The CROWN PROSECUTION SECOND (CPS) meantime |

Administrator
Good

Standing up to corruption and criminals working in the justice system

Posts: 10,669

The CROWN PROSECUTION SECOND (CPS) meantime Mar 5, 2016 20:44:31 GMT via mobile

Post by Administrator on Mar 5, 2016 20:44:31 GMT

Also note that Sandra Kerr and the Court administration staff are perfectly capable of reporting a Barrister to the police, yet they fail to report the Ossett bypass and other illegal signs at enforced roads, including the illegal size signs and non working lighting on the Elland bypass.. as well as ..God knows how ..the fraud permitted to take place in the court itself. And the Police and Crown Prosecution service failing to supply video evidence before court dates. As well as knowledge that evidence sent the Bradford central ticket office and supposedly the CPS by virtue of internal process was not presented or read out on multiple occasions at multiple court hearings.. and what about multiple offences at locations where other drivers were not charged? Popping back up again and again.

1688 Bill of Rights - The right to Petition - It is the Right of the Subjects to petition the Queen & all Commitments & Prosecutions for doing so are illegal.

Administrator
Good

Standing up to corruption and criminals working in the justice system

Posts: 10,669

The CROWN PROSECUTION SECOND (CPS) meantime Mar 5, 2016 22:42:29 GMT

Post by Administrator on Mar 5, 2016 22:42:29 GMT

Should this picture be in the HM Revenue and Customs section?

It is customary of the courts to put the customer first. Always. ?

Exact same items posted either together VS seperately?! either way which.. which is the best customary way to relieve you of your wages?

Multiple costing packets? or a big £8 handling fee and import duty for the easier you made it to handle for them, one item?!

Flyering fixed penalty fine from the council for placing stickers, or Criminal damages charged by the police? Same thing... except they didnt notify you in writing first.. or else Bradford council did... but apparently the CPS police and courts cannot read or just are a set of egits.

Last Edit: Mar 5, 2016 22:49:11 GMT by Administrator

1688 Bill of Rights - The right to Petition - It is the Right of the Subjects to petition the Queen & all Commitments & Prosecutions for doing so are illegal.

Administrator
Good

Standing up to corruption and criminals working in the justice system

Posts: 10,669

The CROWN PROSECUTION SECOND (CPS) meantime Mar 6, 2016 11:12:05 GMT

Post by Administrator on Mar 6, 2016 11:12:05 GMT

Since this story of someone impersonating a barrister at Calderdale Magistrates court... (if its true even) I am starting to think its possible that it could have even been Peter Fahy himself impersonating a Magistrate when i was in Manchester Magistrates court, because the middle magistrate did look a lot like Peter Fahy. Would they pull a stunt like that after I had put the Manchester evening news advert out for Bentcop.biz?

1688 Bill of Rights - The right to Petition - It is the Right of the Subjects to petition the Queen & all Commitments & Prosecutions for doing so are illegal.

Administrator
Good

Standing up to corruption and criminals working in the justice system

Posts: 10,669

The CROWN PROSECUTION SECOND (CPS) meantime Mar 6, 2016 18:28:55 GMT

Post by Administrator on Mar 6, 2016 18:28:55 GMT

They had this at McDonalds today.... be it significant or not..

After I have read the Calderdale magistrates court newspaper story from 2009 regarding the "Man impersonating a Barrister" reported by Sandra Kerr...

And the fact that both a guy at Community service and myself have both been given incorrect court attendance times by Clerks to the Justices.. from Calderdale and Huddersfield.. and the practice may be a widespread strategy...

I have been thinking... my court dates were really far apart and there IS supposed to be a disputes and complaints avenue to the courts, and i was always in contact with them a lot until recently when i have been loosing the will to read brick wall replies...

The fact is this... The police just "bob into court" when it suits them to get this signed, get that authorised, this and that warrant, bla, bla bla.. and as ANY PERSON can present a case to the CPS, I am guessing in LAW that anyone can request a warrant or a court order for something they need, like obtaining evidence from the police or CCTV from the council...

The fact is this.... IF THE COURT SET A TIME AND DATE and that is the allocation. that IS the allocation.. If they issue a warrant, then recall it.. but then you dont turn up later on.. how are you supposed to know a time if not in "writing"..

In fact.... why dont YOU .. just "turn up a day early" And say.. im early.. fit me in now. ?!

How about if you dont show up and they issue a warrant and you are taken in and the matter is just "fit in & around" whenever?!

have you seen the listings on the wall at Manchester salford magistrates court?! its like a cemetary.. or war memorial.. only 1,000 times more people on there

So, if they make a mistake like giving the wrong time for Manchester magistrates court.. i do not see how they will "Just fit you in later" on.

Also.. my Adjournment at Manchester Magistrates when I did turn up... was mostly helped by the fact that another case was overrunning! and had run into the time allocated for MY case!! so there was little time left anyway! and the listings as i say at Manchester are rammed!

The fact is.. that the "Courts" do simply not want to do ANYTHING for someone who is representing themselves or defending themselves.

The courts issue.. "bits of paper" with pen scribbles on, as official documents. And Thus likewise my own "PETITIONS" and "BALLOTS" for bentcop.biz carry the actual true LEGAL POWERS when I WRITE THEM UP OR PRINT THEM OFF.

The fact is.. the Court will not co-operate with ANYONE, and regards people as stupid persons, when it is the COURT that is bent, amateur and corrupted.

Where are the videos I asked for court orders for?

The fact that the court diverts you with "we dont give legal advice" bla bla bla.... When in fact... when you research OFFICIAL COURT FORMS... it usually has about 3 sentences on it and you could have draughted one up yourself.. like copying HTML or internet code, or FLASH code..

The Court Clerk does not want to present you with the correct form that you need to fill in..

For example.. I have requested to have my Political materials returned to me, and the court could have/should have had it signed off, so I could send it to the police. My documents/stickers were printed for the petition.. and I had right to apply to the magistrates court for their return.

Where are all these police documents that are getting signed off by magistrates every day? Is someone say in a room, like RIGNO STARR? signing autographs?

It is a CON and a scam. It is down to this.... The Courts/Magistrates do NOT WANT TO DO IT. They are better than you and your pen - to them carrys NOTHING. no matter what the law says. And they will not full fill the secretarial duties and Advice on forms, when it is CLEARLY NOT ADVOCATE ADVICE ON A CASE OR DEFENCE. IT IS SIMPLY PROCESS REQUEST OF SERVICE.

And when your VIDEO was NOT supplied by the Police to you as Required for a speeding prosecution.. then they did NOT comply with requirements and the case is VOID. and the court is IN ERROR and the matter should be CORRECTED. FAULT OF THE COURT, POLICE AND PROSECUTION. For not doing their job properly.

PLUS all these "wrong time" scams.. of number I now wonder how many people will come forward and say they were given a wrong time by the Court Clerk.. Because it may well be more times than Sir Jimmy Saville touched a kids bottom.

1688 Bill of Rights - The right to Petition - It is the Right of the Subjects to petition the Queen & all Commitments & Prosecutions for doing so are illegal.

Administrator Good Standing up to corruption and criminals working in the justice system Posts: 10,669	The CROWN PROSECUTION SECOND (CPS) meantime Mar 25, 2016 7:08:53 GMT Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top Post by Administrator on Mar 25, 2016 7:08:53 GMT
	1688 Bill of Rights - The right to Petition - It is the Right of the Subjects to petition the Queen & all Commitments & Prosecutions for doing so are illegal.

Administrator
Good

Standing up to corruption and criminals working in the justice system

Posts: 10,669

The CROWN PROSECUTION SECOND (CPS) meantime Mar 25, 2016 21:14:09 GMT

Post by Administrator on Mar 25, 2016 21:14:09 GMT

this set up is more suited for a RED SIGNAL camera set-up in law. Thus no amber phase can be disputed. Or would be required as evidence.

The current legislation on amber, in fact.. renders current red signal cameras as (IMHO) pointless red herring evidence in court.

Like the dummy traffic light camera box & how to change the film lesson, in court N.E.C. style exhibitions. Not related to a working operational camera installation OR.. THE operational camera installation at the time and date of the alledged offences.

(take your dashboard out of the car and take the speedometer into court, to show the magistrates it WAS correctly calibrated to the rest of the vehicle/axle on the day of the offence) ?

Ministry of justice IQ level.

Last Edit: Mar 25, 2016 21:19:08 GMT by Administrator

1688 Bill of Rights - The right to Petition - It is the Right of the Subjects to petition the Queen & all Commitments & Prosecutions for doing so are illegal.

Administrator Good Standing up to corruption and criminals working in the justice system Posts: 10,669	The CROWN PROSECUTION SECOND (CPS) meantime Mar 28, 2016 7:20:56 GMT Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top Post by Administrator on Mar 28, 2016 7:20:56 GMT Points on obtaining the video evidence (give part of the evidence)
	1688 Bill of Rights - The right to Petition - It is the Right of the Subjects to petition the Queen & all Commitments & Prosecutions for doing so are illegal.

Administrator Good Standing up to corruption and criminals working in the justice system Posts: 10,669	The CROWN PROSECUTION SECOND (CPS) meantime Jul 23, 2016 11:18:57 GMT Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top Post by Administrator on Jul 23, 2016 11:18:57 GMT
	1688 Bill of Rights - The right to Petition - It is the Right of the Subjects to petition the Queen & all Commitments & Prosecutions for doing so are illegal.

Administrator
Good

Standing up to corruption and criminals working in the justice system

Posts: 10,669

The CROWN PROSECUTION SECOND (CPS) meantime Jul 26, 2016 15:48:50 GMT via mobile

Post by Administrator on Jul 26, 2016 15:48:50 GMT

Can you tell us THE speed of THE vehicle?

Yes or no.

You must be able to answer the question correctly. What was the speed of the vehicle? What is the speed of the vehicle, sir?

*** JUST TELEPHONED THE VW VAN CENTRE ***

They do NOT do speedometer calibration. It is NOT part of the MOT. They do not touch it. Or test or modify it. It is factory set to the design and cannot be changed. It is NOT under or over calibrated. It is designed to be as exact as possible. If you have the correct tyres and wheels fitted.

What is the sum of the fine to pay, sir? Please key in the fine amount into your keypad in pounds and pence, then press the hash key.

Hmmmmm.
Ok, so I knew you can get digital scanners that can unlock a car, but this mobile phone app gets all the vehicles errors, bulbs, doors, status and wheel speeds as you drive past?!

So why are the police toying with laser guns?

VCDS Mobile Test Drive:

Last Edit: Jul 26, 2016 19:57:03 GMT by Administrator

1688 Bill of Rights - The right to Petition - It is the Right of the Subjects to petition the Queen & all Commitments & Prosecutions for doing so are illegal.

Administrator
Good

Standing up to corruption and criminals working in the justice system

Posts: 10,669

The CROWN PROSECUTION SECOND (CPS) meantime Jul 29, 2016 14:05:35 GMT

Post by Administrator on Jul 29, 2016 14:05:35 GMT

so, ive had a brief look into this "Exclusive Cognisance" that the House of Lords pulled out of the Hat for Lord Hanningfield.

To Get him off the Hook for the Expences scandal (Even though other Mp's have already been prosecuted and sent to prison for other things)

www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt201314/jtselect/jtprivi/30/3004.htm

16. The principle of exclusive cognisance underpins all privilege, including those aspects of privilege which are now based in statute. Thus Article 9 of the Bill of Rights, the most important statutory expression of parliamentary privilege, states that "the freedom of speech and debates or proceedings in parliament ought not to be impeached or questioned in any court or place out of Parliament". This encapsulated a pre-existing claim to exclusive cognisance over things said or done in Parliament—the preamble to the Bill of Rights notes that King James II had sought to subvert the liberties of the realm "by Prosecutions in the Court of King's Bench for Matters and Causes cognizable only in Parliament".

So they Are using the Bill of Rights and it IS still valid in my case with my Petitioning Work.

And the Correct method to Challenge Parliament on any matter is Through "Petitioning" them.

In Fact it is Not "illegal" for the Crown Prosecution service to apparently have even tried to Prosecute Lord Hanningfield.

But it IS Illegal for the Police & Crown Prosecution service to Prosecute someone for Petitioning.

Although.... The Question of What is & What is not Parliamentary work Does not need to be decided by a "Jury" if it is PRE written in Text and "Defined" already.

For Example.. if HM Government have a pre-stated Legal Duty & obligation to "Provide Fast, Safe and Expedient transport" - If there was a large body of evidence that they were "Not" doing that.... then could you state without a doubt that providing UNSAFE, NON-EXPEDIENT and SLOW transport cannot possibly be "Parliamentary work".

Because on paper, there IS NO WORK that Parliament is charged with doing that is Unsafe, inexpedient and slow, for Road traffic Matters.

Because they are "NOT CHARGED WITH DOING ANY WORK OF THE TYPE" in fact is is CONTRARY TO THE WORK THAT IS STATED THAT THEY MUST DO & PROVIDE.

Its like saying.... I am "Laying a garden". But you can only say for so long that you are needing to tear a garden up, to re-lay it.. before it is apparent that you are in fact "NOT" laying a garden, but removing a garden. To do something different.

Thus.. when getting RID of the Nations Greatest Road safety Feature THE HARD SHOULDER. And having vehicles use a dedicated lane, and causing SLOW traffic at 40mph, enforceable instead...

It could be evidence that it is NOT safe, NOT fast & Not expedient.

You would not question the MPs or LORDS or if the actual WORK was done in Parliament or not.

You need only investigate & find out IF WHAT IS BEING DONE IS IN FACT WHAT THEY CLAIM IT TO BE.

Because if it is in FACT, NOT FAST. NOT SAFE and NOT EXPEDIENT .. IT CAN NOT POSSIBLY BE OR CONFORM TO THE DESCRIPTIVE CHARGES OF WHAT THE GOVERNMENT HAVE A DUTY TO PROVIDE THROUGH THEIR WORK.

THUs.. how CAN it BE "THE WORK" that they are claiming to be charged with providing?

Its like an electrician turning up to do a plastering job. YES it might be WORK. But it is NOT the WORK AS DEFINED THAT THEY MUST DO ON PAPER. THUS how CAN it BE THE WORK?

WHEN THE WORK HAS A PRE DEFINED DESCRIPTIVE OF WHAT IT IS?

To Petition you need to promote, collect, investigate & research the subject & put up notices, give notice to the public.

Also.. if it is ILLEGAL to BE PROSECUTED.. then it can never GET to a court. Where as the "Exclusive Cognisance" Did get to a court. But it is NOT ILLEGAL to take them TO a court. THUS Petitioning has MORE protection than "Exclusive Cognisance"

Because those who prosecute you are in fact answerable to the Law.

Anyway.. Most MP's who have been Challenged by "The people" usualy "resign" rather than face prosecution anyway.

I would not seek to chase any Lord or Mps over a few thousand pounds anyway. The idea is stupid.

Rather just have them resign or removed and the damage done by their work NOT folowing what they are CHARGED to provide, being "Corrected" and matters put correct.
You CAN Petition for that.

And THIS WEBSITE and MY WORK is exactly that. In relation to Road Traffic Matters or Enforcement & Connected concerns.

If the crown Prosecution service could get the Lords or MP's to Admid, in their own private leisure time that LEGEND SIGN BoaRDS on Motorways could NOT be seen CLEARLY for practicable angles of approach or on video for later evidence clearly (UNSAFE & incompatable) and that 40mph speed limits after closing lanes off because they removed a hard shoulder was in fact SLOW. and the entire new road "Smart motorway" plan was NOT expedient at all, like the M6 TOLL taking drivers misleadingly up the outside lane.. and J12 M62 DID cause YEARS of DELAYS.. then that WORK would be ADMITTEDLY - NOT the WORK they have been charged with doing & Providing. Thus a Jury would not need to decide it. And the Prosecutor would not need to decide it either, because the MP or LORD would have already decided it THEMSELVES. Thus the matter has been Pre decided.

Thus when challenged on the actual Work DONE... If an MP or Lord were to be quoted to say "This is not the Work I am Charged with Providing to the Public" Then it can NOT POSSIBLY BE "Parliamentary work". Because it is NOT what is Stated that work IS. As DEFINED what must be provided. It is in fact OTHER WORK. and CONTRARY to "Parliamentary Work"

kapish?

The problem with the Crown Prosecution Service, is that they are persuing a LORD over a poxy thing "Money" "Fines" "Community service" "Tags" "Conditional orders" "Prison".

Money and Fines is POXY to Lords & Mp's. They are not in it for Money. They are in it to DO. GET DONE. CHANGE THINGS. DO WHAT THEY WANT.

And you are not going to get that with Silly Prosecution cases.

The WIN, the "VICTORY" over LORDS & MP's is not in a "Court" room. "Parliament" IS a Court room. You WIN with Pettions, Signatures, Votes, Public Opinion and "JUST BEING RIGHT".

They can only win with Lies, Avoidance, Ignorance and Cheating. (If they are wrong). Otherwise it is simply their "WILL" their "WANTS" VS "YOURS".

And the Political avenue would be the "Correct" route for the Crown Prosecution service against "Hanningfield.

Which is exactly why I started a petition.

If the Crown Prosecution service had been "Genuine and Honest" it wouldnt have got into the Mess it is in anyway. It is their own Fault. only now do they try to Prosecute Lords & Mp's. Before een accepting their OWN Errors & Wrongs.

Last Edit: Jul 29, 2016 14:26:20 GMT by Administrator

1688 Bill of Rights - The right to Petition - It is the Right of the Subjects to petition the Queen & all Commitments & Prosecutions for doing so are illegal.

Administrator
Good

Standing up to corruption and criminals working in the justice system

Posts: 10,669

The CROWN PROSECUTION SECOND (CPS) meantime Aug 8, 2016 23:56:01 GMT

Post by Administrator on Aug 8, 2016 23:56:01 GMT

HEARING.

- "To "hear" (Listen) to what you have to say about something (If you are even allowed to speak that is)

usually at a pre-arranged time. - Unless the matter is fit in at another time convenient to the court.

Staff have Administration, Office, Bookings, Legal advisor and Magistrates.

representatives from a seperate organisation 3rd party - the Crown prosecution service use the court a lot more than Private or Corporate Buisness persons, Lawyers, Solicitors or Barristers.

The Organisation & arrangements of a court are mercurious & mysterious to "normal folk".

A Court is usually attached to the side of a police station but it is supposed to be an independent building operating independently.

Many matters the Magistrates have no power to decide upon & the Chief Police Officer is required to be sought after for permission and input.

Some Police Fine/central speeding ticket offices are located at magistrates courts.

Central ticket offices & police chiefs usually will not investigate a complaint about a speeding ticket, or road sign or marking.

You will have to put it to the Magistrates on a specific time & date. If the Police Ticket Office or Crown Prosecution and Police Chief at the Court do not agree with you. You will need to Pay a special fee to an independent Solicitor or lawyer to argue your case to the Court & police over the matter.

The Council are never involved in these stages. And the Government do not intervene.

Occasionally a professuional witness of the choice of the prosecution will give evidence, if you have not already found one yourself or read up on the subject of concern.

When you are being tried and punnished in front of the court, you will be expected to appologise deeply and show acts of great remourse to show the court how shamefull you are about what you have done.

Unless you can find professional help, even the truth & law itself may not be acknowledged by the court.

The court is a member of the speed camera network and wider government tactics collaboration. They will not be easy to convince if you are going to challege their system.

If they decide you are wrong. You have a very short time to appeal, but you will still be punnished. Though, if a different court decides that court was wrong, they might give you your money back, or your possessions that they have taken from you, unless they sold them on. Or took your house and car, or job.

They most likely will not be sorry.

The Women who work for the Crown Prosecution service really enjoy their job, which gives them great satisfaction to punnish people in the court room. It is the most favourite part of their job.

Most police officers like to get civillians to do what they are told. (they call them c villains), Although there are no Laws for telling the truth or about telling lies. There is no Law that says what is kind and what is mean. The Police usually do not disclose how much job satisfaction they get, because it is taboo.

The police must be very serious because they attend very tradgic accidents. The police instead of being happy, choose people with names that wit their jobs. like MacFarlane, Barr, low, or Hunter. Though the associations are not acknowledged officially.

The Police deal with mostly people who do not get along with day to day life, or have temper problems or who have been made poor. or are stupid.

They do not deal with people who hide, move or tamper with peoples things, or very good criminals who steal using legitimate loopholes and buisnesses and pass as Mr. sweetman.

Many positions in authority are "pretend" so that people who are not as big as other people can "Feel big" and help them be normal.

To assist this further, very big people also act small. Then they do not piss off other people. Many singers are employed and used by television producers who are small. This gives other small people the chance to be big. and the producers get to feel clever without getting stoned or put in the village stocks.

Most of the big people "go along" with the little peoples Play-acting. & let them wear dress up costumes to feel better. They also made up "certificates" & "schools" so the little people could fit in better and feel bigger. but also to try tame them from the jungle life. This works OK, until something serious happens and the little people get big people with metal hand gloves and big sticks and put them in a room like gullivers travels. The Wigs make the small people feel less scared, but they can be mean to the big people in the special room. They have special reasons for this. its exciting. but they are not allowed anyone to know they like it.

Because the small people do not really know how to fix any problems, the entire thing can be very silly. One Little person gets to ride a broom-stick to other countries to talk tea-parties. But she doesnt talk McDonalds or she will get fat. the big people try to ignore this & do normal things like work, eat, sleep, drink, and say hello to eachother.

Some Mp's call her "the difficult lady" because she is very bossy. They have to all pretend she is the impertentest person in the whole land, and she pushes her way into the broom closet after she gets back from flying around the whole big world. to talk on the clever phone with the smart men who tell her what they can do because she doesnt actually know.

Last Edit: Aug 9, 2016 7:31:41 GMT by Administrator

1688 Bill of Rights - The right to Petition - It is the Right of the Subjects to petition the Queen & all Commitments & Prosecutions for doing so are illegal.

Administrator Good Standing up to corruption and criminals working in the justice system Posts: 10,669	The CROWN PROSECUTION SECOND (CPS) meantime Aug 11, 2016 19:26:27 GMT Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top Post by Administrator on Aug 11, 2016 19:26:27 GMT Request to CPS for Driver alertness course by request to Chief alternative to prosecution. with some laser tech as well
	1688 Bill of Rights - The right to Petition - It is the Right of the Subjects to petition the Queen & all Commitments & Prosecutions for doing so are illegal.

Administrator Good Standing up to corruption and criminals working in the justice system Posts: 10,669	The CROWN PROSECUTION SECOND (CPS) meantime Aug 12, 2016 7:00:22 GMT Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top Post by Administrator on Aug 12, 2016 7:00:22 GMT Are we subjects or citizens? news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4191613.stm
	1688 Bill of Rights - The right to Petition - It is the Right of the Subjects to petition the Queen & all Commitments & Prosecutions for doing so are illegal.

Administrator
Good

Standing up to corruption and criminals working in the justice system

Posts: 10,669

The CROWN PROSECUTION SECOND (CPS) meantime Aug 16, 2016 17:52:10 GMT via mobile

Post by Administrator on Aug 16, 2016 17:52:10 GMT

You won't believe this but I just delivered to a guy in Nuneaton who I know and just 2 week ago his son was issued with two N.I.P.s for driving through the M1 50mph roadworks average speed cameras twice exceeding the speed limit alledgedly at about 58 and 65mph. Going on and returning from a journey. It was Northamptonshire police.

He was given a speed awareness course for one offence and the other was discontinued!!

The guy practice his band opposite where I buy Wroe (fishheads) from the fish bar at Nuneaton! I'm certain I posted a link to his band on here.. I think I did..I will put it on again. They played at a festival.

Spoort is one of his bands. He has 2 bands.
Sport spelled with two O's. Just trying to remember the other band.

Do you think it was rigged because I know him?

I don't think his dad would lie about it.

Here, this wasn't on YouTube last time I looked. It was like a kitchen poem art performance thing like parklife intro type video

The url actually says live@spoortband

SPOORT:

Still trying to find the other band he does. The lyric is about musical chairs

Its interesting because he will have got the two Notices of intended prosecution about the same time as i did the video outside manningham police station getting speed readings out of the concrete balls either side of the entrance. Why is that significant? Well the guys dad sorted me out with a special set of rare extra large golden solid brass bedknobs, because i wanted different ones on each corner and he had a few interesting ones in his shop! So i have got these really big hard to find brass bedknobs. Its a bit like bedknobs and broomsticks!

I wonder what the Crown Prosecution Service think to the Northampton police chiefs generous gesture?! That is if it is a true story?

No similar gesture for me from Cheshire police chief Simon Byrne so far. In fact the reason i was late with my N.I.P. is i was trying to find out about the speed awareness course for the traffic light offence. The Spoort guy and his dad been on speed awareness courses for a traffic light offence before.

Ive just looked at the First Macclesfield thrwad page and i did write to give contact and correspondence with driver details in legal notice to the ticket office start of October 2015....

Cps and police not giving recognition for that even though i submitted my entire website as evidence to the CPS before the Macclesfield alledged offence. And they knew about the North Wales and all other police contact. So they are just being bitter.

1688 Bill of Rights - The right to Petition - It is the Right of the Subjects to petition the Queen & all Commitments & Prosecutions for doing so are illegal.

Administrator Good Standing up to corruption and criminals working in the justice system Posts: 10,669	The CROWN PROSECUTION SECOND (CPS) meantime Aug 18, 2016 18:04:31 GMT Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top Post by Administrator on Aug 18, 2016 18:04:31 GMT Very Sinister Services - Courts and Prosecutors extremely dangerous people to Public Safety
	1688 Bill of Rights - The right to Petition - It is the Right of the Subjects to petition the Queen & all Commitments & Prosecutions for doing so are illegal.