Post by Administrator on Nov 3, 2019 10:12:32 GMT
Some notes I will be elaborating on this weekend..
Just giving you heads up...
Each note is to remind me of a paragraph or so.. to add to various material I have already written..
And submitted..
This will further clarify.
The problem currently is the government thinks its elite when it is not.
And Judges and magistrates have become megalomaniac.. I have investigated this and found they have lost touch with their place and powers.
Drugs chemical example
Good vs bad irrelevant to law
They can still try* you as it's not (illegal to be prosecuted) where is with the right to Petition.. they cannot try* because its unlawful to try. Failure to recognize the right, professional negligence, breach of procedures rules. Injury and sabotage
Council flyers cause
Vs your flyers for opposition to cause..
Same attachment method and authority allowed
Same must be for investigation of highways to obtain evidence as any other investigation properly stated and claimed
What CAN we do.
What do we NEED to do
List injuries suffered
Obstruction of political freedom
Right
Sabotage campaign
Punished & arrested, detained unlawfully
Financial
Emotional and psychological 5 years
As well as sentenced
Mail, letters,costs
Caused me to start drinking alcohol
Why prosecute? Why not ask to remove the notices?
There no damage when properly removed.. I remove myself.
They incurred costs to themselves by taking them down and opposing and hindering my campaign
Type of affix methods available and permissible are the same, and it depends what method used depending on circumstances and where placing them and to prevent being taken. Also cost affordability
Also getting 100,000 signatures is not easy
The same type of offence, actions happens a lot..
Police clearly not bothered about the stickers and cleaning them. So it is about the content purpose, cause.
It's the opposition element.
That the protection exists for.
Many people don't have ideas or political motivations
Seat belt fine
Parking
Cans and cants
(Giving authority)
Do you recognize it's for the Petition or not? If yes.
Then it doesn't matter what the act was. As everything is covered
Also further human rights violations
Double Jeopardy of law
Autrefois convict
Skeleton.
How can have a skeleton argument for an existing law?
You have one for a defence.
The judge Watson already agreed I was doing Petition work.
There is no case to prove of action or intent.
It would be like the prosecution not proving if someone took something or sold drugs which were illegal.
But trying to prove it was illegal to have them..
When its already established they are not lawful
A main premise of law is that the government makes laws which are clear and eligible and does not deceive the Subjects or mislead them - therefore - in the 1688 bill of rights " illegal prosecutions " must be referring to illegal prosecutions against the subjects. ( for which the right to Petition affords protection against) particularly when or if laws are not properly recognizable to the public/subjects and the parliament or king/queen might try to deceive the Subjects by making laws that were only understood by parliament and not by the Subjects..
Who in fact it is, who can Petition for new laws to be made.
The Subjects Petition the commons to make the laws. Thus they understand them. Recognize them. Cognize them. They are not elusive or mysterious.
Queens counsel are only good debaters or persuasive in legal argument when we are arguing a position or events, or proving a fact from evidence.
The queens Council shouldn't tell us what the law means unless we don't know the law.
Lawyers are there to have memorized and remembered, studied law.
The people must be able to understand it. As they participated in its creation.
You direct and instruct a lawyer. Or ask them to advise if you haven't read yourself.
Just giving you heads up...
Each note is to remind me of a paragraph or so.. to add to various material I have already written..
And submitted..
This will further clarify.
The problem currently is the government thinks its elite when it is not.
And Judges and magistrates have become megalomaniac.. I have investigated this and found they have lost touch with their place and powers.
Drugs chemical example
Good vs bad irrelevant to law
They can still try* you as it's not (illegal to be prosecuted) where is with the right to Petition.. they cannot try* because its unlawful to try. Failure to recognize the right, professional negligence, breach of procedures rules. Injury and sabotage
Council flyers cause
Vs your flyers for opposition to cause..
Same attachment method and authority allowed
Same must be for investigation of highways to obtain evidence as any other investigation properly stated and claimed
What CAN we do.
What do we NEED to do
List injuries suffered
Obstruction of political freedom
Right
Sabotage campaign
Punished & arrested, detained unlawfully
Financial
Emotional and psychological 5 years
As well as sentenced
Mail, letters,costs
Caused me to start drinking alcohol
Why prosecute? Why not ask to remove the notices?
There no damage when properly removed.. I remove myself.
They incurred costs to themselves by taking them down and opposing and hindering my campaign
Type of affix methods available and permissible are the same, and it depends what method used depending on circumstances and where placing them and to prevent being taken. Also cost affordability
Also getting 100,000 signatures is not easy
The same type of offence, actions happens a lot..
Police clearly not bothered about the stickers and cleaning them. So it is about the content purpose, cause.
It's the opposition element.
That the protection exists for.
Many people don't have ideas or political motivations
Seat belt fine
Parking
Cans and cants
(Giving authority)
Do you recognize it's for the Petition or not? If yes.
Then it doesn't matter what the act was. As everything is covered
Also further human rights violations
Double Jeopardy of law
Autrefois convict
Skeleton.
How can have a skeleton argument for an existing law?
You have one for a defence.
The judge Watson already agreed I was doing Petition work.
There is no case to prove of action or intent.
It would be like the prosecution not proving if someone took something or sold drugs which were illegal.
But trying to prove it was illegal to have them..
When its already established they are not lawful
A main premise of law is that the government makes laws which are clear and eligible and does not deceive the Subjects or mislead them - therefore - in the 1688 bill of rights " illegal prosecutions " must be referring to illegal prosecutions against the subjects. ( for which the right to Petition affords protection against) particularly when or if laws are not properly recognizable to the public/subjects and the parliament or king/queen might try to deceive the Subjects by making laws that were only understood by parliament and not by the Subjects..
Who in fact it is, who can Petition for new laws to be made.
The Subjects Petition the commons to make the laws. Thus they understand them. Recognize them. Cognize them. They are not elusive or mysterious.
Queens counsel are only good debaters or persuasive in legal argument when we are arguing a position or events, or proving a fact from evidence.
The queens Council shouldn't tell us what the law means unless we don't know the law.
Lawyers are there to have memorized and remembered, studied law.
The people must be able to understand it. As they participated in its creation.
You direct and instruct a lawyer. Or ask them to advise if you haven't read yourself.