Fergal McEntee
youtu.be/IVcEsDWPaEQZizzy Wolf
www.facebook.com/zizziwolf/videos/578288109855708/?sfnsn=scwspmo____________
Dear Youtube Chief Executive
I am not satisfied with how i am being mistreated currently by your platform in this community strike against me matter.
I expect a lot more care and professional action from you to put this right. Without further delay. I have submitted counter claim and your forms and procedure are not good enough.
I really am unsatisfied at the moment.
Currently you have a community strike against me and it is not possible your staff could have checked the video on my channel: Bentcop . Biz, properly
The fact that you do not even have the decency to say what the issue exactly was and where in the video it was...or even who raised the complaint.
I am here now inconvenienced of not being able to upload videos, when i have done nothing wrong. And further to that, My channel is for hosting petition material. Its cant be put through the strike process because to do so would threaten to remove my videos or channel by that process, when i hold and submit evidence to government and police.
Under the Right to petition bill if rights and 1st amendment.
America cannot have a law. No law can be made and none exists that allows youtube to remove or punish for content thats being used in connection with congress or parliament as evidence.
You can only use law and have policy that can be enforced through courts.
As Congress has not made a law. And as its illegal to make a law or policy that would give you right or authority to abridge (intercept, intervention, block, hinder) my free rights in my work and proceedings using that media submitted to the governments.. and block my upload status.. i currently am being punished unlawfully.
And i think i should get compensation from youtube for the humiliation and inconvenience. Not to mention its illegal for you to do this to me.
Further than that.. there is not anything wrong with the video anyway.
At what point is there any cyberbullying?? Against who?? What Harrassment?? Against who?? I know all the people in the video. They gave me it to use of it. Fergal Mcentee filmed it. zizzi Wolf, Johnathan N Fuller is being interviewed professionally and Melanie Smith and her husband are being Interviewed both Church leaders. Its all interviews.
Also i put some Photoshop colour over to cover up some of the banners. Not aimed at anyone. Actually i was covering the banner messages up.
Here... The full video is on Fergal McEntees channel... So there cannot be anything wring with it. Its the same footage.
Also zizzi Wolf here on facebook also filmed it. Its outside a police station with officers walking past the major New Scotland Yard headquarters at all times.
Fergal McEntee
youtu.be/IVcEsDWPaEQZizzy Wolf
www.facebook.com/zizziwolf/videos/578288109855708/?sfnsn=scwspmoYou have a strike against me that clearly has not been evaluated properly at all or thorough. How can your staff have checked this and found harrassment of any person? Or cyber bullying? At what point in the film?? And who has reported it as such??
I dont think i have ever in 10 years been blocked from uploading a video.
And when i have submitted multiple representations in the past about the law my channel uses... Ive written in as well. Your staff just are not upto standards.
Ive submitted a counter claim but you are restricting the number of characters and i cannot upload a video representation. I have in any legal challenge, the right to submit and attach evidence. If you block my uploading how can i upload a statement or evidence?? In law this IS proceedings. But you are obstructing proceedings and treating us like children when real law gives a right to full representation not limited characters .
You just account for no rights , as if none could exist. And you hold Punishments in place while an appeal has been submitted.
In law when you appeal a claim and while you deny the accusation, until proved guilty in a court or law or until you accept fault.. you cant be punished. Its not the proper legal way.
And youtube policy really really is now perverting this established proper legal process with its policies that really are taking the law into its own hands and enforcement without any fair trial.
You give out these strikes many times while appeal is active and a person is innocent.
There is no cyberbullying in the video i uploaded none. I know there is none because it is interviews outside the police headquarters with mature adults. And church members.
All i did on mine was add colour that covers banners over and a put some slogan text that is directed at nobody in particular. Nobody named. So who could it be harrassing? Name them?? Nobody.
And that video is on youtube on other channels and facebook.
I just dont think your staff know what they are looking at. Or even doing. They must be 16yr old themselves... They clearly are not competent to evaluate videos and are not responsible enough to be issuing strikes against channels.
I want to know who raised the strike against me? And exactly at what time in the video duration is this harrassment?? As if there is any then there must be in fergals video of the same events.
Its really not good enough and you are not even educated in rights.
You dont know political rights.
The crown prosecution service dont even know this right to petition properly because in the Lord Hanningfield case.. the CPS knew nothing. They werent taught it. At Southwark crown court the case couldnt go ahead.
And lord Walney has appeared in live proceedings on the Extinction Rebellion UK channel. So you cannot pull that video or the channel down due to that video being there. Because you dont have the legal right or authority to pursue the matter through the courts in the UK. Due to Lord Walney carrying the jurisdiction of the Lords both in and out of Parliament.
And my channel has statements and evidence videos hosted that i have sent and submitted to Lord Walney on that matter as well sent to the Lords. Its proceedings between me and the Lords and i can use my channel to publish the video and host it. As its too large to email.
You cant abridge that right.
Or stop me from uploading content. Because its important national matters, evidence.
This is not a childs toy channel or purely entertainment. This is serious work.and some i use art but that is for presentation only.
You cant just ignore this. Send standard pre written replies or keep ignoring it.
Its serious political law and exemption that you are going to have to learn to accept and implement because its law. And we have certain rights. Youtube should want to.
So i am raising this to your Directors and Executives. Its not a trivial matter.
You are putting my channel under jeopardy of law and its a threat a real threat against the channel.
There is not even any issue with that video claim against me anyway?? It was not even looked at properly. Your staff cannot know what it is they are viewing even when distributing strikes like that against people on a whim. I havent done anything wrong. The video is adult anyway setting.
I really shouldnt be having to even write this.
Its a real pain for everyone. Humiliating, upsetting.
What explaination do you really give anyway? None. No indication if where abouts in the video. No indication of who.
Its just very unprofessional. You are running a worldwide platform. You just are messing about. You put no time, focus or concentration in. You dont want to have to do it.
You act as a court.. administering justice and punishment but as if you are children on whims and its not the standard we expect.
Particularly with political content that comes with rights.
You need to learn it. Ive sent it in multiple times. You dont want to understand it.
Same with Donald Trump. You are like Jeff Bezos with his space contact.. he lost the bid and he couldn't take losing. He wanted to sue. Because they didnt give him the contract.
Because he is a bad loser. Thats your legal department. You want to win all the time. Because you have got used to authority and you are just bossing us around with this policy. When it deprives of a proper representation and proper treatment of innocent until found guilty.
You want to get the punishment straight in.. before people even really know what was wrong..then by the time its sorted you've already inconvenienced them. Its just medieval. You aren't taking us into the future. We are going backwards with rights and legal claims.. back to the stone age.
Ive broke no rule and the video has no harrassment or cyber bully content.
Ive sited other instances of the same clips video.
Im being subjected to punnishment unlawfully
And what compensation am i going to get for being mistreated like this?? You literally do not care at all.
The platform legal model is stone age. Its medieval and fails to provide any requirements that amount to a real representation.
I should Sue you myself but you are likely more appreciative of Mr.Beast who uses the cash for more less productive purposes than legal action against Youtube.
Yours Sincerely Mr __________