & all Commitments & Prosecutions for doing so are illegal.
Post by Administrator on Feb 19, 2017 14:50:40 GMT
Somebody just posted this on a facebook drivers page...
Looks like they have no intention of stopping the mobile camera vans. They are spending more money on night vision for them.... And this camera officer really seems to think that camera vans improve safety.. Not limiting the top speed of modern safer cars..
I would like to see what his responce is to being questioned about the road signage.
Theres a video there.. Not certain i will be able to post it directly here.
The actual story is from 25 January 2017. I had heard about the new night time technology... I think they do the videos to get them to push psychological resistance and openly support their team i dont think he looks too enthusiastic.
BYCIARAN FAGAN 10:06, 25 JAN 2017UPDATED13:09, 25 JAN 2017
Leicestershire police unveil a new speed camera device.
Watch out motorists! New high-tech speed camera launched and it's set to catch many more speeders
Until now some motorists have evaded detection because mobile speed vans' cameras could not pick out registration plates in the dark
Speeding motorists will have less ability to hide under new technology allowing road safety camera to work better at night.
Infra-red lights which help roadside speed cameras work in the dark will help efforts on poorly or unlit roads, according to the Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland Road Safety Partnership
Until now, a number of motorists have evaded detection because the partnership's mobile speed vans' cameras could not pick out registration plates in the dark.
The new infra-red equipment, which consists of three small banks of 24 bulbs mounted on the rear of the vehicles, first went on the road this week.
"These infra-red lights do not glare or blind drivers - but for the camera teams working in poorly or unlit roads it's like daylight. "As well as being used at night, it's also worth remembering that it gets dark early in the day during the autumn and winter months."
Speeding is a major factor in deaths and injuries on the road and is tackled throughout the year under the partnership's ongoing Fatal 4 campaign.
This also tracks down motorists who use their mobile phones at the wheel, drink drive or do not wear their seat belt.
Tens of thousands of street lights across the county are being switched off or dimmed from midnight to dawn as part of a cost savings plan by Lecistershire City councilhttp://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/leicestershire-county-council
The move has affected both rural and major roads – many of them sites where residents have reported speeding problems.
Deborah Collier, safety camera team leader for the partnership, said: "We have purchased two sets of infra-red lamps which will enable our camera van officers to conduct mobile speed enforcement on unlit roads.
"This will increase our enforcement capability at mobile speed sites on such roads, assisting in keeping speeds down and hopefully reducing casualties on our rural roads."
Earlier this month, the Leicester Mercury reported that city and county drivers received speeding fines totalling well over £1 million in 2016.
In the year up to December 22, 54,007 notices were sent out to drivers, compared with 52,873 last year.
Throughout the county, more than 19,000 of the tickets issued were to people caught by one of the partnership's five mobile speed camera vans.
Speeding fines are paid to central government, rather than the police or councils.
For them no need to come up with this device.. there must have been issues about proving the aim at night time..
And that means that the aim can be challenged in daytime... but they dont even want to show you the video footage to look at it!! so these devices are in fact... just a "Statement" because really they are just trying to plug up every possible hole they can out of being challenged..
Yet they just will not put the road signs correct! lol. And the speed limits consistent! and stop the cars being able to do over 70/80mph would have helped from the start...
When will these retards ever just realise that the entire idea is stupid from the start?
Post by Administrator on Mar 24, 2017 18:37:11 GMT
So in this video a police officer gives evidence that the old radar guns could not single out a vehicle from traffic.
Does that mean they are going to refund the old radar speeding tickets?
Also he gives evidence that the beam is 3 inches. Yet Steve Callaghan stated to me in person its 3 feet to a meter.
Can you believe this? Officer states he picks and chooses what the prosecutable speed limit will be on any given day! 😮 not the published official CPS website threshold speed!
They are allowed to give expert opinion when it comes to "speed" in court because they are police officers!! Obviously they have no idea about giving evidence in LAW! This was only 3 years ago!
How about a professional driver?! They have more experience than a police officer over speed and driving.
Can you believe this!! I QUOTE..
WHEN HE IS SATISFIED HE HAS GOT THE SPEED HE WANTS. Out of the device! 😮
Also gives "expert" evidence the beam must be square on the vehicle! So deffinately cannot be from any angle to either side according to this guy.
So this is the peo laser II. I have the pro laser III the newer one.
He is describing the function where you can hold the trigger down and see the speed displayed live and variable on screen... Which is what im eager to investigate.
Officer uses the words in a statement in this video...
" building up very, very, very slowly.
I believe his word use and subconscious language reveal evidence to us... That when using the device you can "build the speed up" by using the very carefull slow movements. With dexterity thus obtaining the "speed he wants to get out of it"
Post by Administrator on Mar 26, 2017 17:38:28 GMT
This is the device that was used at Ossett bypass by Halstead.
I thought he was positioned at the Police parking pad, but i have been to the site and now from the Video evidence i can establish that he was parked in the Lay-by. But its impossible to determine his exact parking position, front or back and exact co-ordinates.
So, im dissapointed that its not where i thought it was from, but i still strongly believe that the road was not and is not enforceable.
Also, im only given the video from a certain point and im interested to see if im going faster even, further back up the road!
I have now been on site again and found the correct positions and road section.
It appears that the Police device is giving a completely wrong distance.
I made a few video discussions, but i thought it was the location just a bit further along, but i believe essentialy everything i discussed im correct on, and now ive got the right location, it does still look like the device distance is incorrect reading... so i will have to measure it.
Telegraph and argus publish the West Yorkshire locations but i dont think they go back as far as 2013
Look heres FNZ that Halstead was driving. Top front hatch open. Kustom signals Laser witness lite in top hatch.
Post by Administrator on Mar 26, 2017 22:22:30 GMT
Here we have a poor lady got prosecuted for just going above the limit. 31mph is mentioned in the thread on peppipilocks forum. But the photo shows 36mph. In fact this is only 6 days after the Ossett bypass date!
By the laser witness device.
Luckily she posted the photo which i just downloaded.
The target is not even on the vehicle its underneath. Well WELL under.
The unknown peppipoo plonkers are giving her the worst advice ever... complete and total "ROY" CPS, idiot lawyers and bafoons who are set up and placed there to destroy challenges and de-rail people. Its the "Road safety support" Steve Callaghan" community of the internet.
She is under 36mph and cannot even be prosecuted. By official published CPS threshold..
This is the type of photo most people will get and i dont think she got the video.
Not many people do.
And from photos like these at this example location... Checking the device even gave a correcr distance like im doing from my video footage is near impossible. Unless you have a very very good visual guide on the road and you know where the police van was parked.. or have a very good evidence of where it was NOT parked.
Be Warned.. Pepippo forums is NOT there to help you.
How can a photo be sent as evidence when the beam is not even in contact with the vehicle!! And how is it even GIVING a speed reading?! On my video as it goes to edge of vehicle those three lines error message displays! Im keen to see the video of this one.
How can a photo be sent as evidence when the beam is not even in contact with the vehicle!! And how is it even GIVING a speed reading?! On my video as it goes to edge of vehicle those three lines error message didplays! Im keen to see the video of this one.
If it officially comes to light these devices have been misused and are in fact trash... Id like to see the CPS take on the destruction of critical evidence. Obviously they see it as boom or bust from tne start... Serious enough to warn and ban people but not serious enough to keep the evidence?
Post by Administrator on Mar 27, 2017 19:49:44 GMT
I rang Kustom Signals HQ to verify the tolerance on the Prolaser III & 4. and its the same for both devices. Also you dont "Really" calibrate a device... the laser might be a little wonky but they are all made unique.. it sort of always aims straight. enough for it to work. Its a bit like a toy electric keyboard it "Just works as made" you dont really tune it as such.
When calibration is talked about its usually the "SCOPE" alignment thats being talked about. as the laser itself would rarely need alignment and that doesnt really effect the devices ability to get the speed right or the distance... only if you aimed 100% it would reduce the aim accuracy only. Not if the device is working or not to get the right calculations.. ive been through all this though.
Maximum email response from further request. From device manufacturer. (all you are going to get outside a court room)
Post by Administrator on Mar 27, 2017 20:24:00 GMT
The White arrow is 514ft from the OTHER Police position! the dedicated pad with POLICE written on it!
But he was deffinately NOT parked at that one! LOL
He was where one of those 2 Red lines are!
Also he should have accounted for cosine effect on the legal document N.I.P. if he had have been on the police platform aiming straight at oncoming traffic instead, he wouldnt have had to make the cosine effect adjustments which are given in the Tele-traffic UK documentatin for the devices.
Also this is exactly where there should be a sign to "Tell you where the exit goes to" the destination.. but theres no sign to tell anyone where its going to!
OK SO SOMETIMES I HAVE TO GET it WRONG before i get it right.. I dont mind learning..
Administrator: EXTINCTION REBELLION ON LIES AND CORRUPTION IN THE PRESS youtu.be/p1xeZ6gYp1k special relationships between the local tabloids and Council/Police control what the public see and hear in the press.
Jun 12, 2021 6:24:18 GMT
Administrator: With extremely high levels of complaints against local authorities and police, the percentage of the public who elect these authorities is very low. Outlining that we are being governed and controlled by a minority percentage of people, who run the news
Jun 12, 2021 6:28:26 GMT