MACCLESFIELD Silk Road/Mill Lane fixed RED LIGHT CAMERA. |

Administrator
Good

Standing up to corruption and criminals working in the justice system

Posts: 10,669

MACCLESFIELD Silk Road/Mill Lane fixed RED LIGHT CAMERA. Nov 30, 2015 0:02:47 GMT

Post by Administrator on Nov 30, 2015 0:02:47 GMT

MACCLESFIELD MILL LANE FIXED LIGHT CAMERA. NO GIVE WAY AHEAD SIGN BEFORE GIVE WAY JUNCTION

I have had a look on google maps and there is not as it appears the requisite? GIVE WAY AHEAD sign, BEFORE the Give way left slip junction to the traffic lights. (which DOES have the give way sign) But not the GIVE WAY AHEAD.

This leads me to belive that this Junctions that I see as a "TRICK" trap set up junction... COULD BE AND IS IN FACT.. another instance of "AN IMPOSSIBLE JUNCTION"

Because it should not exist.

The traffic lights should control the entire junction, and not have a GIVE WAY slip road to the side.

THERE IS NO TRAFFIC LIGHT WARNING SIGN FOR THIS SET OF LIGHTS (AND) NO GIVE WAY AHEAD SIGN...

THUS YOU CANNOT SAY... IT DOESNT NEED EITHER OR ANY AT ALL.

THESE SIGNS MUST BE LEARNED FOR A DRIVING TEST TO BE PASSED. IF YOU HAVE AN ACCIDENT IT IS THE COUNCILS FAULT NOT YOURS.

See this website about give way junctions...

LINK>
www.drivingtesttips.biz/give-way-signs-road-markings-rules.html

http://www.drivingtesttips.biz/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/give-way-50-yards.jpg

http://www.drivingtesttips.biz/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/giveway-sign1.jpg

Give Way Signs, Road Markings and Rules

Give way signs can be seen frequently throughout British roads and are used to warn motorists of an impending junction ahead. Give way signs are also regulatory signs that give an order.
Give way rules

Give way rules that a motorists facing a give way sign must give way to traffic on the road they intend to join. The traffic on the road they intend on joining has priority and the motorists must wait for this traffic to pass and to wait for a suitable safe gap before joining the new road.

The triangle, red bordered sign with give way written in the centre is a regulatory sign giving an order.

Give way signs

Two types of give way signs are typically seen. A driver approaching a junction may see the give way warning sign – a blank triangle with red border and an information plate below the triangle providing details of the potential hazard ahead. Distance to the junction is in yards and can vary in distance.

Give way warning signs are typically used where they junction may be difficult to see, as it could be on a bend for instance. At the junction the regulatory give way sign may be seen where the driver must give way to traffic before entering the new road.

Why are give way signs upside down

The equilateral give way sign is upside down compared to other warning road signs simply as a recognition of shape. So if for instance a give way sign was to become defaced due to snow for example, the shape of the sign alone would be enough to inform a motorist of the impending hazard (a junction) that is ahead.
Give way road markings and lines

You have probably seen these road markings before and perhaps asked ‘what does the triangle road marking mean’? The upside down triangle markings on the road represent a warning to motorists that there is a give way just ahead. The triangle road marking along with the lines representing where the vehicle must stop and wait if necessary to give way are often placed at a minor junction, particularly where it meets a major road where there is a difference in traffic speed and volume on the two roads.

Should you stop at a give way sign?

Unlike a stop sign, you are not legally obliged to do so. Whether you stop or not however depends on the type of junction. Not all types of junction have give way signs or road markings. Quiet junctions may have no signs or road markings at all, large busy junction may be controlled by traffic lights. One of the most important aspects of a junction is to establish if it is open or closed.

ow to approach a give way sign

Approach a give way junction using the Mirror Signal Manoeuvre routine (MSM), or better still the MSPSL routine. This is expected by the driving examiner during the driving test. To establish whether you need to stop or proceed without stopping, you must assess whether the junction is open or closed.

A closed junction restricts your view of the road and traffic on the road you intend on joining, and open junction is clear to see and determine whether you must stop or proceed. See junctions for further information and a full explanation on open and closed junctions.
Difference between give way and stop sign

Both give way and stop signs are regulatory order signs. The difference between give way and stop signs however is at a stop sign, a motorist must legally stop just before the stop line before proceeding. This is often due to the area that the motorist intends on entering is highly hazardous. Give way rules are different in that the driver must give way to traffic ahead but do not need to stop if it is determined that it is safe to proceed without doing so.

1688 Bill of Rights - The right to Petition - It is the Right of the Subjects to petition the Queen & all Commitments & Prosecutions for doing so are illegal.

Administrator
Good

Standing up to corruption and criminals working in the justice system

Posts: 10,669

MACCLESFIELD Silk Road/Mill Lane fixed RED LIGHT CAMERA. Dec 16, 2015 20:00:07 GMT

Post by Administrator on Dec 16, 2015 20:00:07 GMT

At this Location on the A580 in Manchester, the actual TRAFFIC LIGHT CAMERA raDar detection area is visible by its measurement markings (not usually shown) (Do they have to be?) Or is this really a speed camera?

It at least appears from this location that if anything is even moving IN FRONT of the LINE, not even OVER it, then it triggers the camera.

And I am certain this will include any part of a LONG vehicle lagging behind after the driver is well past the red light before its even gone to red, and possibly even at amber?

Last Edit: Dec 16, 2015 20:06:15 GMT by Administrator

1688 Bill of Rights - The right to Petition - It is the Right of the Subjects to petition the Queen & all Commitments & Prosecutions for doing so are illegal.

Administrator Good Standing up to corruption and criminals working in the justice system Posts: 10,669	MACCLESFIELD Silk Road/Mill Lane fixed RED LIGHT CAMERA. Dec 16, 2015 20:01:03 GMT Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top Post by Administrator on Dec 16, 2015 20:01:03 GMT Also notice the Banners over the road, not removed by Police or Highways.
	1688 Bill of Rights - The right to Petition - It is the Right of the Subjects to petition the Queen & all Commitments & Prosecutions for doing so are illegal.

Administrator
Good

Standing up to corruption and criminals working in the justice system

Posts: 10,669

MACCLESFIELD Silk Road/Mill Lane fixed RED LIGHT CAMERA. Dec 16, 2015 20:07:46 GMT

Post by Administrator on Dec 16, 2015 20:07:46 GMT

Are ANY of the other Traffic Light cameras even VALID with no Road Markings laid down?

Mill Lane, Macclesfield?

This camera is a newer type, i think same as the other traffic light camera on the A580 opposite the Petrol Station not far after you exit the M62 just after the M1 turn off west bound.

here.... Queens service station? There is still one of my sticker backings on that camera.. he didnt remove it correctly. In fact he took half of it off so you just couldnt read the website, and left the other half untouched to make it look as if some kid had peeled half of, the twat.

Yep, same camera type & road markings as the previous example and the detection is "before" the line even.
So long vehicles will trail back over even way after the cab passes.

Its like its DESIGNED to be dodgy.

I know this is a Horrible thing to say. But All my life I looked up to the Royal Family & been proud to be English. But the more & more I look into this & think.. It feels like they really take pleasure in "fox hunting" people for game & leisure. & although they like our Athletes Supported in things like the Olympics... It does not hide the fact that either there are certain families the Royal Family Really dont like, or else What if they go and use their power and secrecy to actually go out there and HINDER capable, honest, decent people who would other wise do really well in life and put a load of idiots & fools in the positions that should be reserved for respectable people. It just seems silly this whole speed camera thing.. like the "stupedest idea ever" because the Quickest Way to LOOSE fans, if you are the Royal Family.. Is to Go Twat all the drivers with speed cameras. Unless this was sme insane Tony Blair Witch project to get the Millers support in the working class? But then go and Stop them all listening to the RADIO through the Day with the Workplace Radio licence FEE, and you CUT THE POWER the various other radio stations have/had.

To me... Frankly. Its the most retarded idea the Government has ever had.

I have seen That Television show, where the BBC were saying "what on earth are we going to "DO" with the royal family?! Talking as if they were some kind of left over spare parts & then they had them on that Show Playing Tennis Against each other & things like that. I og course never made such a comment. So why did I find myself of the receiving end of all the hassle & bullshit? When I actually liked the Royal Family. Now It turns out they just like Twatting people for fun. Especially arabs. And coming from me with the Bentcop website... (Which was only intended to stop misuse of speed cameras & make them put up the proper road signs & Stop making criminals out of nice, Honest, decent folks)

& Now there are the Invictus games. They should have had the original television programme NOW not back in the days when it was on. But its too late now as its all getting past that crazyness into seemingly more & more Cameron Battles.

Will the Fighting & Hunting ever end? & veryone move on to peace?

Could we just send all the police & Criminals & Royal Family to an Island like "the Running man" & let them all just Hunt themselves into Bliss? Have a "War Island" or a "Testosterone" island where males who like hunting eachother can just go play predator & leave everyone else in peace?

Last Edit: Dec 16, 2015 20:40:19 GMT by Administrator

1688 Bill of Rights - The right to Petition - It is the Right of the Subjects to petition the Queen & all Commitments & Prosecutions for doing so are illegal.

Administrator
Good

Standing up to corruption and criminals working in the justice system

Posts: 10,669

MACCLESFIELD Silk Road/Mill Lane fixed RED LIGHT CAMERA. Dec 23, 2015 23:41:47 GMT

Post by Administrator on Dec 23, 2015 23:41:47 GMT

Here in Nottinghamshire there are 2 traffic light cameras. One each side of the road.

One is the older model the other a newer model. The newer model looks very similar, if not the same type as the one in the previous post in Manchester. Yet in this example from Nottinghamshire there are no road markings.

So, if it is the same model of traffic light camera, then does it or doesnt it have the road markings? It either does or doesnt.
I dont see why they have them in Manchester if they are not required.

Also the old version example in Nottinghamshire doesnt have road markings either. I havent seen the older type WITH road markings I dont think.

Has anyone seen that model WITH road markings?

I do have a video of these cameras, because they are by some average speed cameras where the speed limit changed from 40mph to National speed limit and that distracts you from the red light cameras. In fact the signs say "Enforcement cameras" and I think the traffic light cameras are in fact supposed to distract you from noticing the average speed cameras. I will upload the video for this soon.

1688 Bill of Rights - The right to Petition - It is the Right of the Subjects to petition the Queen & all Commitments & Prosecutions for doing so are illegal.

Administrator
Good

Standing up to corruption and criminals working in the justice system

Posts: 10,669

MACCLESFIELD Silk Road/Mill Lane fixed RED LIGHT CAMERA. Jan 15, 2016 0:11:17 GMT

Post by Administrator on Jan 15, 2016 0:11:17 GMT

Ok, so i have sent a complaint in to this Chief of Cheshire Police Simon Byrne.

http://i2.chesterchronicle.co.uk/incoming/article7326957.ece/ALTERNATES/s1227b/2028832.jpg

Im seeing Patrick McLaughing in this photo. You?

http://www.rochdaleonline.co.uk/uploads/f1/news/img/2010714_162522.jpg

Simon began his service with Cheshire Constabulary in June 2014 as Chief Constable. In 2015 he became the National Police Chief's Council (NPCC) National lead for the National Police Air Service. Working locally, he has led a major reorganisation of the Force and an investment in Neighbourhood Policing.

Cheshire Police Professional Standards.

REF: 0073050111034920 Section .85 Road signage missing from enforcement locations
Chief Constable Simon Byrne
bentcop.boards.net/board/8/traffic-light-cameras

Dear Cheshire police Professional standards,
I am writing to complain about The Chief Of police Simon Byrne, who is the National Police Chief's council and is responsible for reorganisation of the force.

I have identified with my own investigations several issues with Fixed Traffic light cameras that is covered in the above web link location in a number of photos and discussions I have put together as part of my HM Government Authorized E-petitions campaign against misuse of traffic enforcement.

The Cheshire police case REF. number also quoted above has been part of this, As I complained to the Local Council authority regarding missing Traffic Light Warning sign and Pre Give way Sign, before the set of traffic lights at Mill lane Macclesfield, fixed Camera.

I have since identified that the "speed reading" taken by the traffic light cameras is by Traffipax Camera, and as part of that cameras function to be calibrated to read speed, the triple strip road markings are required.
As these are neglected to be installed at the traffic light camera sites, and only ONE line exists, at the stop line.. the cames are NOT set up correctly and should not be used at all. If the speed reading cannot be calibrated, the entire evidence from the camera is invalid.

This is confirmed by evidence I sent in also that my Vehiclw (van) was TWO cars long, which is why the camera was triggered, and the rear of the long van acted as if a 2nd car followed me through the traffic lights.

Also, the TIME on the photograph was WITHIN the Dorset police Published threshold of ONE SECOND (0.7)

Thus the error in calibration from the fact the correct lines are not present, required for trafficpax cameras is obviously the reason why their was error in the timin on the camera.

Also the missing (Required) traffic light & give way signs are a serious safety concern and the council are liable for litigation if an accident (or accidental offence) were to occur.

(which it did in my case) And I did NOT drive through a red light.

Also While driving around the country, I have identified a pattern with these LEFT FILTER LANE traffic light cameras. Recently on the A10 Cheshunt and many others including by Bolton Wandereds stadium, Bolton and here in Huddersfield as well as your Macclesfield camera.

The "variations" all make use of slight changes in the set up of the filter lane & give way rules.

In Cheshunt in particular A first set is Give way (Missing sign completely) and a NEXT set is made to look like the first set, but it has a stop line Before the filter lane, at a strange angle.

I have no doubt what so ever that these traffic lights are placed with "Strategy of intent" to catch out and mislead drivers.

I have a large body of evidence to support this.

Also across the entire UK, I have found incorrect SIZE and ILLEGAL size and MISSING road signage, against section .85 of the road traffic act at SPECIFIC enforcement sites.

And I challenge the Chief of police that He is aware of this fact and has collaborated with Councils through the road safety partnership, investors and corporate associates to help fund traffic enforcement as a buisness and not as true road safety.

If it was true road safety, all the signs would be correct, clean & maintained so.

Thus, In these circumstances, in addition to my claim that the N.I.P. issued to me from Mill lane is not prosecutable because of missing road signage and incorrect calibration line at the stop line, where the triple lines should be installed.... Are section .85 issues.

These should not be dealt with by courts, magistrates or Crown Prosecution, because Magistrates can not decide upon cases where road signage is not correct.
On merit, it SHOULD BE CHECKED BEFORE ENFORCEMENT.

There needs to be a new form created, similar to a section .87 ambulance & fire engine emergency vehicle form, but under section .85, where drivers can fill it in, if road signage is not fit & proper as required.

Part of gathering evidence for prosecution should be taking photos of the signs on the DAY of the enforcement to prove they are in place & clean.

This is standard procedure for traffic wardens, who photo the vehicle AND the parking signs.

So WHY are police enforcement NOT photographing the signs AS WELL as gathering the speeding/traffic light camera evidence of Only the vehicle itself?

This is substandard operations and not acceptable when driving licences are at stake, more important than parking tickets.

I request that the REF: 0073050111034920 complaint be investigated to establish WHY the traffic light warning sign was NOT in place for this set of lights OR the give way pre sign for distance.
Also the Traffipax required road markings.

This complaint is regarding ALL constabularies not just Cheshire.
I have identified MANY other fixed speed camera marking issues where the WRONG markings are installed on the road with the wrong type of camera manufacturer.

If the Chief is truly to reorganise anything to any acceptable standard, he needs to make certain that ALL enforcement sites have ALL signs put correct to the correct prescriped SIZE and KEPT CLEAN. This is in collaboration with the road safety partnerships.

Part of maintanance IS CLEANING for proper reflective function of signage.

I trust that The Chief of police will look into these matters, which concern a large number of drivers and effects road safety on a nation wide scale, of utmost importance.

Thank you
Mr _______

I think these Chiefs are all in on the act. You?
They are just "Government ministers" in police uniforms... More Patrick McLaughings. (at our expense)

Last Edit: Jan 15, 2016 0:14:14 GMT by Administrator

1688 Bill of Rights - The right to Petition - It is the Right of the Subjects to petition the Queen & all Commitments & Prosecutions for doing so are illegal.

Administrator
Good

Standing up to corruption and criminals working in the justice system

Posts: 10,669

MACCLESFIELD Silk Road/Mill Lane fixed RED LIGHT CAMERA. Jan 26, 2016 16:55:33 GMT via mobile

Post by Administrator on Jan 26, 2016 16:55:33 GMT

Most recent letter to Winsford, after my Professional stadards complaint and Telephone call this morning at 8:00am from a non police officer staffJoe Dammer. M1/27/16
Subjudice?

apparently they are recording my complaints but apparently are not going to do anything until the ticket office or court have resolved my N.I.P. case. Which is pretty unacceptable really.

I have now found out they do a traffic light awareness course, similar to a speed awareness course as well. I will put the link on.
So I am complaining to them as well.

This is also regarding the claim from ticket offices that they can not stop any N.I.P. process which is not a true statement because they intervene with Emergency vehicle instances that they identify and send out a form (or are supposed to) and a officer investigates. Which SHOULD happen for section .85 as well as section .87 issues that the public report. That is THE WAY that road signage SHOULD be corrected, when the CAMERA service fails to identify missing signs when attending the fixed cameras. I think the Ticket office (POLICE) WANT the court to convict to validate their (personal desire) to continue as they are and NOT be MADE (or in fact SHOULD BY CHOICE) put the signs correct & get their act together... But obviously the power has gone to their heads.. so much history of errors they are in fact like a vehicle that WILL NOT STOP AT A RED LIGHT themselves in their behaviour. they "just carry on" and ignore the complaints.
___________

Cheshire Police Central Ticket Office PO Box 266 WINSFORD CW7 9FN 08 November 2015
REF:0073050111034920

Complaints and disputes continued from previous correspondences.

N.I.P. process withdrawal.

1. vehicle length
2. missing required warning signage
3. time under published 1sec threshold
4. traffipax cameras missing operational road markings

Complete evidence police decision process, beyond reasonable doubt.
bentcop.boards.net/thread/91/macclesfield-silk-fixed-light-camera

There IS an officer or staff member of the ticket office who does intervene in the N.I.P. process. And this is when they have cognitively identified a section .87 instance of an emergency vehicle triggering a fixed camera.

Recognition of this in the N.I.P. process is fact, and active by identifying and acting upon visual data, information and evidence.
Not of an unhaltable automated process, but of one that has intellect and influence upon prosecution decisions going through the system

I require under freedom of information, a copy of the .N.IP. form sent to Fire and Ambulance headquarters that initiates investigation and process to withdraw an N.I.P. under road traffic act section .87 legislation

So I can draw up a similar document under section .85 regarding road signage and maintenance that your own camera service staff are supposed to check when on location at each camera, to maintain enforcement and calibration with signage checks

I have already complained about the traffipax cameras not having road markings to measure vehicle speed. Thus their function is not possible to calibrate correctly. This is not a court matter, but a service and maintenance issue and of concern to the chief police officer

Thus my evidence that the road signage is missing, as well as the time being within the published police one second threshold (0.7 seconds) and the fact it is is obvious that the vehicle is two cars in length and takes

With section .85 and identification of emergency services vehicles and it is acted upon to halt a n.I.p. issued
By intelligent police investigations into the event prior to any court action, as regular police prosecution work.

Who identifies
And there is a form and an officer that deals with it

And this same officer. MUST be available to inspect, investigate and act on the same legislation section .85 and all other issues raised regarding all of the n.I.p. prosecutions and decisions make on whether to withdraw.

The police should not and should not want to continue any prosecution where safety issues are evident, and in addition good evidence to the police that they are not guilty of the offence.

The court also should not be passed cases where section .85 is raised on road signage issues, as you can not be convicted of the offence. And for the police to seek validation from the courts to back and support their actions is wrong.

In fact it is the courts that should be investigated in these instances for fraud.

The fact that all collaborate together in these endeavors is plainly obvious to anyone that the police Want to keep road signage incorrect, unmaintained and to prosecute persons and win. Even when reasonable doubt exists regarding the offence and there IS an avenue of withdrawal from the N.I.P process and investigation officer, who does act under section .87 when cognitive identification of emergency vehicles is obvious, and as the police road safety partnership are responsible for checking the signage, they ARE responsible and under conduct policy to ACT when evidence is produced of section .85 signage issues where conviction is not possible, and it must be acted on in N.I.P process and identified. And N.I.P withdrawn. Not passed on to a court in hope they will convict regardless, and allow the police to continue as they are without corrective action.

If Any court convicting under these circumstances does so beyond its powers. And that is illegal conviction and fraud by abuse of position.

If the police fail to identity this. Then there are serious road safety concerns, conduct and behavior concerns and aiding and abetting the failure to comply with road safety requirements.

There is an officer who identifies when nip should be stopped.

Thus please initiate this persons action in this prosecution decision and intervention

It is against truth and honesty employee policy if you do not decide on a prosecution N.I.P. based on ALL of the evidence supplied to you, the police from the initial N.I.P.
Not to ignore and pass to court through refusal to co-operate and act on supllplied facts and evidence, that applies not only to me. But every prosecution from that device and location.

The fact is that staff are attempting to evade responsibilities and in truth there is concern over the intent and desire to WANT to process prosecutions , N.I.P. where issues are evident, obvious and beyond reasonable doubt. To the process office and all concerned.

If the N.I.P. is now withdrawn, I am prepared to attend a traffic light course, as I see cheshire have them and I have never attended one before
________________

traffic light course contact.
If you have not received the relevant documentation within 10 days of returning your application, please contact this office on 01606 364072 / 01606 364191 or emailing cheshire.driver.training@cheshire.pnn.police.uk

Last Edit: Jan 26, 2016 17:06:46 GMT by Administrator

1688 Bill of Rights - The right to Petition - It is the Right of the Subjects to petition the Queen & all Commitments & Prosecutions for doing so are illegal.

Administrator
Good

Standing up to corruption and criminals working in the justice system

Posts: 10,669

MACCLESFIELD Silk Road/Mill Lane fixed RED LIGHT CAMERA. Jan 27, 2016 1:15:57 GMT

Post by Administrator on Jan 27, 2016 1:15:57 GMT

This is what I have worked out from my actual timing of vehicles on location, and measuring the vehicles.
You do need the markings on the road for certain to time different sizes and speeds of vehicles. Also the distance will be different for the speed, and that function can not possibly work without the full road markings.

Also there SHOULD be a photo taken BEFORE the vehicle crosses the line to PROVE the light was RED before the driver passed it and the 2nd photo should be at one second to show what distance the vehicle got to.

You have to have a control photo before the line to validate the colour of the traffic light, before you go past, or the entire point of the whole thing is completely invalid without photographic proof of a red light showing and the vehicle not over the line.

http://www.bentcop.biz/thesilkroadlines.jpg

1688 Bill of Rights - The right to Petition - It is the Right of the Subjects to petition the Queen & all Commitments & Prosecutions for doing so are illegal.

Administrator
Good

Standing up to corruption and criminals working in the justice system

Posts: 10,669

MACCLESFIELD Silk Road/Mill Lane fixed RED LIGHT CAMERA. Jan 30, 2016 19:25:17 GMT

Post by Administrator on Jan 30, 2016 19:25:17 GMT

Ok, so the ABOVE picture is worked out with maths from my OWN "TIMING" of vehicles driving over the line, in relation to vehicle LENGTHS, with a stopwatch.

NOTE: the below online calculator is not correct. Please see the others later on. i will leave this one up as an example though. The other Calculator IS correct.

These BELOW pictures from the time of the FIXED CAMERA EVENT (date of offence).. well, I have used an online speed/distance calculator.... and there seems something VERY MUCH NOT RIGHT about the distances the van is in relation to the times on the camera data... According to the calculator the exact maths, van should be about 31ft then 51ft past the line. Which it clearly is NOT anywhere near that distance. Also, we can not measure the distance because the CAMERA LINES ARE NOT PAINTED ON THE ROAD! So I will have to go there again & measure it out. These is for CERTAIN something WRONG with the speed calculations with this device. and I dont think the 27mph is correct, thus the timing will be out as well.

http://www.bentcop.biz/cameracalculations.jpg

Also.. with RAdAR.. you have to think.. the WAVE is measuring the DISTANCE AWAY from the camera, and MOTION, but as a CAR or VEHICLE is not a BOX SHAPE,, as it moves THROUGH the WAVE... the bonnet will be a certain HEIGHT, but then the ROOF goes UP, closer to the camera LEVEL, and then goes back DOWN again by the BONNET, so you are getting the HEIGHT MOVING UP & DOWN, at the SAME TIME the vehicle is MOVING FORWARD and the DISTANCE or RATE of forward motion AWAY or TOWARDS the camera will not be consistent to a wave as the HEIGHT will EFFECT the curve of the speed reading by ADDING or SUBTRACTING Towards or AWAY distance into the calculations as the vehicles move through the wave. This is just like the SLIP effect we are debating with the police tele-traffic lasers not being steady on target.

I will draw up a image to show this better..

Last Edit: Mar 8, 2016 18:19:47 GMT by Administrator

1688 Bill of Rights - The right to Petition - It is the Right of the Subjects to petition the Queen & all Commitments & Prosecutions for doing so are illegal.

Administrator Good Standing up to corruption and criminals working in the justice system Posts: 10,669	MACCLESFIELD Silk Road/Mill Lane fixed RED LIGHT CAMERA. Jan 30, 2016 19:53:46 GMT Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top Post by Administrator on Jan 30, 2016 19:53:46 GMT If you are really close to the traffic lights when they go amber, this is apparently the kind of distanes you need to even think about braking and stopping at 27mph
	1688 Bill of Rights - The right to Petition - It is the Right of the Subjects to petition the Queen & all Commitments & Prosecutions for doing so are illegal.

Administrator
Good

Standing up to corruption and criminals working in the justice system

Posts: 10,669

MACCLESFIELD Silk Road/Mill Lane fixed RED LIGHT CAMERA. Jan 31, 2016 10:34:53 GMT

Post by Administrator on Jan 31, 2016 10:34:53 GMT

Here an ambulance speeds through the fixed speed camera & it doesnt go off. So it is not switched on. You can see it in the distance, after i witnessed the camera.

Also at Aspley wharfe traffic lights i saw a vehicle go through the lights well into red at least 3-5 seconds after and the camera did not go off.

So they really are in no way there for safety reasons at all, and when they even are switched on, from the three times in my life i have had a traffic light offence - Oldham, Horwich(bolton) and Macclefield, i was not even driving through a red light, i was close to the lights when they started to change and the van got caught up in the changing process at the line.

These seems to be a set up where this is the type of timing they set them up to get, not the really dangeros red light jumping turned on for safety.. all the time.

and as for the traffic light warning signs.... the police (not council) THE POLICE have vans out setting up speed surveys all over the place.... where are the road sigtnage surveys? for correct size & distance, cleaning, maintenance and replacement of missiung signs? they dont want to do it. Yet they are in law supposed to to enforce there.

(police survey video)

I have now sent another complaint to Simon Byrne, chief of Cheshire police.

I have got a court summons for April this year. Apparently you dont have to be there you can send in mitigation... but my experience with that is it is ignored.

Also.. why is it that at STOCKPORT magistrates court... the MAGISTRATES COULD NOT SEND ME ON A DRIVER ALERTNESS COURSE UNTIL THEY HAD ASKED PERMISSION FROM THE CHIEF OF POLICE!! also you can not be supposedly convicted on the evidence statement of a single witness, so how can the word of an employer be sufficient to initiate a court hearing without further investigations from the p[olice? the entire "fast N.I.P. process" itself breaks every rule, code and moral of law and police work. And it was the Blair government that set it up. The entire process is illegal and the Chiefs send cases to magistrates to continue to validate this illegal process for them, and protect their own personal interests in legal abuse against the public.

So, I ask all Chiefs.. WHAT GAME ARE YOU PLAYING? WHEN YOU REFUSE TO ACT ON COMPLAINTS. FORCE PEOPLE TO COSTLY TAX PAYER MAGISTRATES HEARIUNGS ONLY TO BE REFERED BACK TO THE CHIEF OF POLICE AGAIN? FOR DECISION?

IS THE CHIEF OF POLICE HAVING A LAUGH AT US ALL? WITH HIS CIRCUS SHOWS?

and what about the trailers through the traffic lights? here a hover craft apparently has no wheels and doesnt touch the road

Last Edit: Jan 31, 2016 10:36:18 GMT by Administrator

1688 Bill of Rights - The right to Petition - It is the Right of the Subjects to petition the Queen & all Commitments & Prosecutions for doing so are illegal.

Administrator
Good

Standing up to corruption and criminals working in the justice system

Posts: 10,669

MACCLESFIELD Silk Road/Mill Lane fixed RED LIGHT CAMERA. Jan 31, 2016 11:02:35 GMT

Post by Administrator on Jan 31, 2016 11:02:35 GMT

The hovercraft is just an example (other than co-incidence the street drifting guy at community service told me about it last week) because its not a car/vehicle.

But the fact that the TRAILER triggering the camera on a red light camera way after the car has gone through... is a valid point.

Also I am not 100% convinced about all the online calculations for time/speed/distance so I am going to do further experiments with a tape measure & stopwatch & post them here.

OH! one more important thing.....

They are using the TRAFFIPAX CAMERA for traffic lights, with no ROAD MARKINGS to validate the speed calculation, which is part of the radar detection measurement and function of the device...

Well.. my recorded speed was 27mph.. and it was a 30mph zone.

SO, if it had been 31mph OR 36mph.... Then I would be speeding AS WELL, as alledgedly going through a RED LIGHT!
So they would be issuing SIX (6) PENALTY POINTS and TWO FINES?! as WELL!? or JUST THE RED LIGHT OFFENCE?

How many RED LIGHT OFFENCES get issued AND the speed is OVER 36mph?! ? But they seemingly do NOT prosecute for the speed as well, because of no road markings? or they DO?!

I think it is most likely they do NOT prosecute for BOTH on ONE N.I.P.

And the REASON the CAMERAS are set up to get you when you are in most cases driving AWAY from them, is that if you are going TOWARDS IT,, after the FRONT OF THE BONNET enters the RadAR area... the WINDSCREEN enters it, which is HIGHER than the BONNET.. and NEARER to the FIXED CAMERA, THUS... you get a "JUMP" in DISTANCE of a large section of the vehicle TOWARDS the camera.. in addition to the RATE the FRONT is moving TOWARDS IT. Just like with the Laser aim changes under the vehicle, to the front... On a LAND DROVER (SQUARE) vehicle this would be more prominent. Its difficult to spot the further away you would be, which is why they have the camera get you AFTER you drive past on YOUR side of the road.. and set up TOWARDS the cmera on the opposite side. What do you think?

Anyway... The TRAILER thing is a big thing..
I actually think they WOULD set up the Traffic light cameras to ISSUE 6 POINTS, "if the public didnt play holy hell" as if they dont already... and STILL the POLICE, COURTS & COUNCILs are getting away with legal abuses against drivers in all this.

There seems to be no true road safety involved at all.

Here is the speed survey guy again from South Yorkshire Police... NOT DOING A ROAD SIGNAGE SURVEY. NOTE POLICE DOING A ROAD SURVEY NOT THE COUNCIL.

1688 Bill of Rights - The right to Petition - It is the Right of the Subjects to petition the Queen & all Commitments & Prosecutions for doing so are illegal.

Administrator
Good

Standing up to corruption and criminals working in the justice system

Posts: 10,669

MACCLESFIELD Silk Road/Mill Lane fixed RED LIGHT CAMERA. Feb 1, 2016 14:40:59 GMT via mobile

Post by Administrator on Feb 1, 2016 14:40:59 GMT

My computer had crashed when I got back from Macclesfield yesterday, and it was in the BIOS, I had to run all the tests and systematic checks, and all these test screens, the SATA disk has errors, don't know if I can fix it yet or I will have to get a new computer.

Here are the videos from Macclesfield.
I did some measurements and timed cars so I could work out the true times and distances for 0.78 into red and work it backwards. With the van length.

Please note I SAW the traffic lights change to RED, with a DIFFERENT timing sequence than the regular ones! It was the faster sequence where amber is hardly on! It's the time used for setting off I think.... Red to green! Instead of the slower time for green to red!

So something very unusual going on there for certain. Also I did film it! But the video was not on my phone still when I got home! And its not the first time they have dissapeared!

I was really stoked to get it on film. Until it wasn't there anymore! Grr.

But today I got a "your speed" sign going to 35mph when I was only going at 30mph and that is still here....

Anyway, I cannot get onto my computer at the moment... But here are the YouTube videos. I will do all the explanation and calculations at a later date...

Here are the videos

1688 Bill of Rights - The right to Petition - It is the Right of the Subjects to petition the Queen & all Commitments & Prosecutions for doing so are illegal.

Administrator
Good

Standing up to corruption and criminals working in the justice system

Posts: 10,669

MACCLESFIELD Silk Road/Mill Lane fixed RED LIGHT CAMERA. Feb 1, 2016 15:01:34 GMT via mobile

Post by Administrator on Feb 1, 2016 15:01:34 GMT

I can only just do half a second with my finger over the button and two taps, let alone driving towards the dam things!?

This will need some slow motion replay and frame by frame action, and then backwards measure of the position at 0.7 from the position in the police camera photo.. which is about 3 to 4 meters max in the first picture. We are to assume these cars are doing about 30mph

I have just noticed that YouTube has randomly assigned the code GAZY into the video url for the video of my BIOS system crash screen, and it is beyond reasonable doubt that it cannot be co-incidental, with the recent GAZ N LECCY out of control adverts and connections.

Someone is ducking around with not only my phone, computer but with the traffic light control computers and most likely the hardware settings as well as the electronic speed radar signs via Bluetooth.

I should not need to Gove any evidence of this in court. It is beyond my defense case now. It is national police investigation into the entire government AMD council authority staff and computers.

In my own case I am within the 1second time anyway and Simon Byrne needs to withdraw the charges against me as I did not drive through a red light.

I Did not commit any crime of criminal damages or against Alan White.

I have been legally abused by Manchester and West Yorkshire and Lancashire police against section .85 of the road traffic act.

And by Sgt. Phil Tyson who arrested me illegally.

Peter Fahy, Steve Finnegan, Dee Collins and Simon Byrne need to remove the convictions wrongfully prosecuted and sentanced against me, out of abuse of position to protect their own self interests.

Last Edit: Feb 1, 2016 22:11:31 GMT by Administrator

1688 Bill of Rights - The right to Petition - It is the Right of the Subjects to petition the Queen & all Commitments & Prosecutions for doing so are illegal.

Administrator
Good

Standing up to corruption and criminals working in the justice system

Posts: 10,669

MACCLESFIELD Silk Road/Mill Lane fixed RED LIGHT CAMERA. Feb 1, 2016 15:29:00 GMT via mobile

Post by Administrator on Feb 1, 2016 15:29:00 GMT

Also, can I make a suggestion...

My entire thought from the beginning regarding traffic lights... Why the hell are they making all this effort to get 2 photos? When a simple CCTV camera would do the job perfectly for red lights?!

It just seems a stupid idea.

The video would get the entire traffic lights sequence perfectly on film, with braking and anything else.

It's like they "dont want" to get the proper evidence. The photos are just stupid, hoe can you see in them the colour of the lights just before you passed over the line? It needs to show red before you are across the line. Not after, then another pointless photo driving off. There should be three photos minimum.

How can you even measure it with no markings? I had to make my own temporary markings to calculate with the stopwatch. Which I will take a look as A.S.A.P.

I will upload the electronic speed sign as well, that shows 35mph instead of 30mph. That is TWO now as there was that 50mph one when.I was doing 30mph. This is clear evidence at least Someone is messing with things when I am driving past. And they could be when other people are as well.

They dont even have these cameras all on all the time. And people are blatantly going through red lights and not getting caught. What is the point? Why claim its for road safety when they are cycling them for boarderline traffic light incidents.

All the school road safety videos and speed awareness courses are a joke to this

Last Edit: Feb 1, 2016 15:35:13 GMT by Administrator

1688 Bill of Rights - The right to Petition - It is the Right of the Subjects to petition the Queen & all Commitments & Prosecutions for doing so are illegal.