Post by Administrator on Oct 15, 2021 21:49:10 GMT
Facebook complaint
Question to Mark Zuckerberg and facebook executives..
If we can out questions to such heirachy gods...
If individuals can block anyone or anything from personal controls ...
Why do we need admins and moderators in groups??
Is facebook a social experiment??
We have a "boss" at work. We are paid. Boss is incharge ...
Social domain in life is not under employment of a "boss"
Yet facebook introduces people who are bossing us. Many short sighted and not competent.
If machines replace workers in the workplace, over the years so we have no "boss" employer..
Therefore we have no boss to tell us what to do 9 till 5 or whatever in charge of us.
Therefore for government to control people it seems far too convenient that facebook appears.. with its social bossing models...
And we enter a new era of having social bosses. Particularly when many face to face communication and subtle emotions. Humour are not transferred online..
Why do we need social bosses?? When groups are "formed" shurely it's from mutual subject interest ... We have personal block tools... Seems no need for admins and moderators. You cant own a group because we dont own facebook...
I believe the basis of authoritarianism and fascism is evident here...
Its all too convenient that the gods of platforms Gates, Zuckerberg, Musk, Bezos.. on behalf of government strategy need a new model of obedience and bossing to be implemented, for when humans no longer are required as the working class..
Here admins and mods enjoy the power buttons and power play that Zuckerberg, Branson, musk, bezos and governments like to use...authority..
If facebook is so humane, so advance socially.. so new and ideal..
Why not be using different better models of equals and agreement. Co operation??
Why bother with the authoritarian models at all??
Why not everyone equal??
Its because ultimately Zuckerberg likes authority, likes control. As do governments.
Its fachist plain and simple authoritarian.
I think there are better models for a better world to encourage understanding and cooperation..
Facebook doesnt really like rights. Community rights. Community areas and equality.. where its not possible for any person to have a higher authority. Only debate, and nurture understanding, tolerance,
Thats the main problem i have with facebook.
I dont believe its socially better. Its disguised authoritarianism and exemplifies underlying control issues. Control obsessions.
Its heirachical and controlling ruler models.
Question to Mark Zuckerberg and facebook executives..
If we can out questions to such heirachy gods...
If individuals can block anyone or anything from personal controls ...
Why do we need admins and moderators in groups??
Is facebook a social experiment??
We have a "boss" at work. We are paid. Boss is incharge ...
Social domain in life is not under employment of a "boss"
Yet facebook introduces people who are bossing us. Many short sighted and not competent.
If machines replace workers in the workplace, over the years so we have no "boss" employer..
Therefore we have no boss to tell us what to do 9 till 5 or whatever in charge of us.
Therefore for government to control people it seems far too convenient that facebook appears.. with its social bossing models...
And we enter a new era of having social bosses. Particularly when many face to face communication and subtle emotions. Humour are not transferred online..
Why do we need social bosses?? When groups are "formed" shurely it's from mutual subject interest ... We have personal block tools... Seems no need for admins and moderators. You cant own a group because we dont own facebook...
I believe the basis of authoritarianism and fascism is evident here...
Its all too convenient that the gods of platforms Gates, Zuckerberg, Musk, Bezos.. on behalf of government strategy need a new model of obedience and bossing to be implemented, for when humans no longer are required as the working class..
Here admins and mods enjoy the power buttons and power play that Zuckerberg, Branson, musk, bezos and governments like to use...authority..
If facebook is so humane, so advance socially.. so new and ideal..
Why not be using different better models of equals and agreement. Co operation??
Why bother with the authoritarian models at all??
Why not everyone equal??
Its because ultimately Zuckerberg likes authority, likes control. As do governments.
Its fachist plain and simple authoritarian.
I think there are better models for a better world to encourage understanding and cooperation..
Facebook doesnt really like rights. Community rights. Community areas and equality.. where its not possible for any person to have a higher authority. Only debate, and nurture understanding, tolerance,
Thats the main problem i have with facebook.
I dont believe its socially better. Its disguised authoritarianism and exemplifies underlying control issues. Control obsessions.
Its heirachical and controlling ruler models.